Merge branch 'main' into ssh-rewrite

client/internal/acl/manager.go

@@ -373,11 +373,15 @@ func (d *DefaultManager) getPeerRuleID(
 	//
 	// We zeroed this to notify squash function that this protocol can't be squashed.
 	addRuleToCalculationMap := func(i int, r *mgmProto.FirewallRule, protocols map[mgmProto.RuleProtocol]*protoMatch) {
-		drop := r.Action == mgmProto.RuleAction_DROP || r.Port != ""
+		hasPortRestrictions := r.Action == mgmProto.RuleAction_DROP ||
-		if drop {
+			r.Port != "" || !portInfoEmpty(r.PortInfo)
+
+		if hasPortRestrictions {
+			// Don't squash rules with port restrictions
 			protocols[r.Protocol] = &protoMatch{ips: map[string]int{}}
 			return
 		}
+
 		if _, ok := protocols[r.Protocol]; !ok {
 			protocols[r.Protocol] = &protoMatch{
 				ips: map[string]int{},

client/internal/acl/manager_test.go

@@ -329,3 +329,498 @@ func TestDefaultManagerSquashRulesNoAffect(t *testing.T) {
 	rules := manager.squashAcceptRules(networkMap)
 	assert.Equal(t, len(networkMap.FirewallRules), len(rules))
 }
+
+func TestDefaultManagerSquashRulesWithPortRestrictions(t *testing.T) {
+	tests := []struct {
+		name          string
+		rules         []*mgmProto.FirewallRule
+		expectedCount int
+		description   string
+	}{
+		{
+			name: "should not squash rules with port ranges",
+			rules: []*mgmProto.FirewallRule{
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.1",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					PortInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+						PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range_{
+							Range: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range{
+								Start: 8080,
+								End:   8090,
+							},
+						},
+					},
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.2",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					PortInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+						PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range_{
+							Range: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range{
+								Start: 8080,
+								End:   8090,
+							},
+						},
+					},
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.3",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					PortInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+						PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range_{
+							Range: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range{
+								Start: 8080,
+								End:   8090,
+							},
+						},
+					},
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.4",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					PortInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+						PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range_{
+							Range: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range{
+								Start: 8080,
+								End:   8090,
+							},
+						},
+					},
+				},
+			},
+			expectedCount: 4,
+			description:   "Rules with port ranges should not be squashed even if they cover all peers",
+		},
+		{
+			name: "should not squash rules with specific ports",
+			rules: []*mgmProto.FirewallRule{
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.1",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					PortInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+						PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Port{
+							Port: 80,
+						},
+					},
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.2",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					PortInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+						PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Port{
+							Port: 80,
+						},
+					},
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.3",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					PortInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+						PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Port{
+							Port: 80,
+						},
+					},
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.4",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					PortInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+						PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Port{
+							Port: 80,
+						},
+					},
+				},
+			},
+			expectedCount: 4,
+			description:   "Rules with specific ports should not be squashed even if they cover all peers",
+		},
+		{
+			name: "should not squash rules with legacy port field",
+			rules: []*mgmProto.FirewallRule{
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.1",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					Port:      "443",
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.2",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					Port:      "443",
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.3",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					Port:      "443",
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.4",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					Port:      "443",
+				},
+			},
+			expectedCount: 4,
+			description:   "Rules with legacy port field should not be squashed",
+		},
+		{
+			name: "should not squash rules with DROP action",
+			rules: []*mgmProto.FirewallRule{
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.1",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_DROP,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.2",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_DROP,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.3",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_DROP,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.4",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_DROP,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+				},
+			},
+			expectedCount: 4,
+			description:   "Rules with DROP action should not be squashed",
+		},
+		{
+			name: "should squash rules without port restrictions",
+			rules: []*mgmProto.FirewallRule{
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.1",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.2",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.3",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.4",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+				},
+			},
+			expectedCount: 1,
+			description:   "Rules without port restrictions should be squashed into a single 0.0.0.0 rule",
+		},
+		{
+			name: "mixed rules should not squash protocol with port restrictions",
+			rules: []*mgmProto.FirewallRule{
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.1",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.2",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					PortInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+						PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Port{
+							Port: 80,
+						},
+					},
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.3",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.4",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+				},
