# Description
@cptpiepmatz and I ran into a problem where `toolkit check pr` and
`toolkit clippy --verbose` wouldn't work. I tracked it down to me using
`cargo-completions.nu` out of the nu_scripts repo. It was redefining
`cargo clippy`. The fix was to ensure that all `cargo` commands in
`toolkit.nu` use the external `^cargo`.
Specifically, the problem with `cargo clippy` in `cargo-completions.nu`
is it didn't seem to allow `-- -D blah` type parameters.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the
tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
Refactors the tango helpers in the toolkit and makes them more flexible
(e.g., being able to benchmark any branch against any branch, not just
current and main).
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the
tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Removes the old `nu-cmd-dataframe` crate in favor of the polars plugin.
As such, this PR also removes the `dataframe` feature, related CI, and
full releases of nushell.
# Description
This PR migrates the benchmark suit to Tango. Its different compared to
other framework because it require 2 binaries, to run to do A/B
benchmarking, this is currently limited to Linux, Max, (Windows require
rustc nightly flag), by switching between two suits it can reduce noise
and run the code "almost" concurrently. I have have been in contact with
the maintainer, and bases this on the dev branch, as it had a newer API
simular to criterion. This framework compared to Divan also have a
simple file dump system if we want to generate graphs, do other analysis
on later. I think overall this crate is very nice, a lot faster to
compile and run then criterion, that's for sure.
# Description
We have often had issues with winget during release, and have to fix the
Windows installers and then create new packages.
This runs `release-pkg.nu` for all eight Windows packages we release:
std and full, aarch64 and x86_64, and zip and msi variants.
It requires the cross compiling toolchain for MSVC to be installed,
since Rust generally needs that to build things on Windows. Use the
Visual Studio Installer to do so.
If there's ever a need, this can be extended for other platforms too.
# Description
Updates `toolkit.nu` to use `plugin add`.
There's no need to spawn a separate `nu` to do `register` anymore, since
`plugin add` is not a keyword
# Description
Duration can not be negative, and an underflow causes a panic.
This should fix#12539 as from what I can tell that bug was caused in
`nu-explore:📟:events` from subtracting durations, but I figured
this might be more widespread, and saturating to zero generally makes
sense.
I also added the relevant clippy lint to try to prevent this from
happening in the future. I can't think of a reason we would ever want to
subtract durations without checking first.
cc @fdncred
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
# Description
This is an attempt to isolate the unit tests from whatever might be in
the user's config. If the
user's config is broken in some way or incompatible with this version
(for example, especially if
there are plugins that aren't built for this version), tests can
spuriously fail.
This makes tests more reliably pass the same way they would on CI even
if the user has config, and
should also make them run faster.
I think this is _good enough_, but I still think we should have a
specific config dir env variable for nushell specifically (rather than
having to use `XDG_CONFIG_HOME`, which would mess with other things) and
then we can just have `nu-test-support` set that to a temporary dir
containing the shipped default config files.
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
follow-up to
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/11151
> **Important**
> land only between 0.89 and 0.90
# Description
this PR hides the `std testing` module from the outside.
- moves `nu-std/std/testing.nu` to `nu-std/testing.nu`
- removes the module from the standard library list of modules to parse
- fixes `toolkit.nu` and the CI
# User-Facing Changes
`std testing` won't be part of the standard library anymore.
# Tests + Formatting
# After Submitting
I've noticed that two tests fail on my system when running `toolkit
check pr`. The reason for this is that my locale is set to German. `ls`
is translated, so checking the error message will only work on systems
set to English.
I've adapted the test to check the exit code instead.
Alternatively, we could set the locale, I am not sure if the `nu!` macro
supports that though.
# Description
I've had a few PRs fail clippy in CI after they pass `toolkit check pr`
because the clippy settings are different. This brings `toolkit.nu` into
alignment with CI and leaves notes to prompt future synchronization.
# User-Facing Changes
N/A
# Tests + Formatting
`cargo` output elided:
```
❯ toolkit check pr
running `toolkit fmt`
running `toolkit clippy`
running `toolkit clippy` on tests
running `toolkit clippy` on plugins
running `toolkit test`
running `toolkit test stdlib`
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
```
# After Submitting
N/A
# Description
when i try out a PR, i always end up running `cargo run` but then i
never know if i'm inside my install of Nushell or a PR 👀
in this PR i propose to add a `run` command to the `toolkit.nu` which
- runs the current revision inside `cargo run`
- adds a clear right prompt to make sure one knows they are in `cargo
run`
# User-Facing Changes
an example after running `toolkit run`
# Tests + Formatting
# After Submitting
Align the clippy checks done by `toolkit check pr` with the ones done by
github CI when you post a PR.
