Files
netbird/client/internal/dnsfwd/forwarder_test.go

730 lines
21 KiB
Go

package dnsfwd
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"net/netip"
"strings"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/miekg/dns"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/mock"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
firewall "github.com/netbirdio/netbird/client/firewall/manager"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/client/internal/dns/test"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/client/internal/peer"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/management/domain"
"github.com/netbirdio/netbird/route"
)
func Test_getMatchingEntries(t *testing.T) {
testCases := []struct {
name string
storedMappings map[string]route.ResID
queryDomain string
expectedResId route.ResID
}{
{
name: "Empty map returns empty string",
storedMappings: map[string]route.ResID{},
queryDomain: "example.com",
expectedResId: "",
},
{
name: "Exact match returns stored resId",
storedMappings: map[string]route.ResID{"example.com": "res1"},
queryDomain: "example.com",
expectedResId: "res1",
},
{
name: "Wildcard pattern matches base domain",
storedMappings: map[string]route.ResID{"*.example.com": "res2"},
queryDomain: "example.com",
expectedResId: "res2",
},
{
name: "Wildcard pattern matches subdomain",
storedMappings: map[string]route.ResID{"*.example.com": "res3"},
queryDomain: "foo.example.com",
expectedResId: "res3",
},
{
name: "Wildcard pattern does not match different domain",
storedMappings: map[string]route.ResID{"*.example.com": "res4"},
queryDomain: "foo.example.org",
expectedResId: "",
},
{
name: "Non-wildcard pattern does not match subdomain",
storedMappings: map[string]route.ResID{"example.com": "res5"},
queryDomain: "foo.example.com",
expectedResId: "",
},
{
name: "Exact match over overlapping wildcard",
storedMappings: map[string]route.ResID{
"*.example.com": "resWildcard",
"foo.example.com": "resExact",
},
queryDomain: "foo.example.com",
expectedResId: "resExact",
},
{
name: "Overlapping wildcards: Select more specific wildcard",
storedMappings: map[string]route.ResID{
"*.example.com": "resA",
"*.sub.example.com": "resB",
},
queryDomain: "bar.sub.example.com",
expectedResId: "resB",
},
{
name: "Wildcard multi-level subdomain match",
storedMappings: map[string]route.ResID{
"*.example.com": "resMulti",
},
queryDomain: "a.b.example.com",
expectedResId: "resMulti",
},
}
for _, tc := range testCases {
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
fwd := &DNSForwarder{}
var entries []*ForwarderEntry
for domainPattern, resId := range tc.storedMappings {
d, err := domain.FromString(domainPattern)
require.NoError(t, err)
entries = append(entries, &ForwarderEntry{
Domain: d,
ResID: resId,
})
}
fwd.UpdateDomains(entries)
got, _ := fwd.getMatchingEntries(tc.queryDomain)
assert.Equal(t, got, tc.expectedResId)
})
}
}
type MockFirewall struct {
mock.Mock
}
func (m *MockFirewall) UpdateSet(set firewall.Set, prefixes []netip.Prefix) error {
args := m.Called(set, prefixes)
return args.Error(0)
}
type MockResolver struct {
mock.Mock
}
func (m *MockResolver) LookupNetIP(ctx context.Context, network, host string) ([]netip.Addr, error) {
args := m.Called(ctx, network, host)
return args.Get(0).([]netip.Addr), args.Error(1)
}
func TestDNSForwarder_SubdomainAccessLogic(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
configuredDomain string
queryDomain string
shouldMatch bool
expectedResID route.ResID
description string
}{
{
name: "exact domain match should be allowed",
configuredDomain: "example.com",
queryDomain: "example.com",
shouldMatch: true,
expectedResID: "test-res-id",
description: "Direct match to configured domain should work",
},
{
name: "subdomain access should be restricted",
configuredDomain: "example.com",
queryDomain: "mail.example.com",
