netbird/management/server/policy_test.go
Bethuel Mmbaga 7bda385e1b
[management] Optimize network map updates (#2718)
* Skip peer update on unchanged network map (#2236)

* Enhance network updates by skipping unchanged messages

Optimizes the network update process
by skipping updates where no changes in the peer update message received.

* Add unit tests

* add locks

* Improve concurrency and update peer message handling

* Refactor account manager network update tests

* fix test

* Fix inverted network map update condition

* Add default group and policy to test data

* Run peer updates in a separate goroutine

* Refactor

* Refactor lock

* Fix peers update by including NetworkMap and posture Checks

* go mod tidy

* fix merge

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix merge

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* [management] Skip account peers update if no changes affect peers (#2310)

* Remove incrementing network serial and updating peers after group deletion

* Update account peer if posture check is linked to policy

* Remove account peers update on saving setup key

* Refactor group link checking into re-usable functions

* Add HasPeers function to group

* Refactor group management

* Optimize group change effects on account peers

* Update account peers if ns group has peers

* Refactor group changes

* Optimize account peers update in DNS settings

* Optimize update of account peers on jwt groups sync

* Refactor peer account updates for efficiency

* Optimize peer update on user deletion and changes

* Remove condition check for network serial update

* Optimize account peers updates on route changes

* Remove UpdatePeerSSHKey method

* Remove unused isPolicyRuleGroupsEmpty

* Add tests for peer update behavior on posture check changes

* Add tests for peer update behavior on policy changes

* Add tests for peer update behavior on group changes

* Add tests for peer update behavior on dns settings changes

* Refactor

* Add tests for peer update behavior on name server changes

* Add tests for peer update behavior on user changes

* Add tests for peer update behavior on route changes

* fix tests

* Add tests for peer update behavior on setup key changes

* Add tests for peer update behavior on peers changes

* fix merge

* Fix tests

* go mod tidy

* Add NameServer and Route comparators

* Update network map diff logic with custom comparators

* Add tests

* Refactor duplicate diff handling logic

* fix linter

* fix tests

* Refactor policy group handling and update logic.

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* Update route check by checking if group has peers

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* Refactor posture check policy linking logic

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* Simplify peer update condition in DNS management

Refactor the condition for updating account peers to remove redundant checks

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix merge

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* add policy tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* add posture checks tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix user and setup key tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix account and route tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix typo

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix nameserver tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix routes tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix group tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* upgrade diff package

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix nameserver tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* use generic differ for netip.Addr and netip.Prefix

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* go mod tidy

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* add peer tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix merge

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix management suite tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* fix postgres tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* enable diff nil structs comparison

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* skip the update only last sent the serial is larger

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* refactor peer and user

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* skip spell check for groupD

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* Refactor group, ns group, policy and posture checks

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* skip spell check for GroupD

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* update account policy check before verifying policy status

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* Update management/server/route_test.go

Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com>

* Update management/server/route_test.go

Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com>

* Update management/server/route_test.go

Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com>

* Update management/server/route_test.go

Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com>

* Update management/server/route_test.go

Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com>

* add tests missing tests for dns setting groups

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* add tests for posture checks changes

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* add ns group and policy tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* add route and group tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* increase Linux test timeout to 10 minutes

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* Run diff for client posture checks only

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* add panic recovery and detailed logging in peer update comparison

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

* Fix tests

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: bcmmbaga <bethuelmbaga12@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maycon Santos <mlsmaycon@gmail.com>
2024-10-23 13:05:02 +03:00

