nushell/crates/nuon/Cargo.toml

22 lines
666 B
TOML
Raw Normal View History

create `nuon` crate from `from nuon` and `to nuon` (#12553) # Description playing with the NUON format in Rust code in some plugins, we agreed with the team it was a great time to create a standalone NUON format to allow Rust devs to use this Nushell file format. > **Note** > this PR almost copy-pastes the code from `nu_commands/src/formats/from/nuon.rs` and `nu_commands/src/formats/to/nuon.rs` to `nuon/src/from.rs` and `nuon/src/to.rs`, with minor tweaks to make then standalone functions, e.g. remove the rest of the command implementations ### TODO - [x] add tests - [x] add documentation # User-Facing Changes devs will have access to a new crate, `nuon`, and two functions, `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` ```rust from_nuon( input: &str, span: Option<Span>, ) -> Result<Value, ShellError> ``` ```rust to_nuon( input: &Value, raw: bool, tabs: Option<usize>, indent: Option<usize>, span: Option<Span>, ) -> Result<String, ShellError> ``` # Tests + Formatting i've basically taken all the tests from `crates/nu-command/tests/format_conversions/nuon.rs` and converted them to use `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` instead of Nushell commands - i've created a `nuon_end_to_end` to run both conversions with an optional middle value to check that all is fine > **Note** > the `nuon::tests::read_code_should_fail_rather_than_panic` test does give different results locally and in the CI... > i've left it ignored with comments to help future us :) # After Submitting mention that in the release notes for sure!!
2024-04-19 13:54:16 +02:00
[package]
authors = ["The Nushell Project Developers"]
description = "Support for the NUON format."
repository = "https://github.com/nushell/nushell/tree/main/crates/nuon"
edition = "2021"
license = "MIT"
name = "nuon"
2024-11-14 10:04:39 +01:00
version = "0.100.1"
create `nuon` crate from `from nuon` and `to nuon` (#12553) # Description playing with the NUON format in Rust code in some plugins, we agreed with the team it was a great time to create a standalone NUON format to allow Rust devs to use this Nushell file format. > **Note** > this PR almost copy-pastes the code from `nu_commands/src/formats/from/nuon.rs` and `nu_commands/src/formats/to/nuon.rs` to `nuon/src/from.rs` and `nuon/src/to.rs`, with minor tweaks to make then standalone functions, e.g. remove the rest of the command implementations ### TODO - [x] add tests - [x] add documentation # User-Facing Changes devs will have access to a new crate, `nuon`, and two functions, `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` ```rust from_nuon( input: &str, span: Option<Span>, ) -> Result<Value, ShellError> ``` ```rust to_nuon( input: &Value, raw: bool, tabs: Option<usize>, indent: Option<usize>, span: Option<Span>, ) -> Result<String, ShellError> ``` # Tests + Formatting i've basically taken all the tests from `crates/nu-command/tests/format_conversions/nuon.rs` and converted them to use `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` instead of Nushell commands - i've created a `nuon_end_to_end` to run both conversions with an optional middle value to check that all is fine > **Note** > the `nuon::tests::read_code_should_fail_rather_than_panic` test does give different results locally and in the CI... > i've left it ignored with comments to help future us :) # After Submitting mention that in the release notes for sure!!
2024-04-19 13:54:16 +02:00
# See more keys and their definitions at https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html
[dependencies]
2024-11-14 10:04:39 +01:00
nu-parser = { path = "../nu-parser", version = "0.100.1" }
nu-protocol = { path = "../nu-protocol", version = "0.100.1" }
nu-engine = { path = "../nu-engine", version = "0.100.1" }
nu-utils = { path = "../nu-utils", version = "0.100.1" }
create `nuon` crate from `from nuon` and `to nuon` (#12553) # Description playing with the NUON format in Rust code in some plugins, we agreed with the team it was a great time to create a standalone NUON format to allow Rust devs to use this Nushell file format. > **Note** > this PR almost copy-pastes the code from `nu_commands/src/formats/from/nuon.rs` and `nu_commands/src/formats/to/nuon.rs` to `nuon/src/from.rs` and `nuon/src/to.rs`, with minor tweaks to make then standalone functions, e.g. remove the rest of the command implementations ### TODO - [x] add tests - [x] add documentation # User-Facing Changes devs will have access to a new crate, `nuon`, and two functions, `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` ```rust from_nuon( input: &str, span: Option<Span>, ) -> Result<Value, ShellError> ``` ```rust to_nuon( input: &Value, raw: bool, tabs: Option<usize>, indent: Option<usize>, span: Option<Span>, ) -> Result<String, ShellError> ``` # Tests + Formatting i've basically taken all the tests from `crates/nu-command/tests/format_conversions/nuon.rs` and converted them to use `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` instead of Nushell commands - i've created a `nuon_end_to_end` to run both conversions with an optional middle value to check that all is fine > **Note** > the `nuon::tests::read_code_should_fail_rather_than_panic` test does give different results locally and in the CI... > i've left it ignored with comments to help future us :) # After Submitting mention that in the release notes for sure!!
2024-04-19 13:54:16 +02:00
[dev-dependencies]
chrono = { workspace = true }
[lints]
Bump to version 0.99.0 (#14094) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
2024-10-15 21:01:08 +02:00
workspace = true