mirror of
https://github.com/nushell/nushell.git
synced 2025-06-05 01:26:42 +02:00
17 Commits
Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
7d2e8875e0
|
Make timeit take only closures as an argument (#14483)
# Description Fixes #14401 where expressions passed to `timeit` will execute twice. This PR removes the expression support for `timeit`, as this behavior is almost exclusive to `timeit` and can hinder migration to the IR evaluator in the future. Additionally, `timeit` used to be able to take a `block` as an argument. Blocks should probably only be allowed for parser keywords, so this PR changes `timeit` to instead only take closures as an argument. This also fixes an issue where environment updates inside the `timeit` block would affect the parent scope and all commands later in the pipeline. ```nu > timeit { $env.FOO = 'bar' }; print $env.FOO bar ``` # User-Facing Changes `timeit` now only takes a closure as the first argument. # After Submitting Update examples in the book/docs if necessary. |
||
|
3d008e2c4e
|
Error on non-zero exit statuses (#13515)
# Description This PR makes it so that non-zero exit codes and termination by signal are treated as a normal `ShellError`. Currently, these are silent errors. That is, if an external command fails, then it's code block is aborted, but the parent block can sometimes continue execution. E.g., see #8569 and this example: ```nushell [1 2] | each { ^false } ``` Before this would give: ``` ╭───┬──╮ │ 0 │ │ │ 1 │ │ ╰───┴──╯ ``` Now, this shows an error: ``` Error: nu:🐚:eval_block_with_input × Eval block failed with pipeline input ╭─[entry #1:1:2] 1 │ [1 2] | each { ^false } · ┬ · ╰── source value ╰──── Error: nu:🐚:non_zero_exit_code × External command had a non-zero exit code ╭─[entry #1:1:17] 1 │ [1 2] | each { ^false } · ──┬── · ╰── exited with code 1 ╰──── ``` This PR fixes #12874, fixes #5960, fixes #10856, and fixes #5347. This PR also partially addresses #10633 and #10624 (only the last command of a pipeline is currently checked). It looks like #8569 is already fixed, but this PR will make sure it is definitely fixed (fixes #8569). # User-Facing Changes - Non-zero exit codes and termination by signal now cause an error to be thrown. - The error record value passed to a `catch` block may now have an `exit_code` column containing the integer exit code if the error was due to an external command. - Adds new config values, `display_errors.exit_code` and `display_errors.termination_signal`, which determine whether an error message should be printed in the respective error cases. For non-interactive sessions, these are set to `true`, and for interactive sessions `display_errors.exit_code` is false (via the default config). # Tests Added a few tests. # After Submitting - Update docs and book. - Future work: - Error if other external commands besides the last in a pipeline exit with a non-zero exit code. Then, deprecate `do -c` since this will be the default behavior everywhere. - Add a better mechanism for exit codes and deprecate `$env.LAST_EXIT_CODE` (it's buggy). |
||
|
95b78eee25
|
Change the usage misnomer to "description" (#13598)
# Description The meaning of the word usage is specific to describing how a command function is *used* and not a synonym for general description. Usage can be used to describe the SYNOPSIS or EXAMPLES sections of a man page where the permitted argument combinations are shown or example *uses* are given. Let's not confuse people and call it what it is a description. Our `help` command already creates its own *Usage* section based on the available arguments and doesn't refer to the description with usage. # User-Facing Changes `help commands` and `scope commands` will now use `description` or `extra_description` `usage`-> `description` `extra_usage` -> `extra_description` Breaking change in the plugin protocol: In the signature record communicated with the engine. `usage`-> `description` `extra_usage` -> `extra_description` The same rename also takes place for the methods on `SimplePluginCommand` and `PluginCommand` # Tests + Formatting - Updated plugin protocol specific changes # After Submitting - [ ] update plugin protocol doc |
||
|
d7392f1f3b
|
Internal representation (IR) compiler and evaluator (#13330)
