nushell/crates/nu-command/tests/commands/ucp.rs

1261 lines
39 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
use nu_test_support::fs::file_contents;
use nu_test_support::fs::{
files_exist_at, AbsoluteFile,
Stub::{EmptyFile, FileWithContent, FileWithPermission},
};
use nu_test_support::nu;
use nu_test_support::playground::Playground;
Allow filesystem commands to access files with glob metachars in name (#10694) (squashed version of #10557, clean commit history and review thread) Fixes #10571, also potentially: #10364, #10211, #9558, #9310, # Description Changes processing of arguments to filesystem commands that are source paths or globs. Applies to `cp, cp-old, mv, rm, du` but not `ls` (because it uses a different globbing interface) or `glob` (because it uses a different globbing library). The core of the change is to lookup the argument first as a file and only glob if it is not. That way, a path containing glob metacharacters can be referenced without glob quoting, though it will have to be single quoted to avoid nushell parsing. Before: A file path that looks like a glob is not matched by the glob specified as a (source) argument and takes some thinking about to access. You might say the glob pattern shadows a file with the same spelling. ``` > ls a* ╭───┬────────┬──────┬──────┬────────────────╮ │ # │ name │ type │ size │ modified │ ├───┼────────┼──────┼──────┼────────────────┤ │ 0 │ a[bc]d │ file │ 0 B │ 34 seconds ago │ │ 1 │ abd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ │ 2 │ acd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ ╰───┴────────┴──────┴──────┴────────────────╯ > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd > ## Note -- a[bc]d *not* copied, and seemingly hard to access. > cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest Error: × No matches found ╭─[entry #33:1:1] 1 │ cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest · ─────┬──── · ╰── no matches found ╰──── > #.. but is accessible with enough glob quoting. > cp --verbose 'a[[]bc[]]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d ``` Before_2: if file has glob metachars but isn't a valid pattern, user gets a confusing error: ``` > touch 'a[b' > cp 'a[b' dest Error: × Pattern syntax error near position 30: invalid range pattern ╭─[entry #13:1:1] 1 │ cp 'a[b' dest · ──┬── · ╰── invalid pattern ╰──── ``` After: Args to cp, mv, etc. are tried first as literal files, and only as globs if not found to be files. ``` > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d > cp --verbose '[a][bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd ``` After_2: file with glob metachars but invalid pattern just works. (though Windows does not allow file name to contain `*`.). ``` > cp --verbose 'a[b' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[b to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[b ``` So, with this fix, a file shadows a glob pattern with the same spelling. If you have such a file and really want to use the glob pattern, you will have to glob quote some of the characters in the pattern. I think that's less confusing to the user: if ls shows a file with a weird name, s/he'll still be able to copy, rename or delete it. # User-Facing Changes Could break some existing scripts. If user happened to have a file with a globbish name but was using a glob pattern with the same spelling, the new version will process the file and not expand the glob. # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-10-18 20:31:15 +02:00
use rstest::rstest;
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
use std::path::Path;
Fix variables not allowed in ucp (#10304) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Fixes #10300 , where using variables didnt work with `ucp` as it was only expecting a `Expr::FilePath`. Before: (from the issue) ``` ❯ ucp -r $var $folder Error: × Missing file operand ╭─[entry #40:1:1] 1 │ ucp -r $var $folder · ─┬─ · ╰── Missing file operand ╰──── help: Please provide source and destination paths ``` Now: ``` `ucp -r $var $folder` # success ``` Also added the test to ensure its working:) . Oh, and I tweaked again slightly the messages on two tests because now the whole `path` is printed rather than `a`. Say: ``` #before `cp a a` --> 'a' and 'a' are the same file # now `cp a a` --> /home/current/location/a and /home/current/location/a are the same file ``` <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - [X] `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library <!-- > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
#[cfg(not(target_os = "windows"))]
const PATH_SEPARATOR: &str = "/";
#[cfg(target_os = "windows")]
const PATH_SEPARATOR: &str = "\\";
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
fn get_file_hash<T: std::fmt::Display>(file: T) -> String {
nu!("open -r {} | to text | hash md5", file).out
}
#[test]
fn copies_a_file() {
copies_a_file_impl(false);
copies_a_file_impl(true);
}
fn copies_a_file_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_1", |dirs, _| {
let test_file = dirs.formats().join("sample.ini");
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
let first_hash = get_file_hash(test_file.display());
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} `{}` ucp_test_1/sample.ini",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag,
test_file.display()
);
assert!(dirs.test().join("sample.ini").exists());
// Get the hash of the copied file content to check against first_hash.
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join("sample.ini").display());
assert_eq!(first_hash, after_cp_hash);
});
}
#[test]
fn copies_the_file_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory() {
copies_the_file_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_impl(false);
copies_the_file_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_impl(true);
}
fn copies_the_file_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_2", |dirs, _| {
let expected_file = AbsoluteFile::new(dirs.test().join("sample.ini"));
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
let first_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.formats().join("../formats/sample.ini").display());
nu!(
cwd: dirs.formats(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} ../formats/sample.ini {}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag,
expected_file.dir()
);
assert!(dirs.test().join("sample.ini").exists());
// Check the integrity of the file.
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(expected_file);
assert_eq!(first_hash, after_cp_hash);
})
}
// error msg changes on coreutils
#[test]
fn error_if_attempting_to_copy_a_directory_to_another_directory() {
error_if_attempting_to_copy_a_directory_to_another_directory_impl(false);
error_if_attempting_to_copy_a_directory_to_another_directory_impl(true);
}
fn error_if_attempting_to_copy_a_directory_to_another_directory_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_3", |dirs, _| {
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.formats(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} ../formats {}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag,
dirs.test().display()
);
ucp: Change error when directory is specified but not recursive (#10609) # Description Closes #10537. Basically error message was unhelpful, and this temporary measure adds back the nice previous nushell error message. Ideally, we would like to add a more permanent solution mentioned in the issue [comments](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/10537#issuecomment-1743686122), but since we want to have `ucp` as `cp` on new release, this is hackier but way simpler so this fix should do it. Only downside is that now behavior differs from `uutils` in the sense that: ``` uutils: > cp a foo/ bar ls bar # foo/a nushell: >ucp a foo/ bar # directory error (not copied) .... ``` So, since its non fatal error, uutils copies a, but nushell errors out with nothing copied. If we go to option 3 mentioned above, then we can decide what we want to do, and perhaps continue on a non fatal error. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - [X] `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` # After Submitting --------- Co-authored-by: amtoine <stevan.antoine@gmail.com>
2023-10-06 18:59:46 +02:00
assert!(actual.err.contains("formats"));
assert!(actual.err.contains("resolves to a directory (not copied)"));
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
});
}
#[test]
fn copies_the_directory_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_and_with_recursive_flag() {
copies_the_directory_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_and_with_recursive_flag_impl(
false,
);
copies_the_directory_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_and_with_recursive_flag_impl(
true,
);
}
fn copies_the_directory_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_and_with_recursive_flag_impl(
progress: bool,
) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_4", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox
.within("originals")
.with_files(vec![
EmptyFile("yehuda.txt"),
EmptyFile("jttxt"),
EmptyFile("andres.txt"),
])
.mkdir("expected");
let expected_dir = dirs.test().join("expected").join("originals");
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} originals expected -r",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag
);
assert!(expected_dir.exists());
assert!(files_exist_at(
vec![
Path::new("yehuda.txt"),
Path::new("jttxt"),
Path::new("andres.txt")
],
&expected_dir
));
})
}
#[test]
fn deep_copies_with_recursive_flag() {
deep_copies_with_recursive_flag_impl(false);
deep_copies_with_recursive_flag_impl(true);
}
fn deep_copies_with_recursive_flag_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_5", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox
.within("originals")
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("manifest.txt")])
.within("originals/contributors")
.with_files(vec![
EmptyFile("yehuda.txt"),
EmptyFile("jttxt"),
EmptyFile("andres.txt"),
])
.within("originals/contributors/JT")
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("errors.txt"), EmptyFile("multishells.txt")])
.within("originals/contributors/andres")