1201 lines
32 KiB
Go

package server
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"net"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/rs/xid"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"golang.org/x/exp/slices"
nbgroup "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/group"
nbpeer "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/peer"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/server/posture"
)
func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicy(t *testing.T) {
account := &Account{
Peers: map[string]*nbpeer.Peer{
"peerA": {
ID: "peerA",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.14.88"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
"peerB": {
ID: "peerB",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.80.39"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
"peerC": {
ID: "peerC",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.254.139"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
"peerD": {
ID: "peerD",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.62.5"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
"peerE": {
ID: "peerE",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.32.206"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
"peerF": {
ID: "peerF",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.250.202"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
"peerG": {
ID: "peerG",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.13.186"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
"peerH": {
ID: "peerH",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.29.55"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
},
Groups: map[string]*nbgroup.Group{
"GroupAll": {
ID: "GroupAll",
Name: "All",
Peers: []string{
"peerB",
"peerA",
"peerD",
"peerC",
"peerE",
"peerF",
"peerG",
"peerH",
},
},
"GroupSwarm": {
ID: "GroupSwarm",
Name: "swarm",
Peers: []string{
"peerB",
"peerA",
"peerD",
"peerE",
"peerG",
"peerH",
},
},
},
Policies: []*Policy{
{
ID: "RuleDefault",
Name: "Default",
Description: "This is a default rule that allows connections between all the resources",
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: "RuleDefault",
Name: "Default",
Description: "This is a default rule that allows connections between all the resources",
Bidirectional: true,
Enabled: true,
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolALL,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
Sources: []string{
"GroupAll",
},
Destinations: []string{
"GroupAll",
},
},
},
},
{
ID: "RuleSwarm",
Name: "Swarm",
Description: "No description",
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: "RuleSwarm",
Name: "Swarm",
Description: "No description",
Bidirectional: true,
Enabled: true,
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolALL,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
Sources: []string{
"GroupSwarm",
"GroupAll",
},
Destinations: []string{
"GroupSwarm",
},
},
},
},
},
}
validatedPeers := make(map[string]struct{})
for p := range account.Peers {
validatedPeers[p] = struct{}{}
}
t.Run("check that all peers get map", func(t *testing.T) {
for _, p := range account.Peers {
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), p.ID, validatedPeers)
assert.GreaterOrEqual(t, len(peers), 2, "minimum number peers should present")
assert.GreaterOrEqual(t, len(firewallRules), 2, "minimum number of firewall rules should present")
}
})
t.Run("check first peer map details", func(t *testing.T) {
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", validatedPeers)
assert.Len(t, peers, 7)
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerE"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerF"])
epectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
{
PeerIP: "0.0.0.0",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "0.0.0.0",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.14.88",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.14.88",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.254.139",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.254.139",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.62.5",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.62.5",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.32.206",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.32.206",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.250.202",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.250.202",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.13.186",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.13.186",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.29.55",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.29.55",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
}
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
for i := range firewallRules {
assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
}
})
}
func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyDirect(t *testing.T) {
account := &Account{
Peers: map[string]*nbpeer.Peer{
"peerA": {
ID: "peerA",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.14.88"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
"peerB": {
ID: "peerB",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.80.39"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
"peerC": {
ID: "peerC",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.254.139"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
},
},
Groups: map[string]*nbgroup.Group{
"GroupAll": {
ID: "GroupAll",
Name: "All",
Peers: []string{
"peerB",
"peerA",
"peerC",
},
},
"GroupSwarm": {
ID: "GroupSwarm",
Name: "swarm",
Peers: []string{
"peerB",
},
},
"peerF": {
ID: "peerF",
Name: "dmz",
Peers: []string{
"peerC",
},
},
},
Policies: []*Policy{
{
ID: "RuleDefault",
Name: "Default",
Description: "This is a default rule that allows connections between all the resources",
Enabled: false,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: "RuleDefault",
Name: "Default",
Description: "This is a default rule that allows connections between all the resources",
Bidirectional: true,
Enabled: false,
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolALL,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
Sources: []string{
"GroupAll",
},
Destinations: []string{
"GroupAll",
},
},
},
},
{
ID: "RuleSwarm",
Name: "Swarm",
Description: "No description",
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: "RuleSwarm",
Name: "Swarm",
Description: "No description",
Bidirectional: true,
Enabled: true,
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolALL,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
Sources: []string{
"GroupSwarm",