# Description This PR adds an internal representation language to Nushell, offering an alternative evaluator based on simple instructions, stream-containing registers, and indexed control flow. The number of registers required is determined statically at compile-time, and the fixed size required is allocated upon entering the block. Each instruction is associated with a span, which makes going backwards from IR instructions to source code very easy. Motivations for IR: 1. **Performance.** By simplifying the evaluation path and making it more cache-friendly and branch predictor-friendly, code that does a lot of computation in Nushell itself can be sped up a decent bit. Because the IR is fairly easy to reason about, we can also implement optimization passes in the future to eliminate and simplify code. 2. **Correctness.** The instructions mostly have very simple and easily-specified behavior, so hopefully engine changes are a little bit easier to reason about, and they can be specified in a more formal way at some point. I have made an effort to document each of the instructions in the docs for the enum itself in a reasonably specific way. Some of the errors that would have happened during evaluation before are now moved to the compilation step instead, because they don't make sense to check during evaluation. 3. **As an intermediate target.** This is a good step for us to bring the [`new-nu-parser`](https://github.com/nushell/new-nu-parser) in at some point, as code generated from new AST can be directly compared to code generated from old AST. If the IR code is functionally equivalent, it will behave the exact same way. 4. **Debugging.** With a little bit more work, we can probably give control over advancing the virtual machine that `IrBlock`s run on to some sort of external driver, making things like breakpoints and single stepping possible. Tools like `view ir` and [`explore ir`](https://github.com/devyn/nu_plugin_explore_ir) make it easier than before to see what exactly is going on with your Nushell code. The goal is to eventually replace the AST evaluator entirely, once we're sure it's working just as well. You can help dogfood this by running Nushell with `$env.NU_USE_IR` set to some value. The environment variable is checked when Nushell starts, so config runs with IR, or it can also be set on a line at the REPL to change it dynamically. It is also checked when running `do` in case within a script you want to just run a specific piece of code with or without IR. # Example ```nushell view ir { |data| mut sum = 0 for n in $data { $sum += $n } $sum } ``` ```gas # 3 registers, 19 instructions, 0 bytes of data 0: load-literal %0, int(0) 1: store-variable var 904, %0 # let 2: drain %0 3: drop %0 4: load-variable %1, var 903 5: iterate %0, %1, end 15 # for, label(1), from(14:) 6: store-variable var 905, %0 7: load-variable %0, var 904 8: load-variable %2, var 905 9: binary-op %0, Math(Plus), %2 10: span %0 11: store-variable var 904, %0 12: load-literal %0, nothing 13: drain %0 14: jump 5 15: drop %0 # label(0), from(5:) 16: drain %0 17: load-variable %0, var 904 18: return %0 ``` # Benchmarks All benchmarks run on a base model Mac Mini M1. ## Iterative Fibonacci sequence This is about as best case as possible, making use of the much faster control flow. Most code will not experience a speed improvement nearly this large. ```nushell def fib [n: int] { mut a = 0 mut b = 1 for _ in 2..=$n { let c = $a + $b $a = $b $b = $c } $b } use std bench bench { 0..50 | each { |n| fib $n } } ``` IR disabled: ``` ╭───────┬─────────────────╮ │ mean │ 1ms 924µs 665ns │ │ min │ 1ms 700µs 83ns │ │ max │ 3ms 450µs 125ns │ │ std │ 395µs 759ns │ │ times │ [list 50 items] │ ╰───────┴─────────────────╯ ``` IR enabled: ``` ╭───────┬─────────────────╮ │ mean │ 452µs 820ns │ │ min │ 427µs 417ns │ │ max │ 540µs 167ns │ │ std │ 17µs 158ns │ │ times │ [list 50 items] │ ╰───────┴─────────────────╯ ```  ## [gradient_benchmark_no_check.nu](https://github.com/nushell/nu_scripts/blob/main/benchmarks/gradient_benchmark_no_check.nu) IR disabled: ``` ╭───┬──────────────────╮ │ 0 │ 27ms 929µs 958ns │ │ 1 │ 21ms 153µs 459ns │ │ 2 │ 18ms 639µs 666ns │ │ 3 │ 19ms 554µs 583ns │ │ 4 │ 13ms 383µs 375ns │ │ 5 │ 11ms 328µs 208ns │ │ 6 │ 5ms 659µs 542ns │ ╰───┴──────────────────╯ ``` IR enabled: ``` ╭───┬──────────────────╮ │ 0 │ 22ms 662µs │ │ 1 │ 17ms 221µs 792ns │ │ 2 │ 14ms 786µs 708ns │ │ 3 │ 13ms 876µs 834ns │ │ 4 │ 13ms 52µs 875ns │ │ 5 │ 11ms 269µs 666ns │ │ 6 │ 6ms 942µs 500ns │ ╰───┴──────────────────╯ ``` ## [random-bytes.nu](https://github.com/nushell/nu_scripts/blob/main/benchmarks/random-bytes.nu) I got pretty random results out of this benchmark so I decided not to include it. Not clear why. # User-Facing Changes - IR compilation errors may appear even if the user isn't evaluating with IR. - IR evaluation can be enabled by setting the `NU_USE_IR` environment variable to any value. - New command `view ir` pretty-prints the IR for a block, and `view ir --json` can be piped into an external tool like [`explore ir`](https://github.com/devyn/nu_plugin_explore_ir). # Tests + Formatting All tests are passing with `NU_USE_IR=1`, and I've added some more eval tests to compare the results for some very core operations. I will probably want to add some more so we don't have to always check `NU_USE_IR=1 toolkit test --workspace` on a regular basis. # After Submitting - [ ] release notes - [ ] further documentation of instructions? - [ ] post-release: publish `nu_plugin_explore_ir` |
||