+			},
+			expectedCount: 4,
+			description:   "TCP should not be squashed because one rule has port restrictions",
+		},
+		{
+			name: "should squash UDP but not TCP when TCP has port restrictions",
+			rules: []*mgmProto.FirewallRule{
+				// TCP rules with port restrictions - should NOT be squashed
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.1",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					Port:      "443",
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.2",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					Port:      "443",
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.3",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					Port:      "443",
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.4",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+					Port:      "443",
+				},
+				// UDP rules without port restrictions - SHOULD be squashed
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.1",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_UDP,
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.2",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_UDP,
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.3",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_UDP,
+				},
+				{
+					PeerIP:    "10.93.0.4",
+					Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+					Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+					Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_UDP,
+				},
+			},
+			expectedCount: 5, // 4 TCP rules + 1 squashed UDP rule (0.0.0.0)
+			description:   "UDP should be squashed to 0.0.0.0 rule, but TCP should remain as individual rules due to port restrictions",
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			networkMap := &mgmProto.NetworkMap{
+				RemotePeers: []*mgmProto.RemotePeerConfig{
+					{AllowedIps: []string{"10.93.0.1"}},
+					{AllowedIps: []string{"10.93.0.2"}},
+					{AllowedIps: []string{"10.93.0.3"}},
+					{AllowedIps: []string{"10.93.0.4"}},
+				},
+				FirewallRules: tt.rules,
+			}
+
+			manager := &DefaultManager{}
+			rules, _ := manager.squashAcceptRules(networkMap)
+
+			assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedCount, len(rules), tt.description)
+
+			// For squashed rules, verify we get the expected 0.0.0.0 rule
+			if tt.expectedCount == 1 {
+				assert.Equal(t, "0.0.0.0", rules[0].PeerIP)
+				assert.Equal(t, mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN, rules[0].Direction)
+				assert.Equal(t, mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT, rules[0].Action)
+			}
+		})
+	}
+}
+
+func TestPortInfoEmpty(t *testing.T) {
+	tests := []struct {
+		name     string
+		portInfo *mgmProto.PortInfo
+		expected bool
+	}{
+		{
+			name:     "nil PortInfo should be empty",
+			portInfo: nil,
+			expected: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "PortInfo with zero port should be empty",
+			portInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+				PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Port{
+					Port: 0,
+				},
+			},
+			expected: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "PortInfo with valid port should not be empty",
+			portInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+				PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Port{
+					Port: 80,
+				},
+			},
+			expected: false,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "PortInfo with nil range should be empty",
+			portInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+				PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range_{
+					Range: nil,
+				},
+			},
+			expected: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "PortInfo with zero start range should be empty",
+			portInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+				PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range_{
+					Range: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range{
+						Start: 0,
+						End:   100,
+					},
+				},
+			},
+			expected: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "PortInfo with zero end range should be empty",
+			portInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+				PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range_{
+					Range: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range{
+						Start: 80,
+						End:   0,
+					},
+				},
+			},
+			expected: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "PortInfo with valid range should not be empty",
+			portInfo: &mgmProto.PortInfo{
+				PortSelection: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range_{
+					Range: &mgmProto.PortInfo_Range{
+						Start: 8080,
+						End:   8090,
+					},
+				},
+			},
+			expected: false,
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			result := portInfoEmpty(tt.portInfo)
+			assert.Equal(t, tt.expected, result)
+		})
+	}
+}
+
+func TestDefaultManagerEnableSSHRules(t *testing.T) {
+	networkMap := &mgmProto.NetworkMap{
+		PeerConfig: &mgmProto.PeerConfig{
+			SshConfig: &mgmProto.SSHConfig{
+				SshEnabled: true,
+			},
+		},
+		RemotePeers: []*mgmProto.RemotePeerConfig{
+			{AllowedIps: []string{"10.93.0.1"}},
+			{AllowedIps: []string{"10.93.0.2"}},
+			{AllowedIps: []string{"10.93.0.3"}},
+		},
+		FirewallRules: []*mgmProto.FirewallRule{
+			{
+				PeerIP:    "10.93.0.1",
+				Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+				Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+				Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+			},
+			{
+				PeerIP:    "10.93.0.2",
+				Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_IN,
+				Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+				Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_TCP,
+			},
+			{
+				PeerIP:    "10.93.0.3",
+				Direction: mgmProto.RuleDirection_OUT,
+				Action:    mgmProto.RuleAction_ACCEPT,
+				Protocol:  mgmProto.RuleProtocol_UDP,
+			},
+		},
+	}
+
+	ctrl := gomock.NewController(t)
+	defer ctrl.Finish()
+
+	ifaceMock := mocks.NewMockIFaceMapper(ctrl)
+	ifaceMock.EXPECT().IsUserspaceBind().Return(true).AnyTimes()
+	ifaceMock.EXPECT().SetFilter(gomock.Any())
+	network := netip.MustParsePrefix("172.0.0.1/32")
+
+	ifaceMock.EXPECT().Name().Return("lo").AnyTimes()
+	ifaceMock.EXPECT().Address().Return(wgaddr.Address{
+		IP:      network.Addr(),
+		Network: network,
+	}).AnyTimes()
+	ifaceMock.EXPECT().GetWGDevice().Return(nil).AnyTimes()
+
+	fw, err := firewall.NewFirewall(ifaceMock, nil, flowLogger, false)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	defer func() {
+		err = fw.Close(nil)
+		require.NoError(t, err)
+	}()
+
+	acl := NewDefaultManager(fw)
+
+	acl.ApplyFiltering(networkMap, false)
+
+	expectedRules := 3
+	if fw.IsStateful() {
+		expectedRules = 3 // 2 inbound rules + SSH rule
+	}
+	assert.Equal(t, expectedRules, len(acl.peerRulesPairs))
+}

management/server/http/api/openapi.yml

@@ -426,6 +426,10 @@ components:
               items:
                 type: string
                 example: "stage-host-1"
+            ephemeral:
+              description: Indicates whether the peer is ephemeral or not
+              type: boolean
+              example: false
           required:
             - city_name
             - connected
@@ -450,6 +454,7 @@ components:
             - approval_required
             - serial_number
             - extra_dns_labels
+            - ephemeral
     AccessiblePeer:
       allOf:
         - $ref: '#/components/schemas/PeerMinimum'

management/server/http/api/types.gen.go

@@ -1016,6 +1016,9 @@ type Peer struct {
 	// DnsLabel Peer's DNS label is the parsed peer name for domain resolution. It is used to form an FQDN by appending the account's domain to the peer label. e.g. peer-dns-label.netbird.cloud
 	DnsLabel string `json:"dns_label"`
 
+	// Ephemeral Indicates whether the peer is ephemeral or not
+	Ephemeral bool `json:"ephemeral"`
+
 	// ExtraDnsLabels Extra DNS labels added to the peer
 	ExtraDnsLabels []string `json:"extra_dns_labels"`
 
@@ -1097,6 +1100,9 @@ type PeerBatch struct {
 	// DnsLabel Peer's DNS label is the parsed peer name for domain resolution. It is used to form an FQDN by appending the account's domain to the peer label. e.g. peer-dns-label.netbird.cloud
 	DnsLabel string `json:"dns_label"`
 
+	// Ephemeral Indicates whether the peer is ephemeral or not
+	Ephemeral bool `json:"ephemeral"`
+
 	// ExtraDnsLabels Extra DNS labels added to the peer
 	ExtraDnsLabels []string `json:"extra_dns_labels"`
 

management/server/http/handlers/peers/peers_handler.go

@@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ func toSinglePeerResponse(peer *nbpeer.Peer, groupsInfo []api.GroupMinimum, dnsD
 		CityName:                    peer.Location.CityName,
 		SerialNumber:                peer.Meta.SystemSerialNumber,
 		InactivityExpirationEnabled: peer.InactivityExpirationEnabled,
+		Ephemeral:                   peer.Ephemeral,
 	}
 }
 

management/server/peer.go

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) getUserAccessiblePeers(ctx context.Context, acc
 
 	// fetch all the peers that have access to the user's peers
 	for _, peer := range peers {
-		aclPeers, _ := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(ctx, peer.ID, approvedPeersMap)
+		aclPeers, _ := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(ctx, peer, approvedPeersMap)
 		for _, p := range aclPeers {
 			peersMap[p.ID] = p
 		}
@@ -1149,7 +1149,7 @@ func (am *DefaultAccountManager) checkIfUserOwnsPeer(ctx context.Context, accoun
 	}
 
 	for _, p := range userPeers {
-		aclPeers, _ := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(ctx, p.ID, approvedPeersMap)
+		aclPeers, _ := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(ctx, p, approvedPeersMap)
 		for _, aclPeer := range aclPeers {
 			if aclPeer.ID == peer.ID {
 				return peer, nil

management/server/policy_test.go

@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
 				ID:     "peerB",
 				IP:     net.ParseIP("100.65.80.39"),
 				Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
+				Meta:   nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{WtVersion: "0.48.0"},
 			},
 			"peerC": {
 				ID:     "peerC",
@@ -63,6 +64,12 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
 				IP:     net.ParseIP("100.65.31.2"),
 				Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
 			},
+			"peerK": {
+				ID:     "peerK",
+				IP:     net.ParseIP("100.32.80.1"),
+				Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
+				Meta:   nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{WtVersion: "0.30.0"},
+			},
 		},
 		Groups: map[string]*types.Group{
 			"GroupAll": {
@@ -111,6 +118,13 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
 					"peerI",
 				},
 			},
+			"GroupWorkflow": {
+				ID:   "GroupWorkflow",
+				Name: "workflow",
+				Peers: []string{
+					"peerK",
+				},
+			},
 		},
 		Policies: []*types.Policy{
 			{
@@ -189,6 +203,39 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
 					},
 				},
 			},
+			{
+				ID:          "RuleWorkflow",
+				Name:        "Workflow",
+				Description: "No description",
+				Enabled:     true,
+				Rules: []*types.PolicyRule{
+					{
+						ID:            "RuleWorkflow",
+						Name:          "Workflow",
+						Description:   "No description",
+						Bidirectional: true,
+						Enabled:       true,
+						Protocol:      types.PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
+						Action:        types.PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
+						PortRanges: []types.RulePortRange{
+							{
+								Start: 8088,
+								End:   8088,
+							},
+							{
+								Start: 9090,
+								End:   9095,
+							},
+						},
+						Sources: []string{
+							"GroupWorkflow",
+						},
+						Destinations: []string{
+							"GroupDMZ",
+						},
+					},
+				},
+			},
 		},
 	}
 
@@ -199,14 +246,14 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
 
 	t.Run("check that all peers get map", func(t *testing.T) {
 		for _, p := range account.Peers {
-			peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), p.ID, validatedPeers)
+			peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), p, validatedPeers)
-			assert.GreaterOrEqual(t, len(peers), 2, "minimum number peers should present")
+			assert.GreaterOrEqual(t, len(peers), 1, "minimum number peers should present")
-			assert.GreaterOrEqual(t, len(firewallRules), 2, "minimum number of firewall rules should present")
+			assert.GreaterOrEqual(t, len(firewallRules), 1, "minimum number of firewall rules should present")
 		}
 	})
 
 	t.Run("check first peer map details", func(t *testing.T) {
-		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", validatedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerB"], validatedPeers)
 		assert.Len(t, peers, 8)
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
@@ -364,6 +411,32 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
 			assert.True(t, contains, "rule not found in expected rules %#v", rule)
 		}
 	})
+
+	t.Run("check port ranges support for older peers", func(t *testing.T) {
+		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerK"], validatedPeers)
+		assert.Len(t, peers, 1)
+		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerI"])
+
+		expectedFirewallRules := []*types.FirewallRule{
+			{
+				PeerIP:    "100.65.31.2",
+				Direction: types.FirewallRuleDirectionIN,
+				Action:    "accept",
+				Protocol:  "tcp",
+				Port:      "8088",
+				PolicyID:  "RuleWorkflow",
+			},
+			{
+				PeerIP:    "100.65.31.2",
+				Direction: types.FirewallRuleDirectionOUT,
+				Action:    "accept",
+				Protocol:  "tcp",
+				Port:      "8088",
+				PolicyID:  "RuleWorkflow",
+			},
+		}
+		assert.ElementsMatch(t, firewallRules, expectedFirewallRules)
+	})
 }
 
 func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyDirect(t *testing.T) {
@@ -466,10 +539,10 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyDirect(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 
 	t.Run("check first peer map", func(t *testing.T) {
-		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerB"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
 
-		epectedFirewallRules := []*types.FirewallRule{
+		expectedFirewallRules := []*types.FirewallRule{
 			{
 				PeerIP:    "100.65.254.139",
 				Direction: types.FirewallRuleDirectionIN,
@@ -487,19 +560,19 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyDirect(t *testing.T) {
 				PolicyID:  "RuleSwarm",
 			},
 		}
-		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
+		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(expectedFirewallRules))
-		slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
+		slices.SortFunc(expectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
 		slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
 		for i := range firewallRules {
-			assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
+			assert.Equal(t, expectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
 		}
 	})
 
 	t.Run("check second peer map", func(t *testing.T) {
-		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerC", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerC"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerB"])
 
-		epectedFirewallRules := []*types.FirewallRule{
+		expectedFirewallRules := []*types.FirewallRule{
 			{
 				PeerIP:    "100.65.80.39",
 				Direction: types.FirewallRuleDirectionIN,
@@ -517,21 +590,21 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyDirect(t *testing.T) {
 				PolicyID:  "RuleSwarm",
 			},
 		}
-		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
+		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(expectedFirewallRules))
-		slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
+		slices.SortFunc(expectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
 		slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
 		for i := range firewallRules {
-			assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
+			assert.Equal(t, expectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
 		}
 	})
 
 	account.Policies[1].Rules[0].Bidirectional = false
 
 	t.Run("check first peer map directional only", func(t *testing.T) {
-		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerB"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
 
-		epectedFirewallRules := []*types.FirewallRule{
+		expectedFirewallRules := []*types.FirewallRule{
 			{
 				PeerIP:    "100.65.254.139",
 				Direction: types.FirewallRuleDirectionOUT,
@@ -541,19 +614,19 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyDirect(t *testing.T) {
 				PolicyID:  "RuleSwarm",
 			},
 		}
-		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
+		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(expectedFirewallRules))
-		slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
+		slices.SortFunc(expectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
 		slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
 		for i := range firewallRules {
-			assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
+			assert.Equal(t, expectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
 		}
 	})
 
 	t.Run("check second peer map directional only", func(t *testing.T) {
-		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerC", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerC"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerB"])
 
-		epectedFirewallRules := []*types.FirewallRule{
+		expectedFirewallRules := []*types.FirewallRule{
 			{
 				PeerIP:    "100.65.80.39",
 				Direction: types.FirewallRuleDirectionIN,
@@ -563,11 +636,11 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyDirect(t *testing.T) {
 				PolicyID:  "RuleSwarm",
 			},
 		}
-		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
+		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(expectedFirewallRules))
-		slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
+		slices.SortFunc(expectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
 		slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
 		for i := range firewallRules {
-			assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
+			assert.Equal(t, expectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
 		}
 	})
 }
@@ -748,7 +821,7 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
 	t.Run("verify peer's network map with default group peer list", func(t *testing.T) {
 		// peerB doesn't fulfill the NB posture check but is included in the destination group Swarm,
 		// will establish a connection with all source peers satisfying the NB posture check.
-		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerB"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Len(t, peers, 4)
 		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 4)
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
@@ -758,7 +831,7 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
 