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("coverage.txt"), EmptyFile("commands.txt")])
.within("originals/contributors/yehuda")
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("defer-evaluation.txt")])
.mkdir("expected");
let expected_dir = dirs.test().join("expected").join("originals");
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
let jts_expected_copied_dir = expected_dir.join("contributors").join("JT");
let andres_expected_copied_dir = expected_dir.join("contributors").join("andres");
let yehudas_expected_copied_dir = expected_dir.join("contributors").join("yehuda");
nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} originals expected --recursive",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag
);
assert!(expected_dir.exists());
assert!(files_exist_at(
vec![Path::new("errors.txt"), Path::new("multishells.txt")],
jts_expected_copied_dir
));
assert!(files_exist_at(
vec![Path::new("coverage.txt"), Path::new("commands.txt")],
andres_expected_copied_dir
));
assert!(files_exist_at(
vec![Path::new("defer-evaluation.txt")],
yehudas_expected_copied_dir
));
})
}
#[test]
fn copies_using_path_with_wildcard() {
copies_using_path_with_wildcard_impl(false);
copies_using_path_with_wildcard_impl(true);
}
fn copies_using_path_with_wildcard_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_6", |dirs, _| {
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
let src_hashes = nu!(
cwd: dirs.formats(),
"for file in (ls ../formats/*) { open --raw $file.name | to text | hash md5 }"
)
.out;
nu!(
cwd: dirs.formats(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} -r ../formats/* {}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag,
dirs.test().display()
);
assert!(files_exist_at(
vec![
Path::new("caco3_plastics.csv"),
Path::new("cargo_sample.toml"),
Path::new("jt.xml"),
Path::new("sample.ini"),
Path::new("sgml_description.json"),
Path::new("utf16.ini"),
],
dirs.test()
));
// Check integrity after the copy is done
let dst_hashes = nu!(
cwd: dirs.formats(),
"for file in (ls {}) {{ open --raw $file.name | to text | hash md5 }}", dirs.test().display()
).out;
assert_eq!(src_hashes, dst_hashes);
})
}
#[test]
fn copies_using_a_glob() {
copies_using_a_glob_impl(false);
copies_using_a_glob_impl(true);
}
fn copies_using_a_glob_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_7", |dirs, _| {
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
let src_hashes = nu!(
cwd: dirs.formats(),
"for file in (ls *) { open --raw $file.name | to text | hash md5 }"
)
.out;
nu!(
cwd: dirs.formats(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} -r * {}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag,
dirs.test().display()
);
assert!(files_exist_at(
vec![
Path::new("caco3_plastics.csv"),
Path::new("cargo_sample.toml"),
Path::new("jt.xml"),
Path::new("sample.ini"),
Path::new("sgml_description.json"),
Path::new("utf16.ini"),
],
dirs.test()
));
// Check integrity after the copy is done
let dst_hashes = nu!(
cwd: dirs.formats(),
"for file in (ls {}) {{ open --raw $file.name | to text | hash md5 }}",
dirs.test().display()
)
.out;
assert_eq!(src_hashes, dst_hashes);
});
}
#[test]
fn copies_same_file_twice() {
copies_same_file_twice_impl(false);
copies_same_file_twice_impl(true);
}
fn copies_same_file_twice_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_8", |dirs, _| {
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} `{}` ucp_test_8/sample.ini",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag,
dirs.formats().join("sample.ini").display()
);
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} `{}` ucp_test_8/sample.ini",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag,
dirs.formats().join("sample.ini").display()
);
assert!(dirs.test().join("sample.ini").exists());
});
}
#[test]
#[ignore = "Behavior not supported by uutils cp"]
fn copy_files_using_glob_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots() {
copy_files_using_glob_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_imp(false);
copy_files_using_glob_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_imp(true);
}
fn copy_files_using_glob_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_imp(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_9", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.within("foo").within("bar").with_files(vec![
EmptyFile("jtjson"),
EmptyFile("andres.xml"),
EmptyFile("yehuda.yaml"),
EmptyFile("kevin.txt"),
EmptyFile("many_more.ppl"),
]);
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
nu!(
cwd: dirs.test().join("foo/bar"),
" cp {} * ...",
progress_flag,
);
assert!(files_exist_at(
vec![
"yehuda.yaml",
"jtjson",
"andres.xml",
"kevin.txt",
"many_more.ppl",
],
dirs.test()
));
})
}
#[test]
fn copy_file_and_dir_from_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_to_current_dir_recursive() {
copy_file_and_dir_from_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_to_current_dir_recursive_impl(false);
copy_file_and_dir_from_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_to_current_dir_recursive_impl(true);
}
fn copy_file_and_dir_from_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_to_current_dir_recursive_impl(
progress: bool,
) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_10", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("hello_there")]);
sandbox.mkdir("hello_again");
sandbox.within("foo").mkdir("bar");
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
nu!(
cwd: dirs.test().join("foo/bar"),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} -r .../hello* .",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag
);
let expected = dirs.test().join("foo/bar");
assert!(files_exist_at(vec!["hello_there", "hello_again"], expected));
})
}
// error msg changes on coreutils
#[test]
fn copy_to_non_existing_dir() {
copy_to_non_existing_dir_impl(false);
copy_to_non_existing_dir_impl(true);
}
fn copy_to_non_existing_dir_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_11", |_dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("empty_file")]);
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
let actual = nu!(
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} empty_file ~/not_a_dir{}",
Fix variables not allowed in ucp (#10304) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Fixes #10300 , where using variables didnt work with `ucp` as it was only expecting a `Expr::FilePath`. Before: (from the issue) ``` ❯ ucp -r $var $folder Error: × Missing file operand ╭─[entry #40:1:1] 1 │ ucp -r $var $folder · ─┬─ · ╰── Missing file operand ╰──── help: Please provide source and destination paths ``` Now: ``` `ucp -r $var $folder` # success ``` Also added the test to ensure its working:) . Oh, and I tweaked again slightly the messages on two tests because now the whole `path` is printed rather than `a`. Say: ``` #before `cp a a` --> 'a' and 'a' are the same file # now `cp a a` --> /home/current/location/a and /home/current/location/a are the same file ``` <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - [X] `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library <!-- > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
progress_flag,
PATH_SEPARATOR,
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
);
assert!(actual.err.contains("is not a directory"));
});
}
#[test]
fn copy_dir_contains_symlink_ignored() {
copy_dir_contains_symlink_ignored_impl(false);
copy_dir_contains_symlink_ignored_impl(true);
}
fn copy_dir_contains_symlink_ignored_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_12", |_dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox
.within("tmp_dir")
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("hello_there"), EmptyFile("good_bye")])
.within("tmp_dir")
.symlink("good_bye", "dangle_symlink");
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
// make symbolic link and copy.
nu!(
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
"rm {} tmp_dir/good_bye; cp -r tmp_dir tmp_dir_2",
progress_flag
);
// check hello_there exists inside `tmp_dir_2`, and `dangle_symlink` don't exists inside `tmp_dir_2`.
let expected = sandbox.cwd().join("tmp_dir_2");
assert!(files_exist_at(vec!["hello_there"], expected));
// GNU cp will copy the broken symlink, so following their behavior
// thus commenting out below
// let path = expected.join("dangle_symlink");
// assert!(!path.exists() && !path.is_symlink());
});
}
#[test]
fn copy_dir_contains_symlink() {
copy_dir_contains_symlink_impl(false);
copy_dir_contains_symlink_impl(true);
}
fn copy_dir_contains_symlink_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_13", |_dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox
.within("tmp_dir")
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("hello_there"), EmptyFile("good_bye")])
.within("tmp_dir")
.symlink("good_bye", "dangle_symlink");
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
// make symbolic link and copy.
nu!(
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
"rm tmp_dir/good_bye; cp {} -r -n tmp_dir tmp_dir_2",
progress_flag
);
// check hello_there exists inside `tmp_dir_2`, and `dangle_symlink` also exists inside `tmp_dir_2`.
let expected = sandbox.cwd().join("tmp_dir_2");
assert!(files_exist_at(vec!["hello_there"], expected.clone()));
let path = expected.join("dangle_symlink");
assert!(path.is_symlink());
});
}
#[test]
fn copy_dir_symlink_file_body_not_changed() {
copy_dir_symlink_file_body_not_changed_impl(false);
copy_dir_symlink_file_body_not_changed_impl(true);
}
fn copy_dir_symlink_file_body_not_changed_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_14", |_dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox
.within("tmp_dir")
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("hello_there"), EmptyFile("good_bye")])
.within("tmp_dir")
.symlink("good_bye", "dangle_symlink");
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
// make symbolic link and copy.
nu!(
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
"rm tmp_dir/good_bye; cp {} -r -n tmp_dir tmp_dir_2; rm -r tmp_dir; cp {} -r -n tmp_dir_2 tmp_dir; echo hello_data | save tmp_dir/good_bye",
progress_flag,
progress_flag,
);
// check dangle_symlink in tmp_dir is no longer dangling.
