Makes it easier to understand what happens when a real element isn't
passed as a target to updateVisibility(). Also makes the code more
robust to future changes.
Co-authored-by: Alex Tanskanen <aleta@cendio.se>
Co-authored-by: Niko Lehto <nikle@cendio.se>
In the cursor emulation when deciding if the cursor should be hidden -
Instead of checking what's under the cursor, we check the element that
has capture.
This introduced another bug in the cursor emulation. The cursor did not
always disappear properly when using our cursor emulation together with
our setCapture polyfill. More specifically, we saw a problem when a
capture ended on an element without cursor emulation.
We solved this by introducing another visibility check on a timer in
the cursor emulation. However this led to yet another problem where
this timer conflicted with the timer in the setCapture polyfill.
We removed the timeout in the setCapture polyfill and created a
variable to make sure that all the events remaining in the queue can be
completed.
Co-authored-by: Alex Tanskanen <aleta@cendio.se>
Co-authored-by: Niko Lehto <nikle@cendio.se>
It's not obvious that we want to hide the cursor when we get a leave,
it depends on the element that we're leaving to. This makes the code
more robust.
Co-authored-by: Alex Tanskanen <aleta@cendio.se>
Co-authored-by: Niko Lehto <nikle@cendio.se>
