19 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jack Wright
c2ac8f730e
Rust 1.85, edition=2024 (#15741) 2025-05-13 16:49:30 +02:00
Stefan Holderbach
a58d9b0b3a
Refactor/fix tests affecting the whole command set (#15073)
# Description
Pre-cratification of `nu-command` we added tests that covered the whole
command set to ensure consistent documentation style choices and that
the search terms which are added are not uselessly redundant. These
tests are now moved into the suite of the main binary to truly cover all
commands.

- **Move parser quickcheck "fuzz" to `nu-cmd-lang`**
- **Factor out creation of full engine state for tests**
- **Move all-command tests to main context creation**
- **Fix all descriptions**
- **Fix search term duplicate**

# User-Facing Changes
As a result I had to fix a few command argument descriptions. (Doesn't
mean I fully stand behind this choice, but) positionals
(rest/required/optional) and top level descriptions should start with a
capital letter and end with a period. This is not enforced for flags.

# Tests + Formatting
Furthermore I moved our poor-peoples-fuzzer that runs in CI with
`quicktest` over the parser to `nu-cmd-lang` reducing its command set to
just the keywords (similar to
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/15036). Thus this should also
run slightly faster (maybe a slight parallel build cost due to earlier
dependency on quicktest)
2025-02-11 11:36:36 +01:00
Stefan Holderbach
43dcf19ac3
Fix bits ror/bits rol implementation (#13673)
# Description
`bits rol` and `bits ror` were both undefined for the full byte rotates
and panicked when exceeding the byte rotation range.
`bits ror` further more produced nonsensical results by pulling bits
from the following byte instead of the preceding byte.

Those bugs are now fixed

# User-Facing Changes
Sound Nushell `IncorrectValue` error when exceeding the available bits

# Tests + Formatting
Added the necessary tests
2024-08-22 21:22:10 +02:00
Stefan Holderbach
95b78eee25
Change the usage misnomer to "description" (#13598)
# Description
    
The meaning of the word usage is specific to describing how a command
function is *used* and not a synonym for general description. Usage can
be used to describe the SYNOPSIS or EXAMPLES sections of a man page
where the permitted argument combinations are shown or example *uses*
are given.
Let's not confuse people and call it what it is a description.

Our `help` command already creates its own *Usage* section based on the
available arguments and doesn't refer to the description with usage.

# User-Facing Changes

`help commands` and `scope commands` will now use `description` or
`extra_description`
`usage`-> `description`
`extra_usage` -> `extra_description`

Breaking change in the plugin protocol:

In the signature record communicated with the engine.
`usage`-> `description`
`extra_usage` -> `extra_description`

The same rename also takes place for the methods on
`SimplePluginCommand` and `PluginCommand`

# Tests + Formatting
- Updated plugin protocol specific changes
# After Submitting
- [ ] update plugin protocol doc
2024-08-22 12:02:08 +02:00
Ian Manske
399a7c8836
Add and use new Signals struct (#13314)
# Description
This PR introduces a new `Signals` struct to replace our adhoc passing
around of `ctrlc: Option<Arc<AtomicBool>>`. Doing so has a few benefits:
- We can better enforce when/where resetting or triggering an interrupt
is allowed.
- Consolidates `nu_utils::ctrl_c::was_pressed` and other ad-hoc
re-implementations into a single place: `Signals::check`.
- This allows us to add other types of signals later if we want. E.g.,
exiting or suspension.
- Similarly, we can more easily change the underlying implementation if
we need to in the future.
- Places that used to have a `ctrlc` of `None` now use
`Signals::empty()`, so we can double check these usages for correctness
in the future.
2024-07-07 22:29:01 +00:00
Ian Manske
c747ec75c9
Add command_prelude module (#12291)
# Description
When implementing a `Command`, one must also import all the types
present in the function signatures for `Command`. This makes it so that
we often import the same set of types in each command implementation
file. E.g., something like this:
```rust
use nu_protocol::ast::Call;
use nu_protocol::engine::{Command, EngineState, Stack};
use nu_protocol::{
    record, Category, Example, IntoInterruptiblePipelineData, IntoPipelineData, PipelineData,
    ShellError, Signature, Span, Type, Value,
};
```

