mirror of
https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird.git
synced 2024-11-25 17:43:38 +01:00
7bda385e1b
* Skip peer update on unchanged network map (#2236) * Enhance network updates by skipping unchanged messages Optimizes the network update process by skipping updates where no changes in the peer update message received. * Add unit tests * add locks * Improve concurrency and update peer message handling * Refactor account manager network update tests * fix test * Fix inverted network map update condition * Add default group and policy to test data * Run peer updates in a separate goroutine * Refactor * Refactor lock * Fix peers update by including NetworkMap and posture Checks * go mod tidy * fix merge Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix merge Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * [management] Skip account peers update if no changes affect peers (#2310) * Remove incrementing network serial and updating peers after group deletion * Update account peer if posture check is linked to policy * Remove account peers update on saving setup key * Refactor group link checking into re-usable functions * Add HasPeers function to group * Refactor group management * Optimize group change effects on account peers * Update account peers if ns group has peers * Refactor group changes * Optimize account peers update in DNS settings * Optimize update of account peers on jwt groups sync * Refactor peer account updates for efficiency * Optimize peer update on user deletion and changes * Remove condition check for network serial update * Optimize account peers updates on route changes * Remove UpdatePeerSSHKey method * Remove unused isPolicyRuleGroupsEmpty * Add tests for peer update behavior on posture check changes * Add tests for peer update behavior on policy changes * Add tests for peer update behavior on group changes * Add tests for peer update behavior on dns settings changes * Refactor * Add tests for peer update behavior on name server changes * Add tests for peer update behavior on user changes * Add tests for peer update behavior on route changes * fix tests * Add tests for peer update behavior on setup key changes * Add tests for peer update behavior on peers changes * fix merge * Fix tests * go mod tidy * Add NameServer and Route comparators * Update network map diff logic with custom comparators * Add tests * Refactor duplicate diff handling logic * fix linter * fix tests * Refactor policy group handling and update logic. Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * Update route check by checking if group has peers Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * Refactor posture check policy linking logic Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * Simplify peer update condition in DNS management Refactor the condition for updating account peers to remove redundant checks Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix merge Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * add policy tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * add posture checks tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix user and setup key tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix account and route tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix typo Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix nameserver tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix routes tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix group tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * upgrade diff package Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix nameserver tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * use generic differ for netip.Addr and netip.Prefix Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * go mod tidy Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * add peer tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix merge Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix management suite tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * fix postgres tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * enable diff nil structs comparison Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * skip the update only last sent the serial is larger Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * refactor peer and user Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * skip spell check for groupD Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * Refactor group, ns group, policy and posture checks Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * skip spell check for GroupD Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * update account policy check before verifying policy status Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * Update management/server/route_test.go Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com> * Update management/server/route_test.go Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com> * Update management/server/route_test.go Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com> * Update management/server/route_test.go Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com> * Update management/server/route_test.go Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com> * add tests missing tests for dns setting groups Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * add tests for posture checks changes Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * add ns group and policy tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * add route and group tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * increase Linux test timeout to 10 minutes Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * Run diff for client posture checks only Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * add panic recovery and detailed logging in peer update comparison Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> * Fix tests Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com>
1201 lines
32 KiB
Go
1201 lines
32 KiB
Go
package server
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"net"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/rs/xid"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
"golang.org/x/exp/slices"
|
|
|
|
nbgroup "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/group"
|
|
nbpeer "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/peer"
|
|
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/posture"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|
account := &Account{
|
|
Peers: map[string]*nbpeer.Peer{
|
|
"peerA": {
|
|
ID: "peerA",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.14.88"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerB": {
|
|
ID: "peerB",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.80.39"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerC": {