Motivated in no small part by my frustration at having the third PR in
one day fail due to a lint that `toolkit check pr` didn't find!
# Description
Change definition of `toolkit clippy`
* always run checks on all crates in the workspace
* always run checks on tests as well as non-test code
* don't check for `unwrap_used`. There are many (legit) uses of
`.unwrap()` in tests,
*
# User-Facing Changes
Changes to `toolkit clippy`:
* remove `--workspace` switch
* `--features` is no longer mutually exclusive with `--workspace`
# Tests + Formatting
n/a
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: amtoine <stevan.antoine@gmail.com>
related to
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9973
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9918
thanks to @jntrnr and their super useful tips on this PR, i learned
about the parser + evaluation, so 🙏
# Description
because we already have `null` as the value of the type `nothing` and as
a followup to the two other attempts of mine, i propose to remove the
redundant `$nothing` built-in variable 😋
this PR is the first step, deprecating `$nothing`.
a followup PR will remove it altogether and wait for 0.87 👍⚙️ **details**: a new `NOTHING_VARIABLE_ID = 3` has been added,
parsing `$nothing` will create it, finally a `Value::Nothing` will be
produced and a warning will be reported.
this PR already fixes the `toolkit.nu` module so that it does not throw
a bunch of warnings each time 👌
# User-Facing Changes
`$nothing` is now deprecated and will be removed in 0.87
```nushell
> $nothing
Error: × Deprecated variable
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ $nothing
· ────┬───
· ╰── `$nothing` is deprecated and will be removed in 0.87.
╰────
help: Use `null` instead
```
# Tests + Formatting
tests have been updated, especially
- `nothing_fails_string`
- `nothing_fails_int`
which use a variable called `nil` now to make sure `nothing` does not
support cell paths 👍
# After Submitting
classic deprecation mention 👍
# Description
Fixes: #10450
This pr differentiating between `--x: bool` and `--x`
Here are examples which demostrate difference between them:
```nushell
def a [--x: bool] { $x };
a --x # not allowed, you need to parse a value to the flag.
a # it's allowed, and the value of `$x` is false, which behaves the same to `def a [--x] { $x }; a`
```
For boolean flag with default value, it works a little bit different to
#10450 mentioned:
```nushell
def foo [--option: bool = false] { $option }
foo # output false
foo --option # not allowed, you need to parse a value to the flag.
foo --option true # output true
```
# User-Facing Changes
After the pr, the following code is not allowed:
```nushell
def a [--x: bool] { $x }; a --x
```
Instead, you have to pass a value to flag `--x` like `a --x false`. But
bare flag works in the same way as before.
## Update: one more breaking change to help on #7260
```
def foo [--option: bool] { $option == null }
foo
```
After the pr, if we don't use a boolean flag, the value will be `null`
instead of `true`. Because here `--option: bool` is treated as a flag
rather than a switch
---------
Co-authored-by: amtoine <stevan.antoine@gmail.com>
# Description
* The path to the binaries for tests is slightly incorrect. It is
missing the build target when it is set with the `CARGO_BUILD_TARGET`
environment variable. For example, when `CARGO_BUILD_TARGET` is set to
`aarch64-linux-android`, the path to the `nu` binary is:
`./target/aarch64-linux-android/debug/nu`
rather than
`./target/debug/nu`
This is common on Termux since the default target that rustc detects can
cause problems on some projects, such as [python's `cryptography`
package](https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/7248).
This technically isn't a problem specific to Android, but is more likely
to happen on Android due to the latter.
* Additionally, the existing variable named `NUSHELL_CARGO_TARGET` is in
fact the profile, not the build target, so this was renamed to
`NUSHELL_CARGO_PROFILE`. This change is included because without the
rename, the build system would be using `CARGO_BUILD_TARGET` for the
build target and `NUSHELL_CARGO_TARGET` for the build profile, which is
confusing.
* `std path add` tests were missing `android` test
# User-Facing Changes
For those who would like to build nushell on Termux, the unit tests will
pass now.
# Description
This PR updates the toolkit and the build/install scripts to include
`--locked`, also added `extra` feature to the _all_ scripts, and
`--force` to the install scripts.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
`version` has always been a bit off regarding the `commit_hash`
😕
i think it was @fdncred who found this trick: `touch`ing the
`crates/nu-cmd-lang/build.rs` file
- won't change the Git index
- will force Nushell to recompile the `version` information correctly
this PR adds a call to `touch` on that file to `toolkit install`.
# User-Facing Changes
`version` should be correct when installing locally with the `toolkit`.
