egroupware_official/etemplate/js/et2_DOMWidget.js

287 lines
5.9 KiB
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

/**
* eGroupWare eTemplate2 - JS DOM Widget class
*
* @license http://opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.php GPL - GNU General Public License
* @package etemplate
* @subpackage api
* @link http://www.egroupware.org
* @author Andreas Stöckel
* @copyright Stylite 2011
* @version $Id$
*/
"use strict";
/*egw:uses
et2_widget;
*/
/**
* Interface for all widget classes, which are based on a DOM node.
*/
var et2_IDOMNode = new Interface({
/**
* Returns the DOM-Node of the current widget. The return value has to be
* a plain DOM node. If you want to return an jQuery object as you receive
* it with
*
* obj = $j(node);
*
* simply return obj[0];
*
* @param _sender The _sender parameter defines which widget is asking for
* the DOMNode. Depending on that, the widget may return different nodes.
* This is used in the grid. Normally the _sender parameter can be omitted
* in most implementations of the getDOMNode function.
* However, you should always define the _sender parameter when calling
* getDOMNode!
*/
getDOMNode: function(_sender) {}
});
/**
* Abstract widget class which can be inserted into the DOM. All widget classes
* deriving from this class have to care about implementing the "getDOMNode"
* function which has to return the DOM-Node.
*/
var et2_DOMWidget = et2_widget.extend(et2_IDOMNode, {
attributes: {
"disabled": {
"name": "Visible",
"type": "boolean",
"description": "Defines whether this widget is visible.",
"default": false
Major update of the et2_widget internal structure. The following changes were made: - All attributes of the widgets are now parsed from XML before the widget itself is created. These attributes plus all default values are then added to an associative array. The associative array is passed as second parameter to the init function of et2_widget, but is also available as this.options *after* the constructor of the et2_widget baseclass has been called. The et2_widget constructor also calls a function parseArrayMgrAttrs(_attrs) - in this function widget implementations can read the values from e.g. the content and validation_errors array and merge it into the given _attrs associative array. After the complete internal widgettree is completely loaded and created the "loadingFinished" function gets called and invokes all given setter functions. After that it "glues" the DOM tree together. This should also (I didn't measure it) be a bit faster than before, when the DOM-Tree was created on the fly. Please have a look at the changes of the et2_textbox widget to see how this affects writing widgets. Note: The "id" property is copied to the object scope on the top of the et2_widget constructor. - When widgets are cloned the "options" array gets passed along to the newly created widget. This means that changes made on the widgets during runtime are not automatically copied to the clone - as this didn't happen anyhow it is not a really disadvantage. On the other side there should be no difference between widgets directly inside the "overlay" xet tag and widgets which are inside instanciated templates. - The selbox widget doesn't work anymore - it relied on the loadAttributes function which isn't available anymore. et2_selbox should use the parseArrayMgrAttrs function to access - I've commented out some of the "validator"-code in etemplate2.js as it created some error messages when destroying the widget tree.
2011-08-19 18:00:44 +02:00
},
"width": {
"name": "Width",
"type": "dimension",
"default": et2_no_init,
"description": "Width of the element in pixels, percentage or 'auto'"
},
"height": {
"name": "Height",
"type": "dimension",
"default": et2_no_init,
"description": "Height of the element in pixels, percentage or 'auto'"
},
"class": {
"name": "CSS Class",
"type": "string",
"default": et2_no_init,
"description": "CSS Class which is applied to the dom element of this node"
},
"overflow": {
"name": "Overflow",
"type": "string",
"default": et2_no_init,
"description": "If set, the css-overflow attribute is set to that value"
}
},
/**
* When the DOMWidget is initialized, it grabs the DOM-Node of the parent
* object (if available) and passes it to its own "createDOMNode" function
*/
Major update of the et2_widget internal structure. The following changes were made: - All attributes of the widgets are now parsed from XML before the widget itself is created. These attributes plus all default values are then added to an associative array. The associative array is passed as second parameter to the init function of et2_widget, but is also available as this.options *after* the constructor of the et2_widget baseclass has been called. The et2_widget constructor also calls a function parseArrayMgrAttrs(_attrs) - in this function widget implementations can read the values from e.g. the content and validation_errors array and merge it into the given _attrs associative array. After the complete internal widgettree is completely loaded and created the "loadingFinished" function gets called and invokes all given setter functions. After that it "glues" the DOM tree together. This should also (I didn't measure it) be a bit faster than before, when the DOM-Tree was created on the fly. Please have a look at the changes of the et2_textbox widget to see how this affects writing widgets. Note: The "id" property is copied to the object scope on the top of the et2_widget constructor. - When widgets are cloned the "options" array gets passed along to the newly created widget. This means that changes made on the widgets during runtime are not automatically copied to the clone - as this didn't happen anyhow it is not a really disadvantage. On the other side there should be no difference between widgets directly inside the "overlay" xet tag and widgets which are inside instanciated templates. - The selbox widget doesn't work anymore - it relied on the loadAttributes function which isn't available anymore. et2_selbox should use the parseArrayMgrAttrs function to access - I've commented out some of the "validator"-code in etemplate2.js as it created some error messages when destroying the widget tree.
