mirror of
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git
synced 2025-08-16 18:11:58 +02:00
[management] Fix networks net map generation with posture checks (#3124)
This commit is contained in:
@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ import (
|
||||
"github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror"
|
||||
"github.com/miekg/dns"
|
||||
log "github.com/sirupsen/logrus"
|
||||
"github.com/yourbasic/radix"
|
||||
|
||||
nbdns "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/dns"
|
||||
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/domain"
|
||||
@ -1045,37 +1046,32 @@ func (a *Account) connResourcesGenerator(ctx context.Context) (func(*PolicyRule,
|
||||
// for destination group peers, call this method with an empty list of sourcePostureChecksIDs
|
||||
func (a *Account) getAllPeersFromGroups(ctx context.Context, groups []string, peerID string, sourcePostureChecksIDs []string, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}) ([]*nbpeer.Peer, bool) {
|
||||
peerInGroups := false
|
||||
filteredPeers := make([]*nbpeer.Peer, 0, len(groups))
|
||||
for _, g := range groups {
|
||||
group, ok := a.Groups[g]
|
||||
if !ok {
|
||||
uniquePeerIDs := a.getUniquePeerIDsFromGroupsIDs(ctx, groups)
|
||||
filteredPeers := make([]*nbpeer.Peer, 0, len(uniquePeerIDs))
|
||||
for _, p := range uniquePeerIDs {
|
||||
peer, ok := a.Peers[p]
|
||||
if !ok || peer == nil {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, p := range group.Peers {
|
||||
peer, ok := a.Peers[p]
|
||||
if !ok || peer == nil {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// validate the peer based on policy posture checks applied
|
||||
isValid := a.validatePostureChecksOnPeer(ctx, sourcePostureChecksIDs, peer.ID)
|
||||
if !isValid {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if _, ok := validatedPeersMap[peer.ID]; !ok {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if peer.ID == peerID {
|
||||
peerInGroups = true
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
filteredPeers = append(filteredPeers, peer)
|
||||
// validate the peer based on policy posture checks applied
|
||||
isValid := a.validatePostureChecksOnPeer(ctx, sourcePostureChecksIDs, peer.ID)
|
||||
if !isValid {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if _, ok := validatedPeersMap[peer.ID]; !ok {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if peer.ID == peerID {
|
||||
peerInGroups = true
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
filteredPeers = append(filteredPeers, peer)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return filteredPeers, peerInGroups
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1151,7 +1147,7 @@ func (a *Account) getRouteFirewallRules(ctx context.Context, peerID string, poli
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rulePeers := a.getRulePeers(rule, peerID, distributionPeers, validatedPeersMap)
|
||||
rulePeers := a.getRulePeers(rule, policy.SourcePostureChecks, peerID, distributionPeers, validatedPeersMap)
|
||||
rules := generateRouteFirewallRules(ctx, route, rule, rulePeers, FirewallRuleDirectionIN)
|
||||
fwRules = append(fwRules, rules...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1159,8 +1155,8 @@ func (a *Account) getRouteFirewallRules(ctx context.Context, peerID string, poli
|
||||
return fwRules
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (a *Account) getRulePeers(rule *PolicyRule, peerID string, distributionPeers map[string]struct{}, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}) []*nbpeer.Peer {
|
||||
distPeersWithPolicy := make(map[string]struct{})
|
||||
func (a *Account) getRulePeers(rule *PolicyRule, postureChecks []string, peerID string, distributionPeers map[string]struct{}, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}) []*nbpeer.Peer {
|
||||
distPeersWithPolicy := make([]string, 0)
|
||||
for _, id := range rule.Sources {
|
||||
group := a.Groups[id]
|
||||
if group == nil {
|
||||
@ -1173,14 +1169,17 @@ func (a *Account) getRulePeers(rule *PolicyRule, peerID string, distributionPeer
|
||||
}
|
||||
_, distPeer := distributionPeers[pID]
|
||||
_, valid := validatedPeersMap[pID]
|
||||
if distPeer && valid {
|
||||
distPeersWithPolicy[pID] = struct{}{}
|
||||
if distPeer && valid && a.validatePostureChecksOnPeer(context.Background(), postureChecks, pID) {
|
||||
distPeersWithPolicy = append(distPeersWithPolicy, pID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
distributionGroupPeers := make([]*nbpeer.Peer, 0, len(distPeersWithPolicy))
|
||||
for pID := range distPeersWithPolicy {
|
||||
radix.Sort(distPeersWithPolicy)
|
||||
uniqueDistributionPeers := slices.Compact(distPeersWithPolicy)
|
||||
|
||||
distributionGroupPeers := make([]*nbpeer.Peer, 0, len(uniqueDistributionPeers))
|
||||
for _, pID := range uniqueDistributionPeers {
|
||||
peer := a.Peers[pID]
|
||||
if peer == nil {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
@ -1271,7 +1270,11 @@ func (a *Account) GetPeerNetworkResourceFirewallRules(ctx context.Context, peer
|
||||
distributionPeers := getPoliciesSourcePeers(resourceAppliedPolicies, a.Groups)
|
||||
|
||||
rules := a.getRouteFirewallRules(ctx, peer.ID, resourceAppliedPolicies, route, validatedPeersMap, distributionPeers)
|
||||
routesFirewallRules = append(routesFirewallRules, rules...)