|
|
ID: "peerC",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.254.139"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerD": {
|
|
ID: "peerD",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.62.5"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerE": {
|
|
ID: "peerE",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.32.206"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerF": {
|
|
ID: "peerF",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.250.202"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerG": {
|
|
ID: "peerG",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.13.186"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerH": {
|
|
ID: "peerH",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.29.55"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
Groups: map[string]*nbgroup.Group{
|
|
"GroupAll": {
|
|
ID: "GroupAll",
|
|
Name: "All",
|
|
Peers: []string{
|
|
"peerB",
|
|
"peerA",
|
|
"peerD",
|
|
"peerC",
|
|
"peerE",
|
|
"peerF",
|
|
"peerG",
|
|
"peerH",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"GroupSwarm": {
|
|
ID: "GroupSwarm",
|
|
Name: "swarm",
|
|
Peers: []string{
|
|
"peerB",
|
|
"peerA",
|
|
"peerD",
|
|
"peerE",
|
|
"peerG",
|
|
"peerH",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
Policies: []*Policy{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "RuleDefault",
|
|
Name: "Default",
|
|
Description: "This is a default rule that allows connections between all the resources",
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "RuleDefault",
|
|
Name: "Default",
|
|
Description: "This is a default rule that allows connections between all the resources",
|
|
Bidirectional: true,
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolALL,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
Sources: []string{
|
|
"GroupAll",
|
|
},
|
|
Destinations: []string{
|
|
"GroupAll",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "RuleSwarm",
|
|
Name: "Swarm",
|
|
Description: "No description",
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "RuleSwarm",
|
|
Name: "Swarm",
|
|
Description: "No description",
|
|
Bidirectional: true,
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolALL,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
Sources: []string{
|
|
"GroupSwarm",
|
|
"GroupAll",
|
|
},
|
|
Destinations: []string{
|
|
"GroupSwarm",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
validatedPeers := make(map[string]struct{})
|
|
for p := range account.Peers {
|
|
validatedPeers[p] = struct{}{}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
t.Run("check that all peers get map", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
for _, p := range account.Peers {
|
|
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), p.ID, validatedPeers)
|
|
assert.GreaterOrEqual(t, len(peers), 2, "minimum number peers should present")
|
|
assert.GreaterOrEqual(t, len(firewallRules), 2, "minimum number of firewall rules should present")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("check first peer map details", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", validatedPeers)
|
|
assert.Len(t, peers, 7)
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerE"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerF"])
|
|
|
|
epectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "0.0.0.0",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "0.0.0.0",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.14.88",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.14.88",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.254.139",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.254.139",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.62.5",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.62.5",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.32.206",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.32.206",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.250.202",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.250.202",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.13.186",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.13.186",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.29.55",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.29.55",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
|
|
slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
|
|
slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
|
|
for i := range firewallRules {
|
|
assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyDirect(t *testing.T) {
|
|
account := &Account{
|
|
Peers: map[string]*nbpeer.Peer{
|
|
"peerA": {
|
|
ID: "peerA",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.14.88"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerB": {
|
|
ID: "peerB",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.80.39"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerC": {
|
|
ID: "peerC",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.254.139"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
Groups: map[string]*nbgroup.Group{
|
|
"GroupAll": {
|
|
ID: "GroupAll",
|
|
Name: "All",
|
|
Peers: []string{
|
|
"peerB",
|
|
"peerA",
|
|
"peerC",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"GroupSwarm": {
|
|
ID: "GroupSwarm",
|
|
Name: "swarm",
|
|
Peers: []string{
|
|
"peerB",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerF": {
|
|
ID: "peerF",
|
|
Name: "dmz",
|
|
Peers: []string{
|
|
"peerC",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
Policies: []*Policy{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "RuleDefault",
|
|
Name: "Default",
|
|
Description: "This is a default rule that allows connections between all the resources",
|
|
Enabled: false,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "RuleDefault",
|
|
Name: "Default",
|
|
Description: "This is a default rule that allows connections between all the resources",
|
|
Bidirectional: true,
|
|
Enabled: false,
|
|
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolALL,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
Sources: []string{
|
|
"GroupAll",
|
|
},
|
|
Destinations: []string{
|
|
"GroupAll",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "RuleSwarm",
|
|
Name: "Swarm",
|
|
Description: "No description",
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "RuleSwarm",
|
|
Name: "Swarm",
|
|
Description: "No description",
|
|
Bidirectional: true,
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolALL,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
Sources: []string{
|
|
"GroupSwarm",
|
|
},
|
|
Destinations: []string{
|
|
"peerF",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
approvedPeers := make(map[string]struct{})
|
|
for p := range account.Peers {