let expected_file = sandbox.cwd().join("tmp_dir").join("dangle_symlink");
let actual = file_contents(expected_file);
assert!(actual.contains("hello_data"));
});
}
// error msg changes on coreutils
#[test]
fn copy_identical_file() {
copy_identical_file_impl(false);
copy_identical_file_impl(true);
}
fn copy_identical_file_impl(progress: bool) {
Fix variables not allowed in ucp (#10304) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Fixes #10300 , where using variables didnt work with `ucp` as it was only expecting a `Expr::FilePath`. Before: (from the issue) ``` ❯ ucp -r $var $folder Error: × Missing file operand ╭─[entry #40:1:1] 1 │ ucp -r $var $folder · ─┬─ · ╰── Missing file operand ╰──── help: Please provide source and destination paths ``` Now: ``` `ucp -r $var $folder` # success ``` Also added the test to ensure its working:) . Oh, and I tweaked again slightly the messages on two tests because now the whole `path` is printed rather than `a`. Say: ``` #before `cp a a` --> 'a' and 'a' are the same file # now `cp a a` --> /home/current/location/a and /home/current/location/a are the same file ``` <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - [X] `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library <!-- > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
Playground::setup("ucp_test_15", |dirs, sandbox| {
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("same.txt")]);
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
let actual = nu!(
Fix variables not allowed in ucp (#10304) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Fixes #10300 , where using variables didnt work with `ucp` as it was only expecting a `Expr::FilePath`. Before: (from the issue) ``` ❯ ucp -r $var $folder Error: × Missing file operand ╭─[entry #40:1:1] 1 │ ucp -r $var $folder · ─┬─ · ╰── Missing file operand ╰──── help: Please provide source and destination paths ``` Now: ``` `ucp -r $var $folder` # success ``` Also added the test to ensure its working:) . Oh, and I tweaked again slightly the messages on two tests because now the whole `path` is printed rather than `a`. Say: ``` #before `cp a a` --> 'a' and 'a' are the same file # now `cp a a` --> /home/current/location/a and /home/current/location/a are the same file ``` <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - [X] `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library <!-- > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
cwd: dirs.test(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} same.txt same.txt",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag,
);
// assert!(actual.err.contains("Copy aborted"));
Fix variables not allowed in ucp (#10304) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Fixes #10300 , where using variables didnt work with `ucp` as it was only expecting a `Expr::FilePath`. Before: (from the issue) ``` ❯ ucp -r $var $folder Error: × Missing file operand ╭─[entry #40:1:1] 1 │ ucp -r $var $folder · ─┬─ · ╰── Missing file operand ╰──── help: Please provide source and destination paths ``` Now: ``` `ucp -r $var $folder` # success ``` Also added the test to ensure its working:) . Oh, and I tweaked again slightly the messages on two tests because now the whole `path` is printed rather than `a`. Say: ``` #before `cp a a` --> 'a' and 'a' are the same file # now `cp a a` --> /home/current/location/a and /home/current/location/a are the same file ``` <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - [X] `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library <!-- > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
let msg = format!(
"'{}' and '{}' are the same file",
dirs.test().join("same.txt").display(),
dirs.test().join("same.txt").display(),
);
// debug messages in CI
if !actual.err.contains(&msg) {
panic!("stderr was: {}", actual.err);
}
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
});
}
#[test]
#[ignore = "File name in progress bar not on uutils impl"]
fn copy_ignores_ansi() {
copy_ignores_ansi_impl(false);
copy_ignores_ansi_impl(true);
}
fn copy_ignores_ansi_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_16", |_dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("test.txt")]);
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
let actual = nu!(
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
"ls | find test | get name | cp {} $in.0 success.txt; ls | find success | get name | ansi strip | get 0",
progress_flag,
);
assert_eq!(actual.out, "success.txt");
});
}
//apparently on windows error msg is different, but linux(where i test) is fine.
//fix later FIXME
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
#[cfg(unix)]
#[test]
fn copy_file_not_exists_dst() {
copy_file_not_exists_dst_impl(false);
copy_file_not_exists_dst_impl(true);
}
#[cfg(unix)]
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
fn copy_file_not_exists_dst_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_17", |_dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("valid.txt")]);
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
let actual = nu!(
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} valid.txt ~/invalid_dir/invalid_dir1",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag,
);
assert!(
actual.err.contains("invalid_dir1") && actual.err.contains("No such file or directory")
);
});
}
//again slightly different error message on windows on tests
// compared to linux
#[test]
#[ignore] //FIXME: This test needs to be re-enabled once uu_cp has fixed the bug
fn copy_file_with_read_permission() {
copy_file_with_read_permission_impl(false);
copy_file_with_read_permission_impl(true);
}
fn copy_file_with_read_permission_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_18", |_dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![
EmptyFile("valid.txt"),
FileWithPermission("invalid_prem.txt", false),
]);
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
let actual = nu!(
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} valid.txt invalid_prem.txt",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
progress_flag,
);
assert!(actual.err.contains("invalid_prem.txt") && actual.err.contains("denied"));
});
}
// uutils/coreutils copy tests
static TEST_EXISTING_FILE: &str = "existing_file.txt";
static TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE: &str = "hello_world.txt";
static TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST: &str = "copy_of_hello_world.txt";
static TEST_HOW_ARE_YOU_SOURCE: &str = "how_are_you.txt";
static TEST_HOW_ARE_YOU_DEST: &str = "hello_dir/how_are_you.txt";
static TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER: &str = "hello_dir/";
static TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_FILE: &str = "hello_dir/hello_world.txt";
static TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER: &str = "hello_dir_with_file/";
static TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER_FILE: &str = "hello_dir_with_file/hello_world.txt";
#[cfg(not(target_os = "macos"))]
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
static TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_NEW: &str = "hello_dir_new";
#[cfg(not(target_os = "macos"))]
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
static TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_NEW_FILE: &str = "hello_dir_new/hello_world.txt";
#[test]
fn test_cp_cp() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_19", |dirs, _| {
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
let src_hash = get_file_hash(src.display());
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} ucp_test_19/{}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
src.display(),
TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST
);
assert!(dirs.test().join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST).exists());
// Get the hash of the copied file content to check against first_hash.
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST).display());
assert_eq!(src_hash, after_cp_hash);
});
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_existing_target() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_20", |dirs, _| {
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
let existing = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_EXISTING_FILE);
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
let src_hash = get_file_hash(src.display());
// Copy existing file to destination, so that it exists for the test
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} ucp_test_20/{}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
existing.display(),
TEST_EXISTING_FILE
);
// At this point the src and existing files should be different
assert!(dirs.test().join(TEST_EXISTING_FILE).exists());
// Now for the test
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} ucp_test_20/{}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
src.display(),
TEST_EXISTING_FILE
);
assert!(dirs.test().join(TEST_EXISTING_FILE).exists());
// Get the hash of the copied file content to check against first_hash.
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_EXISTING_FILE).display());
assert_eq!(src_hash, after_cp_hash);
});
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_multiple_files() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_21", |dirs, sandbox| {
let src1 = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
let src2 = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HOW_ARE_YOU_SOURCE);
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
let src1_hash = get_file_hash(src1.display());
let src2_hash = get_file_hash(src2.display());
//Create target directory
sandbox.mkdir(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER);
// Start test
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} {} ucp_test_21/{}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
src1.display(),
src2.display(),
TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER
);
assert!(dirs.test().join(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER).exists());
// Get the hash of the copied file content to check against first_hash.
