# Description
With the current typechecking logic this property has no effect.
It was only used in the example testing, and provided some indication of
this vectorizing property.
With #9742 all commands that previously declared it have explicit list
signatures. If we want to get it back in the future we can reconstruct
it from the signature.
Simplifies the example testing a bit.
# User-Facing Changes
Causes a breaking change for plugins that previously declared it. While
this causes a compile fail, this was already broken by our more
stringent type checking.
This will be a good reminder for plugin authors to update their
signature as well to reflect the more stringent type checking.
# Description
All commands that declared `.vectorizes_over_list(true)` now also
explicitly declare the list form of their scalar types.
- Explicit in/out list signatures for nu-command
- Explicit in/out list signatures for nu-cmd-extra
- Add comments about cellpath behavior that is still unresolved
# User-Facing Changes
Our type signatures will now be more explicit about which commands
support vectorization over lists.
On the downside this is a bit more verbose and less systematic.
I added a new capability to `bracoxide` which is for `brace expansion`
(it's almost like bash brace expressions).
Anyway, this change adds this capability:
`A{,B,C} | str expand`, returns:
```md
- A
- AB
- AC
```
`A{B,,C} | str expand`, returns:
```md
- AB
- A
- AC
```
`A{B,C,} | str expand`, returns:
```md
- AB
- AC
- A
```
Updated examples, according to the new feature.
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
Description can be found [here:
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/discussions/9277#discussioncomment-5997793](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/discussions/9277#discussioncomment-5997793)
# User-Facing Changes
Again, examples can be found in the discussion #9277
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
I've written tests that cover the changes I've made.
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
