# Description
Requires each of the rest args for `select` and `reject` to be a cell
path instead of the current `oneof(cellpath, list<cellpath>`. This
simplifies the command signatures and code for `select` and `reject`.
Users can now spread lists into the rest arguments instead of providing
them as is.
For example,
```nushell
ls | select [name size]
```
must now be
```nushell
ls | select ...[name size]
```
# User-Facing Changes
Breaking change for the `select` and `reject` command signatures.
# Description
Pretty much all operations/commands in Nushell assume that the column
names/keys in a record and thus also in a table (which consists of a
list of records) are unique.
Access through a string-like cell path should refer to a single column
or key/value pair and our output through `table` will only show the last
mention of a repeated column name.
```nu
[[a a]; [1 2]]
╭─#─┬─a─╮
│ 0 │ 2 │
╰───┴───╯
```
While the record parsing already either errors with the
`ShellError::ColumnDefinedTwice` or silently overwrites the first
occurence with the second occurence, the table literal syntax `[[header
columns]; [val1 val2]]` currently still allowed the creation of tables
(and internally records with more than one entry with the same name.
This is not only confusing, but also breaks some assumptions around how
we can efficiently perform operations or in the past lead to outright
bugs (e.g. #8431 fixed by #8446).
This PR proposes to make this an error.
After this change another hole which allowed the construction of records
with non-unique column names will be plugged.
## Parts
- Fix `SE::ColumnDefinedTwice` error code
- Remove previous tests permitting duplicate columns
- Deny duplicate column in table literal eval
- Deny duplicate column in const eval
- Deny duplicate column in `from nuon`
# User-Facing Changes
`[[a a]; [1 2]]` will now return an error:
```
Error: nu:🐚:column_defined_twice
× Record field or table column used twice
╭─[entry #2:1:1]
1 │ [[a a]; [1 2]]
· ┬ ┬
· │ ╰── field redefined here
· ╰── field first defined here
╰────
```
this may under rare circumstances block code from evaluating.
Furthermore this makes some NUON files invalid if they previously
contained tables with repeated column names.
# Tests + Formatting
Added tests for each of the different evaluation paths that materialize
tables.
Add `--ignore-errors` flag to reject.
This is a PR in reference to #10215 as select has the flag, but reject
hasn't
user can now add `-i` or `--ignore-errors` flag to turn every cell path
into option.
```nushell
> let arg = [0 5 a c]
> [[a b];[1 2] [3 4] [5 6]] | reject $a | to nuon
error index to large
# ----
> let arg = [0 5 a c]
> [[a b];[1 2] [3 4] [5 6]] | reject $a -i | to nuon
[[a, b]; [1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6]]
```
This PR is in relation to #10215
# Description
This PR introduces `reject` to receive list of columns or rows as
argument.
This change is similar to change of `select` and the code used is
similar.
# User-Facing Changes
The user will be able to pass a list as rejection arguments.
```nushell
let arg = [ type size ]
[[name type size]; [ cargo.toml file 20mb ] [ Cargo.lock file 20mb] [src dir 100mb]] | reject $arg
```
# Description
This PR fixes `reject` failing when providing row items in ascending
order.
# User-Facing Changes
users can now `reject` multiple rows independently of each other.
```nushell
let foo = [[a b]; [ 1 2] [3 4] [ 5 6]]
# this will work independant of the order
print ($foo | reject 2 1)
print ($foo | reject 1 2)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Stevan <44101798+amtoine@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR just tidies up some tests by removing unused code:
1. If the filesystem is not touched, don't use the filesystem
playground/sandbox
2. If the filesystem is not touched, don't specify the `cwd`
3. If the command is short, don't bother wrapping it in `pipeline()`
4. If the command doesn't have quotes, don't bother with a `r#"..."#`
raw string
Part of #8670.
# Description
Prevents redefining fields in a record, for example `{a: 1, a: 2}` would
now error.
fixes https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8699
# User-Facing Changes
Is technically a breaking change. If you relied on this behaviour to
give you the last value, your code will now error.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-utils/standard_library/tests.nu` to run the
tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
This PR makes `?` work with `reject`. For example:
```bash
> {} | reject foo
Error: nu:🐚:column_not_found
× Cannot find column
╭─[entry #2:1:1]
1 │ {} | reject foo
· ───┬── ─┬─
· │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo'
· ╰── value originates here
╰────
> {} | reject foo?
╭──────────────╮
│ empty record │
╰──────────────╯
```
This was prompted by [a user
question](https://discord.com/channels/601130461678272522/614593951969574961/1091466428546306078).
I would like to get this in for 0.78, I think it's low-risk and I want
the `?` feature to be as polished as possible for its debut.
# Description
Require that any value that looks like it might be a number (starts with
a digit, or a '-' + digit, or a '+' + digits, or a special form float
like `-inf`, `inf`, or `NaN`) must now be treated as a number-like
value. Number-like syntax can only parse into number-like values.
Number-like values include: durations, ints, floats, ranges, filesizes,
binary data, etc.