shouldMatch: false,
expectedResID: "",
description: "Subdomain should not be accessible unless explicitly configured",
},
{
name: "wildcard should allow subdomains",
configuredDomain: "*.example.com",
queryDomain: "mail.example.com",
shouldMatch: true,
expectedResID: "test-res-id",
description: "Wildcard domains should allow subdomain access",
},
{
name: "wildcard should allow base domain",
configuredDomain: "*.example.com",
queryDomain: "example.com",
shouldMatch: true,
expectedResID: "test-res-id",
description: "Wildcard should also match the base domain",
},
{
name: "deep subdomain should be restricted",
configuredDomain: "example.com",
queryDomain: "deep.mail.example.com",
shouldMatch: false,
expectedResID: "",
description: "Deep subdomains should not be accessible",
},
{
name: "wildcard allows deep subdomains",
configuredDomain: "*.example.com",
queryDomain: "deep.mail.example.com",
shouldMatch: true,
expectedResID: "test-res-id",
description: "Wildcard should allow deep subdomains",
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
forwarder := &DNSForwarder{}
d, err := domain.FromString(tt.configuredDomain)
require.NoError(t, err)
entries := []*ForwarderEntry{
{
Domain: d,
ResID: "test-res-id",
},
}
forwarder.UpdateDomains(entries)
resID, matchingEntries := forwarder.getMatchingEntries(tt.queryDomain)
if tt.shouldMatch {
assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedResID, resID, "Expected matching ResID")
assert.NotEmpty(t, matchingEntries, "Expected matching entries")
t.Logf("✓ Domain %s correctly matches pattern %s", tt.queryDomain, tt.configuredDomain)
} else {
assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedResID, resID, "Expected no ResID match")
assert.Empty(t, matchingEntries, "Expected no matching entries")
t.Logf("✓ Domain %s correctly does NOT match pattern %s", tt.queryDomain, tt.configuredDomain)
}
})
}
}
func TestDNSForwarder_UnauthorizedDomainAccess(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("Skipping integration test in short mode")
}
tests := []struct {
name string
configuredDomain string
queryDomain string
shouldResolve bool
description string
}{
{
name: "configured exact domain resolves",
configuredDomain: "example.com",
queryDomain: "example.com",
shouldResolve: true,
description: "Exact match should resolve",
},
{
name: "unauthorized subdomain blocked",
configuredDomain: "example.com",
queryDomain: "mail.example.com",
shouldResolve: false,
description: "Subdomain should be blocked without wildcard",
},
{
name: "wildcard allows subdomain",
configuredDomain: "*.example.com",
queryDomain: "mail.example.com",
shouldResolve: true,
description: "Wildcard should allow subdomain",
},
{
name: "wildcard allows base domain",
configuredDomain: "*.example.com",
queryDomain: "example.com",
shouldResolve: true,
description: "Wildcard should allow base domain",
},
{
name: "unrelated domain blocked",
configuredDomain: "example.com",
queryDomain: "example.org",
shouldResolve: false,
description: "Unrelated domain should be blocked",
},
{
name: "deep subdomain blocked",
configuredDomain: "example.com",
queryDomain: "deep.mail.example.com",
shouldResolve: false,
description: "Deep subdomain should be blocked",
},
{
name: "wildcard allows deep subdomain",
configuredDomain: "*.example.com",
queryDomain: "deep.mail.example.com",
shouldResolve: true,
description: "Wildcard should allow deep subdomain",
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
mockFirewall := &MockFirewall{}
mockResolver := &MockResolver{}
if tt.shouldResolve {
mockFirewall.On("UpdateSet", mock.AnythingOfType("manager.Set"), mock.AnythingOfType("[]netip.Prefix")).Return(nil)
// Mock successful DNS resolution
fakeIP := netip.MustParseAddr("1.2.3.4")
mockResolver.On("LookupNetIP", mock.Anything, "ip4", dns.Fqdn(tt.queryDomain)).Return([]netip.Addr{fakeIP}, nil)
