# Description
I thought about bringing `nu_plugin_msgpack` in, but that is MPL with a
clause that prevents other licenses, so rather than adapt that code I
decided to take a crack at just doing it straight from `rmp` to `Value`
without any `rmpv` in the middle. It seems like it's probably faster,
though I can't say for sure how much with the plugin overhead.
@IanManske I started on a `Read` implementation for `RawStream` but just
specialized to `from msgpack` here, but I'm thinking after release maybe
we can polish it up and make it a real one. It works!
# User-Facing Changes
New commands:
- `from msgpack`
- `from msgpackz`
- `to msgpack`
- `to msgpackz`
# Tests + Formatting
Pretty thorough tests added for the format deserialization, with a
roundtrip for serialization. Some example tests too for both `from
msgpack` and `to msgpack`.
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
- [ ] update release notes
# Description
The intended effect of the `extra` feature has been undermined by
introducing the full builds on our release pages and having more
activity on some of the extra commands.
To simplify the feature matrix let's get rid of it and focus our effort
on truly either refining a command to well-specified behavior or
discarding it entirely from the `nu` binary and moving it into plugins.
## Details
- Remove `--features extra` from CI
- Don't explicitly name `extra` in full build wf
- Remove feature extra from build-help scripts
- Update README in `nu-cmd-extra`
- Remove feature `extra`
- Fix previously dead `format pattern` tests
- Relax signature of `to html`
- Fix/ignore `html::test_no_color_flag`
- Remove dead features from `version`
- Refine `to html` type signature
# User-Facing Changes
The commands that were previously only available when building with
`--features extra` will now be available to everyone. This increases the
number of dependencies slightly but has a limited impact on the overall
binary size.
# Tests + Formatting
Some tests that were left in `nu-command` during cratification were dead
because the feature was not passed to `nu-command` and only to
`nu-cmd-lang` for feature-flag mention in `version`.
Those tests have now been either fixed or ignored in one case.
# After Submitting
There may be places in the documentation where we point to `--features
extra` that will now be moot (apart from the generated command help)
requires
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9455
# ⚙️ Description
in this PR i move the commands we've all agreed, in the core team, to
move out of the core Nushell to the `extra` feature.
> **Warning**
> in the first commits here, i've
> - moved the implementations to `nu-cmd-extra`
> - removed the declaration of all the commands below from `nu-command`
> - made sure the commands were not available anymore with `cargo run --
-n`
## the list of commands to move
with the current command table downloaded as `commands.csv`, i've run
```bash
let commands = (
open commands.csv
| where is_plugin == "FALSE" and category != "deprecated"
| select name category "approv. %"
| rename name category approval
| insert treated {|it| (
($it.approval == 100) or # all the core team agreed on them
($it.name | str starts-with "bits") or # see https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9241
($it.name | str starts-with "dfr") # see https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9327
)}
)
```
to preprocess them and then
```bash
$commands | where {|it| (not $it.treated) and ($it.approval == 0)}
```
to get all untreated commands with no approval, which gives
```
╭────┬───────────────┬─────────┬─────────────┬──────────╮
│ # │ name │ treated │ category │ approval │
├────┼───────────────┼─────────┼─────────────┼──────────┤
│ 0 │ fmt │ false │ conversions │ 0 │
│ 1 │ each while │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 2 │ roll │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 3 │ roll down │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 4 │ roll left │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 5 │ roll right │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 6 │ roll up │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 7 │ rotate │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 8 │ update cells │ false │ filters │ 0 │
│ 9 │ decode hex │ false │ formats │ 0 │
│ 10 │ encode hex │ false │ formats │ 0 │
│ 11 │ from url │ false │ formats │ 0 │
│ 12 │ to html │ false │ formats │ 0 │
│ 13 │ ansi gradient │ false │ platform │ 0 │
│ 14 │ ansi link │ false │ platform │ 0 │
│ 15 │ format │ false │ strings │ 0 │
╰────┴───────────────┴─────────┴─────────────┴──────────╯
```
# 🖌️ User-Facing Changes
```
$nothing
```
# 🧪 Tests + Formatting
- ⚫ `toolkit fmt`
- ⚫ `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# 📖 After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# 🔍 For reviewers
```bash
$commands | where {|it| (not $it.treated) and ($it.approval == 0)} | each {|command|
try {
help $command.name | ignore
} catch {|e|
$"($command.name): ($e.msg)"
}
}
```
should give no output in `cargo run --features extra -- -n` and a table
with 16 lines in `cargo run -- -n`
# Description
From nushell 0.8 philosophy:
https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io/blob/main/contributor-book/philosophy_0_80.md#core-categories
> The following categories should be moved to plugins:
Uncommon format support
So this pr is trying to move following commands to plugin:
- [X] from eml
- [x] from ics
- [x] from ini
- [x] from vcf
And we can have a new plugin handles for these formatting, currently
it's implemented here:
https://github.com/WindSoilder/nu_plugin_format
The command usage should be the same to original command.
If it's ok, the plugin can support more formats like
[parquet](https://github.com/fdncred/nu_plugin_from_parquet), or [EDN
format](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/6415), or something
else.
Just create a draft pr to show what's the blueprint looks like, and is
it a good direction to move forward?
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
* move commands, futures.rs, script.rs, utils
* move over maybe_print_errors
* add nu_command crate references to nu_cli
* in commands.rs open up to pub mod from pub(crate)
* nu-cli, nu-command, and nu tests are now passing
* cargo fmt
* clean up nu-cli/src/prelude.rs
* code cleanup
* for some reason lex.rs was not formatted, may be causing my error
* remove mod completion from lib.rs which was not being used along with quickcheck macros
* add in allow unused imports
* comment out one failing external test; comment out one failing internal test
* revert commenting out failing tests; something else might be going on; someone with a windows machine should check and see what is going on with these failing windows tests
* Update Cargo.toml
Extend the optional features to nu-command
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Turner <jonathandturner@users.noreply.github.com>