This PR adds the `nu_engine::command_prelude` module which contains the
necessary and commonly used types to implement a `Command`:
```rust
// command_prelude.rs
pub use crate::CallExt;
pub use nu_protocol::{
    ast::{Call, CellPath},
    engine::{Command, EngineState, Stack},
    record, Category, Example, IntoInterruptiblePipelineData, IntoPipelineData, IntoSpanned,
    PipelineData, Record, ShellError, Signature, Span, Spanned, SyntaxShape, Type, Value,
};
```

This should reduce the boilerplate needed to implement a command and
also gives us a place to track the breadth of the `Command` API. I tried
to be conservative with what went into the prelude modules, since it
might be hard/annoying to remove items from the prelude in the future.
Let me know if something should be included or excluded.
2024-03-26 21:17:30 +00:00
moonlander
d3895d71db
add binary data handling to bits commands (#11854)
# Description
- enables `bits` commands to operate on binary data, where both inputs
are binary and can vary in length
- adds an `--endian` flag to `bits and`, `or`, `xor` for specifying
endianness (for binary values of different lengths)

# User-Facing Changes
- `bits` commands will no longer error for non-int inputs
- the default for `--number-bytes` is now `auto` (infer int size;
changed from 8)

# Tests + Formatting
> addendum: first PR, please inform if any changes are needed
2024-02-28 20:43:50 +08:00
Artemiy
1867bb1a88
Fix incorrect handling of boolean flags for builtin commands (#11492)
# Description
Possible fix of #11456
This PR fixes a bug where builtin commands did not respect the logic of
dynamically passed boolean flags. The reason is
[has_flag](6f59abaf43/crates/nu-protocol/src/ast/call.rs (L204C5-L212C6))
method did not evaluate and take into consideration expression used with
flag.

To address this issue a solution is proposed:
1. `has_flag` method is moved to `CallExt` and new logic to evaluate
expression and check if it is a boolean value is added
2. `has_flag_const` method is added to `CallExt` which is a constant
version of `has_flag`
3. `has_named` method is added to `Call` which is basically the old
logic of `has_flag`
4. All usages of `has_flag` in code are updated, mostly to pass
`engine_state` and `stack` to new `has_flag`. In `run_const` commands it
is replaced with `has_flag_const`. And in a few select places: parser,
`to nuon` and `into string` old logic via `has_named` is used.

# User-Facing Changes
Explicit values of boolean flags are now respected in builtin commands.
Before:

![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/17511668/f9fbabb2-3cfd-43f9-ba9e-ece76d80043c)
After:

![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/17511668/21867596-2075-437f-9c85-45563ac70083)

Another example:
Before:

![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/17511668/efdbc5ca-5227-45a4-ac5b-532cdc2bbf5f)
After:

![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/17511668/2907d5c5-aa93-404d-af1c-21cdc3d44646)


# Tests + Formatting
Added test reproducing some variants of original issue.
2024-01-11 17:19:48 +02:00
Eric Hodel
a95a4505ef
Convert Shellerror::GenericError to named fields (#11230)
# Description

Replace `.to_string()` used in `GenericError` with `.into()` as
`.into()` seems more popular

Replace `Vec::new()` used in `GenericError` with `vec![]` as `vec![]`
seems more popular

(There are so, so many)
2023-12-07 00:40:03 +01:00
Eric Hodel
7a3cbf43e8
Convert ShellError::UnsupportedInput to named fields (#10971)
# Description

This is easy to do with rust-analyzer, but I didn't want to just pump
these all out without feedback.

Part of #10700

# User-Facing Changes

None

# Tests + Formatting

- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`

# After Submitting

N/A

---------

Co-authored-by: Stefan Holderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-11-07 23:25:32 +01:00
Hofer-Julian
471c58448e
Add long options for bits and bytes (#10601)
As discussed in
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/10597#issuecomment-1745692687
2023-10-05 18:45:28 +02:00
Stefan Holderbach
7c1487e18d
Use int type name consistently (#10579)
# Description
When referring to the type use `int` consistently. Only when referring
to the concept of integer numbers use `integer`.

- Fix `random integer` to `random int` tests
  - Forgot in #10520
- Use int instead of integer in error messages
- Use int type name in bits commands
- Fix messages in `for` examples
- Use int typename in `into` commands
- Use int typename in rest of commands
- Report errors in `nu-protocol` with int typename

Work for #10332 

# User-Facing Changes
User errorrs should now use `int` so you can easily find the necessary
commands or type annotations.