 		// peerC satisfy the NB posture check, should establish connection to all destination group peer's
 		// We expect a single permissive firewall rule which all outgoing connections
-		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerC", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerC"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Len(t, peers, len(account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers))
 		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 1)
 		expectedFirewallRules := []*types.FirewallRule{
@@ -775,7 +848,7 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
 
 		// peerE doesn't fulfill the NB posture check and exists in only destination group Swarm,
 		// all source group peers satisfying the NB posture check should establish connection
-		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerE", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerE"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Len(t, peers, 4)
 		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 4)
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
@@ -785,7 +858,7 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
 
 		// peerI doesn't fulfill the OS version posture check and exists in only destination group Swarm,
 		// all source group peers satisfying the NB posture check should establish connection
-		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerI", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerI"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Len(t, peers, 4)
 		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 4)
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
@@ -800,19 +873,19 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
 
 		// peerB doesn't satisfy the NB posture check, and doesn't exist in destination group peer's
 		// no connection should be established to any peer of destination group
-		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules := account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerB"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Len(t, peers, 0)
 		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 0)
 
 		// peerI doesn't satisfy the OS version posture check, and doesn't exist in destination group peer's
 		// no connection should be established to any peer of destination group
-		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerI", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerI"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Len(t, peers, 0)
 		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 0)
 
 		// peerC satisfy the NB posture check, should establish connection to all destination group peer's
 		// We expect a single permissive firewall rule which all outgoing connections
-		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerC", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerC"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Len(t, peers, len(account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers))
 		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers))
 
@@ -827,14 +900,14 @@ func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
 
 		// peerE doesn't fulfill the NB posture check and exists in only destination group Swarm,
 		// all source group peers satisfying the NB posture check should establish connection
-		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerE", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerE"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Len(t, peers, 3)
 		assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 3)
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
 
-		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerA", approvedPeers)
+		peers, firewallRules = account.GetPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), account.Peers["peerA"], approvedPeers)
 		assert.Len(t, peers, 5)
 		// assert peers from Group Swarm
 		assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])

management/server/posture/nb_version.go

@@ -24,20 +24,12 @@ func sanitizeVersion(version string) string {
 }
 
 func (n *NBVersionCheck) Check(ctx context.Context, peer nbpeer.Peer) (bool, error) {
-	peerVersion := sanitizeVersion(peer.Meta.WtVersion)
+	meetsMin, err := MeetsMinVersion(n.MinVersion, peer.Meta.WtVersion)
-	minVersion := sanitizeVersion(n.MinVersion)
-
-	peerNBVersion, err := version.NewVersion(peerVersion)
 	if err != nil {
 		return false, err
 	}
 
-	constraints, err := version.NewConstraint(">= " + minVersion)
+	if meetsMin {
-	if err != nil {
-		return false, err
-	}
-
-	if constraints.Check(peerNBVersion) {
 		return true, nil
 	}
 
@@ -60,3 +52,21 @@ func (n *NBVersionCheck) Validate() error {
 	}
 	return nil
 }
+
+// MeetsMinVersion checks if the peer's version meets or exceeds the minimum required version
+func MeetsMinVersion(minVer, peerVer string) (bool, error) {
+	peerVer = sanitizeVersion(peerVer)
+	minVer = sanitizeVersion(minVer)
+
+	peerNBVer, err := version.NewVersion(peerVer)
+	if err != nil {
+		return false, err
+	}
+
+	constraints, err := version.NewConstraint(">= " + minVer)
+	if err != nil {
+		return false, err
+	}
+
+	return constraints.Check(peerNBVer), nil
+}