|
|
approvedPeers[p] = struct{}{}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
t.Run("check first peer map", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
|
|
|
|
epectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.254.139",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.254.139",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
|
|
slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
|
|
slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
|
|
for i := range firewallRules {
|
|
assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("check second peer map", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerC", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerB"])
|
|
|
|
epectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.80.39",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.80.39",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
|
|
slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
|
|
slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
|
|
for i := range firewallRules {
|
|
assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
account.Policies[1].Rules[0].Bidirectional = false
|
|
|
|
t.Run("check first peer map directional only", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
|
|
|
|
epectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.254.139",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
|
|
slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
|
|
slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
|
|
for i := range firewallRules {
|
|
assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("check second peer map directional only", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerC", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerB"])
|
|
|
|
epectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.80.39",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "all",
|
|
Port: "",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
|
|
slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
|
|
slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
|
|
for i := range firewallRules {
|
|
assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
|
|
account := &Account{
|
|
Peers: map[string]*nbpeer.Peer{
|
|
"peerA": {
|
|
ID: "peerA",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.14.88"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
|
|
GoOS: "linux",
|
|
KernelVersion: "6.6.7",
|
|
WtVersion: "0.25.9",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerB": {
|
|
ID: "peerB",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.80.39"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
|
|
GoOS: "linux",
|
|
KernelVersion: "6.6.1",
|
|
WtVersion: "0.23.0",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerC": {
|
|
ID: "peerC",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.254.139"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
|
|
GoOS: "linux",
|
|
KernelVersion: "6.6.1",
|
|
WtVersion: "0.25.8",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerD": {
|
|
ID: "peerD",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.62.5"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
|
|
GoOS: "linux",
|
|
KernelVersion: "6.6.0",
|
|
WtVersion: "0.25.9",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerE": {
|
|
ID: "peerE",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.32.206"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
|
|
GoOS: "linux",
|
|
KernelVersion: "6.6.1",
|
|
WtVersion: "0.24.0",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerF": {
|
|
ID: "peerF",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.250.202"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
|
|
GoOS: "linux",
|
|
KernelVersion: "6.6.1",
|
|
WtVersion: "0.25.9",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerG": {
|
|
ID: "peerG",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.13.186"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
|
|
GoOS: "linux",
|
|
KernelVersion: "6.6.1",
|
|
WtVersion: "0.23.2",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerH": {
|
|
ID: "peerH",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.29.55"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
|
|
GoOS: "linux",
|
|
KernelVersion: "6.6.1",
|
|
WtVersion: "0.23.1",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"peerI": {
|
|
ID: "peerI",
|
|
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.21.56"),
|
|
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
|
|
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
|
|
GoOS: "windows",
|
|
KernelVersion: "10.0.14393.2430",
|
|
WtVersion: "0.25.1",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
Groups: map[string]*nbgroup.Group{
|
|
"GroupAll": {
|
|
ID: "GroupAll",
|
|
Name: "All",
|
|
Peers: []string{
|
|
"peerB",
|
|
"peerA",
|
|
"peerD",
|
|
"peerC",
|
|
"peerF",
|
|
"peerG",
|
|
"peerH",
|
|
"peerI",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"GroupSwarm": {
|
|
ID: "GroupSwarm",
|
|
Name: "swarm",
|
|
Peers: []string{
|
|
"peerB",
|
|
"peerA",
|
|
"peerD",
|
|
"peerE",
|
|
"peerG",
|
|
"peerH",
|
|
"peerI",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
PostureChecks: []*posture.Checks{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "PostureChecksDefault",
|
|
Name: "Default",
|
|
Description: "This is a posture checks that check if peer is running required versions",
|
|
Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
|
|
NBVersionCheck: &posture.NBVersionCheck{
|
|
MinVersion: "0.25",
|
|
},
|
|
OSVersionCheck: &posture.OSVersionCheck{
|
|
Linux: &posture.MinKernelVersionCheck{
|
|
MinKernelVersion: "6.6.0",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
account.Policies = append(account.Policies, &Policy{
|
|
ID: "PolicyPostureChecks",
|
|
Name: "",
|
|
Description: "This is the policy with posture checks applied",
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "RuleSwarm",
|
|
Name: "Swarm",
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
Destinations: []string{
|
|
"GroupSwarm",
|
|
},
|
|
Sources: []string{
|
|
"GroupAll",
|
|
},
|
|
Bidirectional: false,
|
|
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
|
|
Ports: []string{"80"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
SourcePostureChecks: []string{
|
|
"PostureChecksDefault",
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
approvedPeers := make(map[string]struct{})
|
|
for p := range account.Peers {
|
|
approvedPeers[p] = struct{}{}
|
|
}
|
|
t.Run("verify peer's network map with default group peer list", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// peerB doesn't fulfill the NB posture check but is included in the destination group Swarm,
|
|
// will establish a connection with all source peers satisfying the NB posture check.