# Tests + Formatting
# After Submitting
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Test runner now uses annotations instead of magic function names to pick
up code to run. Additionally skipping tests is now done on annotation
level so skipping and unskipping a test no longer requires changes to
the test code
In order for a function to be picked up by the test runner it needs to
meet following criteria:
* Needs to be private (all exported functions are ignored)
* Needs to contain one of valid annotations (and only the annotation)
directly above the definition, all other comments are ignored
Following are considered valid annotations:
* \# test
* \# test-skip
* \# before-all
* \# before-each
* \# after-each
* \# after-all
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
For years, Nushell has used `let-env` to set a single environment
variable. As our work on scoping continued, we refined what it meant for
a variable to be in scope using `let` but never updated how `let-env`
would work. Instead, `let-env` confusingly created mutations to the
command's copy of `$env`.
So, to help fix the mental model and point people to the right way of
thinking about what changing the environment means, this PR removes
`let-env` to encourage people to think of it as updating the command's
environment variable via mutation.
Before:
```
let-env FOO = "BAR"
```
Now:
```
$env.FOO = "BAR"
```
It's also a good reminder that the environment owned by the command is
in the `$env` variable rather than global like it is in other shells.
# User-Facing Changes
BREAKING CHANGE BREAKING CHANGE
This completely removes `let-env FOO = "BAR"` so that we can focus on
`$env.FOO = "BAR"`.
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After / Before Submitting
integration scripts to update:
- ✔️
[starship](https://github.com/starship/starship/blob/master/src/init/starship.nu)
- ✔️
[virtualenv](https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/blob/main/src/virtualenv/activation/nushell/activate.nu)
- ✔️
[atuin](https://github.com/ellie/atuin/blob/main/atuin/src/shell/atuin.nu)
(PR: https://github.com/ellie/atuin/pull/1080)
- ❌
[zoxide](https://github.com/ajeetdsouza/zoxide/blob/main/templates/nushell.txt)
(PR: https://github.com/ajeetdsouza/zoxide/pull/587)
- ✔️
[oh-my-posh](https://github.com/JanDeDobbeleer/oh-my-posh/blob/main/src/shell/scripts/omp.nu)
(pr: https://github.com/JanDeDobbeleer/oh-my-posh/pull/4011)
related to
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9357
# Description
with the new `extra` feature introduce in the `toolkit.nu` module in
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9357, the `--dataframe` option
does not make sense anymore...
this PR changes that and replaces it with `--features: list<string>`.
this has the benefit of simplifying the commands because we can just
pass `--features ($features | str join ",")` to the `cargo` commands
regardless of whether the `$features` list is empty of not 👌
i've also refactored a bit the module:
- break the long `error make -u` lines
- break the long `cargo clippy` command
# User-Facing Changes
devs can now choose which feature to test with the `toolkit` commands.
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
related to
closes#9342
complete the install command to install plugins
[
](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9288)
the issue
toolkit build only builds in debug mode
toolkit install only installs Nushell
toolkit register plugins will install any plugins in the path, in debug
or release
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Test runner now performs following actions in order to run tests:
* Module file is opened
* Public function with random name is added to the source code, this
function calls user-specified private function
* Modified module file is saved under random name in $nu.temp-path
* Modified module file is imported in subprocess, injected function is
called by the test runner
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
* Test functions no longer need to be exported
* test functions no longer need to reside in separate test_ files
* setup and teardown renamed to before-each and after-each respectively
* before-all and after-all functions added that run before all tests in
given module. This matches the behavior of test runners used by other
languages such as JUnit/TestNG or Mocha
# Tests + Formatting
# After Submitting
---------
Co-authored-by: Kamil <skelly37@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: amtoine <stevan.antoine@gmail.com>
# Description
i was installing Nushell and, as we have the `dataframe` feature and
very soon at least the `extra` feature with more and more commands, i
thought it could be cool to have a little `toolkit install` command
😋
# User-Facing Changes
exposes the following command to developers
```
install Nushell and features you want
Usage:
> install ...(features)
Flags:
-h, --help - Display the help message for this command
Parameters:
...features <string>: a space-separated list of feature to install with Nushell
```
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# Description
This PR allows you to pass `--dataframe` into `toolkit check pr --fast
--dataframe` in order to check and build with the dataframe feature.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Enable setup-git-hooks on windows. It works just fine without doing
anything special. More testing from other windows users is welcomed as
there might be a reason it was done that way before.