}
forwarder := NewDNSForwarder("127.0.0.1:0", 300, mockFirewall, &peer.Status{})
forwarder.resolver = mockResolver
d, err := domain.FromString(tt.configuredDomain)
require.NoError(t, err)
entries := []*ForwarderEntry{
{
Domain: d,
ResID: "test-res-id",
Set: firewall.NewDomainSet([]domain.Domain{d}),
},
}
forwarder.UpdateDomains(entries)
query := &dns.Msg{}
query.SetQuestion(dns.Fqdn(tt.queryDomain), dns.TypeA)
mockWriter := &test.MockResponseWriter{}
resp := forwarder.handleDNSQuery(mockWriter, query)
if tt.shouldResolve {
require.NotNil(t, resp, "Expected response for authorized domain")
require.Equal(t, dns.RcodeSuccess, resp.Rcode, "Expected successful response")
assert.NotEmpty(t, resp.Answer, "Expected DNS answer records")
time.Sleep(10 * time.Millisecond)
mockFirewall.AssertExpectations(t)
mockResolver.AssertExpectations(t)
} else {
if resp != nil {
assert.True(t, len(resp.Answer) == 0 || resp.Rcode != dns.RcodeSuccess,
"Unauthorized domain should not return successful answers")
}
mockFirewall.AssertNotCalled(t, "UpdateSet")
mockResolver.AssertNotCalled(t, "LookupNetIP")
}
})
}
}
func TestDNSForwarder_FirewallSetUpdates(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
configuredDomains []string
query string
mockIP string
shouldResolve bool
expectedSetCount int // How many sets should be updated
description string
}{
{
name: "exact domain gets firewall update",
configuredDomains: []string{"example.com"},
query: "example.com",
mockIP: "1.1.1.1",
shouldResolve: true,
expectedSetCount: 1,
description: "Single exact match updates one set",
},
{
name: "wildcard domain gets firewall update",
configuredDomains: []string{"*.example.com"},
query: "mail.example.com",
mockIP: "1.1.1.2",
shouldResolve: true,
expectedSetCount: 1,
description: "Wildcard match updates one set",
},
{
name: "overlapping exact and wildcard both get updates",
configuredDomains: []string{"*.example.com", "mail.example.com"},
query: "mail.example.com",
mockIP: "1.1.1.3",
shouldResolve: true,
expectedSetCount: 2,
description: "Both exact and wildcard sets should be updated",
},
{
name: "unauthorized domain gets no firewall update",
configuredDomains: []string{"example.com"},
query: "mail.example.com",
mockIP: "1.1.1.4",
shouldResolve: false,
expectedSetCount: 0,
description: "No firewall update for unauthorized domains",
},
{
name: "multiple wildcards matching get all updated",
configuredDomains: []string{"*.example.com", "*.sub.example.com"},
query: "test.sub.example.com",
mockIP: "1.1.1.5",
shouldResolve: true,
expectedSetCount: 2,
description: "All matching wildcard sets should be updated",
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
mockFirewall := &MockFirewall{}
mockResolver := &MockResolver{}
// Set up forwarder
forwarder := NewDNSForwarder("127.0.0.1:0", 300, mockFirewall, &peer.Status{})
forwarder.resolver = mockResolver
// Create entries and track sets
var entries []*ForwarderEntry
sets := make([]firewall.Set, 0)
for i, configDomain := range tt.configuredDomains {
d, err := domain.FromString(configDomain)
require.NoError(t, err)
set := firewall.NewDomainSet([]domain.Domain{d})
sets = append(sets, set)
entries = append(entries, &ForwarderEntry{
Domain: d,
ResID: route.ResID(fmt.Sprintf("res-%d", i)),
Set: set,
})
}
forwarder.UpdateDomains(entries)
// Set up mocks
if tt.shouldResolve {
fakeIP := netip.MustParseAddr(tt.mockIP)
mockResolver.On("LookupNetIP", mock.Anything, "ip4", dns.Fqdn(tt.query)).
Return([]netip.Addr{fakeIP}, nil).Once()
expectedPrefixes := []netip.Prefix{netip.PrefixFrom(fakeIP, 32)}
// Count how many sets should actually match
updateCount := 0
for i, entry := range entries {
domain := strings.ToLower(tt.query)
pattern := entry.Domain.PunycodeString()
matches := false
if strings.HasPrefix(pattern, "*.") {
baseDomain := strings.TrimPrefix(pattern, "*.")