let after_cp_1_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_FILE).display());
let after_cp_2_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_HOW_ARE_YOU_DEST).display());
assert_eq!(src1_hash, after_cp_1_hash);
assert_eq!(src2_hash, after_cp_2_hash);
});
}
#[test]
#[cfg(not(target_os = "macos"))]
fn test_cp_recurse() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_22", |dirs, sandbox| {
// Create the relevant target directories
sandbox.mkdir(TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER);
sandbox.mkdir(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_NEW);
let src = dirs
.fixtures
.join("cp")
.join(TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER)
.join(TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER_FILE);
let src_hash = get_file_hash(src.display());
// Start test
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp -r {} ucp_test_22/{}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER,
TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_NEW,
);
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_NEW_FILE).display());
assert_eq!(src_hash, after_cp_hash);
});
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_with_dirs() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_23", |dirs, sandbox| {
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
let src_hash = get_file_hash(src.display());
//Create target directory
sandbox.mkdir(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER);
// Start test
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} ucp_test_23/{}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
src.display(),
TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER,
);
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_FILE).display());
assert_eq!(src_hash, after_cp_hash);
// Other way around
sandbox.mkdir(TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER);
let src2 = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER_FILE);
let src2_hash = get_file_hash(src2.display());
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} ucp_test_23/{}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
src2.display(),
TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST,
);
let after_cp_2_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST).display());
assert_eq!(src2_hash, after_cp_2_hash);
});
}
#[cfg(not(windows))]
#[test]
fn test_cp_arg_force() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_24", |dirs, sandbox| {
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
let src_hash = get_file_hash(src.display());
sandbox.with_files(vec![FileWithPermission("invalid_prem.txt", false)]);
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} --force ucp_test_24/{}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
src.display(),
"invalid_prem.txt"
);
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join("invalid_prem.txt").display());
// Check content was copied by the use of --force
assert_eq!(src_hash, after_cp_hash);
});
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_directory_to_itself_disallowed() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_25", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.mkdir("d");
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp -r ucp_test_25/{} ucp_test_25/{}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
"d",
"d"
);
actual
.err
.contains("cannot copy a directory, 'd', into itself, 'd/d'");
});
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_nested_directory_to_itself_disallowed() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_26", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.mkdir("a");
sandbox.mkdir("a/b");
sandbox.mkdir("a/b/c");
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp -r {} {}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
"a/b",
"a/b/c"
);
actual
.err
.contains("cannot copy a directory, 'a/b', into itself, 'a/b/c/b'");
});
}
#[cfg(not(windows))]
#[test]
fn test_cp_same_file_force() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_27", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("f")]);
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp --force {} {}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
"f",
"f"
);
actual.err.contains("cp: 'f' and 'f' are the same file");
assert!(!dirs.test().join("f~").exists());
});
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_arg_no_clobber() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_28", |dirs, _| {
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
let target = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HOW_ARE_YOU_SOURCE);
let target_hash = get_file_hash(target.display());
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {} {} --no-clobber",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
src.display(),
target.display()
);
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(target.display());
assert!(actual.err.contains("not replacing"));
// Check content was not clobbered
assert_eq!(after_cp_hash, target_hash);
});
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_arg_no_clobber_twice() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_29", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![
EmptyFile("source.txt"),
FileWithContent("source_with_body.txt", "some-body"),
]);
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp --no-clobber ucp_test_29/{} ucp_test_29/{}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
"source.txt",
"dest.txt"
);
assert!(dirs.test().join("dest.txt").exists());
nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp --no-clobber ucp_test_29/{} ucp_test_29/{}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
"source_with_body.txt",
"dest.txt"
);
// Should have same contents of original empty file as --no-clobber should not overwrite dest.txt
assert_eq!(file_contents(dirs.test().join("dest.txt")), "fake data");
});
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_debug_default() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_30", |dirs, _| {
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp --debug {} ucp_test_30/{}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
src.display(),
TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST
);
#[cfg(target_os = "macos")]
if !actual
.out
.contains("copy offload: unknown, reflink: unsupported, sparse detection: unsupported")
{
panic!("{}", format!("Failure: stdout was \n{}", actual.out));
}
#[cfg(any(target_os = "linux", target_os = "freebsd"))]
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
if !actual
.out
.contains("copy offload: unknown, reflink: unsupported, sparse detection: no")
{
panic!("{}", format!("Failure: stdout was \n{}", actual.out));
}
#[cfg(windows)]
if !actual.out.contains(
"copy offload: unsupported, reflink: unsupported, sparse detection: unsupported",
) {
panic!("{}", format!("Failure: stdout was \n{}", actual.out));
}
});
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_verbose_default() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_31", |dirs, _| {
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp --verbose {} {}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
src.display(),
TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST
);
assert!(actual.out.contains(
format!(
Fix variables not allowed in ucp (#10304) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Fixes #10300 , where using variables didnt work with `ucp` as it was only expecting a `Expr::FilePath`. Before: (from the issue) ``` ❯ ucp -r $var $folder Error: × Missing file operand ╭─[entry #40:1:1] 1 │ ucp -r $var $folder · ─┬─ · ╰── Missing file operand ╰──── help: Please provide source and destination paths ``` Now: ``` `ucp -r $var $folder` # success ``` Also added the test to ensure its working:) . Oh, and I tweaked again slightly the messages on two tests because now the whole `path` is printed rather than `a`. Say: ``` #before `cp a a` --> 'a' and 'a' are the same file # now `cp a a` --> /home/current/location/a and /home/current/location/a are the same file ``` <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - [X] `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library <!-- > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
"'{}' -> '{}'",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
src.display(),
Fix variables not allowed in ucp (#10304) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Fixes #10300 , where using variables didnt work with `ucp` as it was only expecting a `Expr::FilePath`. Before: (from the issue) ``` ❯ ucp -r $var $folder Error: × Missing file operand ╭─[entry #40:1:1] 1 │ ucp -r $var $folder · ─┬─ · ╰── Missing file operand ╰──── help: Please provide source and destination paths ``` Now: ``` `ucp -r $var $folder` # success ``` Also added the test to ensure its working:) . Oh, and I tweaked again slightly the messages on two tests because now the whole `path` is printed rather than `a`. Say: ``` #before `cp a a` --> 'a' and 'a' are the same file # now `cp a a` --> /home/current/location/a and /home/current/location/a are the same file ``` <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - [X] `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library <!-- > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
dirs.root().join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST).display()
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
)
.as_str(),
));
});
}
#[test]
fn test_cp_only_source_no_dest() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_32", |dirs, _| {
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.root(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"cp {}",
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue: <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
src.display(),
);
assert!(actual
.err
.contains("Missing destination path operand after"));
assert!(actual.err.contains(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE));
});
}
Fix variables not allowed in ucp (#10304) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Fixes #10300 , where using variables didnt work with `ucp` as it was only expecting a `Expr::FilePath`. Before: (from the issue) ``` ❯ ucp -r $var $folder Error: × Missing file operand ╭─[entry #40:1:1] 1 │ ucp -r $var $folder · ─┬─ · ╰── Missing file operand ╰──── help: Please provide source and destination paths ``` Now: ``` `ucp -r $var $folder` # success ``` Also added the test to ensure its working:) . Oh, and I tweaked again slightly the messages on two tests because now the whole `path` is printed rather than `a`. Say: ``` #before `cp a a` --> 'a' and 'a' are the same file # now `cp a a` --> /home/current/location/a and /home/current/location/a are the same file ``` <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - [X] `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library <!-- > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
#[test]
fn test_cp_with_vars() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_33", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("input")]);
nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
rename nushell's cp command to cp-old making coreutils the default cp (#10678) # Description This PR renames nushell's `cp` command to `cp-old` to make room for `ucp` to be renamed to `cp`, making the coreutils version of `cp` the default for nushell. After some period of time, we should remove `cp-old` entirely. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
"let src = 'input'; let dst = 'target'; cp $src $dst",
Fix variables not allowed in ucp (#10304) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Fixes #10300 , where using variables didnt work with `ucp` as it was only expecting a `Expr::FilePath`. Before: (from the issue) ``` ❯ ucp -r $var $folder Error: × Missing file operand ╭─[entry #40:1:1] 1 │ ucp -r $var $folder · ─┬─ · ╰── Missing file operand ╰──── help: Please provide source and destination paths ``` Now: ``` `ucp -r $var $folder` # success ``` Also added the test to ensure its working:) . Oh, and I tweaked again slightly the messages on two tests because now the whole `path` is printed rather than `a`. Say: ``` #before `cp a a` --> 'a' and 'a' are the same file # now `cp a a` --> /home/current/location/a and /home/current/location/a are the same file ``` <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - [X] `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library <!-- > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
);
assert!(dirs.test().join("target").exists());
});
}
Allow filesystem commands to access files with glob metachars in name (#10694) (squashed version of #10557, clean commit history and review thread) Fixes #10571, also potentially: #10364, #10211, #9558, #9310, # Description Changes processing of arguments to filesystem commands that are source paths or globs. Applies to `cp, cp-old, mv, rm, du` but not `ls` (because it uses a different globbing interface) or `glob` (because it uses a different globbing library). The core of the change is to lookup the argument first as a file and only glob if it is not. That way, a path containing glob metacharacters can be referenced without glob quoting, though it will have to be single quoted to avoid nushell parsing. Before: A file path that looks like a glob is not matched by the glob specified as a (source) argument and takes some thinking about to access. You might say the glob pattern shadows a file with the same spelling. ``` > ls a* ╭───┬────────┬──────┬──────┬────────────────╮ │ # │ name │ type │ size │ modified │ ├───┼────────┼──────┼──────┼────────────────┤ │ 0 │ a[bc]d │ file │ 0 B │ 34 seconds ago │ │ 1 │ abd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ │ 2 │ acd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ ╰───┴────────┴──────┴──────┴────────────────╯ > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd > ## Note -- a[bc]d *not* copied, and seemingly hard to access. > cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest Error: × No matches found ╭─[entry #33:1:1] 1 │ cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest · ─────┬──── · ╰── no matches found ╰──── > #.. but is accessible with enough glob quoting. > cp --verbose 'a[[]bc[]]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d ``` Before_2: if file has glob metachars but isn't a valid pattern, user gets a confusing error: ``` > touch 'a[b' > cp 'a[b' dest Error: × Pattern syntax error near position 30: invalid range pattern ╭─[entry #13:1:1] 1 │ cp 'a[b' dest · ──┬── · ╰── invalid pattern ╰──── ``` After: Args to cp, mv, etc. are tried first as literal files, and only as globs if not found to be files. ``` > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d > cp --verbose '[a][bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd ``` After_2: file with glob metachars but invalid pattern just works. (though Windows does not allow file name to contain `*`.). ``` > cp --verbose 'a[b' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[b to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[b ``` So, with this fix, a file shadows a glob pattern with the same spelling. If you have such a file and really want to use the glob pattern, you will have to glob quote some of the characters in the pattern. I think that's less confusing to the user: if ls shows a file with a weird name, s/he'll still be able to copy, rename or delete it. # User-Facing Changes Could break some existing scripts. If user happened to have a file with a globbish name but was using a glob pattern with the same spelling, the new version will process the file and not expand the glob. # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-10-18 20:31:15 +02:00
Cp target expansion (#11152) # Description This PR addresses issue with cp brough up on [discord](https://discord.com/channels/601130461678272522/614593951969574961/1177669443917189130) where target of cp is not correctly expanded. If one has directory `test` with file `file.txt` in it then the following command (in one line or inside a `do` block): ```nu cd test; let file = 'copy.txt'; cp file.txt $file ``` will create a `copy.txt` in `.` not in `test` instead. This happens because target of `cp` is a variable which is not expanded unlike a string literal # User-Facing Changes `cp` will correctly parse realative target paths # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2023-11-25 16:42:20 +01:00
#[test]
fn test_cp_destination_after_cd() {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_34", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.mkdir("test");
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("test/file.txt")]);
nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
// Defining variable avoid path expansion of cp argument.
// If argument was not expanded ucp wrapper should do it
"cd test; let file = 'copy.txt'; cp file.txt $file",
);
assert!(dirs.test().join("test").join("copy.txt").exists());
});
}
Allow filesystem commands to access files with glob metachars in name (#10694) (squashed version of #10557, clean commit history and review thread) Fixes #10571, also potentially: #10364, #10211, #9558, #9310, # Description Changes processing of arguments to filesystem commands that are source paths or globs. Applies to `cp, cp-old, mv, rm, du` but not `ls` (because it uses a different globbing interface) or `glob` (because it uses a different globbing library). The core of the change is to lookup the argument first as a file and only glob if it is not. That way, a path containing glob metacharacters can be referenced without glob quoting, though it will have to be single quoted to avoid nushell parsing. Before: A file path that looks like a glob is not matched by the glob specified as a (source) argument and takes some thinking about to access. You might say the glob pattern shadows a file with the same spelling. ``` > ls a* ╭───┬────────┬──────┬──────┬────────────────╮ │ # │ name │ type │ size │ modified │ ├───┼────────┼──────┼──────┼────────────────┤ │ 0 │ a[bc]d │ file │ 0 B │ 34 seconds ago │ │ 1 │ abd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ │ 2 │ acd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ ╰───┴────────┴──────┴──────┴────────────────╯ > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd > ## Note -- a[bc]d *not* copied, and seemingly hard to access. > cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest Error: × No matches found ╭─[entry #33:1:1] 1 │ cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest · ─────┬──── · ╰── no matches found ╰──── > #.. but is accessible with enough glob quoting. > cp --verbose 'a[[]bc[]]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d ``` Before_2: if file has glob metachars but isn't a valid pattern, user gets a confusing error: ``` > touch 'a[b' > cp 'a[b' dest Error: × Pattern syntax error near position 30: invalid range pattern ╭─[entry #13:1:1] 1 │ cp 'a[b' dest · ──┬── · ╰── invalid pattern ╰──── ``` After: Args to cp, mv, etc. are tried first as literal files, and only as globs if not found to be files. ``` > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d > cp --verbose '[a][bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd ``` After_2: file with glob metachars but invalid pattern just works. (though Windows does not allow file name to contain `*`.). ``` > cp --verbose 'a[b' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[b to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[b ``` So, with this fix, a file shadows a glob pattern with the same spelling. If you have such a file and really want to use the glob pattern, you will have to glob quote some of the characters in the pattern. I think that's less confusing to the user: if ls shows a file with a weird name, s/he'll still be able to copy, rename or delete it. # User-Facing Changes Could break some existing scripts. If user happened to have a file with a globbish name but was using a glob pattern with the same spelling, the new version will process the file and not expand the glob. # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-10-18 20:31:15 +02:00
#[rstest]
Unify glob behavior on `open`, `rm`, `cp-old`, `mv`, `umv`, `cp` and `du` commands (#11621) # Description This pr is a follow up to [#11569](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/11569#issuecomment-1902279587) > Revert the logic in https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/10694 and apply the logic in this pr to mv, cp, rv will require a larger change, I need to think how to achieve the bahavior And sorry @bobhy for reverting some of your changes. This pr is going to unify glob behavior on the given commands: * open * rm * cp-old * mv * umv * cp * du So they have the same behavior to `ls`, which is: If given parameter is quoted by single quote(`'`) or double quote(`"`), don't auto-expand the glob pattern. If not quoted, auto-expand the glob pattern. Fixes: #9558 Fixes: #10211 Fixes: #9310 Fixes: #10364 # TODO But there is one thing remains: if we give a variable to the command, it will always auto-expand the glob pattern, e.g: ```nushell let path = "a[123]b" rm $path ``` I don't think it's expected. But I also think user might want to auto-expand the glob pattern in variables. So I'll introduce a new command called `glob escape`, then if user doesn't want to auto-expand the glob pattern, he can just do this: `rm ($path | glob escape)` # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Done # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> ## NOTE This pr changes the semantic of `GlobPattern`, before this pr, it will `expand path` after evaluated, this makes `nu_engine::glob_from` have no chance to glob things right if a path contains glob pattern. e.g: [#9310 ](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/9310#issuecomment-1886824030) #10211 I think changing the semantic is fine, because it makes glob works if path contains something like '*'. It maybe a breaking change if a custom command's argument are annotated by `: glob`.
