- the backup is independent of the used DB and can eg. be used to port an install to an other DB type
- autom. backup before upgrades of the DB structure
- installing backups instead an installation from scratch
- own backup screen in setup and admin to:
+ shedule repeating backups
+ up- and download of backups
+ creating and restoring backups
but reduced to those functions, which are needed to manage ldap entries, which
rely only on standard schemas (core, qmail) which are not considered "experimental"
and without the need to add a separate schema.
This modul will be extended whenever possible and approved for more values.
Main goal here is: Ability to easily use eGW Admin for account management with
LDAP beackend and to comply with those schemas, the distros are delivering.
The link for this module will be shown in addition to Lars' EmailAdmin if LDAP
is used as account storage. So it will not break existing installation ;-)
translation file (only those not translated in simplified Chinese).
This is because
1) most simplified Chinese readers can read traditional
Chinese. If some phrase doesn't have simplified Chinese translation,
egroupware better fall back to traditional Chinese then English.
2) Translation can be easier (just pick up the unfamiliar traditional
translation and change to simplified form)
The change is made by using
> find . -type d -name "setup" -exec /tmp/merge_tradition.sh {} \;
where merge_tradition.sh is:
#!/bin/sh
cd $1
if [ -f phpgw_zh.lang ] && [ -f phpgw_zt.lang ]; then
mv phpgw_zh.lang phpgw_zh.lang.old
join -a 1 -t " " phpgw_zt.lang phpgw_zh.lang.old | \
awk -F " " \
'{ OFS = FS; if (NF == 7) print $1, $5, $6, $7; else print $0 ;}' \
> phpgw_zh.lang
fi
Kiang if you like the idea you can merge my translation to your lang
file too. And it's even better if the language engine can be changed in
the way that, as a phrase has no translation for current language,
choose the nearest language before falling back to English. Say, when no
translation in zh, use zt before trying English.
Could it be better that this apply to pt too? (pt-br and pt)