if domain == baseDomain || strings.HasSuffix(domain, "."+baseDomain) {
matches = true
}
} else if domain == pattern {
matches = true
}
if matches {
mockFirewall.On("UpdateSet", sets[i], expectedPrefixes).Return(nil).Once()
updateCount++
}
}
assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedSetCount, updateCount,
"Expected %d sets to be updated, but mock expects %d",
tt.expectedSetCount, updateCount)
}
// Execute query
dnsQuery := &dns.Msg{}
dnsQuery.SetQuestion(dns.Fqdn(tt.query), dns.TypeA)
mockWriter := &test.MockResponseWriter{}
resp := forwarder.handleDNSQuery(mockWriter, dnsQuery)
// Verify response
if tt.shouldResolve {
require.NotNil(t, resp, "Expected response for authorized domain")
require.Equal(t, dns.RcodeSuccess, resp.Rcode)
require.NotEmpty(t, resp.Answer)
} else if resp != nil {
assert.True(t, resp.Rcode == dns.RcodeRefused || len(resp.Answer) == 0,
"Unauthorized domain should be refused or have no answers")
}
// Verify all mock expectations were met
mockFirewall.AssertExpectations(t)
mockResolver.AssertExpectations(t)
})
}
}
// Test to verify that multiple IPs for one domain result in all prefixes being sent together
func TestDNSForwarder_MultipleIPsInSingleUpdate(t *testing.T) {
mockFirewall := &MockFirewall{}
mockResolver := &MockResolver{}
forwarder := NewDNSForwarder("127.0.0.1:0", 300, mockFirewall, &peer.Status{})
forwarder.resolver = mockResolver
// Configure a single domain
d, err := domain.FromString("example.com")
require.NoError(t, err)
set := firewall.NewDomainSet([]domain.Domain{d})
entries := []*ForwarderEntry{{
Domain: d,
ResID: "test-res",
Set: set,
}}
forwarder.UpdateDomains(entries)
// Mock resolver returns multiple IPs
ips := []netip.Addr{
netip.MustParseAddr("1.1.1.1"),
netip.MustParseAddr("1.1.1.2"),
netip.MustParseAddr("1.1.1.3"),
}
mockResolver.On("LookupNetIP", mock.Anything, "ip4", "example.com.").
Return(ips, nil).Once()
// Expect ONE UpdateSet call with ALL prefixes
expectedPrefixes := []netip.Prefix{
netip.PrefixFrom(ips[0], 32),
netip.PrefixFrom(ips[1], 32),
netip.PrefixFrom(ips[2], 32),
}
mockFirewall.On("UpdateSet", set, expectedPrefixes).Return(nil).Once()
// Execute query
query := &dns.Msg{}
query.SetQuestion("example.com.", dns.TypeA)
mockWriter := &test.MockResponseWriter{}
resp := forwarder.handleDNSQuery(mockWriter, query)
// Verify response contains all IPs
require.NotNil(t, resp)
require.Equal(t, dns.RcodeSuccess, resp.Rcode)
require.Len(t, resp.Answer, 3, "Should have 3 answer records")
// Verify mocks
mockFirewall.AssertExpectations(t)
mockResolver.AssertExpectations(t)
}
func TestDNSForwarder_ResponseCodes(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
queryType uint16
queryDomain string
configured string
expectedCode int
description string
}{
{
name: "unauthorized domain returns REFUSED",
queryType: dns.TypeA,
queryDomain: "evil.com",
configured: "example.com",
expectedCode: dns.RcodeRefused,
description: "RFC compliant REFUSED for unauthorized queries",
},
{
name: "unsupported query type returns NOTIMP",
queryType: dns.TypeMX,
queryDomain: "example.com",
configured: "example.com",
expectedCode: dns.RcodeNotImplemented,
description: "RFC compliant NOTIMP for unsupported types",
},
{
name: "CNAME query returns NOTIMP",
queryType: dns.TypeCNAME,
queryDomain: "example.com",
configured: "example.com",
expectedCode: dns.RcodeNotImplemented,
description: "CNAME queries not supported",
},
{
name: "TXT query returns NOTIMP",
queryType: dns.TypeTXT,
queryDomain: "example.com",
configured: "example.com",
expectedCode: dns.RcodeNotImplemented,
description: "TXT queries not supported",
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
forwarder := NewDNSForwarder("127.0.0.1:0", 300, nil, &peer.Status{})
d, err := domain.FromString(tt.configured)
require.NoError(t, err)
entries := []*ForwarderEntry{{Domain: d, ResID: "test-res"}}
forwarder.UpdateDomains(entries)
query := &dns.Msg{}
query.SetQuestion(dns.Fqdn(tt.queryDomain), tt.queryType)
// Capture the written response
var writtenResp *dns.Msg
mockWriter := &test.MockResponseWriter{