2024-01-26 14:57:35 +01:00
#[case("a]c")]
#[case("a[c")]
#[case("a[bc]d")]
#[case("a][c")]
Allow filesystem commands to access files with glob metachars in name (#10694) (squashed version of #10557, clean commit history and review thread) Fixes #10571, also potentially: #10364, #10211, #9558, #9310, # Description Changes processing of arguments to filesystem commands that are source paths or globs. Applies to `cp, cp-old, mv, rm, du` but not `ls` (because it uses a different globbing interface) or `glob` (because it uses a different globbing library). The core of the change is to lookup the argument first as a file and only glob if it is not. That way, a path containing glob metacharacters can be referenced without glob quoting, though it will have to be single quoted to avoid nushell parsing. Before: A file path that looks like a glob is not matched by the glob specified as a (source) argument and takes some thinking about to access. You might say the glob pattern shadows a file with the same spelling. ``` > ls a* ╭───┬────────┬──────┬──────┬────────────────╮ │ # │ name │ type │ size │ modified │ ├───┼────────┼──────┼──────┼────────────────┤ │ 0 │ a[bc]d │ file │ 0 B │ 34 seconds ago │ │ 1 │ abd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ │ 2 │ acd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ ╰───┴────────┴──────┴──────┴────────────────╯ > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd > ## Note -- a[bc]d *not* copied, and seemingly hard to access. > cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest Error: × No matches found ╭─[entry #33:1:1] 1 │ cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest · ─────┬──── · ╰── no matches found ╰──── > #.. but is accessible with enough glob quoting. > cp --verbose 'a[[]bc[]]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d ``` Before_2: if file has glob metachars but isn't a valid pattern, user gets a confusing error: ``` > touch 'a[b' > cp 'a[b' dest Error: × Pattern syntax error near position 30: invalid range pattern ╭─[entry #13:1:1] 1 │ cp 'a[b' dest · ──┬── · ╰── invalid pattern ╰──── ``` After: Args to cp, mv, etc. are tried first as literal files, and only as globs if not found to be files. ``` > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d > cp --verbose '[a][bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd ``` After_2: file with glob metachars but invalid pattern just works. (though Windows does not allow file name to contain `*`.). ``` > cp --verbose 'a[b' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[b to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[b ``` So, with this fix, a file shadows a glob pattern with the same spelling. If you have such a file and really want to use the glob pattern, you will have to glob quote some of the characters in the pattern. I think that's less confusing to the user: if ls shows a file with a weird name, s/he'll still be able to copy, rename or delete it. # User-Facing Changes Could break some existing scripts. If user happened to have a file with a globbish name but was using a glob pattern with the same spelling, the new version will process the file and not expand the glob. # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-10-18 20:31:15 +02:00
fn copies_files_with_glob_metachars(#[case] src_name: &str) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_34", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![FileWithContent(
src_name,
"What is the sound of one hand clapping?",
)]);
let src = dirs.test().join(src_name);
// -- open command doesn't like file name
//// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
//let src_hash = get_file_hash(src.display());
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
Unify glob behavior on `open`, `rm`, `cp-old`, `mv`, `umv`, `cp` and `du` commands (#11621) # Description This pr is a follow up to [#11569](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/11569#issuecomment-1902279587) > Revert the logic in https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/10694 and apply the logic in this pr to mv, cp, rv will require a larger change, I need to think how to achieve the bahavior And sorry @bobhy for reverting some of your changes. This pr is going to unify glob behavior on the given commands: * open * rm * cp-old * mv * umv * cp * du So they have the same behavior to `ls`, which is: If given parameter is quoted by single quote(`'`) or double quote(`"`), don't auto-expand the glob pattern. If not quoted, auto-expand the glob pattern. Fixes: #9558 Fixes: #10211 Fixes: #9310 Fixes: #10364 # TODO But there is one thing remains: if we give a variable to the command, it will always auto-expand the glob pattern, e.g: ```nushell let path = "a[123]b" rm $path ``` I don't think it's expected. But I also think user might want to auto-expand the glob pattern in variables. So I'll introduce a new command called `glob escape`, then if user doesn't want to auto-expand the glob pattern, he can just do this: `rm ($path | glob escape)` # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Done # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> ## NOTE This pr changes the semantic of `GlobPattern`, before this pr, it will `expand path` after evaluated, this makes `nu_engine::glob_from` have no chance to glob things right if a path contains glob pattern. e.g: [#9310 ](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/9310#issuecomment-1886824030) #10211 I think changing the semantic is fine, because it makes glob works if path contains something like '*'. It maybe a breaking change if a custom command's argument are annotated by `: glob`.
2024-01-26 14:57:35 +01:00
"cp '{}' {}",
Allow filesystem commands to access files with glob metachars in name (#10694) (squashed version of #10557, clean commit history and review thread) Fixes #10571, also potentially: #10364, #10211, #9558, #9310, # Description Changes processing of arguments to filesystem commands that are source paths or globs. Applies to `cp, cp-old, mv, rm, du` but not `ls` (because it uses a different globbing interface) or `glob` (because it uses a different globbing library). The core of the change is to lookup the argument first as a file and only glob if it is not. That way, a path containing glob metacharacters can be referenced without glob quoting, though it will have to be single quoted to avoid nushell parsing. Before: A file path that looks like a glob is not matched by the glob specified as a (source) argument and takes some thinking about to access. You might say the glob pattern shadows a file with the same spelling. ``` > ls a* ╭───┬────────┬──────┬──────┬────────────────╮ │ # │ name │ type │ size │ modified │ ├───┼────────┼──────┼──────┼────────────────┤ │ 0 │ a[bc]d │ file │ 0 B │ 34 seconds ago │ │ 1 │ abd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ │ 2 │ acd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ ╰───┴────────┴──────┴──────┴────────────────╯ > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd > ## Note -- a[bc]d *not* copied, and seemingly hard to access. > cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest Error: × No matches found ╭─[entry #33:1:1] 1 │ cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest · ─────┬──── · ╰── no matches found ╰──── > #.. but is accessible with enough glob quoting. > cp --verbose 'a[[]bc[]]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d ``` Before_2: if file has glob metachars but isn't a valid pattern, user gets a confusing error: ``` > touch 'a[b' > cp 'a[b' dest Error: × Pattern syntax error near position 30: invalid range pattern ╭─[entry #13:1:1] 1 │ cp 'a[b' dest · ──┬── · ╰── invalid pattern ╰──── ``` After: Args to cp, mv, etc. are tried first as literal files, and only as globs if not found to be files. ``` > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d > cp --verbose '[a][bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd ``` After_2: file with glob metachars but invalid pattern just works. (though Windows does not allow file name to contain `*`.). ``` > cp --verbose 'a[b' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[b to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[b ``` So, with this fix, a file shadows a glob pattern with the same spelling. If you have such a file and really want to use the glob pattern, you will have to glob quote some of the characters in the pattern. I think that's less confusing to the user: if ls shows a file with a weird name, s/he'll still be able to copy, rename or delete it. # User-Facing Changes Could break some existing scripts. If user happened to have a file with a globbish name but was using a glob pattern with the same spelling, the new version will process the file and not expand the glob. # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-10-18 20:31:15 +02:00
src.display(),
TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST
);
assert!(actual.err.is_empty());
assert!(dirs.test().join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST).exists());
//// Get the hash of the copied file content to check against first_hash.
//let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST).display());
//assert_eq!(src_hash, after_cp_hash);
});
}
`open`, `rm`, `umv`, `cp`, `rm` and `du`: Don't globs if inputs are variables or string interpolation (#11886) # Description This is a follow up to https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/11621#issuecomment-1937484322 Also Fixes: #11838 ## About the code change It applys the same logic when we pass variables to external commands: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/blob/0487e9ffcbc57c2d5feca606e10c3f8221ff5e00/crates/nu-command/src/system/run_external.rs#L162-L170 That is: if user input dynamic things(like variables, sub-expression, or string interpolation), it returns a quoted `NuPath`, then user input won't be globbed # User-Facing Changes Given two input files: `a*c.txt`, `abc.txt` * `let f = "a*c.txt"; rm $f` will remove one file: `a*c.txt`. ~* `let f = "a*c.txt"; rm --glob $f` will remove `a*c.txt` and `abc.txt`~ * `let f: glob = "a*c.txt"; rm $f` will remove `a*c.txt` and `abc.txt` ## Rules about globbing with *variable* Given two files: `a*c.txt`, `abc.txt` | Cmd Type | example | Result | | ----- | ------------------ | ------ | | builtin | let f = "a*c.txt"; rm $f | remove `a*c.txt` | | builtin | let f: glob = "a*c.txt"; rm $f | remove `a*c.txt` and `abc.txt` | builtin | let f = "a*c.txt"; rm ($f \| into glob) | remove `a*c.txt` and `abc.txt` | custom | def crm [f: glob] { rm $f }; let f = "a*c.txt"; crm $f | remove `a*c.txt` and `abc.txt` | custom | def crm [f: glob] { rm ($f \| into string) }; let f = "a*c.txt"; crm $f | remove `a*c.txt` | custom | def crm [f: string] { rm $f }; let f = "a*c.txt"; crm $f | remove `a*c.txt` | custom | def crm [f: string] { rm $f }; let f = "a*c.txt"; crm ($f \| into glob) | remove `a*c.txt` and `abc.txt` In general, if a variable is annotated with `glob` type, nushell will expand glob pattern. Or else, we need to use `into | glob` to expand glob pattern # Tests + Formatting Done # After Submitting I think `str glob-escape` command will be no-longer required. We can remove it.
2024-02-23 02:17:09 +01:00
#[rstest]
#[case("a]c")]
#[case("a[c")]
#[case("a[bc]d")]
#[case("a][c")]
fn copies_files_with_glob_metachars_when_input_are_variables(#[case] src_name: &str) {
Playground::setup("ucp_test_35", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![FileWithContent(
src_name,
"What is the sound of one hand clapping?",
)]);
let src = dirs.test().join(src_name);
// -- open command doesn't like file name
//// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
//let src_hash = get_file_hash(src.display());
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
"let f = '{}'; cp $f {}",
src.display(),
TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST
);
assert!(actual.err.is_empty());
assert!(dirs.test().join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST).exists());
//// Get the hash of the copied file content to check against first_hash.