|
6fd854ed9f
|
Replace ExternalStream with new ByteStream type (#12774)
# Description This PR introduces a `ByteStream` type which is a `Read`-able stream of bytes. Internally, it has an enum over three different byte stream sources: ```rust pub enum ByteStreamSource { Read(Box<dyn Read + Send + 'static>), File(File), Child(ChildProcess), } ``` This is in comparison to the current `RawStream` type, which is an `Iterator<Item = Vec<u8>>` and has to allocate for each read chunk. Currently, `PipelineData::ExternalStream` serves a weird dual role where it is either external command output or a wrapper around `RawStream`. `ByteStream` makes this distinction more clear (via `ByteStreamSource`) and replaces `PipelineData::ExternalStream` in this PR: ```rust pub enum PipelineData { Empty, Value(Value, Option<PipelineMetadata>), ListStream(ListStream, Option<PipelineMetadata>), ByteStream(ByteStream, Option<PipelineMetadata>), } ``` The PR is relatively large, but a decent amount of it is just repetitive changes. This PR fixes #7017, fixes #10763, and fixes #12369. This PR also improves performance when piping external commands. Nushell should, in most cases, have competitive pipeline throughput compared to, e.g., bash. | Command | Before (MB/s) | After (MB/s) | Bash (MB/s) | | -------------------------------------------------- | -------------:| ------------:| -----------:| | `throughput \| rg 'x'` | 3059 | 3744 | 3739 | | `throughput \| nu --testbin relay o> /dev/null` | 3508 | 8087 | 8136 | # User-Facing Changes - This is a breaking change for the plugin communication protocol, because the `ExternalStreamInfo` was replaced with `ByteStreamInfo`. Plugins now only have to deal with a single input stream, as opposed to the previous three streams: stdout, stderr, and exit code. - The output of `describe` has been changed for external/byte streams. - Temporary breaking change: `bytes starts-with` no longer works with byte streams. This is to keep the PR smaller, and `bytes ends-with` already does not work on byte streams. - If a process core dumped, then instead of having a `Value::Error` in the `exit_code` column of the output returned from `complete`, it now is a `Value::Int` with the negation of the signal number. # After Submitting - Update docs and book as necessary - Release notes (e.g., plugin protocol changes) - Adapt/convert commands to work with byte streams (high priority is `str length`, `bytes starts-with`, and maybe `bytes ends-with`). - Refactor the `tee` code, Devyn has already done some work on this. --------- Co-authored-by: Devyn Cairns <devyn.cairns@gmail.com> |
||
|
13160b3ec3
|
Replace subtraction of Instants and Durations with saturating subtractions (#12549)
# Description Duration can not be negative, and an underflow causes a panic. This should fix #12539 as from what I can tell that bug was caused in `nu-explore:📟:events` from subtracting durations, but I figured this might be more widespread, and saturating to zero generally makes sense. I also added the relevant clippy lint to try to prevent this from happening in the future. I can't think of a reason we would ever want to subtract durations without checking first. cc @fdncred # Tests + Formatting - 🟢 `toolkit fmt` - 🟢 `toolkit clippy` - 🟢 `toolkit test` - 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib` |
||
|
18ddf95d44
|
Force timeit to not capture stdout (#12465)
# Description Fixes: #11996 After this change `let t = timeit ^ls` will list current directory to stdout. ``` ❯ let t = timeit ^ls CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md Cargo.lock Cross.toml README.md aaa benches devdocs here11 scripts target toolkit.nu wix CONTRIBUTING.md Cargo.toml LICENSE a.txt assets crates docker rust-toolchain.toml src tests typos.toml ``` If user don't want such behavior, he can redirect the stdout to `std null-stream` easily ``` > use std > let t = timeit { ^ls o> (std null-device) } ``` # User-Facing Changes NaN # Tests + Formatting Done # After Submitting Nan --------- Co-authored-by: Ian Manske <ian.manske@pm.me> |
||
|
c747ec75c9
|
Add command_prelude module (#12291)