WriteMsgFunc: func(m *dns.Msg) error {
writtenResp = m
return nil
},
}
_ = forwarder.handleDNSQuery(mockWriter, query)
// Check the response written to the writer
require.NotNil(t, writtenResp, "Expected response to be written")
assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedCode, writtenResp.Rcode, tt.description)
})
}
}
func TestDNSForwarder_TCPTruncation(t *testing.T) {
// Test that large UDP responses are truncated with TC bit set
mockResolver := &MockResolver{}
forwarder := NewDNSForwarder("127.0.0.1:0", 300, nil, &peer.Status{})
forwarder.resolver = mockResolver
d, _ := domain.FromString("example.com")
entries := []*ForwarderEntry{{Domain: d, ResID: "test-res"}}
forwarder.UpdateDomains(entries)
// Mock many IPs to create a large response
var manyIPs []netip.Addr
for i := 0; i < 100; i++ {
manyIPs = append(manyIPs, netip.MustParseAddr(fmt.Sprintf("1.1.1.%d", i%256)))
}
mockResolver.On("LookupNetIP", mock.Anything, "ip4", "example.com.").Return(manyIPs, nil)
// Query without EDNS0
query := &dns.Msg{}
query.SetQuestion("example.com.", dns.TypeA)
var writtenResp *dns.Msg
mockWriter := &test.MockResponseWriter{
WriteMsgFunc: func(m *dns.Msg) error {
writtenResp = m
return nil
},
}
forwarder.handleDNSQueryUDP(mockWriter, query)
require.NotNil(t, writtenResp)
assert.True(t, writtenResp.Truncated, "Large response should be truncated")
assert.LessOrEqual(t, writtenResp.Len(), dns.MinMsgSize, "Response should fit in minimum UDP size")
}
func TestDNSForwarder_MultipleOverlappingPatterns(t *testing.T) {
// Test complex overlapping pattern scenarios
mockFirewall := &MockFirewall{}
mockResolver := &MockResolver{}
forwarder := NewDNSForwarder("127.0.0.1:0", 300, mockFirewall, &peer.Status{})
forwarder.resolver = mockResolver
// Set up complex overlapping patterns
patterns := []string{
"*.example.com", // Matches all subdomains
"*.mail.example.com", // More specific wildcard
"smtp.mail.example.com", // Exact match
"example.com", // Base domain
}
var entries []*ForwarderEntry
sets := make(map[string]firewall.Set)
for _, pattern := range patterns {
d, _ := domain.FromString(pattern)
set := firewall.NewDomainSet([]domain.Domain{d})
sets[pattern] = set
entries = append(entries, &ForwarderEntry{
Domain: d,
ResID: route.ResID("res-" + pattern),
Set: set,
})
}
forwarder.UpdateDomains(entries)
// Test smtp.mail.example.com - should match 3 patterns
fakeIP := netip.MustParseAddr("1.2.3.4")
mockResolver.On("LookupNetIP", mock.Anything, "ip4", "smtp.mail.example.com.").Return([]netip.Addr{fakeIP}, nil)
expectedPrefix := netip.PrefixFrom(fakeIP, 32)
// All three matching patterns should get firewall updates
mockFirewall.On("UpdateSet", sets["smtp.mail.example.com"], []netip.Prefix{expectedPrefix}).Return(nil)
mockFirewall.On("UpdateSet", sets["*.mail.example.com"], []netip.Prefix{expectedPrefix}).Return(nil)
mockFirewall.On("UpdateSet", sets["*.example.com"], []netip.Prefix{expectedPrefix}).Return(nil)
query := &dns.Msg{}
query.SetQuestion("smtp.mail.example.com.", dns.TypeA)
mockWriter := &test.MockResponseWriter{}
resp := forwarder.handleDNSQuery(mockWriter, query)
require.NotNil(t, resp)
assert.Equal(t, dns.RcodeSuccess, resp.Rcode)
// Verify all three sets were updated
mockFirewall.AssertExpectations(t)
// Verify the most specific ResID was selected
// (exact match should win over wildcards)
resID, matches := forwarder.getMatchingEntries("smtp.mail.example.com")
assert.Equal(t, route.ResID("res-smtp.mail.example.com"), resID)
assert.Len(t, matches, 3, "Should match 3 patterns")
}
func TestDNSForwarder_EmptyQuery(t *testing.T) {
// Test handling of malformed query with no questions
forwarder := NewDNSForwarder("127.0.0.1:0", 300, nil, &peer.Status{})
query := &dns.Msg{}
// Don't set any question
writeCalled := false
mockWriter := &test.MockResponseWriter{
WriteMsgFunc: func(m *dns.Msg) error {
writeCalled = true
return nil
},
}
resp := forwarder.handleDNSQuery(mockWriter, query)
assert.Nil(t, resp, "Should return nil for empty query")
assert.False(t, writeCalled, "Should not write response for empty query")
}