},
Destinations: []string{
"peerF",
},
},
},
},
},
}
approvedPeers := make(map[string]struct{})
for p := range account.Peers {
approvedPeers[p] = struct{}{}
}
t.Run("check first peer map", func(t *testing.T) {
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", approvedPeers)
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
epectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
{
PeerIP: "100.65.254.139",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.254.139",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
}
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
for i := range firewallRules {
assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
}
})
t.Run("check second peer map", func(t *testing.T) {
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerC", approvedPeers)
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerB"])
epectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
{
PeerIP: "100.65.80.39",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.80.39",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
}
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
for i := range firewallRules {
assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
}
})
account.Policies[1].Rules[0].Bidirectional = false
t.Run("check first peer map directional only", func(t *testing.T) {
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", approvedPeers)
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
epectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
{
PeerIP: "100.65.254.139",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
}
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
for i := range firewallRules {
assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
}
})
t.Run("check second peer map directional only", func(t *testing.T) {
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerC", approvedPeers)
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerB"])
epectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
{
PeerIP: "100.65.80.39",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "all",
Port: "",
},
}
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(epectedFirewallRules))
slices.SortFunc(epectedFirewallRules, sortFunc())
slices.SortFunc(firewallRules, sortFunc())
for i := range firewallRules {
assert.Equal(t, epectedFirewallRules[i], firewallRules[i])
}
})
}
func TestAccount_getPeersByPolicyPostureChecks(t *testing.T) {
account := &Account{
Peers: map[string]*nbpeer.Peer{
"peerA": {
ID: "peerA",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.14.88"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
GoOS: "linux",
KernelVersion: "6.6.7",
WtVersion: "0.25.9",
},
},
"peerB": {
ID: "peerB",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.80.39"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
GoOS: "linux",
KernelVersion: "6.6.1",
WtVersion: "0.23.0",
},
},
"peerC": {
ID: "peerC",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.254.139"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
GoOS: "linux",
KernelVersion: "6.6.1",
WtVersion: "0.25.8",
},
},
"peerD": {
ID: "peerD",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.62.5"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
GoOS: "linux",
KernelVersion: "6.6.0",
WtVersion: "0.25.9",
},
},
"peerE": {
ID: "peerE",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.32.206"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
GoOS: "linux",
KernelVersion: "6.6.1",
WtVersion: "0.24.0",
},
},
"peerF": {
ID: "peerF",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.250.202"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
GoOS: "linux",
KernelVersion: "6.6.1",
WtVersion: "0.25.9",
},
},
"peerG": {
ID: "peerG",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.13.186"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
GoOS: "linux",
KernelVersion: "6.6.1",
WtVersion: "0.23.2",
},
},
"peerH": {
ID: "peerH",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.29.55"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
GoOS: "linux",
KernelVersion: "6.6.1",
WtVersion: "0.23.1",
},
},
"peerI": {
ID: "peerI",
IP: net.ParseIP("100.65.21.56"),
Status: &nbpeer.PeerStatus{},
Meta: nbpeer.PeerSystemMeta{
GoOS: "windows",
KernelVersion: "10.0.14393.2430",
WtVersion: "0.25.1",
},
},
},
Groups: map[string]*nbgroup.Group{
"GroupAll": {
ID: "GroupAll",
Name: "All",
Peers: []string{
"peerB",
"peerA",
"peerD",
"peerC",
"peerF",
"peerG",
"peerH",
"peerI",
},
},
"GroupSwarm": {
ID: "GroupSwarm",
Name: "swarm",
Peers: []string{
"peerB",
"peerA",
"peerD",
"peerE",
"peerG",
"peerH",
"peerI",
},
},
},
PostureChecks: []*posture.Checks{
{
ID: "PostureChecksDefault",
Name: "Default",
Description: "This is a posture checks that check if peer is running required versions",
Checks: posture.ChecksDefinition{
NBVersionCheck: &posture.NBVersionCheck{
MinVersion: "0.25",
},
OSVersionCheck: &posture.OSVersionCheck{
Linux: &posture.MinKernelVersionCheck{
MinKernelVersion: "6.6.0",
},
},
},
},
},
}
account.Policies = append(account.Policies, &Policy{
ID: "PolicyPostureChecks",
Name: "",
Description: "This is the policy with posture checks applied",
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: "RuleSwarm",
Name: "Swarm",
Enabled: true,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
Destinations: []string{
"GroupSwarm",
},
Sources: []string{
"GroupAll",
},
Bidirectional: false,
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
Ports: []string{"80"},
},
},
SourcePostureChecks: []string{
"PostureChecksDefault",
},
})
approvedPeers := make(map[string]struct{})
for p := range account.Peers {
approvedPeers[p] = struct{}{}
}
t.Run("verify peer's network map with default group peer list", func(t *testing.T) {
// peerB doesn't fulfill the NB posture check but is included in the destination group Swarm,
// will establish a connection with all source peers satisfying the NB posture check.
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", approvedPeers)
assert.Len(t, peers, 4)
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 4)
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerF"])
// peerC satisfy the NB posture check, should establish connection to all destination group peer's
// We expect a single permissive firewall rule which all outgoing connections
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerC", approvedPeers)
assert.Len(t, peers, len(account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers))
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 1)
expectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
{
PeerIP: "0.0.0.0",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "tcp",
