mirror of
https://github.com/vgough/encfs.git
synced 2024-11-25 17:33:19 +01:00
withFileNode: move canary check to its own function
The do_op closure is complicated enough. Get the canary check out of the way to not make it even more complicated. Also, use an explicitely atomic type for the canary.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d2ee96d2bd
commit
9a4ea2007f
@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ FileNode *EncFS_Context::putNode(const char *path,
|
|||||||
return list.front().get();
|
return list.front().get();
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// eraseNode is called by encfs_release in response to the RELEASE
|
||||||
|
// FUSE-command we get from the kernel.
|
||||||
void EncFS_Context::eraseNode(const char *path, FileNode *pl) {
|
void EncFS_Context::eraseNode(const char *path, FileNode *pl) {
|
||||||
Lock lock(contextMutex);
|
Lock lock(contextMutex);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
|
|||||||
#include <stdint.h>
|
#include <stdint.h>
|
||||||
#include <string>
|
#include <string>
|
||||||
#include <sys/types.h>
|
#include <sys/types.h>
|
||||||
|
#include <atomic>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#include "CipherKey.h"
|
#include "CipherKey.h"
|
||||||
#include "FSConfig.h"
|
#include "FSConfig.h"
|
||||||
@ -49,7 +50,9 @@ class FileNode {
|
|||||||
const char *cipherName);
|
const char *cipherName);
|
||||||
~FileNode();
|
~FileNode();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
uint32_t canary;
|
// Use an atomic type. The canary is accessed without holding any
|
||||||
|
// locks.
|
||||||
|
std::atomic<std::uint32_t> canary;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
const char *plaintextName() const;
|
const char *plaintextName() const;
|
||||||
const char *cipherName() const;
|
const char *cipherName() const;
|
||||||
|
@ -111,6 +111,25 @@ static int withCipherPath(const char *opName, const char *path,
|
|||||||
return res;
|
return res;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
static void checkCanary(std::shared_ptr<FileNode> fnode) {
|
||||||
|
if(fnode->canary == CANARY_OK) {
|
||||||
|
return;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
if(fnode->canary == CANARY_RELEASED) {
|
||||||
|
// "fnode" may have been released after it was retrieved by
|
||||||
|
// lookupFuseFh. This is not an error. std::shared_ptr will release
|
||||||
|
// the memory only when all operations on the FileNode have been
|
||||||
|
// completed.
|
||||||
|
return;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
if(fnode->canary == CANARY_DESTROYED) {
|
||||||
|
RLOG(ERROR) << "canary=CANARY_DESTROYED. FileNode accessed after it was destroyed.";
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
RLOG(ERROR) << "canary=0x" << std::hex << fnode->canary << ". Memory corruption?";
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
throw Error("dead canary");
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// helper function -- apply a functor to a node
|
// helper function -- apply a functor to a node
|
||||||
static int withFileNode(const char *opName, const char *path,
|
static int withFileNode(const char *opName, const char *path,
|
||||||
struct fuse_file_info *fi,
|
struct fuse_file_info *fi,
|
||||||
@ -125,16 +144,7 @@ static int withFileNode(const char *opName, const char *path,
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
auto do_op = [&FSRoot, opName, &op](FileNode *fnode) {
|
auto do_op = [&FSRoot, opName, &op](FileNode *fnode) {
|
||||||
rAssert(fnode != nullptr);
|
rAssert(fnode != nullptr);
|
||||||
if(fnode->canary != CANARY_OK) {
|
checkCanary(fnode);
|
||||||
if(fnode->canary == CANARY_RELEASED) {
|
|
||||||
RLOG(ERROR) << "canary=CANARY_RELEASED. File node accessed after it was released.";
|
|
||||||
} else if(fnode->canary == CANARY_DESTROYED) {
|
|
||||||
RLOG(ERROR) << "canary=CANARY_DESTROYED. File node accessed after it was destroyed.";
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
|
||||||
RLOG(ERROR) << "canary=0x" << std::hex << fnode->canary << ". Corruption?";
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
throw Error("dead canary");
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
VLOG(1) << "op: " << opName << " : " << fnode->cipherName();
|
VLOG(1) << "op: " << opName << " : " << fnode->cipherName();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// check that we're not recursing into the mount point itself
|
// check that we're not recursing into the mount point itself
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user