|
||||
for _, rule := range rules {
|
||||
if len(rule.SourceRanges) > 0 {
|
||||
routesFirewallRules = append(routesFirewallRules, rule)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return routesFirewallRules
|
||||
@ -1306,7 +1309,7 @@ func (a *Account) GetResourcePoliciesMap() map[string][]*Policy {
|
||||
func (a *Account) GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(ctx context.Context, peerID string, resourcePolicies map[string][]*Policy, routers map[string]map[string]*routerTypes.NetworkRouter) (bool, []*route.Route, []string) {
|
||||
var isRoutingPeer bool
|
||||
var routes []*route.Route
|
||||
var allSourcePeers []string
|
||||
allSourcePeers := make([]string, 0)
|
||||
|
||||
for _, resource := range a.NetworkResources {
|
||||
var addSourcePeers bool
|
||||
@ -1319,28 +1322,63 @@ func (a *Account) GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(ctx context.Context, peerID st
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
addedResourceRoute := false
|
||||
for _, policy := range resourcePolicies[resource.ID] {
|
||||
for _, sourceGroup := range policy.SourceGroups() {
|
||||
group := a.GetGroup(sourceGroup)
|
||||
if group == nil {
|
||||
log.WithContext(ctx).Warnf("policy %s has source group %s that doesn't exist under account %s, will continue map generation without it", policy.ID, sourceGroup, a.Id)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// routing peer should be able to connect with all source peers
|
||||
if addSourcePeers {
|
||||
allSourcePeers = append(allSourcePeers, group.Peers...)
|
||||
} else if slices.Contains(group.Peers, peerID) {
|
||||
// add routes for the resource if the peer is in the distribution group
|
||||
for peerId, router := range networkRoutingPeers {
|
||||
routes = append(routes, a.getNetworkResourcesRoutes(resource, peerId, router, resourcePolicies)...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
peers := a.getUniquePeerIDsFromGroupsIDs(ctx, policy.SourceGroups())
|
||||
if addSourcePeers {
|
||||
allSourcePeers = append(allSourcePeers, a.getPostureValidPeers(peers, policy.SourcePostureChecks)...)
|
||||
} else if slices.Contains(peers, peerID) && a.validatePostureChecksOnPeer(ctx, policy.SourcePostureChecks, peerID) {
|
||||
// add routes for the resource if the peer is in the distribution group
|
||||
for peerId, router := range networkRoutingPeers {
|
||||
routes = append(routes, a.getNetworkResourcesRoutes(resource, peerId, router, resourcePolicies)...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
addedResourceRoute = true
|
||||
}
|
||||
if addedResourceRoute {
|
||||
break
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return isRoutingPeer, routes, allSourcePeers
|
||||
radix.Sort(allSourcePeers)
|
||||
return isRoutingPeer, routes, slices.Compact(allSourcePeers)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (a *Account) getPostureValidPeers(inputPeers []string, postureChecksIDs []string) []string {
|
||||
var dest []string
|
||||
for _, peerID := range inputPeers {
|
||||
if a.validatePostureChecksOnPeer(context.Background(), postureChecksIDs, peerID) {
|
||||
dest = append(dest, peerID)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return dest
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (a *Account) getUniquePeerIDsFromGroupsIDs(ctx context.Context, groups []string) []string {
|
||||
gObjs := make([]*Group, 0, len(groups))
|
||||
tp := 0
|
||||
for _, groupID := range groups {
|
||||
group := a.GetGroup(groupID)
|
||||
if group == nil {
|
||||
log.WithContext(ctx).Warnf("group %s doesn't exist under account %s, will continue map generation without it", groupID, a.Id)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if group.IsGroupAll() || len(groups) == 1 {
|
||||
return group.Peers
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
gObjs = append(gObjs, group)
|
||||
tp += len(group.Peers)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ids := make([]string, 0, tp)
|
||||
for _, group := range gObjs {
|
||||
ids = append(ids, group.Peers...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
radix.Sort(ids)
|
||||
return slices.Compact(ids)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// getNetworkResources filters and returns a list of network resources associated with the given network ID.
