# Description
Fixes: #7706
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Holderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
This PR adds the `mime-type` to the `type` column if you add the
`--mime-type(-m)` flag to `ls`.
<img width="853" alt="Screenshot 2022-12-27 at 11 43 20 AM"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/343840/209705499-27fe40fe-0356-4d9d-97f2-4b2dc52e0963.png">
<img width="781" alt="Screenshot 2022-12-27 at 11 45 53 AM"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/343840/209705509-4d677389-fd68-401e-a7af-3fc6052743b6.png">
# User-Facing Changes
If you specify the `-m` flag, you get the "guessed at" mime type. The
guess is based on the file name and uses this crate
https://docs.rs/mime_guess/latest/mime_guess/ for the guessing.
Part of issue #7612 and and #7524
There's some debate on if the `mime-type` should be added to the `type`
column or if there should be a separate `mime` column. I tend to lean on
the side of `type` since it's technically a type and it's only in that
column if you ask it to be there. Also, I'd prefer to reuse a column
rather than having a list of sprawling columns. Also, as @KodiCraft
suggested, there is precedence as with `ls -d` where the summed size is
in the size column.
I could go either way and if someone wants to create a `mime` column,
we'd probably accept it.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
* start working on source-env
* WIP
* Get most tests working, still one to go
* Fix file-relative paths; Report parser error
* Fix merge conflicts; Restore source as deprecated
* Tests: Use source-env; Remove redundant tests
* Fmt
* Respect hidden env vars
* Fix file-relative eval for source-env
* Add file-relative eval to "overlay use"
* Use FILE_PWD only in source-env and "overlay use"
* Ignore new tests for now
This will be another issue
* Throw an error if setting FILE_PWD manually
* Fix source-related test failures
* Fix nu-check to respect FILE_PWD
* Fix corrupted spans in source-env shell errors
* Fix up some references to old source
* Remove deprecation message
* Re-introduce deleted tests
Co-authored-by: kubouch <kubouch@gmail.com>
This PR merges all the completions tests into one file.
The reason for them to be separated was organization, so we wouldn't need to scroll a huge file.
But that came with another issue, because rust generates a new binary for each completion test file and each completion test depends on Nu looks like all the dataframes were coming into each test file as well (as pointed by @rgwood