|
|
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Len(t, peers, 4)
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 4)
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerF"])
|
|
|
|
// peerC satisfy the NB posture check, should establish connection to all destination group peer's
|
|
// We expect a single permissive firewall rule which all outgoing connections
|
|
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerC", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Len(t, peers, len(account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers))
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 1)
|
|
expectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "0.0.0.0",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "tcp",
|
|
Port: "80",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
assert.ElementsMatch(t, firewallRules, expectedFirewallRules)
|
|
|
|
// peerE doesn't fulfill the NB posture check and exists in only destination group Swarm,
|
|
// all source group peers satisfying the NB posture check should establish connection
|
|
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerE", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Len(t, peers, 4)
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 4)
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerF"])
|
|
|
|
// peerI doesn't fulfill the OS version posture check and exists in only destination group Swarm,
|
|
// all source group peers satisfying the NB posture check should establish connection
|
|
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerI", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Len(t, peers, 4)
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 4)
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerF"])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("verify peer's network map with modified group peer list", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Removing peerB as the part of destination group Swarm
|
|
account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers = []string{"peerA", "peerD", "peerE", "peerG", "peerH"}
|
|
|
|
// peerB doesn't satisfy the NB posture check, and doesn't exist in destination group peer's
|
|
// no connection should be established to any peer of destination group
|
|
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Len(t, peers, 0)
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 0)
|
|
|
|
// peerI doesn't satisfy the OS version posture check, and doesn't exist in destination group peer's
|
|
// no connection should be established to any peer of destination group
|
|
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerI", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Len(t, peers, 0)
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 0)
|
|
|
|
// peerC satisfy the NB posture check, should establish connection to all destination group peer's
|
|
// We expect a single permissive firewall rule which all outgoing connections
|
|
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerC", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Len(t, peers, len(account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers))
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers))
|
|
|
|
peerIDs := make([]string, 0, len(peers))
|
|
for _, peer := range peers {
|
|
peerIDs = append(peerIDs, peer.ID)
|
|
}
|
|
assert.ElementsMatch(t, peerIDs, account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers)
|
|
|
|
// Removing peerF as the part of source group All
|
|
account.Groups["GroupAll"].Peers = []string{"peerB", "peerA", "peerD", "peerC", "peerG", "peerH"}
|
|
|
|
// peerE doesn't fulfill the NB posture check and exists in only destination group Swarm,
|
|
// all source group peers satisfying the NB posture check should establish connection
|
|
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerE", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Len(t, peers, 3)
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 3)
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
|
|
|
|
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerA", approvedPeers)
|
|
assert.Len(t, peers, 5)
|
|
// assert peers from Group Swarm
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerE"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerG"])
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerH"])
|
|
|
|
// assert peers from Group All
|
|
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
|
|
|
|
expectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.62.5",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "tcp",
|
|
Port: "80",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.32.206",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "tcp",
|
|
Port: "80",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.13.186",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "tcp",
|
|
Port: "80",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.29.55",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "tcp",
|
|
Port: "80",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.254.139",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "tcp",
|
|
Port: "80",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
PeerIP: "100.65.62.5",
|
|
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Protocol: "tcp",
|
|
Port: "80",
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(expectedFirewallRules))
|
|
assert.ElementsMatch(t, firewallRules, expectedFirewallRules)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func sortFunc() func(a *FirewallRule, b *FirewallRule) int {
|
|
return func(a, b *FirewallRule) int {
|
|
// Concatenate PeerIP and Direction as string for comparison
|
|
aStr := a.PeerIP + fmt.Sprintf("%d", a.Direction)
|
|
bStr := b.PeerIP + fmt.Sprintf("%d", b.Direction)
|
|
|
|
// Compare the concatenated strings
|
|
if aStr < bStr {
|
|
return -1 // a is less than b
|
|
}
|
|
if aStr > bStr {
|
|
return 1 // a is greater than b
|
|
}
|
|
return 0 // a is equal to b
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestPolicyAccountPeersUpdate(t *testing.T) {
|
|
manager, account, peer1, peer2, peer3 := setupNetworkMapTest(t)
|
|
|
|
err := manager.SaveGroups(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, []*nbgroup.Group{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "groupA",
|
|
Name: "GroupA",
|
|
Peers: []string{peer1.ID, peer3.ID},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "groupB",
|
|
Name: "GroupB",
|
|
Peers: []string{},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "groupC",
|
|
Name: "GroupC",
|
|
Peers: []string{},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ID: "groupD",
|
|
Name: "GroupD",
|
|
Peers: []string{peer1.ID, peer2.ID},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
updMsg1 := manager.peersUpdateManager.CreateChannel(context.Background(), peer1.ID)
|
|
t.Cleanup(func() {
|
|
manager.peersUpdateManager.CloseChannel(context.Background(), peer1.ID)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
updMsg2 := manager.peersUpdateManager.CreateChannel(context.Background(), peer2.ID)
|
|
t.Cleanup(func() {
|
|
manager.peersUpdateManager.CloseChannel(context.Background(), peer2.ID)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Saving policy with rule groups with no peers should not update account's peers and not send peer update
|
|
t.Run("saving policy with rule groups with no peers", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
policy := Policy{
|
|
ID: "policy-rule-groups-no-peers",
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: xid.New().String(),
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Sources: []string{"groupB"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"groupC"},
|
|
Bidirectional: true,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
done := make(chan struct{})
|
|
go func() {
|
|
peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
|
|