management/server/posture/nb_version_test.go

@@ -139,3 +139,68 @@ func TestNBVersionCheck_Validate(t *testing.T) {
 		})
 	}
 }
+
+func TestMeetsMinVersion(t *testing.T) {
+	tests := []struct {
+		name    string
+		minVer  string
+		peerVer string
+		want    bool
+		wantErr bool
+	}{
+		{
+			name:    "Peer version greater than min version",
+			minVer:  "0.26.0",
+			peerVer: "0.60.1",
+			want:    true,
+			wantErr: false,
+		},
+		{
+			name:    "Peer version equals min version",
+			minVer:  "1.0.0",
+			peerVer: "1.0.0",
+			want:    true,
+			wantErr: false,
+		},
+		{
+			name:    "Peer version less than min version",
+			minVer:  "1.0.0",
+			peerVer: "0.9.9",
+			want:    false,
+			wantErr: false,
+		},
+		{
+			name:    "Peer version with pre-release tag greater than min version",
+			minVer:  "1.0.0",
+			peerVer: "1.0.1-alpha",
+			want:    true,
+			wantErr: false,
+		},
+		{
+			name:    "Invalid peer version format",
+			minVer:  "1.0.0",
+			peerVer: "dev",
+			want:    false,
+			wantErr: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name:    "Invalid min version format",
+			minVer:  "invalid.version",
+			peerVer: "1.0.0",
+			want:    false,
+			wantErr: true,
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			got, err := MeetsMinVersion(tt.minVer, tt.peerVer)
+			if tt.wantErr {
+				assert.Error(t, err)
+			} else {
+				assert.NoError(t, err)
+			}
+			assert.Equal(t, tt.want, got)
+		})
+	}
+}

management/server/types/account.go

@@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ const (
 	PublicCategory  = "public"
 	PrivateCategory = "private"
 	UnknownCategory = "unknown"
+
+	// firewallRuleMinPortRangesVer defines the minimum peer version that supports port range rules.
+	firewallRuleMinPortRangesVer = "0.48.0"
 )
 
 type LookupMap map[string]struct{}
@@ -248,7 +251,7 @@ func (a *Account) GetPeerNetworkMap(
 		}
 	}
 
-	aclPeers, firewallRules := a.GetPeerConnectionResources(ctx, peerID, validatedPeersMap)
+	aclPeers, firewallRules := a.GetPeerConnectionResources(ctx, peer, validatedPeersMap)
 	// exclude expired peers
 	var peersToConnect []*nbpeer.Peer
 	var expiredPeers []*nbpeer.Peer
@@ -961,8 +964,9 @@ func (a *Account) UserGroupsRemoveFromPeers(userID string, groups ...string) map
 // GetPeerConnectionResources for a given peer
 //
 // This function returns the list of peers and firewall rules that are applicable to a given peer.
-func (a *Account) GetPeerConnectionResources(ctx context.Context, peerID string, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}) ([]*nbpeer.Peer, []*FirewallRule) {
+func (a *Account) GetPeerConnectionResources(ctx context.Context, peer *nbpeer.Peer, validatedPeersMap map[string]struct{}) ([]*nbpeer.Peer, []*FirewallRule) {
-	generateResources, getAccumulatedResources := a.connResourcesGenerator(ctx)
+	generateResources, getAccumulatedResources := a.connResourcesGenerator(ctx, peer)
+
 	for _, policy := range a.Policies {
 		if !policy.Enabled {
 			continue
@@ -973,8 +977,8 @@ func (a *Account) GetPeerConnectionResources(ctx context.Context, peerID string,
 				continue
 			}
 