2011-08-19 18:00:44 +02:00
init: function() {
// Call the inherited constructor
this._super.apply(this, arguments);
this.parentNode = null;
this._attachSet = {
"node": null,
"parent": null
};
Major update of the et2_widget internal structure. The following changes were made: - All attributes of the widgets are now parsed from XML before the widget itself is created. These attributes plus all default values are then added to an associative array. The associative array is passed as second parameter to the init function of et2_widget, but is also available as this.options *after* the constructor of the et2_widget baseclass has been called. The et2_widget constructor also calls a function parseArrayMgrAttrs(_attrs) - in this function widget implementations can read the values from e.g. the content and validation_errors array and merge it into the given _attrs associative array. After the complete internal widgettree is completely loaded and created the "loadingFinished" function gets called and invokes all given setter functions. After that it "glues" the DOM tree together. This should also (I didn't measure it) be a bit faster than before, when the DOM-Tree was created on the fly. Please have a look at the changes of the et2_textbox widget to see how this affects writing widgets. Note: The "id" property is copied to the object scope on the top of the et2_widget constructor. - When widgets are cloned the "options" array gets passed along to the newly created widget. This means that changes made on the widgets during runtime are not automatically copied to the clone - as this didn't happen anyhow it is not a really disadvantage. On the other side there should be no difference between widgets directly inside the "overlay" xet tag and widgets which are inside instanciated templates. - The selbox widget doesn't work anymore - it relied on the loadAttributes function which isn't available anymore. et2_selbox should use the parseArrayMgrAttrs function to access - I've commented out some of the "validator"-code in etemplate2.js as it created some error messages when destroying the widget tree.
2011-08-19 18:00:44 +02:00
this._disabled = false;
},
/**
* Detatches the node from the DOM and clears all references to the parent
* node or the dom node of this widget.
*/
destroy: function() {
this.detatchFromDOM();
this.parentNode = null;
this._attachSet = {};
this._super();
},
/**
Major update of the et2_widget internal structure. The following changes were made: - All attributes of the widgets are now parsed from XML before the widget itself is created. These attributes plus all default values are then added to an associative array. The associative array is passed as second parameter to the init function of et2_widget, but is also available as this.options *after* the constructor of the et2_widget baseclass has been called. The et2_widget constructor also calls a function parseArrayMgrAttrs(_attrs) - in this function widget implementations can read the values from e.g. the content and validation_errors array and merge it into the given _attrs associative array. After the complete internal widgettree is completely loaded and created the "loadingFinished" function gets called and invokes all given setter functions. After that it "glues" the DOM tree together. This should also (I didn't measure it) be a bit faster than before, when the DOM-Tree was created on the fly. Please have a look at the changes of the et2_textbox widget to see how this affects writing widgets. Note: The "id" property is copied to the object scope on the top of the et2_widget constructor. - When widgets are cloned the "options" array gets passed along to the newly created widget. This means that changes made on the widgets during runtime are not automatically copied to the clone - as this didn't happen anyhow it is not a really disadvantage. On the other side there should be no difference between widgets directly inside the "overlay" xet tag and widgets which are inside instanciated templates. - The selbox widget doesn't work anymore - it relied on the loadAttributes function which isn't available anymore. et2_selbox should use the parseArrayMgrAttrs function to access - I've commented out some of the "validator"-code in etemplate2.js as it created some error messages when destroying the widget tree.