Port: "80",
},
}
assert.ElementsMatch(t, firewallRules, expectedFirewallRules)
// peerE doesn't fulfill the NB posture check and exists in only destination group Swarm,
// all source group peers satisfying the NB posture check should establish connection
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerE", approvedPeers)
assert.Len(t, peers, 4)
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 4)
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerF"])
// peerI doesn't fulfill the OS version posture check and exists in only destination group Swarm,
// all source group peers satisfying the NB posture check should establish connection
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerI", approvedPeers)
assert.Len(t, peers, 4)
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 4)
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerF"])
})
t.Run("verify peer's network map with modified group peer list", func(t *testing.T) {
// Removing peerB as the part of destination group Swarm
account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers = []string{"peerA", "peerD", "peerE", "peerG", "peerH"}
// peerB doesn't satisfy the NB posture check, and doesn't exist in destination group peer's
// no connection should be established to any peer of destination group
peers, firewallRules := account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerB", approvedPeers)
assert.Len(t, peers, 0)
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 0)
// peerI doesn't satisfy the OS version posture check, and doesn't exist in destination group peer's
// no connection should be established to any peer of destination group
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerI", approvedPeers)
assert.Len(t, peers, 0)
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 0)
// peerC satisfy the NB posture check, should establish connection to all destination group peer's
// We expect a single permissive firewall rule which all outgoing connections
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerC", approvedPeers)
assert.Len(t, peers, len(account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers))
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers))
peerIDs := make([]string, 0, len(peers))
for _, peer := range peers {
peerIDs = append(peerIDs, peer.ID)
}
assert.ElementsMatch(t, peerIDs, account.Groups["GroupSwarm"].Peers)
// Removing peerF as the part of source group All
account.Groups["GroupAll"].Peers = []string{"peerB", "peerA", "peerD", "peerC", "peerG", "peerH"}
// peerE doesn't fulfill the NB posture check and exists in only destination group Swarm,
// all source group peers satisfying the NB posture check should establish connection
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerE", approvedPeers)
assert.Len(t, peers, 3)
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, 3)
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerA"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
peers, firewallRules = account.getPeerConnectionResources(context.Background(), "peerA", approvedPeers)
assert.Len(t, peers, 5)
// assert peers from Group Swarm
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerD"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerE"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerG"])
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerH"])
// assert peers from Group All
assert.Contains(t, peers, account.Peers["peerC"])
expectedFirewallRules := []*FirewallRule{
{
PeerIP: "100.65.62.5",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "tcp",
Port: "80",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.32.206",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "tcp",
Port: "80",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.13.186",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "tcp",
Port: "80",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.29.55",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionOUT,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "tcp",
Port: "80",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.254.139",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "tcp",
Port: "80",
},
{
PeerIP: "100.65.62.5",
Direction: firewallRuleDirectionIN,
Action: "accept",
Protocol: "tcp",
Port: "80",
},
}
assert.Len(t, firewallRules, len(expectedFirewallRules))
assert.ElementsMatch(t, firewallRules, expectedFirewallRules)
})
}
func sortFunc() func(a *FirewallRule, b *FirewallRule) int {
return func(a, b *FirewallRule) int {
// Concatenate PeerIP and Direction as string for comparison
aStr := a.PeerIP + fmt.Sprintf("%d", a.Direction)
bStr := b.PeerIP + fmt.Sprintf("%d", b.Direction)
// Compare the concatenated strings
if aStr < bStr {
return -1 // a is less than b
}
if aStr > bStr {
return 1 // a is greater than b
}
return 0 // a is equal to b
}
}
func TestPolicyAccountPeersUpdate(t *testing.T) {
manager, account, peer1, peer2, peer3 := setupNetworkMapTest(t)
err := manager.SaveGroups(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, []*nbgroup.Group{
{
ID: "groupA",
Name: "GroupA",
Peers: []string{peer1.ID, peer3.ID},
},
{
ID: "groupB",
Name: "GroupB",
Peers: []string{},
},
{
ID: "groupC",
Name: "GroupC",
Peers: []string{},
},
{
ID: "groupD",
Name: "GroupD",
Peers: []string{peer1.ID, peer2.ID},
},
})
assert.NoError(t, err)
updMsg1 := manager.peersUpdateManager.CreateChannel(context.Background(), peer1.ID)
t.Cleanup(func() {
manager.peersUpdateManager.CloseChannel(context.Background(), peer1.ID)
})
updMsg2 := manager.peersUpdateManager.CreateChannel(context.Background(), peer2.ID)
t.Cleanup(func() {
manager.peersUpdateManager.CloseChannel(context.Background(), peer2.ID)
})
// Saving policy with rule groups with no peers should not update account's peers and not send peer update
t.Run("saving policy with rule groups with no peers", func(t *testing.T) {
policy := Policy{
ID: "policy-rule-groups-no-peers",
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: xid.New().String(),
Enabled: true,
Sources: []string{"groupB"},
Destinations: []string{"groupC"},
Bidirectional: true,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
},
},
}
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
close(done)
}()
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, false)
assert.NoError(t, err)
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate")
}
})
// Saving policy with source group containing peers, but destination group without peers should
// update account's peers and send peer update
t.Run("saving policy where source has peers but destination does not", func(t *testing.T) {
policy := Policy{