|
||||
|
@ -1,14 +1,20 @@
|
||||
package types
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"context"
|
||||
"net"
|
||||
"net/netip"
|
||||
"slices"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
||||
|
||||
resourceTypes "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/networks/resources/types"
|
||||
routerTypes "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/networks/routers/types"
|
||||
networkTypes "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/networks/types"
|
||||
nbpeer "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/peer"
|
||||
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/posture"
|
||||
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/route"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -373,3 +379,379 @@ func Test_AddNetworksRoutingPeersHandlesNoMissingPeers(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
result := account.addNetworksRoutingPeers(networkResourcesRoutes, peer, peersToConnect, expiredPeers, false, []string{})
|
||||
require.Len(t, result, 0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const (
|
||||
accID = "accountID"
|
||||
network1ID = "network1ID"
|
||||
group1ID = "group1"
|
||||
accNetResourcePeer1ID = "peer1"
|
||||
accNetResourcePeer2ID = "peer2"
|
||||
accNetResourceRouter1ID = "router1"
|
||||
accNetResource1ID = "resource1ID"
|
||||
accNetResourceRestrictPostureCheckID = "restrictPostureCheck"
|
||||
accNetResourceRelaxedPostureCheckID = "relaxedPostureCheck"
|
||||
accNetResourceLockedPostureCheckID = "lockedPostureCheck"
|
||||
accNetResourceLinuxPostureCheckID = "linuxPostureCheck"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
var (
|
||||
accNetResourcePeer1IP = net.IP{192, 168, 1, 1}
|
||||
accNetResourcePeer2IP = net.IP{192, 168, 1, 2}
|
||||
accNetResourceRouter1IP = net.IP{192, 168, 1, 3}
|
||||
accNetResourceValidPeers = map[string]struct{}{accNetResourcePeer1ID: {}, accNetResourcePeer2ID: {}}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
func getBasicAccountsWithResource() *Account {
|
||||
return &Account{
|
||||
Id: accID,
|
||||
Peers: map[string]*nbpeer.Peer{
|
||||
accNetResourcePeer1ID: {
|
||||
ID: accNetResourcePeer1ID,
|
||||
AccountID: accID,
|
||||
Key: "peer1Key",
|
||||
IP: accNetResourcePeer1IP,
|
||||
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
|
||||
GoOS: "linux",
|
||||
WtVersion: "0.35.1",
|
||||
KernelVersion: "4.4.0",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
accNetResourcePeer2ID: {
|
||||
ID: accNetResourcePeer2ID,
|
||||
AccountID: accID,
|
||||
Key: "peer2Key",
|
||||
IP: accNetResourcePeer2IP,
|
||||
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
|
||||
GoOS: "windows",
|
||||
WtVersion: "0.34.1",
|
||||
KernelVersion: "4.4.0",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
accNetResourceRouter1ID: {
|
||||
ID: accNetResourceRouter1ID,
|
||||
AccountID: accID,
|
||||
Key: "router1Key",
|
||||
IP: accNetResourceRouter1IP,
|
||||
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
|
||||
GoOS: "linux",
|
||||
WtVersion: "0.35.1",
|
||||
KernelVersion: "4.4.0",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Groups: map[string]*Group{
|
||||
group1ID: {
|
||||
ID: group1ID,
|
||||
Peers: []string{accNetResourcePeer1ID, accNetResourcePeer2ID},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Networks: []*networkTypes.Network{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: network1ID,
|
||||
AccountID: accID,
|
||||
Name: "network1",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
NetworkRouters: []*routerTypes.NetworkRouter{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: accNetResourceRouter1ID,
|
||||
NetworkID: network1ID,
|
||||
AccountID: accID,
|
||||
Peer: accNetResourceRouter1ID,
|
||||
PeerGroups: []string{},
|
||||
Masquerade: false,
|
||||
Metric: 100,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
NetworkResources: []*resourceTypes.NetworkResource{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: accNetResource1ID,
|
||||
AccountID: accID,
|
||||
NetworkID: network1ID,
|
||||
Address: "10.10.10.0/24",
|
||||
Prefix: netip.MustParsePrefix("10.10.10.0/24"),
|
||||
Type: resourceTypes.NetworkResourceType("subnet"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Policies: []*Policy{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "policy1ID",
|
||||
AccountID: accID,
|
||||
Enabled: true,
|
||||
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "rule1ID",
|
||||
Enabled: true,
|
||||
Sources: []string{group1ID},
|
||||
DestinationResource: Resource{
|
||||
ID: accNetResource1ID,
|
||||
Type: "Host",
|
||||
},
|
||||
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
|
||||
Ports: []string{"80"},
|
||||
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
SourcePostureChecks: nil,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
PostureChecks: []*posture.Checks{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: accNetResourceRestrictPostureCheckID,
|
||||
Name: accNetResourceRestrictPostureCheckID,
|
||||
Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
|
||||
NBVersionCheck: &posture.NBVersionCheck{
|
||||
MinVersion: "0.35.0",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: accNetResourceRelaxedPostureCheckID,
|
||||
Name: accNetResourceRelaxedPostureCheckID,
|
||||
Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
|
||||
NBVersionCheck: &posture.NBVersionCheck{
|
||||
MinVersion: "0.0.1",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: accNetResourceLockedPostureCheckID,
|
||||
Name: accNetResourceLockedPostureCheckID,
|
||||
Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
|
||||
NBVersionCheck: &posture.NBVersionCheck{
|
||||
MinVersion: "7.7.7",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: accNetResourceLinuxPostureCheckID,
|
||||
Name: accNetResourceLinuxPostureCheckID,
|
||||
Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
|
||||
OSVersionCheck: &posture.OSVersionCheck{