# Description When implementing a `Command`, one must also import all the types present in the function signatures for `Command`. This makes it so that we often import the same set of types in each command implementation file. E.g., something like this: ```rust use nu_protocol::ast::Call; use nu_protocol::engine::{Command, EngineState, Stack}; use nu_protocol::{ record, Category, Example, IntoInterruptiblePipelineData, IntoPipelineData, PipelineData, ShellError, Signature, Span, Type, Value, }; ``` This PR adds the `nu_engine::command_prelude` module which contains the necessary and commonly used types to implement a `Command`: ```rust // command_prelude.rs pub use crate::CallExt; pub use nu_protocol::{ ast::{Call, CellPath}, engine::{Command, EngineState, Stack}, record, Category, Example, IntoInterruptiblePipelineData, IntoPipelineData, IntoSpanned, PipelineData, Record, ShellError, Signature, Span, Spanned, SyntaxShape, Type, Value, }; ``` This should reduce the boilerplate needed to implement a command and also gives us a place to track the breadth of the `Command` API. I tried to be conservative with what went into the prelude modules, since it might be hard/annoying to remove items from the prelude in the future. Let me know if something should be included or excluded. |
||
|
b6c7656194
|
IO and redirection overhaul (#11934)
# Description The PR overhauls how IO redirection is handled, allowing more explicit and fine-grain control over `stdout` and `stderr` output as well as more efficient IO and piping. To summarize the changes in this PR: - Added a new `IoStream` type to indicate the intended destination for a pipeline element's `stdout` and `stderr`. - The `stdout` and `stderr` `IoStream`s are stored in the `Stack` and to avoid adding 6 additional arguments to every eval function and `Command::run`. The `stdout` and `stderr` streams can be temporarily overwritten through functions on `Stack` and these functions will return a guard that restores the original `stdout` and `stderr` when dropped. - In the AST, redirections are now directly part of a `PipelineElement` as a `Option<Redirection>` field instead of having multiple different `PipelineElement` enum variants for each kind of redirection. This required changes to the parser, mainly in `lite_parser.rs`. - `Command`s can also set a `IoStream` override/redirection which will apply to the previous command in the pipeline. This is used, for example, in `ignore` to allow the previous external command to have its stdout redirected to `Stdio::null()` at spawn time. In contrast, the current implementation has to create an os pipe and manually consume the output on nushell's side. File and pipe redirections (`o>`, `e>`, `e>|`, etc.) have precedence over overrides from commands. This PR improves piping and IO speed, partially addressing #10763. Using the `throughput` command from that issue, this PR gives the following speedup on my setup for the commands below: | Command | Before (MB/s) | After (MB/s) | Bash (MB/s) | | --------------------------- | -------------:| ------------:| -----------:| | `throughput o> /dev/null` | 1169 | 52938 | 54305 | | `throughput \| ignore` | 840 | 55438 | N/A | | `throughput \| null` | Error | 53617 | N/A | | `throughput \| rg 'x'` | 1165 | 3049 | 3736 | | `(throughput) \| rg 'x'` | 810 | 3085 | 3815 | (Numbers above are the median samples for throughput) This PR also paves the way to refactor our `ExternalStream` handling in the various commands. For example, this PR already fixes the following code: ```nushell ^sh -c 'echo -n "hello "; sleep 0; echo "world"' | find "hello world" ``` This returns an empty list on 0.90.1 and returns a highlighted "hello world" on this PR. Since the `stdout` and `stderr` `IoStream`s are available to commands when they are run, then this unlocks the potential for more convenient behavior. E.g., the `find` command can disable its ansi highlighting if it detects that the output `IoStream` is not the terminal. Knowing the output streams will also allow background job output to be redirected more easily and efficiently. # User-Facing Changes - External commands returned from closures will be collected (in most cases): ```nushell 1..2 | each {|_| nu -c "print a" } ``` This gives `["a", "a"]` on this PR, whereas this used to print "a\na\n" and then return an empty list. ```nushell 1..2 | each {|_| nu -c "print -e a" } ``` This gives `["", ""]` and prints "a\na\n" to stderr, whereas this used to return an empty list and print "a\na\n" to stderr. - Trailing new lines are always trimmed for external commands when piping into internal commands or collecting it as a value. (Failure to decode the output as utf-8 will keep the trailing newline for the last binary value.) In the current nushell version, the following three code snippets differ only in parenthesis placement, but they all also have different outputs: 1. `1..2 | each { ^echo a }` ``` a a ╭────────────╮ │ empty list │ ╰────────────╯ ``` 2. `1..2 | each { (^echo a) }` ``` ╭───┬───╮ │ 0 │ a │ │ 1 │ a │ ╰───┴───╯ ``` 3. `1..2 | (each { ^echo a })` ``` ╭───┬───╮ │ 0 │ a │ │ │ │ │ 1 │ a │ │ │ │ ╰───┴───╯ ``` But in this PR, the above snippets will all have the same output: ``` ╭───┬───╮ │ 0 │ a │ │ 1 │ a │ ╰───┴───╯ ``` - All existing flags on `run-external` are now deprecated. - File redirections now apply to all commands inside a code block: ```nushell (nu -c "print -e a"; nu -c "print -e b") e> test.out ``` This gives "a\nb\n" in `test.out` and prints nothing. The same result would happen when printing to stdout and using a `o>` file redirection. - External command output will (almost) never be ignored, and ignoring output must be explicit now: ```nushell (^echo a; ^echo b) ``` This prints "a\nb\n", whereas this used to print only "b\n". This only applies to external commands; values and internal commands not in return position will not print anything (e.g., `(echo a; echo b)` still only prints "b"). - `complete` now always captures stderr (`do` is not necessary). # After Submitting The language guide and other documentation will need to be updated. |
||
|
14d1c67863
|
Debugger experiments (#11441)
<!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> This PR adds a new evaluator path with callbacks to a mutable trait object implementing a Debugger trait. The trait object can do anything, e.g., profiling, code coverage, step debugging. Currently, entering/leaving a block and a pipeline element is marked with callbacks, but more callbacks can be added as necessary. Not all callbacks need to be used by all debuggers; unused ones are simply empty calls. A simple profiler is implemented as a proof of concept. The debugging support is implementing by making `eval_xxx()` functions generic depending on whether we're debugging or not. This has zero computational overhead, but makes the binary slightly larger (see benchmarks below). `eval_xxx()` variants called from commands (like `eval_block_with_early_return()` in `each`) are chosen with a dynamic dispatch for two reasons: to not grow the binary size due to duplicating the code of many commands, and for the fact that it isn't possible because it would make Command trait objects object-unsafe. In the future, I hope it will be possible to allow plugin callbacks such that users would be able to implement their profiler plugins instead of having to recompile Nushell. [DAP](https://microsoft.github.io/debug-adapter-protocol/) would also be interesting to explore. Try `help debug profile`. ## Screenshots Basic output:  To profile with more granularity, increase the profiler depth (you'll see that repeated `is-windows` calls take a large chunk of total time, making it a good candidate for optimizing):  ## Benchmarks ### Binary size Binary size increase vs. main: **+40360 bytes**. _(Both built with `--release --features=extra,dataframe`.)_ ### Time ```nushell # bench_debug.nu use std bench let test = { 1..100 | each { ls | each {|row| $row.name | str length } } | flatten | math avg } print 'debug:' let res2 = bench { debug profile $test } --pretty print $res2 ``` ```nushell # bench_nodebug.nu use std bench let test = { 1..100 | each { ls | each {|row| $row.name | str length } } | flatten | math avg } print 'no debug:' let res1 = bench { do $test } --pretty print $res1 ``` `cargo run --release -- bench_debug.nu` is consistently 1--2 ms slower than `cargo run --release -- bench_nodebug.nu` due to the collection overhead + gathering the report. This is expected. When gathering more stuff, the overhead is obviously higher. `cargo run --release -- bench_nodebug.nu` vs. `nu bench_nodebug.nu` I didn't measure any difference. Both benchmarks report times between 97 and 103 ms randomly, without one being consistently higher than the other. This suggests that at least in this particular case, when not running any debugger, there is no runtime overhead. ## API changes This PR adds a generic parameter to all `eval_xxx` functions that forces you to specify whether you use the debugger. You can resolve it in two ways: * Use a provided helper that will figure it out for you. If you wanted to use `eval_block(&engine_state, ...)`, call `let eval_block = get_eval_block(&engine_state); eval_block(&engine_state, ...)` * If you know you're in an evaluation path that doesn't need debugger support, call `eval_block::<WithoutDebug>(&engine_state, ...)` (this is the case of hooks, for example). I tried to add more explanation in the docstring of `debugger_trait.rs`. ## TODO - [x] Better profiler output to reduce spam of iterative commands like `each` - [x] Resolve `TODO: DEBUG` comments - [x] Resolve unwraps - [x] Add doc comments - [x] Add usage and extra usage for `debug profile`, explaining all columns # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> Hopefully none. # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> |