ID: "policy-source-has-peers-destination-none",
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: xid.New().String(),
Enabled: true,
Sources: []string{"groupA"},
Destinations: []string{"groupB"},
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
Bidirectional: true,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
},
},
}
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
close(done)
}()
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, false)
assert.NoError(t, err)
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
}
})
// Saving policy with destination group containing peers, but source group without peers should
// update account's peers and send peer update
t.Run("saving policy where destination has peers but source does not", func(t *testing.T) {
policy := Policy{
ID: "policy-destination-has-peers-source-none",
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: xid.New().String(),
Enabled: false,
Sources: []string{"groupC"},
Destinations: []string{"groupD"},
Bidirectional: true,
Protocol: PolicyRuleProtocolTCP,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
},
},
}
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg2)
close(done)
}()
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, false)
assert.NoError(t, err)
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
}
})
// Saving policy with destination and source groups containing peers should update account's peers
// and send peer update
t.Run("saving policy with source and destination groups with peers", func(t *testing.T) {
policy := Policy{
ID: "policy-source-destination-peers",
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: xid.New().String(),
Enabled: true,
Sources: []string{"groupA"},
Destinations: []string{"groupD"},
Bidirectional: true,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
},
},
}
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
close(done)
}()
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, false)
assert.NoError(t, err)
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
}
})
// Disabling policy with destination and source groups containing peers should update account's peers
// and send peer update
t.Run("disabling policy with source and destination groups with peers", func(t *testing.T) {
policy := Policy{
ID: "policy-source-destination-peers",
Enabled: false,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: xid.New().String(),
Enabled: true,
Sources: []string{"groupA"},
Destinations: []string{"groupD"},
Bidirectional: true,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
},
},
}
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
close(done)
}()
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, true)
assert.NoError(t, err)
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
}
})
// Updating disabled policy with destination and source groups containing peers should not update account's peers
// or send peer update
t.Run("updating disabled policy with source and destination groups with peers", func(t *testing.T) {
policy := Policy{
ID: "policy-source-destination-peers",
Description: "updated description",
Enabled: false,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: xid.New().String(),
Enabled: true,
Sources: []string{"groupA"},
Destinations: []string{"groupA"},
Bidirectional: true,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
},
},
}
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
close(done)
}()
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, true)
assert.NoError(t, err)
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate")
}
})
// Enabling policy with destination and source groups containing peers should update account's peers
// and send peer update
t.Run("enabling policy with source and destination groups with peers", func(t *testing.T) {
policy := Policy{
ID: "policy-source-destination-peers",
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: xid.New().String(),
Enabled: true,
Sources: []string{"groupA"},
Destinations: []string{"groupD"},
Bidirectional: true,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
},
},
}
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
close(done)
}()
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, true)
assert.NoError(t, err)
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
}
})
// Saving unchanged policy should trigger account peers update but not send peer update
t.Run("saving unchanged policy", func(t *testing.T) {
policy := Policy{
ID: "policy-source-destination-peers",
Enabled: true,
Rules: []*PolicyRule{
{
ID: xid.New().String(),
Enabled: true,
Sources: []string{"groupA"},
Destinations: []string{"groupD"},
Bidirectional: true,
Action: PolicyTrafficActionAccept,
},
},
}
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
close(done)
}()
err := manager.SavePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, userID, &policy, true)
assert.NoError(t, err)
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate")
}
})
// Deleting policy should trigger account peers update and send peer update
t.Run("deleting policy with source and destination groups with peers", func(t *testing.T) {
policyID := "policy-source-destination-peers"
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
close(done)
}()
err := manager.DeletePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, policyID, userID)
assert.NoError(t, err)
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
}
})
// Deleting policy with destination group containing peers, but source group without peers should
// update account's peers and send peer update
t.Run("deleting policy where destination has peers but source does not", func(t *testing.T) {
policyID := "policy-destination-has-peers-source-none"
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
peerShouldReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg2)
close(done)
}()
err := manager.DeletePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, policyID, userID)
assert.NoError(t, err)
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldReceiveUpdate")
}
})
// Deleting policy with no peers in groups should not update account's peers and not send peer update
t.Run("deleting policy with no peers in groups", func(t *testing.T) {
policyID := "policy-rule-groups-no-peers" // Deleting the policy created in Case 2
done := make(chan struct{})
go func() {
peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate(t, updMsg1)
close(done)
}()
err := manager.DeletePolicy(context.Background(), account.Id, policyID, userID)
assert.NoError(t, err)
select {
case <-done:
case <-time.After(time.Second):
t.Error("timeout waiting for peerShouldNotReceiveUpdate")
}
})
}