|
||||
Linux: &posture.MinKernelVersionCheck{
|
||||
MinKernelVersion: "0.0.0"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func Test_NetworksNetMapGenWithNoPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
account := getBasicAccountsWithResource()
|
||||
|
||||
// all peers should match the policy
|
||||
|
||||
// validate for peer1
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers := account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate for peer2
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer2ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate routes for router1
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourceRouter1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.True(t, isRouter, "should be router")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 2, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, accNetResourcePeer1ID, sourcePeers[0], "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, accNetResourcePeer2ID, sourcePeers[1], "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate rules for router1
|
||||
rules := account.GetPeerNetworkResourceFirewallRules(context.Background(), account.Peers[accNetResourceRouter1ID], accNetResourceValidPeers, networkResourcesRoutes, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap())
|
||||
assert.Len(t, rules, 1, "expected rules count don't match")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, uint16(80), rules[0].Port, "should have port 80")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, "tcp", rules[0].Protocol, "should have protocol tcp")
|
||||
if !slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String()+"/32") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer1 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String()+"/32") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer2 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func Test_NetworksNetMapGenWithPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
account := getBasicAccountsWithResource()
|
||||
|
||||
// should allow peer1 to match the policy
|
||||
policy := account.Policies[0]
|
||||
policy.SourcePostureChecks = []string{accNetResourceRestrictPostureCheckID}
|
||||
|
||||
// validate for peer1
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers := account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate for peer2
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer2ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 0, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate routes for router1
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourceRouter1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.True(t, isRouter, "should be router")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 1, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, accNetResourcePeer1ID, sourcePeers[0], "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate rules for router1
|
||||
rules := account.GetPeerNetworkResourceFirewallRules(context.Background(), account.Peers[accNetResourceRouter1ID], accNetResourceValidPeers, networkResourcesRoutes, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap())
|
||||
assert.Len(t, rules, 1, "expected rules count don't match")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, uint16(80), rules[0].Port, "should have port 80")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, "tcp", rules[0].Protocol, "should have protocol tcp")
|
||||
if !slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String()+"/32") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer1 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String()+"/32") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%s should not have source range of peer2 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func Test_NetworksNetMapGenWithNoMatchedPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
account := getBasicAccountsWithResource()
|
||||
|
||||
// should not match any peer
|
||||
policy := account.Policies[0]
|
||||
policy.SourcePostureChecks = []string{accNetResourceLockedPostureCheckID}
|
||||
|
||||
// validate for peer1
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers := account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 0, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate for peer2
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer2ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 0, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate routes for router1
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourceRouter1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.True(t, isRouter, "should be router")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate rules for router1
|
||||
rules := account.GetPeerNetworkResourceFirewallRules(context.Background(), account.Peers[accNetResourceRouter1ID], accNetResourceValidPeers, networkResourcesRoutes, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap())
|
||||
assert.Len(t, rules, 0, "expected rules count don't match")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func Test_NetworksNetMapGenWithTwoPoliciesAndPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
account := getBasicAccountsWithResource()
|
||||
|
||||
// should allow peer1 to match the policy
|
||||
policy := account.Policies[0]
|
||||
policy.SourcePostureChecks = []string{accNetResourceRestrictPostureCheckID}
|
||||
|
||||
// should allow peer1 and peer2 to match the policy
|
||||
newPolicy := &Policy{
|
||||
ID: "policy2ID",
|
||||
AccountID: accID,
|
||||
Enabled: true,
|
||||
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "policy2ID",
|
||||
Enabled: true,
|
||||
Sources: []string{group1ID},
|
||||
DestinationResource: Resource{
|
||||
ID: accNetResource1ID,
|
||||
Type: "Host",
|
||||
},
|
||||
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
|
||||
Ports: []string{"22"},
|
||||
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
