<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
When using `find`, we insert ansi code.
This is great for visual but it make comparison a tedious task.
For exemple
```nu
> ([{a: 1 b: 1}] | find 1 | get 0 | get a) == 1
# false
```
The documentation recommand using the `ansi strip` command but you then
lose your typing converting it to a string.
```nu
> [{a: 1 b: 1}] | find 1 | get 0 | get a | ansi strip | describe
# string
```
And this makes me very sad 😢 .
The idea here is to have a simple option to keep the usage of `find`
without the ansi marking.
```nu
> ([{a: 1 b: 1}] | find --raw 1 | get 0 | get a) == 1
# true
```
Tbh I think we could also do a fix on the parser to really escape the
ansi makers but this sounded like way more work so I would like your
opinion on this before working on it.
Also note that this is my first time writting rust and trying to
contribute to nushell so if you see any weird shenanigans be sure to
tell me !
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
A new flag for find
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the
tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
For testing I updated all the previous `find` test to also run them with
this new flag just to be sure that we didn't lose any other
functionalities
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Tangui <mael.nicolas@clever-cloud.com>
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
fixes#13245
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
In addition to addressing #13245, this PR also updated one of the doc
example to the `find` command to document that non-regex mode is case
insensitive, which may surprise some users.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the
tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Ben Yang <ben@ya.ng>
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
fixes#11900
# Description
Use `serde_json` instead.
# User-Facing Changes
The problem described in the issue now no longer persists.
No whitespace in the output of `to json --raw`
Output of unicode escape changed to consistent `\uffff`
# Tests + Formatting
I corrected all Tests that were affected by this change.
this PR should close#9105
# Description
I have implemented highlights for find which work for all strings. The
implementation also works for lists, but with exceptions (for example,
it does not work for list of lists). The implementation is also not
implemented for --regex.
---------
Co-authored-by: Georgiana <geo@LAPTOP-EQP6H37N>
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
Trying to fix#9394.
The problem with PR #9159 seems to be when searching for multiple terms,
each term is checked against the original values. It outputs a new value
for each such check, thus introducing replication for each search term.
As a result, it works fine with num of search term = 1.
# Description
This PR fixes issue #9043 where find -v was returning empty tables
and/or wrong output.
It also refactors some big code chunks with repetitions into it's own
functions.
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
Unit tests added for asserting changes.
# After Submitting
# Description
Fixes#7774. The functionality should be the same as feeding all
`PipelineDate::Value(Value::String(_,_),_)` into `lines` before putting
it into `find`.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
