1 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
David Matos	fed4233db4	use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097) ... <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started. Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was named. > [!NOTE] Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place to make this PR work. The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils` crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current `nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from the `uutils` repo. With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and keep working on: Crawl: - Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`. - Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see `--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args. - Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but maybe the more relevant to what we want. - Refactor this code Walk: - Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to stdout but errors have no span - Better integration An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for `Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work. I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door, as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer 😛 <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass - [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>	2023-09-08 13:57:38 -05:00