SourcePostureChecks: []string{accNetResourceRelaxedPostureCheckID},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
account.Policies = append(account.Policies, newPolicy)
|
||||
|
||||
// validate for peer1
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers := account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate for peer2
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer2ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate routes for router1
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourceRouter1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.True(t, isRouter, "should be router")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 2, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, accNetResourcePeer1ID, sourcePeers[0], "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, accNetResourcePeer2ID, sourcePeers[1], "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate rules for router1
|
||||
rules := account.GetPeerNetworkResourceFirewallRules(context.Background(), account.Peers[accNetResourceRouter1ID], accNetResourceValidPeers, networkResourcesRoutes, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap())
|
||||
assert.Len(t, rules, 2, "expected rules count don't match")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, uint16(80), rules[0].Port, "should have port 80")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, "tcp", rules[0].Protocol, "should have protocol tcp")
|
||||
if !slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String()+"/32") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer1 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String()+"/32") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%s should not have source range of peer2 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, uint16(22), rules[1].Port, "should have port 22")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, "tcp", rules[1].Protocol, "should have protocol tcp")
|
||||
if !slices.Contains(rules[1].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String()+"/32") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer1 %s", rules[1].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !slices.Contains(rules[1].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String()+"/32") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer2 %s", rules[1].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func Test_NetworksNetMapGenWithTwoPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
account := getBasicAccountsWithResource()
|
||||
|
||||
// two posture checks should match only the peers that match both checks
|
||||
policy := account.Policies[0]
|
||||
policy.SourcePostureChecks = []string{accNetResourceRelaxedPostureCheckID, accNetResourceLinuxPostureCheckID}
|
||||
|
||||
// validate for peer1
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers := account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate for peer2
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourcePeer2ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.False(t, isRouter, "expected router status")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 0, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 0, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate routes for router1
|
||||
isRouter, networkResourcesRoutes, sourcePeers = account.GetNetworkResourcesRoutesToSync(context.Background(), accNetResourceRouter1ID, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap(), account.GetResourceRoutersMap())
|
||||
assert.True(t, isRouter, "should be router")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, networkResourcesRoutes, 1, "expected network resource route don't match")
|
||||
assert.Len(t, sourcePeers, 1, "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, accNetResourcePeer1ID, sourcePeers[0], "expected source peers don't match")
|
||||
|
||||
// validate rules for router1
|
||||
rules := account.GetPeerNetworkResourceFirewallRules(context.Background(), account.Peers[accNetResourceRouter1ID], accNetResourceValidPeers, networkResourcesRoutes, account.GetResourcePoliciesMap())
|
||||
assert.Len(t, rules, 1, "expected rules count don't match")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, uint16(80), rules[0].Port, "should have port 80")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, "tcp", rules[0].Protocol, "should have protocol tcp")
|
||||
if !slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String()+"/32") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%s should have source range of peer1 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer1IP.String())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if slices.Contains(rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String()+"/32") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%s should not have source range of peer2 %s", rules[0].SourceRanges, accNetResourcePeer2IP.String())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
|
||||
package types
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"slices"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/yourbasic/radix"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
const (
|
||||
// PolicyTrafficActionAccept indicates that the traffic is accepted
|
||||
PolicyTrafficActionAccept = PolicyTrafficActionType("accept")
|
||||
@ -117,9 +123,13 @@ func (p *Policy) RuleGroups() []string {
|
||||
|
||||
// SourceGroups returns a slice of all unique source groups referenced in the policy's rules.
|
||||
func (p *Policy) SourceGroups() []string {
|
||||
if len(p.Rules) == 1 {
|
||||
return p.Rules[0].Sources
|
||||
}
|
||||
groups := make([]string, 0)
|
||||
for _, rule := range p.Rules {
|
||||
groups = append(groups, rule.Sources...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return groups
|
||||
radix.Sort(groups)
|
||||
return slices.Compact(groups)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user