//let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST).display());
//assert_eq!(src_hash, after_cp_hash);
});
}
Allow filesystem commands to access files with glob metachars in name (#10694) (squashed version of #10557, clean commit history and review thread) Fixes #10571, also potentially: #10364, #10211, #9558, #9310, # Description Changes processing of arguments to filesystem commands that are source paths or globs. Applies to `cp, cp-old, mv, rm, du` but not `ls` (because it uses a different globbing interface) or `glob` (because it uses a different globbing library). The core of the change is to lookup the argument first as a file and only glob if it is not. That way, a path containing glob metacharacters can be referenced without glob quoting, though it will have to be single quoted to avoid nushell parsing. Before: A file path that looks like a glob is not matched by the glob specified as a (source) argument and takes some thinking about to access. You might say the glob pattern shadows a file with the same spelling. ``` > ls a* ╭───┬────────┬──────┬──────┬────────────────╮ │ # │ name │ type │ size │ modified │ ├───┼────────┼──────┼──────┼────────────────┤ │ 0 │ a[bc]d │ file │ 0 B │ 34 seconds ago │ │ 1 │ abd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ │ 2 │ acd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ ╰───┴────────┴──────┴──────┴────────────────╯ > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd > ## Note -- a[bc]d *not* copied, and seemingly hard to access. > cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest Error: × No matches found ╭─[entry #33:1:1] 1 │ cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest · ─────┬──── · ╰── no matches found ╰──── > #.. but is accessible with enough glob quoting. > cp --verbose 'a[[]bc[]]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d ``` Before_2: if file has glob metachars but isn't a valid pattern, user gets a confusing error: ``` > touch 'a[b' > cp 'a[b' dest Error: × Pattern syntax error near position 30: invalid range pattern ╭─[entry #13:1:1] 1 │ cp 'a[b' dest · ──┬── · ╰── invalid pattern ╰──── ``` After: Args to cp, mv, etc. are tried first as literal files, and only as globs if not found to be files. ``` > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d > cp --verbose '[a][bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd ``` After_2: file with glob metachars but invalid pattern just works. (though Windows does not allow file name to contain `*`.). ``` > cp --verbose 'a[b' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[b to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[b ``` So, with this fix, a file shadows a glob pattern with the same spelling. If you have such a file and really want to use the glob pattern, you will have to glob quote some of the characters in the pattern. I think that's less confusing to the user: if ls shows a file with a weird name, s/he'll still be able to copy, rename or delete it. # User-Facing Changes Could break some existing scripts. If user happened to have a file with a globbish name but was using a glob pattern with the same spelling, the new version will process the file and not expand the glob. # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-10-18 20:31:15 +02:00
#[cfg(not(windows))]
#[rstest]
#[case(r#"'a]?c'"#)]
#[case(r#"'a*.?c'"#)]
// windows doesn't allow filename with `*`.
fn copies_files_with_glob_metachars_nw(#[case] src_name: &str) {
copies_files_with_glob_metachars(src_name);
`open`, `rm`, `umv`, `cp`, `rm` and `du`: Don't globs if inputs are variables or string interpolation (#11886) # Description This is a follow up to https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/11621#issuecomment-1937484322 Also Fixes: #11838 ## About the code change It applys the same logic when we pass variables to external commands: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/blob/0487e9ffcbc57c2d5feca606e10c3f8221ff5e00/crates/nu-command/src/system/run_external.rs#L162-L170 That is: if user input dynamic things(like variables, sub-expression, or string interpolation), it returns a quoted `NuPath`, then user input won't be globbed # User-Facing Changes Given two input files: `a*c.txt`, `abc.txt` * `let f = "a*c.txt"; rm $f` will remove one file: `a*c.txt`. ~* `let f = "a*c.txt"; rm --glob $f` will remove `a*c.txt` and `abc.txt`~ * `let f: glob = "a*c.txt"; rm $f` will remove `a*c.txt` and `abc.txt` ## Rules about globbing with *variable* Given two files: `a*c.txt`, `abc.txt` | Cmd Type | example | Result | | ----- | ------------------ | ------ | | builtin | let f = "a*c.txt"; rm $f | remove `a*c.txt` | | builtin | let f: glob = "a*c.txt"; rm $f | remove `a*c.txt` and `abc.txt` | builtin | let f = "a*c.txt"; rm ($f \| into glob) | remove `a*c.txt` and `abc.txt` | custom | def crm [f: glob] { rm $f }; let f = "a*c.txt"; crm $f | remove `a*c.txt` and `abc.txt` | custom | def crm [f: glob] { rm ($f \| into string) }; let f = "a*c.txt"; crm $f | remove `a*c.txt` | custom | def crm [f: string] { rm $f }; let f = "a*c.txt"; crm $f | remove `a*c.txt` | custom | def crm [f: string] { rm $f }; let f = "a*c.txt"; crm ($f \| into glob) | remove `a*c.txt` and `abc.txt` In general, if a variable is annotated with `glob` type, nushell will expand glob pattern. Or else, we need to use `into | glob` to expand glob pattern # Tests + Formatting Done # After Submitting I think `str glob-escape` command will be no-longer required. We can remove it.
2024-02-23 02:17:09 +01:00
copies_files_with_glob_metachars_when_input_are_variables(src_name);
Allow filesystem commands to access files with glob metachars in name (#10694) (squashed version of #10557, clean commit history and review thread) Fixes #10571, also potentially: #10364, #10211, #9558, #9310, # Description Changes processing of arguments to filesystem commands that are source paths or globs. Applies to `cp, cp-old, mv, rm, du` but not `ls` (because it uses a different globbing interface) or `glob` (because it uses a different globbing library). The core of the change is to lookup the argument first as a file and only glob if it is not. That way, a path containing glob metacharacters can be referenced without glob quoting, though it will have to be single quoted to avoid nushell parsing. Before: A file path that looks like a glob is not matched by the glob specified as a (source) argument and takes some thinking about to access. You might say the glob pattern shadows a file with the same spelling. ``` > ls a* ╭───┬────────┬──────┬──────┬────────────────╮ │ # │ name │ type │ size │ modified │ ├───┼────────┼──────┼──────┼────────────────┤ │ 0 │ a[bc]d │ file │ 0 B │ 34 seconds ago │ │ 1 │ abd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ │ 2 │ acd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ ╰───┴────────┴──────┴──────┴────────────────╯ > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd > ## Note -- a[bc]d *not* copied, and seemingly hard to access. > cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest Error: × No matches found ╭─[entry #33:1:1] 1 │ cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest · ─────┬──── · ╰── no matches found ╰──── > #.. but is accessible with enough glob quoting. > cp --verbose 'a[[]bc[]]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d ``` Before_2: if file has glob metachars but isn't a valid pattern, user gets a confusing error: ``` > touch 'a[b' > cp 'a[b' dest Error: × Pattern syntax error near position 30: invalid range pattern ╭─[entry #13:1:1] 1 │ cp 'a[b' dest · ──┬── · ╰── invalid pattern ╰──── ``` After: Args to cp, mv, etc. are tried first as literal files, and only as globs if not found to be files. ``` > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d > cp --verbose '[a][bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd ``` After_2: file with glob metachars but invalid pattern just works. (though Windows does not allow file name to contain `*`.). ``` > cp --verbose 'a[b' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[b to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[b ``` So, with this fix, a file shadows a glob pattern with the same spelling. If you have such a file and really want to use the glob pattern, you will have to glob quote some of the characters in the pattern. I think that's less confusing to the user: if ls shows a file with a weird name, s/he'll still be able to copy, rename or delete it. # User-Facing Changes Could break some existing scripts. If user happened to have a file with a globbish name but was using a glob pattern with the same spelling, the new version will process the file and not expand the glob. # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-10-18 20:31:15 +02:00
}
Add file attribute handling flag to cp (#11491) # Description This PR adds possibility to preserve/strip attributes from files when using `cp` (via uu_cp::Attributes). To achieve this a single `--preserve <list of attributes>` flag is added. This is different from how coreutils and uutils cp function, but I believe this is better for nushell. Coreutils cp has three options `-p`, `--preserve` and `--no-presevce`. The logic of these two options is not straightforward. As far as I understand it is: 1. By default only mode attributes are preserved 2. `--preserve` option adds to default preserved attributes specified ones (e.g. `--preserve=xattr,timestamps` will preserve mode, timestamps and xattr) 3. `-p` is the same as `--preserve=mode,ownership,timestamps` 4. `--no-preserve` option rejects specified attributes (having priority over `--preserve`) However (in my opinion) the `--no-preserve` option is not needed, because its only use seems to be rejecting attributes preserved by default. But there is no need for this in nushell, because `--preserve` can be specified with empty list as argument (whereas coreutils cp will display a `cp: ambiguous argument ‘’ for ‘--preserve’` error if `--preserve` is used with empty string as argument). So to simplify this command is suggest (and implemented) only the `--preserve` with the following logic: 1. By default mode attribute is preserved (as in coreutils cp) 2. `--preserve [ ... ]` will overwrite default with whatever is specified in list (empty list meaning preserve nothing) This way cp without `--preserve` behaves the same as coreutils `cp`, but instead of using combinations of `--preserve` and `--no-preserve` one needs to use `--preserve [ ... ]` with all attributes specified explicitly. This seems more user-friendly to me as it does not require remembering what the attributes preserved by default are and rejecting them manually. However I see the possible problem with behavior different from coreutils implementation, so some feedback is apprecieated! # User-Facing Changes Users can now preserve or reject file attributes when using `cp` # Tests + Formatting Added tests manipulating mode and timestamps attributes.