||
|
5b01685fc3
|
Enforce required, optional, and rest positional arguments start with an uppercase and end with a period. (#11285)
# Description This updates all the positional arguments (except with `--features=dataframe` or `--features=extra`) to start with an uppercase letter and end with a period. Part of #5066, specifically [this comment](/nushell/nushell/issues/5066#issuecomment-1421528910) Some arguments had example data removed from them because it also appears in the examples. There are other inconsistencies in positional arguments I noticed while making the tests pass which I will bring up in #5066. # User-Facing Changes Positional arguments are now consistent # Tests + Formatting - 🟢 `toolkit fmt` - 🟢 `toolkit clippy` - 🟢 `toolkit test` - 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib` # After Submitting Automatic documentation updates |
||
|
6cdfee3573
|
Move Value to helpers, separate span call (#10121)
# Description As part of the refactor to split spans off of Value, this moves to using helper functions to create values, and using `.span()` instead of matching span out of Value directly. Hoping to get a few more helping hands to finish this, as there are a lot of commands to update :) # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: WindSoilder <windsoilder@outlook.com> |
||
|
85bfdba1e2
|
Make timeit work with command calls (#8594)
# Description Allows `timeit` to also run commands directly, eg) `timeit ls -la` # User-Facing Changes Additional capabilities to `timeit`. # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` # After Submitting If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. |
||
|
546c753d1e
|
Move timeit to use blocks. Make match vars immutable (#8592)
# Description This does a couple random changes/fixes: * Moves `timeit` to use a block instead of a closure. This makes it a bit more flexible. * Moves var bindings in patterns to be immutable # User-Facing Changes `timeit` now takes a block and no arguments. # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` # After Submitting If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. |
||
|
a8eef9af33
|
Restrict closure expression to be something like {|| ...} (#8290)
# Description As title, closes: #7921 closes: #8273 # User-Facing Changes when define a closure without pipe, nushell will raise error for now: ``` ❯ let x = {ss ss} Error: nu::parser::closure_missing_pipe × Missing || inside closure ╭─[entry #2:1:1] 1 │ let x = {ss ss} · ───┬─── · ╰── Parsing as a closure, but || is missing ╰──── help: Try add || to the beginning of closure ``` `any`, `each`, `all`, `where` command accepts closure, it forces user input closure like `{||`, or parse error will returned. ``` ❯ {major:2, minor:1, patch:4} | values | each { into string } Error: nu::parser::closure_missing_pipe × Missing || inside closure ╭─[entry #4:1:1] 1 │ {major:2, minor:1, patch:4} | values | each { into string } · ───────┬─────── · ╰── Parsing as a closure, but || is missing ╰──── help: Try add || to the beginning of closure ``` `with-env`, `do`, `def`, `try` are special, they still remain the same, although it says that it accepts a closure, but they don't need to be written like `{||`, it's more likely a block but can capture variable outside of scope: ``` ❯ def test [input] { echo [0 1 2] | do { do { echo $input } } }; test aaa aaa ``` Just realize that It's a big breaking change, we need to update config and scripts... # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass # After Submitting If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. |
||
|
a5c604c283
|
Uniformize usage() and extra_usage() message ending for commands helper. (#8268)
# Description Working on uniformizing the ending messages regarding methods usage() and extra_usage(). This is related to the issue https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/5066 after discussing it with @jntrnr # User-Facing Changes None. # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass # After Submitting If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. |
||
|
4c787af26d
|
relocate debug commands (#8071)
# Description Now that we've landed the debug commands we were working on, let's relocate them to an easier place to find all of them. That's what this PR does. The only actual code change was changing the `timeit` command to a `Category::Debug` command. The rest is just moving things around and hooking them up. # User-Facing Changes # Tests + Formatting Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass # After Submitting If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. |