# Tests + Formatting
Only two tests found that needed updating
2023-10-03 18:24:32 +02:00
Stefan Holderbach
a14e9e0a2e
Invert &Options to Option<&T> (#10315)
Elide the reference for `Copy` type (`usize`)
Use the canonical deref where possible.
* `&Box` -> `&`
* `&String` -> `&str`
* `&PathBuf` -> `&Path`

Skips the ctrl-C handler for now.
2023-09-13 07:00:58 +08:00
JT
6cdfee3573
Move Value to helpers, separate span call (#10121)
# Description

As part of the refactor to split spans off of Value, this moves to using
helper functions to create values, and using `.span()` instead of
matching span out of Value directly.

Hoping to get a few more helping hands to finish this, as there are a
lot of commands to update :)

# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->

# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library

> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->

# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: WindSoilder <windsoilder@outlook.com>
2023-09-03 07:27:29 -07:00
JT
1e3e034021
Spanned Value step 1: span all value cases (#10042)
# Description

This doesn't really do much that the user could see, but it helps get us
ready to do the steps of the refactor to split the span off of Value, so
that values can be spanless. This allows us to have top-level values
that can hold both a Value and a Span, without requiring that all values
have them.

We expect to see significant memory reduction by removing so many
unnecessary spans from values. For example, a table of 100,000 rows and
5 columns would have a savings of ~8megs in just spans that are almost
always duplicated.

# User-Facing Changes

Nothing yet

# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library

> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->

# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
2023-08-25 08:48:05 +12:00
Stefan Holderbach
b2e191f836
Remove Signature.vectorizes_over_list entirely (#9777)
# Description
With the current typechecking logic this property has no effect.
It was only used in the example testing, and provided some indication of
this vectorizing property.
With #9742 all commands that previously declared it have explicit list
signatures. If we want to get it back in the future we can reconstruct
it from the signature.

Simplifies the example testing a bit.

# User-Facing Changes
Causes a breaking change for plugins that previously declared it. While
this causes a compile fail, this was already broken by our more
stringent type checking.
This will be a good reminder for plugin authors to update their
signature as well to reflect the more stringent type checking.
2023-07-26 23:34:43 +02:00
JT
786ba3bf91
Input output checking (#9680)
# Description

This PR tights input/output type-checking a bit more. There are a lot of
commands that don't have correct input/output types, so part of the
effort is updating them.

This PR now contains updates to commands that had wrong input/output
signatures. It doesn't add examples for these new signatures, but that
can be follow-up work.

# User-Facing Changes

BREAKING CHANGE BREAKING CHANGE

This work enforces many more checks on pipeline type correctness than
previous nushell versions. This strictness may uncover incompatibilities
in existing scripts or shortcomings in the type information for internal
commands.

# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library

> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->

# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
2023-07-14 15:20:35 +12:00
Antoine Stevan
9fcc49e556
REFACTOR: simplify the declaration of extra commands (#9398)
cc/ @stormasm 

# Description
i was about to start the cratification of the 0% commands and thought i
could refactor and simplify a bit the declaration of the `bits`
commands, having hopefully a simpler structure to work with the other
commands 😌

this PR:
- gives real names to all the `bits` commands, instead of `SubCommand`
- make them publicly available inside the `nu-cmd-extra` crate to
declare them through `add_extra_decls`
- move the declaration code to the top-level `mod.nu` of `nu-cmd-extra`
so that all commands can be declared there as in `default_context` in
`nu-command`

# User-Facing Changes
```
$nothing
```

# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
-  `toolkit test`
-  `toolkit test stdlib`

# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
2023-06-10 10:33:33 -07:00
Michael Angerman
356e05177c
nu-cmd-extra crate infrastructure in place with the Bits command as the model for adding other commands (#9327)
I wanted to get the infrastructure in place for starters for our
*nu-cmd-extra* crate...

The plan is to put inside here the following commands...

* bits
* bytes
* math

I thought it would be easier to do one at a time as well as get the
nu-cmd-extra crate out there on crates.io
for this upcoming release...

Once this lands the infrastructure will be in place to move over the
other noted commands for now...
And then add other stuff we do NOT want to be in 1.0.
2023-06-01 10:46:16 -07:00