2024-01-12 19:02:55 +01:00
#[cfg(not(windows))]
#[test]
fn test_cp_preserve_timestamps() {
// Preserve timestamp and mode
Playground::setup("ucp_test_35", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("file.txt")]);
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
"
chmod +x file.txt
cp --preserve [ mode timestamps ] file.txt other.txt
let old_attrs = ls -l file.txt | get 0 | select mode accessed modified
let new_attrs = ls -l other.txt | get 0 | select mode accessed modified
$old_attrs == $new_attrs
",
);
assert!(actual.err.is_empty());
assert_eq!(actual.out, "true");
});
}
#[cfg(not(windows))]
#[test]
fn test_cp_preserve_only_timestamps() {
// Preserve timestamps and discard all other attributes including mode
Playground::setup("ucp_test_35", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("file.txt")]);
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
"
chmod +x file.txt
cp --preserve [ timestamps ] file.txt other.txt
let old_attrs = ls -l file.txt | get 0 | select mode accessed modified
let new_attrs = ls -l other.txt | get 0 | select mode accessed modified
print (($old_attrs | select mode) != ($new_attrs | select mode))
print (($old_attrs | select accessed modified) == ($new_attrs | select accessed modified))
",
);
assert!(actual.err.is_empty());
assert_eq!(actual.out, "truetrue");
});
}
#[cfg(not(windows))]
#[test]
fn test_cp_preserve_nothing() {
// Preserve no attributes
Playground::setup("ucp_test_35", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("file.txt")]);
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
"
chmod +x file.txt
cp --preserve [] file.txt other.txt
let old_attrs = ls -l file.txt | get 0 | select mode accessed modified
let new_attrs = ls -l other.txt | get 0 | select mode accessed modified
$old_attrs != $new_attrs
",
);
assert!(actual.err.is_empty());
assert_eq!(actual.out, "true");
});
}
Unify glob behavior on `open`, `rm`, `cp-old`, `mv`, `umv`, `cp` and `du` commands (#11621) # Description This pr is a follow up to [#11569](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/11569#issuecomment-1902279587) > Revert the logic in https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/10694 and apply the logic in this pr to mv, cp, rv will require a larger change, I need to think how to achieve the bahavior And sorry @bobhy for reverting some of your changes. This pr is going to unify glob behavior on the given commands: * open * rm * cp-old * mv * umv * cp * du So they have the same behavior to `ls`, which is: If given parameter is quoted by single quote(`'`) or double quote(`"`), don't auto-expand the glob pattern. If not quoted, auto-expand the glob pattern. Fixes: #9558 Fixes: #10211 Fixes: #9310 Fixes: #10364 # TODO But there is one thing remains: if we give a variable to the command, it will always auto-expand the glob pattern, e.g: ```nushell let path = "a[123]b" rm $path ``` I don't think it's expected. But I also think user might want to auto-expand the glob pattern in variables. So I'll introduce a new command called `glob escape`, then if user doesn't want to auto-expand the glob pattern, he can just do this: `rm ($path | glob escape)` # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Done # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> ## NOTE This pr changes the semantic of `GlobPattern`, before this pr, it will `expand path` after evaluated, this makes `nu_engine::glob_from` have no chance to glob things right if a path contains glob pattern. e.g: [#9310 ](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/9310#issuecomment-1886824030) #10211 I think changing the semantic is fine, because it makes glob works if path contains something like '*'. It maybe a breaking change if a custom command's argument are annotated by `: glob`.
2024-01-26 14:57:35 +01:00
#[test]
fn test_cp_inside_glob_metachars_dir() {
Playground::setup("open_files_inside_glob_metachars_dir", |dirs, sandbox| {
let sub_dir = "test[]";
sandbox
.within(sub_dir)
.with_files(vec![FileWithContent("test_file.txt", "hello")]);
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.test().join(sub_dir),
"cp test_file.txt ../",
);
assert!(actual.err.is_empty());
assert!(files_exist_at(
vec!["test_file.txt"],
dirs.test().join(sub_dir)
));
assert!(files_exist_at(vec!["test_file.txt"], dirs.test()));
});
}
#[cfg(not(windows))]
#[test]
fn test_cp_to_customized_home_directory() {
Playground::setup("cp_to_home", |dirs, sandbox| {
std::env::set_var("HOME", dirs.test());
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("test_file.txt")]);
let actual = nu!(cwd: dirs.test(), "mkdir test; cp test_file.txt ~/test/");
assert!(actual.err.is_empty());
assert!(files_exist_at(
vec!["test_file.txt"],
dirs.test().join("test")
));
})
}
#[test]
fn cp_with_tilde() {
Playground::setup("cp_tilde", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.within("~tilde").with_files(vec![
EmptyFile("f1.txt"),
EmptyFile("f2.txt"),
EmptyFile("f3.txt"),
]);
sandbox.within("~tilde2");
// cp directory
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
"let f = '~tilde'; cp -r $f '~tilde2'; ls '~tilde2/~tilde' | length"
);
assert_eq!(actual.out, "3");
// cp file
let actual = nu!(cwd: dirs.test(), "cp '~tilde/f1.txt' ./");
assert!(actual.err.is_empty());
assert!(files_exist_at(
vec![Path::new("f1.txt")],
dirs.test().join("~tilde")
));
assert!(files_exist_at(vec![Path::new("f1.txt")], dirs.test()));
// pass variable
let actual = nu!(cwd: dirs.test(), "let f = '~tilde/f2.txt'; cp $f ./");
assert!(actual.err.is_empty());
assert!(files_exist_at(
vec![Path::new("f2.txt")],
dirs.test().join("~tilde")
));
assert!(files_exist_at(vec![Path::new("f1.txt")], dirs.test()));
})
}
#[test]
fn copy_file_with_update_flag() {
copy_file_with_update_flag_impl(false);
copy_file_with_update_flag_impl(true);
}
fn copy_file_with_update_flag_impl(progress: bool) {
Playground::setup("cp_test_36", |_dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![
EmptyFile("valid.txt"),
FileWithContent("newer_valid.txt", "body"),
]);
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
let actual = nu!(
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
"cp {} -u valid.txt newer_valid.txt; open newer_valid.txt",
progress_flag,
);
assert!(actual.out.contains("body"));
// create a file after assert to make sure that newest_valid.txt is newest
std::thread::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_secs(1));
sandbox.with_files(vec![FileWithContent("newest_valid.txt", "newest_body")]);
let actual = nu!(cwd: sandbox.cwd(), "cp {} -u newest_valid.txt valid.txt; open valid.txt", progress_flag);
assert_eq!(actual.out, "newest_body");
// when destination doesn't exist
let actual = nu!(cwd: sandbox.cwd(), "cp {} -u newest_valid.txt des_missing.txt; open des_missing.txt", progress_flag);
assert_eq!(actual.out, "newest_body");
});
}
#[test]
fn cp_with_cd() {
Playground::setup("cp_test_37", |_dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox
.mkdir("tmp_dir")
.with_files(vec![FileWithContent("tmp_dir/file.txt", "body")]);
let actual = nu!(
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
r#"do { cd tmp_dir; let f = 'file.txt'; cp $f .. }; open file.txt"#,
);
assert!(actual.out.contains("body"));
});
}