-			sourcePeers, peerInSources := a.getAllPeersFromGroups(ctx, rule.Sources, peerID, policy.SourcePostureChecks, validatedPeersMap)
+			sourcePeers, peerInSources := a.getAllPeersFromGroups(ctx, rule.Sources, peer.ID, policy.SourcePostureChecks, validatedPeersMap)
-			destinationPeers, peerInDestinations := a.getAllPeersFromGroups(ctx, rule.Destinations, peerID, nil, validatedPeersMap)
+			destinationPeers, peerInDestinations := a.getAllPeersFromGroups(ctx, rule.Destinations, peer.ID, nil, validatedPeersMap)
 
 			if rule.Bidirectional {
 				if peerInSources {
@@ -1003,7 +1007,7 @@ func (a *Account) GetPeerConnectionResources(ctx context.Context, peerID string,
 // The generator function is used to generate the list of peers and firewall rules that are applicable to a given peer.
 // It safe to call the generator function multiple times for same peer and different rules no duplicates will be
 // generated. The accumulator function returns the result of all the generator calls.
-func (a *Account) connResourcesGenerator(ctx context.Context) (func(*PolicyRule, []*nbpeer.Peer, int), func() ([]*nbpeer.Peer, []*FirewallRule)) {
+func (a *Account) connResourcesGenerator(ctx context.Context, targetPeer *nbpeer.Peer) (func(*PolicyRule, []*nbpeer.Peer, int), func() ([]*nbpeer.Peer, []*FirewallRule)) {
 	rulesExists := make(map[string]struct{})
 	peersExists := make(map[string]struct{})
 	rules := make([]*FirewallRule, 0)
@@ -1051,17 +1055,7 @@ func (a *Account) connResourcesGenerator(ctx context.Context) (func(*PolicyRule,
 					continue
 				}
 
-				for _, port := range rule.Ports {
+				rules = append(rules, expandPortsAndRanges(fr, rule, targetPeer)...)
-					pr := fr // clone rule and add set new port
-					pr.Port = port
-					rules = append(rules, &pr)
-				}
-
-				for _, portRange := range rule.PortRanges {
-					pr := fr
-					pr.PortRange = portRange
-					rules = append(rules, &pr)
-				}
 			}
 		}, func() ([]*nbpeer.Peer, []*FirewallRule) {
 			return peers, rules
@@ -1590,3 +1584,45 @@ func (a *Account) AddAllGroup() error {
 	}
 	return nil
 }
+
+// expandPortsAndRanges expands Ports and PortRanges of a rule into individual firewall rules
+func expandPortsAndRanges(base FirewallRule, rule *PolicyRule, peer *nbpeer.Peer) []*FirewallRule {
+	var expanded []*FirewallRule
+
+	if len(rule.Ports) > 0 {
+		for _, port := range rule.Ports {
+			fr := base
+			fr.Port = port
+			expanded = append(expanded, &fr)
+		}
+		return expanded
+	}
+
+	supportPortRanges := peerSupportsPortRanges(peer.Meta.WtVersion)
+	for _, portRange := range rule.PortRanges {
+		fr := base
+
+		if supportPortRanges {
+			fr.PortRange = portRange
+		} else {
+			// Peer doesn't support port ranges, only allow single-port ranges
+			if portRange.Start != portRange.End {
+				continue
+			}
+			fr.Port = strconv.FormatUint(uint64(portRange.Start), 10)
+		}
+		expanded = append(expanded, &fr)
+	}
+
+	return expanded
+}
+
+// peerSupportsPortRanges checks if the peer version supports port ranges.
+func peerSupportsPortRanges(peerVer string) bool {
+	if strings.Contains(peerVer, "dev") {
+		return true
+	}
+
+	meetMinVer, err := posture.MeetsMinVersion(firewallRuleMinPortRangesVer, peerVer)
+	return err == nil && meetMinVer
+}

management/server/types/firewall_rule.go

@@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ func generateRouteFirewallRules(ctx context.Context, route *nbroute.Route, rule
 		rules = append(rules, generateRulesWithPortRanges(baseRule, rule, rulesExists)...)
 	} else {
 		rules = append(rules, generateRulesWithPorts(ctx, baseRule, rule, rulesExists)...)
-
 	}
 
 	// TODO: generate IPv6 rules for dynamic routes