2011-08-19 18:00:44 +02:00
* Attaches the container node of this widget to the DOM-Tree
*/
Major update of the et2_widget internal structure. The following changes were made: - All attributes of the widgets are now parsed from XML before the widget itself is created. These attributes plus all default values are then added to an associative array. The associative array is passed as second parameter to the init function of et2_widget, but is also available as this.options *after* the constructor of the et2_widget baseclass has been called. The et2_widget constructor also calls a function parseArrayMgrAttrs(_attrs) - in this function widget implementations can read the values from e.g. the content and validation_errors array and merge it into the given _attrs associative array. After the complete internal widgettree is completely loaded and created the "loadingFinished" function gets called and invokes all given setter functions. After that it "glues" the DOM tree together. This should also (I didn't measure it) be a bit faster than before, when the DOM-Tree was created on the fly. Please have a look at the changes of the et2_textbox widget to see how this affects writing widgets. Note: The "id" property is copied to the object scope on the top of the et2_widget constructor. - When widgets are cloned the "options" array gets passed along to the newly created widget. This means that changes made on the widgets during runtime are not automatically copied to the clone - as this didn't happen anyhow it is not a really disadvantage. On the other side there should be no difference between widgets directly inside the "overlay" xet tag and widgets which are inside instanciated templates. - The selbox widget doesn't work anymore - it relied on the loadAttributes function which isn't available anymore. et2_selbox should use the parseArrayMgrAttrs function to access - I've commented out some of the "validator"-code in etemplate2.js as it created some error messages when destroying the widget tree.
2011-08-19 18:00:44 +02:00
doLoadingFinished: function() {
// Check whether the parent implements the et2_IDOMNode interface. If
// yes, grab the DOM node and create our own.
if (this._parent && this._parent.implements(et2_IDOMNode)) {
this.setParentDOMNode(this._parent.getDOMNode(this));
}
Major update of the et2_widget internal structure. The following changes were made: - All attributes of the widgets are now parsed from XML before the widget itself is created. These attributes plus all default values are then added to an associative array. The associative array is passed as second parameter to the init function of et2_widget, but is also available as this.options *after* the constructor of the et2_widget baseclass has been called. The et2_widget constructor also calls a function parseArrayMgrAttrs(_attrs) - in this function widget implementations can read the values from e.g. the content and validation_errors array and merge it into the given _attrs associative array. After the complete internal widgettree is completely loaded and created the "loadingFinished" function gets called and invokes all given setter functions. After that it "glues" the DOM tree together. This should also (I didn't measure it) be a bit faster than before, when the DOM-Tree was created on the fly. Please have a look at the changes of the et2_textbox widget to see how this affects writing widgets. Note: The "id" property is copied to the object scope on the top of the et2_widget constructor. - When widgets are cloned the "options" array gets passed along to the newly created widget. This means that changes made on the widgets during runtime are not automatically copied to the clone - as this didn't happen anyhow it is not a really disadvantage. On the other side there should be no difference between widgets directly inside the "overlay" xet tag and widgets which are inside instanciated templates. - The selbox widget doesn't work anymore - it relied on the loadAttributes function which isn't available anymore. et2_selbox should use the parseArrayMgrAttrs function to access - I've commented out some of the "validator"-code in etemplate2.js as it created some error messages when destroying the widget tree.
2011-08-19 18:00:44 +02:00
return true;
},
/**
* Detaches the widget from the DOM tree, if it had been attached to the
* DOM-Tree using the attachToDOM method.
*/
detatchFromDOM: function() {
if (this._attachSet.node && this._attachSet.parent)
{
// Remove the current node from the parent node
this._attachSet.parent.removeChild(this._attachSet.node);
// Reset the "attachSet"
this._attachSet = {
"node": null,
"parent": null
};
return true;
}
return false;
},
/**
* Attaches the widget to the DOM tree. Fails if the widget is already
* attached to the tree or no parent node or no node for this widget is
* defined.