close(done)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, false)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Saving policy with source group containing peers, but destination group without peers should
|
|
// update account's peers and send peer update
|
|
t.Run("saving policy where source has peers but destination does not", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
policy := Policy{
|
|
ID: "policy-source-has-peers-destination-none",
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: xid.New().String(),
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Sources: []string{"groupA"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"groupB"},
|
|
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
|
|
Bidirectional: true,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
done := make(chan struct{})
|
|
go func() {
|
|
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
|
|
close(done)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, false)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Saving policy with destination group containing peers, but source group without peers should
|
|
// update account's peers and send peer update
|
|
t.Run("saving policy where destination has peers but source does not", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
policy := Policy{
|
|
ID: "policy-destination-has-peers-source-none",
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: xid.New().String(),
|
|
Enabled: false,
|
|
Sources: []string{"groupC"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"groupD"},
|
|
Bidirectional: true,
|
|
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
done := make(chan struct{})
|
|
go func() {
|
|
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg2)
|
|
close(done)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, false)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Saving policy with destination and source groups containing peers should update account's peers
|
|
// and send peer update
|
|
t.Run("saving policy with source and destination groups with peers", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
policy := Policy{
|
|
ID: "policy-source-destination-peers",
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: xid.New().String(),
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Sources: []string{"groupA"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"groupD"},
|
|
Bidirectional: true,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
done := make(chan struct{})
|
|
go func() {
|
|
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
|
|
close(done)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, false)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Disabling policy with destination and source groups containing peers should update account's peers
|
|
// and send peer update
|
|
t.Run("disabling policy with source and destination groups with peers", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
policy := Policy{
|
|
ID: "policy-source-destination-peers",
|
|
Enabled: false,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: xid.New().String(),
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Sources: []string{"groupA"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"groupD"},
|
|
Bidirectional: true,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
done := make(chan struct{})
|
|
go func() {
|
|
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
|
|
close(done)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, true)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Updating disabled policy with destination and source groups containing peers should not update account's peers
|
|
// or send peer update
|
|
t.Run("updating disabled policy with source and destination groups with peers", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
policy := Policy{
|
|
ID: "policy-source-destination-peers",
|
|
Description: "updated description",
|
|
Enabled: false,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: xid.New().String(),
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Sources: []string{"groupA"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"groupA"},
|
|
Bidirectional: true,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
done := make(chan struct{})
|
|
go func() {
|
|
peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
|
|
close(done)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, true)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Enabling policy with destination and source groups containing peers should update account's peers
|
|
// and send peer update
|
|
t.Run("enabling policy with source and destination groups with peers", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
policy := Policy{
|
|
ID: "policy-source-destination-peers",
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: xid.New().String(),
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Sources: []string{"groupA"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"groupD"},
|
|
Bidirectional: true,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
done := make(chan struct{})
|
|
go func() {
|
|
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
|
|
close(done)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, true)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Saving unchanged policy should trigger account peers update but not send peer update
|
|
t.Run("saving unchanged policy", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
policy := Policy{
|
|
ID: "policy-source-destination-peers",
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
|
|
{
|
|
ID: xid.New().String(),
|
|
Enabled: true,
|
|
Sources: []string{"groupA"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"groupD"},
|
|
Bidirectional: true,
|
|
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
done := make(chan struct{})
|
|
go func() {
|
|
peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
|
|
close(done)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, true)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Deleting policy should trigger account peers update and send peer update
|
|
t.Run("deleting policy with source and destination groups with peers", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
policyID := "policy-source-destination-peers"
|
|
|
|
done := make(chan struct{})
|
|
go func() {
|
|
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
|
|
close(done)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
err := manager.DeletePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, policyID, userID)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Deleting policy with destination group containing peers, but source group without peers should
|
|
// update account's peers and send peer update
|
|
t.Run("deleting policy where destination has peers but source does not", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
policyID := "policy-destination-has-peers-source-none"
|
|
done := make(chan struct{})
|
|
go func() {
|
|
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg2)
|
|
close(done)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
err := manager.DeletePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, policyID, userID)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Deleting policy with no peers in groups should not update account's peers and not send peer update
|
|
t.Run("deleting policy with no peers in groups", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
policyID := "policy-rule-groups-no-peers" // Deleting the policy created in Case 2
|
|
done := make(chan struct{})
|
|
go func() {
|
|
peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
|
|
close(done)
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
err := manager.DeletePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, policyID, userID)
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate")
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|