# User-Facing Changes
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
BREAKING CHANGE
Just making sure we see this for release notes 😅
This breaks any and all numberlike values that were treated as strings
before. Example, we used to allow `3,` as a bare word. Anything like
this would now require quotes or backticks to be treated as a string or
bare word, respectively.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
This is a follow up from https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7540.
Please provide feedback if you have the time!
## Summary
This PR lets you use `?` to indicate that a member in a cell path is
optional and Nushell should return `null` if that member cannot be
accessed.
Unlike the previous PR, `?` is now a _postfix_ modifier for cell path
members. A cell path of `.foo?.bar` means that `foo` is optional and
`bar` is not.
`?` does _not_ suppress all errors; it is intended to help in situations
where data has "holes", i.e. the data types are correct but something is
missing. Type mismatches (like trying to do a string path access on a
date) will still fail.
### Record Examples
```bash
{ foo: 123 }.foo # returns 123
{ foo: 123 }.bar # errors
{ foo: 123 }.bar? # returns null
{ foo: 123 } | get bar # errors
{ foo: 123 } | get bar? # returns null
{ foo: 123 }.bar.baz # errors
{ foo: 123 }.bar?.baz # errors because `baz` is not present on the result from `bar?`
{ foo: 123 }.bar.baz? # errors
{ foo: 123 }.bar?.baz? # returns null
```
### List Examples
```
〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo
Error: nu:🐚:column_not_found
× Cannot find column
╭─[entry #30:1:1]
1 │ [{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo
· ─┬ ─┬─
· │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo'
· ╰── value originates here
╰────
〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo?
╭───┬───╮
│ 0 │ 1 │
│ 1 │ 2 │
│ 2 │ │
╰───┴───╯
〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}].foo?.2 | describe
nothing
〉[a b c].4? | describe
nothing
〉[{foo: 1} {foo: 2} {}] | where foo? == 1
╭───┬─────╮
│ # │ foo │
├───┼─────┤
│ 0 │ 1 │
╰───┴─────╯
```
# Breaking changes
1. Column names with `?` in them now need to be quoted.
2. The `-i`/`--ignore-errors` flag has been removed from `get` and
`select`
1. After this PR, most `get` error handling can be done with `?` and/or
`try`/`catch`.
4. Cell path accesses like this no longer work without a `?`:
```bash
〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b.0
2
```
We had some clever code that was able to recognize that since we only
want row `0`, it's OK if other rows are missing column `b`. I removed
that because it's tricky to maintain, and now that query needs to be
written like:
```bash
〉[{a:1 b:2} {a:3}].b?.0
2
```
I think the regression is acceptable for now. I plan to do more work in
the future to enable streaming of cell path accesses, and when that
happens I'll be able to make `.b.0` work again.
# Description
This fixes up some clippy warnings and removes some old names/info from
our unit tests
# User-Facing Changes
Internal changes only
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
The correction made here concerns the issue #8431. Indeed, the algorithm
initially proposed to remove elements of a `vector` performed a loop
with `remove` and an incident therefore appeared when several values
were equal because the deletion was done outside the length of the
vector:
```rust
let mut found = false;
for (i, col) in cols.clone().iter().enumerate() {
if col == col_name {
cols.remove(i);
vals.remove(i);
found = true;
}
}
```
Then, `[[a, a]; [1, 2]] | reject a: ` gave `thread 'main' panicked at
'removal index (is 1) should be < len (is 1)',
crates/nu-protocol/src/value/mod.rs:1213:54`.
The proposed correction is therefore the implementation of the
`retain_mut` utility dedicated to this functionality.
```rust
let mut found = false;
let mut index = 0;
cols.retain_mut(|col| {
if col == col_name {
found = true;
vals.remove(index);
false
} else {
index += 1;
true
}
});
```
I tackled some of the disabled `FIXME`/`#[ignore]` tests. Most were
straightforward to re-enable, and a few of them did not deserve to be
re-enabled.
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
* add signature information when help on one command
* tell user that one command support operated on cell paths
Also, make type output to be more friendly, like `record<>` should just be `record`
And the same to `table<>`, which should be `table`
* simplify code
* don't show signatures for parser keyword
* update comment
* output arg syntax shape as type, so it's the same as describe command
* fix string when no positional args
* update signature body
* update
* add help signature test
* fix arg output format for composed data type like list or record
* fix clippy
* add comment
* Initialize join.rs as a copy of collect.rs
* Evolve StrCollect into StrJoin
* Replace 'str collect' with 'str join' everywhere
git ls-files | lines | par-each { |it| sed -i 's,str collect,str join,g' $it }
* Deprecate 'str collect'
* Revert "Deprecate 'str collect'"
This reverts commit 959d14203e.
* Change `str collect` help message to say that it is deprecated
We cannot remove `str collect` currently (i.e. via
`nu_protocol::ShellError::DeprecatedCommand` since a prominent project
uses the API:
b85542c31c/src/virtualenv/activation/nushell/activate.nu (L43)
* add new function to remove data at a cellpath; allow reject to use cellpath
* add tests
* fmt
* fix clippt
* get it working properly with lists of records
* fix clippy, hopefully
* fix clippy, hopefully 2
