1
0
mirror of https://github.com/nushell/nushell.git synced 2025-03-30 01:28:11 +01:00
Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
JT
aded2c1937
Refactor to support multiple parse errors ()
# Description

This is a pretty heavy refactor of the parser to support multiple parser
errors. It has a few issues we should address before landing:

- [x] In some cases, error quality has gotten worse `1 / "bob"` for
example
- [x] if/else isn't currently parsing correctly
- probably others

# User-Facing Changes

This may have error quality degradation as we adjust to the new error
reporting mechanism.

# Tests + Formatting

Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-utils/standard_library/tests.nu` to run the
tests for the standard library

> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```

# After Submitting

If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
2023-04-07 12:35:45 +12:00
mike
8cf9bc9993
allow lists to have type annotations ()
this pr refines  and closes 

# description
examples:

the original syntax is okay
```nu
def okay [nums: list] {}         # the type of list will be list<any>
```

empty annotations are allowed in any variation
the last two may be caught by a future formatter, 
but do not affect `nu` code currently
```nu
def okay [nums: list<>] {}       # okay

def okay [nums: list<     >] {}  # weird but also okay

def okay [nums: list<
>] {}                            # also weird but okay
```

types are allowed (See [notes](#notes) below)
```nu
def okay [nums: list<int>] {}    # `test [a b c]` will throw an error 

def okay [nums: list< int > {}   # any amount of space within the angle brackets is okay

def err [nums: list <int>] {}    # this is not okay, `nums` and `<int>` will be parsed as
                                 # two separate params, 
```

nested annotations are allowed in many variations
```nu
def okay [items: list<list<int>>] {}

def okay [items: list<list>] {}
```

any unterminated annotation is caught
```nu
Error: nu::parser::unexpected_eof

  × Unexpected end of code.
   ╭─[source:1:1]
 1 │ def err [nums: list<int] {}
   ·                       ▲
   ·                       ╰── expected closing >
   ╰────
```

unknown types are flagged
```nu
Error: nu::parser::unknown_type

  × Unknown type.
   ╭─[source:1:1]
 1 │ def err [nums: list<str>] {}
   ·                     ─┬─
   ·                      ╰── unknown type
   ╰────

Error: nu::parser::unknown_type

  × Unknown type.
   ╭─[source:1:1]
 1 │ def err [nums: list<int, string>] {}
   ·                    ─────┬─────
   ·                          ╰── unknown type
   ╰────
```

# notes
the error message for mismatched types in not as intuitive
```nu
Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch

  × Parse mismatch during operation.
   ╭─[source:1:1]
 1 │ def err [nums: list<int>] {}; err [a b c]
   ·                                    ┬
   ·                                    ╰── expected int
   ╰────
```
it should be something like this
```nu
Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch

  × Parse mismatch during operation.
   ╭─[source:1:1]
 1 │ def err [nums: list<int>] {}; err [a b c]
   ·                                    ──┬──
   ·                                      ╰── expected list<int>
   ╰────
```
this is currently not implemented
2023-03-24 12:54:06 +01:00
Mango The Fourth
d0e0701a88
fix: fix lexing of comments, such that a#b becomes a coherent Item ()
# Description

Previously `nix run nixpkgs#hello` was lexed as `Item, Item, Item,
Comment`, however, `#hello` is *not* supposed to be a comment here and
should be parsed as part of the third `Item`.

This change introduces this behavior by not interrupting the parse of
the current token upon seeing a `#`.

Thank you so much for considering this, I think many `nix` users will be
grateful for this change and I think this will lead to more adaptation
in the ecosystem.

- closes  and  

# User-Facing Changes

- code like `somecode# bla` and `somecode#bla` will not be parsed as
`somecode, comment` but as `somecode#bla`, hence this is a breaking
change for all users who didn't put a space before a comment introducing
token (`#`)

# Tests + Formatting

I've added tests that cover this behavior in `test_lex.rs`

- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [x] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- [x] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass

# After Submitting

> If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.

I think this is expected behavior in most other shells, so the
documentation was lacking for not documenting the unexpected behavior
before and hence now is automatically more complete >D
2023-02-22 12:59:47 +00:00
Daniel Buch Hansen
850ecf648a
Protocol: debug_assert!() Span to reflect a valid slice ()
Also enforce this by #[non_exhaustive] span such that going forward we
cannot, in debug builds (1), construct invalid spans.

The motivation for this stems from  where I've seen crashes due to
invalid slice indexing.

My hope is this will mitigate such senarios

1. https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/6431#issuecomment-1278147241

# Description

(description of your pull request here)

# Tests

Make sure you've done the following:

- [ ] Add tests that cover your changes, either in the command examples,
the crate/tests folder, or in the /tests folder.
- [ ] Try to think about corner cases and various ways how your changes
could break. Cover them with tests.
- [ ] If adding tests is not possible, please document in the PR body a
minimal example with steps on how to reproduce so one can verify your
change works.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [ ] `cargo clippy --workspace --features=extra -- -D warnings -D
clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're
using the standard code style
- [ ] `cargo test --workspace --features=extra` to check that all the
tests pass

# Documentation

- [ ] If your PR touches a user-facing nushell feature then make sure
that there is an entry in the documentation
(https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) for the feature, and
update it if necessary.
2022-12-03 11:44:12 +02:00
JT
143855b662
Add better comment skipping () 2021-11-22 07:13:09 +13:00
JT
bc3f820227
Merge pull request from jntrnr/value_streams_in_value
Value streams in value
2021-09-03 15:49:27 +12:00
JT
3d252a9797 Add nu-protocol 2021-09-02 13:29:43 +12:00
Fernando Herrera
5da2ab1b7d comments with a newline dont get together 2021-08-31 20:33:41 +01:00
Fernando Herrera
b3fb106cce tests for lex and lite parser 2021-08-30 19:36:07 +01:00