# Description
This updates `string_expand()` in nu-table's util.rs to use the
`std::iter` library's `repeat_n()` function, which was suggested as a
more readable version of the existing `repeat().take()` implementation.
# User-Facing Changes
Should have no user facing changes.
# Tests + Formatting
All green circles!
```
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib
```
This addresses color issue; Yeees just got forgotten it :(
As far as I understand an acceptance test can't be created because ansi
got stripped in `nu!`. (for future regressions)
But wrapping I need to take a deeper look.
Maybe in an hour.
cc: @fdncred
With this comes a new `unicode-width` as I remember there was some issue
with `ratatui`.
And a bit of refactorings which are ment to reduce code lines while not
breaking anything.
Not yet complete, I think I'll try to improve some more places,
just wanted to trigger CI 😄
And yessssssssss we have a new `unicode-width` but I sort of doubtful,
I mean the original issue with emojie.
I think it may require an additional "clean" call.
I am just saying I was not testing it with that case of complex emojies.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
Hi there
Here I am using latest tabled.
My tests shows it does fixes panics, but I am wanna be sure.
@fdncred could you verify that it does fixes those panics/errors?
Closes#13405Closes#12786
fix#9796
Sorry that you've had the issues.
I've actually encountered them yesterday too (seems like they have
appeared after some refactoring in the middle) but was not able to fix
that rapid.
Created a bunch of tests.
cc: @fdncred
Note:
This option will be certainly slower then a default ones. (could be
fixed but ... maybe later).
Maybe it shall be cited somewhere.
PS: Haven't tested on a wrapped/expanded tables.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
Reverts nushell/nushell#9796
This is just draft since we're seeing some issues with the latest fixes
to table drawing that just landed with #9796. We're hoping to get these
fixed, but if we're not able to fix them before the next release, we'll
need to revert (hence this PR, just in case we need it).
close? #8060
Quite a bit of refactoring took place.
I believe a few improvements to collapse/expand were made.
I've tried to track any performance regressions and seems like it is
fine.
I've noticed something different now with default configuration path or
something in this regard?
So I might missed something while testing because of this.
Requires some oversight.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
I have changed `assert!(a == b)` calls to `assert_eq!(a, b)`, which give
better error messages. Similarly for `assert!(a != b)` and
`assert_ne!(a, b)`. Basically all instances were comparing primitives
(string slices or integers), so there is no loss of generality from
special-case macros,
I have also fixed a number of typos in comments, variable names, and a
few user-facing messages.
ref #7598
To be honest I was not able to obtain such results in basic mode as you
@rgwood.
But I've got it in `table -e`.
So this must fix the `table -e` wrapping.
Could you verify if it got fixed?
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
close#7591
I tend to think it must be addressed.
But I'd verify it @rgwood.
PS: I've noticed how `table -e` and `table` with the same width wraps a
bit differently sometimes. (I guess it also must be addressed......)
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