# User-Facing Changes
`toolkit setup-git-hooks` now work on windows
# Description
until now, a call to `toolkit` alone would give
```bash
Error: nu:🐚:external_command
× External command failed
╭─[entry #2:1:1]
1 │ toolkit
· ───┬───
· ╰── did you mean 'toolkit clippy'?
╰────
help: No such file or directory (os error 2)
```
which i find confusing after a `use toolkit.nu` 🤔
this PR adds a `main` command to `toolkit.nu` which runs the `help`
command on the module.
# User-Facing Changes
now
```
> use toolkit.nu
> toolkit
Usage:
> toolkit
Subcommands:
toolkit check pr - run all the necessary checks and tests to submit a perfect PR
toolkit clippy - check that you're using the standard code style
toolkit fmt - check standard code formatting and apply the changes
toolkit setup-git-hooks - set up git hooks to run:
- `toolkit fmt --check --verbose` on `git commit`
- `toolkit fmt --check --verbose` and `toolkit clippy --verbose` on `git push`
toolkit test - check that all the tests pass
toolkit test stdlib - run the tests for the standard library
Flags:
-h, --help - Display the help message for this command
```
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# Description
This PR bumps the rust toolchain from 1.66.1 to 1.67.1
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
Move test runner to standard library.
Originated from #8819
# After Submitting
I'll update the documentation about testing:
http://www.nushell.sh/book/testing.html
---------
Co-authored-by: Mate Farkas <Mate.Farkas@oneidentity.com>
# Description
As another life improvement (and to avoid those `run cargo fmt` commits
😉), this PR adds a command to the toolkit for formatting and running
`clippy` when committing and pushing.
Thanks to @amtoine for the idea!
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
as we now have a prelude thanks to #8627, i'd like to work on the
structure of the library 😋
and i think the first step is to make it a true standalone crate 😏
this PR
- moves all the library from `crates/nu-utils/standard_library/` to
`crates/nu-std/`
- moves the `rust` loading code from `src/run.rs` to
`crates/nu-std/src/lib.rs`
Related to #8525.
# Description
With #8525, the tests for the standard library have been enabled in the
CI.
The only places where these tests are missing are
- the PR template
- the toolkit
This PR adds
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-utils/standard_library/tests.nu` to the PR
template
- the same command as `toolkit test stdlib`
- the `test stdlib` command to `toolkit check pr`
# User-Facing Changes
```
$nothing
```
# Tests + Formatting
the new output of `toolkit check pr`, with the same color code:
> - 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
> - 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
> - 🟢 `toolkit test`
> - 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
when i write a PR, i run the tests and i like to have a pretty output to
make extra clear which one of the tests did run, which one did not, etc,
etc...
this always end up a variation of the template
> - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
> - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
> - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
but with emojis and without the descriptions
> - 🟢 `cargo fmt --all`
> - 🔴 `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D
clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect`
> - 🟡 `cargo test --workspace`
>
> and a ⚫ (`⚫`) when i did not have the time
or the resources to run the check stage
in this PR, i came up with a way to do that automatically with the
`toolkit` introduced in #8152😋
# Description
this PR
- adds `toolkit::pretty-print-command` to print the command names being
run with backticks and some colors
- adds `toolkit::report` to return a "report" of the PR check stages =>
see `help toolkit check pr`
- adds the `--pretty` option to `toolkit check pr` to return a
list-with-emojis version of the check report, i.e. a *GitHub*-friendly
list to drop in place in the "Tests + Formatting" section
- adds a clear mention to `toolkit check pr --pretty` in the PR template
to make it easily visible to anyone
hope you'll like it, that's not a huge deal but that's my attempt to
encourage developers to show that they run the tests, what stages did
pass and which one did not 😌👋
# User-Facing Changes
the developer can now use `toolkit check pr --pretty` to have a
ready-to-use output for *GitHub*
# Tests + Formatting
```
$nothing
```
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
i was writing #8148 and came to the "_Test + Formatting_" section of the
PR template.
i felt the developer instructions could be wrapped up in a common easy
to use format, e.g. a `Makefile`, to be used with a few-words command
only, e.g. `make fmt` or `make clippy`, instead of the long commands in
the PR template 🤔
> **Note**
> in case you guys do not want to add a `Makefile` to the `nushell`
source, that PR can be discarded 😌
# Description
this PR
- adds the few rules from the PR template to a new `Makefile`
- replaces the instructions in the PR template from the full commands to
the new `make` rules
# User-Facing Changes
- _none for the regular user_
- i believe easier to test PRs for the developer, allowing one not to
realy on knowing the long commands or using the shell history to run
them again 😋
# Tests + Formatting
_nothing to test_
# After Submitting
maybe mention that in `CONTRIBUTING.md`?