*/
attachToDOM: function() {
// Attach the DOM node of this widget (if existing) to the new parent
var node = this.getDOMNode(this);
if (node && this.parentNode &&
(node != this._attachSet.node ||
this.parentNode != this._attachSet.parent))
{
this.parentNode.appendChild(node);
// Store the currently attached nodes
this._attachSet = {
"node": node,
"parent": this.parentNode
};
return true;
}
return false;
},
isAttached: function() {
return this.parentNode != null;
},
/**
* Set the parent DOM node of this element. If another parent node is already
* set, this widget removes itself from the DOM tree
*/
setParentDOMNode: function(_node) {
if (_node != this.parentNode)
{
// Detatch this element from the DOM tree
this.detatchFromDOM();
this.parentNode = _node;
// And attatch the element to the DOM tree
this.attachToDOM();
}
},
/**
* Returns the parent node.
*/
getParentDOMNode: function() {
return this.parentNode;
},
/**
* Sets the id of the DOM-Node.
*/
set_id: function(_value) {
this.id = _value;
var node = this.getDOMNode(this);
if (node)
{
if (_value != "")
{
node.setAttribute("id", _value);
}
else
{
node.removeAttribute("id");
}
}
},
set_disabled: function(_value) {
Major update of the et2_widget internal structure. The following changes were made: - All attributes of the widgets are now parsed from XML before the widget itself is created. These attributes plus all default values are then added to an associative array. The associative array is passed as second parameter to the init function of et2_widget, but is also available as this.options *after* the constructor of the et2_widget baseclass has been called. The et2_widget constructor also calls a function parseArrayMgrAttrs(_attrs) - in this function widget implementations can read the values from e.g. the content and validation_errors array and merge it into the given _attrs associative array. After the complete internal widgettree is completely loaded and created the "loadingFinished" function gets called and invokes all given setter functions. After that it "glues" the DOM tree together. This should also (I didn't measure it) be a bit faster than before, when the DOM-Tree was created on the fly. Please have a look at the changes of the et2_textbox widget to see how this affects writing widgets. Note: The "id" property is copied to the object scope on the top of the et2_widget constructor. - When widgets are cloned the "options" array gets passed along to the newly created widget. This means that changes made on the widgets during runtime are not automatically copied to the clone - as this didn't happen anyhow it is not a really disadvantage. On the other side there should be no difference between widgets directly inside the "overlay" xet tag and widgets which are inside instanciated templates. - The selbox widget doesn't work anymore - it relied on the loadAttributes function which isn't available anymore. et2_selbox should use the parseArrayMgrAttrs function to access - I've commented out some of the "validator"-code in etemplate2.js as it created some error messages when destroying the widget tree.
2011-08-19 18:00:44 +02:00
var node = this.getDOMNode(this);
if (node)
{
2011-08-17 19:48:39 +02:00
this.disabled = _value;
if (_value)
{
$j(node).hide();
}
else
{
$j(node).show();
}
}
Major update of the et2_widget internal structure. The following changes were made: - All attributes of the widgets are now parsed from XML before the widget itself is created. These attributes plus all default values are then added to an associative array. The associative array is passed as second parameter to the init function of et2_widget, but is also available as this.options *after* the constructor of the et2_widget baseclass has been called. The et2_widget constructor also calls a function parseArrayMgrAttrs(_attrs) - in this function widget implementations can read the values from e.g. the content and validation_errors array and merge it into the given _attrs associative array. After the complete internal widgettree is completely loaded and created the "loadingFinished" function gets called and invokes all given setter functions. After that it "glues" the DOM tree together. This should also (I didn't measure it) be a bit faster than before, when the DOM-Tree was created on the fly. Please have a look at the changes of the et2_textbox widget to see how this affects writing widgets. Note: The "id" property is copied to the object scope on the top of the et2_widget constructor. - When widgets are cloned the "options" array gets passed along to the newly created widget. This means that changes made on the widgets during runtime are not automatically copied to the clone - as this didn't happen anyhow it is not a really disadvantage. On the other side there should be no difference between widgets directly inside the "overlay" xet tag and widgets which are inside instanciated templates. - The selbox widget doesn't work anymore - it relied on the loadAttributes function which isn't available anymore. et2_selbox should use the parseArrayMgrAttrs function to access - I've commented out some of the "validator"-code in etemplate2.js as it created some error messages when destroying the widget tree.
