extern/nushell
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/nushell/nushell.git synced 2024-11-29 03:44:19 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
157494e803
nushell/crates/nuon/Cargo.toml

24 lines
674 B
TOML
Raw Normal View History

create `nuon` crate from `from nuon` and `to nuon` (#12553) # Description playing with the NUON format in Rust code in some plugins, we agreed with the team it was a great time to create a standalone NUON format to allow Rust devs to use this Nushell file format. > **Note** > this PR almost copy-pastes the code from `nu_commands/src/formats/from/nuon.rs` and `nu_commands/src/formats/to/nuon.rs` to `nuon/src/from.rs` and `nuon/src/to.rs`, with minor tweaks to make then standalone functions, e.g. remove the rest of the command implementations ### TODO - [x] add tests - [x] add documentation # User-Facing Changes devs will have access to a new crate, `nuon`, and two functions, `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` ```rust from_nuon( input: &str, span: Option<Span>, ) -> Result<Value, ShellError> ``` ```rust to_nuon( input: &Value, raw: bool, tabs: Option<usize>, indent: Option<usize>, span: Option<Span>, ) -> Result<String, ShellError> ``` # Tests + Formatting i've basically taken all the tests from `crates/nu-command/tests/format_conversions/nuon.rs` and converted them to use `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` instead of Nushell commands - i've created a `nuon_end_to_end` to run both conversions with an optional middle value to check that all is fine > **Note** > the `nuon::tests::read_code_should_fail_rather_than_panic` test does give different results locally and in the CI... > i've left it ignored with comments to help future us :) # After Submitting mention that in the release notes for sure!!
2024-04-19 13:54:16 +02:00
[package]
authors = ["The Nushell Project Developers"]
description = "Support for the NUON format."
repository = "https://github.com/nushell/nushell/tree/main/crates/nuon"
edition = "2021"
license = "MIT"
name = "nuon"
Bump version to 0.98.1 (#13896)
2024-09-22 06:41:44 +02:00
version = "0.98.1"
create `nuon` crate from `from nuon` and `to nuon` (#12553) # Description playing with the NUON format in Rust code in some plugins, we agreed with the team it was a great time to create a standalone NUON format to allow Rust devs to use this Nushell file format. > **Note** > this PR almost copy-pastes the code from `nu_commands/src/formats/from/nuon.rs` and `nu_commands/src/formats/to/nuon.rs` to `nuon/src/from.rs` and `nuon/src/to.rs`, with minor tweaks to make then standalone functions, e.g. remove the rest of the command implementations ### TODO - [x] add tests - [x] add documentation # User-Facing Changes devs will have access to a new crate, `nuon`, and two functions, `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` ```rust from_nuon( input: &str, span: Option<Span>, ) -> Result<Value, ShellError> ``` ```rust to_nuon( input: &Value, raw: bool, tabs: Option<usize>, indent: Option<usize>, span: Option<Span>, ) -> Result<String, ShellError> ``` # Tests + Formatting i've basically taken all the tests from `crates/nu-command/tests/format_conversions/nuon.rs` and converted them to use `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` instead of Nushell commands - i've created a `nuon_end_to_end` to run both conversions with an optional middle value to check that all is fine > **Note** > the `nuon::tests::read_code_should_fail_rather_than_panic` test does give different results locally and in the CI... > i've left it ignored with comments to help future us :) # After Submitting mention that in the release notes for sure!!
2024-04-19 13:54:16 +02:00
# See more keys and their definitions at https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html
[dependencies]
Bump version to 0.98.1 (#13896)
2024-09-22 06:41:44 +02:00
nu-parser = { path = "../nu-parser", version = "0.98.1" }
nu-protocol = { path = "../nu-protocol", version = "0.98.1" }
nu-engine = { path = "../nu-engine", version = "0.98.1" }
create `nuon` crate from `from nuon` and `to nuon` (#12553) # Description playing with the NUON format in Rust code in some plugins, we agreed with the team it was a great time to create a standalone NUON format to allow Rust devs to use this Nushell file format. > **Note** > this PR almost copy-pastes the code from `nu_commands/src/formats/from/nuon.rs` and `nu_commands/src/formats/to/nuon.rs` to `nuon/src/from.rs` and `nuon/src/to.rs`, with minor tweaks to make then standalone functions, e.g. remove the rest of the command implementations ### TODO - [x] add tests - [x] add documentation # User-Facing Changes devs will have access to a new crate, `nuon`, and two functions, `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` ```rust from_nuon( input: &str, span: Option<Span>, ) -> Result<Value, ShellError> ``` ```rust to_nuon( input: &Value, raw: bool, tabs: Option<usize>, indent: Option<usize>, span: Option<Span>, ) -> Result<String, ShellError> ``` # Tests + Formatting i've basically taken all the tests from `crates/nu-command/tests/format_conversions/nuon.rs` and converted them to use `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` instead of Nushell commands - i've created a `nuon_end_to_end` to run both conversions with an optional middle value to check that all is fine > **Note** > the `nuon::tests::read_code_should_fail_rather_than_panic` test does give different results locally and in the CI... > i've left it ignored with comments to help future us :) # After Submitting mention that in the release notes for sure!!
2024-04-19 13:54:16 +02:00
once_cell = { workspace = true }
fancy-regex = { workspace = true }
[dev-dependencies]
Setup global `cargo` lint configuration (#13691) # Description `cargo` somewhat recently gained the capability to store `lints` settings for the crate and workspace, that can override the defaults from `rustc` and `clippy` lints. This means we can enforce some lints without having to actively pass them to clippy via `cargo clippy -- -W ...`. So users just forking the repo have an easier time to follow similar requirements like our CI. ## Limitation An exception that remains is that those lints apply to both the primary code base and the tests. Thus we can't include e.g. `unwrap_used` without generating noise in the tests. Here the setup in the CI remains the most helpful. ## Included lints - Add `clippy::unchecked_duration_subtraction` (added by #12549) # User-Facing Changes Running `cargo clippy --workspace` should be closer to the CI. This has benefits for editor configured runs of clippy and saves you from having to use `toolkit` to be close to CI in more cases.
2024-08-28 23:37:17 +02:00
chrono = { workspace = true }
[lints]
Bump version to 0.98.1 (#13896)
2024-09-22 06:41:44 +02:00
workspace = true
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink