fix#9796
Sorry that you've had the issues.
I've actually encountered them yesterday too (seems like they have
appeared after some refactoring in the middle) but was not able to fix
that rapid.
Created a bunch of tests.
cc: @fdncred
Note:
This option will be certainly slower then a default ones. (could be
fixed but ... maybe later).
Maybe it shall be cited somewhere.
PS: Haven't tested on a wrapped/expanded tables.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
Reverts nushell/nushell#9796
This is just draft since we're seeing some issues with the latest fixes
to table drawing that just landed with #9796. We're hoping to get these
fixed, but if we're not able to fix them before the next release, we'll
need to revert (hence this PR, just in case we need it).
A patch to play with.
Need to make a few tests after all.
The question is what shall be done with `table.mode = none`, as it has
no borders.
```nu
$env.config.table.move_header = true
```
cc: @fdncred
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
close? #8060
Quite a bit of refactoring took place.
I believe a few improvements to collapse/expand were made.
I've tried to track any performance regressions and seems like it is
fine.
I've noticed something different now with default configuration path or
something in this regard?
So I might missed something while testing because of this.
Requires some oversight.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
> I'm not sure how i feel about that. I mean if there are a lot of
columns, it should probably have a max width so 1 column doesn't take
the entire width of your screen. Ideally it would work closely like
table worked before we migrated to tabled, as far as how column widths
were allocated.
I believe it still not completely matched.
*To be honest I am not against the #7446 approach.
The PR makes a switch between logics on a premise of `termwidth`.
So if `termwidth > 120` we start prioritizing amount of columns we can
show (We try to show as many columns as we can).
Otherwise we do what I've described in #7446 (We show the least columns
but with least truncation involvement).
In case it's OK,
I guess we could make the value configurable.
cc @fdncred
ref #7446
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