2011-08-19 18:00:44 +02:00
},
set_width: function(_value) {
this.width = _value;
Major update of the et2_widget internal structure. The following changes were made: - All attributes of the widgets are now parsed from XML before the widget itself is created. These attributes plus all default values are then added to an associative array. The associative array is passed as second parameter to the init function of et2_widget, but is also available as this.options *after* the constructor of the et2_widget baseclass has been called. The et2_widget constructor also calls a function parseArrayMgrAttrs(_attrs) - in this function widget implementations can read the values from e.g. the content and validation_errors array and merge it into the given _attrs associative array. After the complete internal widgettree is completely loaded and created the "loadingFinished" function gets called and invokes all given setter functions. After that it "glues" the DOM tree together. This should also (I didn't measure it) be a bit faster than before, when the DOM-Tree was created on the fly. Please have a look at the changes of the et2_textbox widget to see how this affects writing widgets. Note: The "id" property is copied to the object scope on the top of the et2_widget constructor. - When widgets are cloned the "options" array gets passed along to the newly created widget. This means that changes made on the widgets during runtime are not automatically copied to the clone - as this didn't happen anyhow it is not a really disadvantage. On the other side there should be no difference between widgets directly inside the "overlay" xet tag and widgets which are inside instanciated templates. - The selbox widget doesn't work anymore - it relied on the loadAttributes function which isn't available anymore. et2_selbox should use the parseArrayMgrAttrs function to access - I've commented out some of the "validator"-code in etemplate2.js as it created some error messages when destroying the widget tree.
2011-08-19 18:00:44 +02:00
var node = this.getDOMNode(this);
if (node)
{
$j(node).css("width", _value);
}
},
set_height: function(_value) {
this.height = _value;
var node = this.getDOMNode(this);
if (node)
{
$j(node).css("height", _value);
}
},
set_class: function(_value) {
var node = this.getDOMNode(this);
if (node)
{
if (this["class"])
{
$j(node).removeClass(this["class"]);
}
$j(node).addClass(_value);
}
this["class"] = _value;
},
set_overflow: function(_value) {
this.overflow = _value;
var node = this.getDOMNode(this);
if (node)
{
$j(node).css("overflow", _value);
}
Major update of the et2_widget internal structure. The following changes were made: - All attributes of the widgets are now parsed from XML before the widget itself is created. These attributes plus all default values are then added to an associative array. The associative array is passed as second parameter to the init function of et2_widget, but is also available as this.options *after* the constructor of the et2_widget baseclass has been called. The et2_widget constructor also calls a function parseArrayMgrAttrs(_attrs) - in this function widget implementations can read the values from e.g. the content and validation_errors array and merge it into the given _attrs associative array. After the complete internal widgettree is completely loaded and created the "loadingFinished" function gets called and invokes all given setter functions. After that it "glues" the DOM tree together. This should also (I didn't measure it) be a bit faster than before, when the DOM-Tree was created on the fly. Please have a look at the changes of the et2_textbox widget to see how this affects writing widgets. Note: The "id" property is copied to the object scope on the top of the et2_widget constructor. - When widgets are cloned the "options" array gets passed along to the newly created widget. This means that changes made on the widgets during runtime are not automatically copied to the clone - as this didn't happen anyhow it is not a really disadvantage. On the other side there should be no difference between widgets directly inside the "overlay" xet tag and widgets which are inside instanciated templates. - The selbox widget doesn't work anymore - it relied on the loadAttributes function which isn't available anymore. et2_selbox should use the parseArrayMgrAttrs function to access - I've commented out some of the "validator"-code in etemplate2.js as it created some error messages when destroying the widget tree.
2011-08-19 18:00:44 +02:00
}
});