# Description
* The path to the binaries for tests is slightly incorrect. It is
missing the build target when it is set with the `CARGO_BUILD_TARGET`
environment variable. For example, when `CARGO_BUILD_TARGET` is set to
`aarch64-linux-android`, the path to the `nu` binary is:
`./target/aarch64-linux-android/debug/nu`
rather than
`./target/debug/nu`
This is common on Termux since the default target that rustc detects can
cause problems on some projects, such as [python's `cryptography`
package](https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/7248).
This technically isn't a problem specific to Android, but is more likely
to happen on Android due to the latter.
* Additionally, the existing variable named `NUSHELL_CARGO_TARGET` is in
fact the profile, not the build target, so this was renamed to
`NUSHELL_CARGO_PROFILE`. This change is included because without the
rename, the build system would be using `CARGO_BUILD_TARGET` for the
build target and `NUSHELL_CARGO_TARGET` for the build profile, which is
confusing.
* `std path add` tests were missing `android` test
# User-Facing Changes
For those who would like to build nushell on Termux, the unit tests will
pass now.
# Description
For years, Nushell has used `let-env` to set a single environment
variable. As our work on scoping continued, we refined what it meant for
a variable to be in scope using `let` but never updated how `let-env`
would work. Instead, `let-env` confusingly created mutations to the
command's copy of `$env`.
So, to help fix the mental model and point people to the right way of
thinking about what changing the environment means, this PR removes
`let-env` to encourage people to think of it as updating the command's
environment variable via mutation.
Before:
```
let-env FOO = "BAR"
```
Now:
```
$env.FOO = "BAR"
```
It's also a good reminder that the environment owned by the command is
in the `$env` variable rather than global like it is in other shells.
# User-Facing Changes
BREAKING CHANGE BREAKING CHANGE
This completely removes `let-env FOO = "BAR"` so that we can focus on
`$env.FOO = "BAR"`.
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After / Before Submitting
integration scripts to update:
- ✔️
[starship](https://github.com/starship/starship/blob/master/src/init/starship.nu)
- ✔️
[virtualenv](https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/blob/main/src/virtualenv/activation/nushell/activate.nu)
- ✔️
[atuin](https://github.com/ellie/atuin/blob/main/atuin/src/shell/atuin.nu)
(PR: https://github.com/ellie/atuin/pull/1080)
- ❌
[zoxide](https://github.com/ajeetdsouza/zoxide/blob/main/templates/nushell.txt)
(PR: https://github.com/ajeetdsouza/zoxide/pull/587)
- ✔️
[oh-my-posh](https://github.com/JanDeDobbeleer/oh-my-posh/blob/main/src/shell/scripts/omp.nu)
(pr: https://github.com/JanDeDobbeleer/oh-my-posh/pull/4011)
# Description
i was installing Nushell and, as we have the `dataframe` feature and
very soon at least the `extra` feature with more and more commands, i
thought it could be cool to have a little `toolkit install` command
😋
# User-Facing Changes
exposes the following command to developers
```
install Nushell and features you want
Usage:
> install ...(features)
Flags:
-h, --help - Display the help message for this command
Parameters:
...features <string>: a space-separated list of feature to install with Nushell
```
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# Description
i've almost always wanted to clean up the root of the repo, so here is
my take at it, with some important advice given by @fdncred 😌
- `README.release.txt` is now gone and directly inline in the
`release-pkg` script used in the `release` *workflow*
- `build.rs` has been moved to `scripts/` and its path has been changed
in
[`Cargo.toml`](https://github.com/amtoine/nushell/blob/refactor/clean-root/Cargo.toml#L3)
according to the [*Build Scripts*
section](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/build-scripts.html#build-scripts)
of *The Cargo Book*
- i've merged `images/` into `assets/` and fix the only mention to the
GIF in the README
- i've moved the `docs/README.md` inside the main `README.md` as a new
[*Configuration*
section](https://github.com/amtoine/nushell/tree/refactor/clean-root#configuration)
- the very deprecated `pkg_mgrs/` has been removed
- all the `.nu`, `.sh`, `.ps1` and `.cmd` scripts have been moved to
`scripts/`
### things i've left as-is
- all the other `.md` documents
- the configuration files
- all the Rust and core stuff
- `docker/`
- `toolkit.nu`
- the `wix/` diretory which appears to be important for `winget`
# User-Facing Changes
scripts that used to rely on the paths to some of the scripts should now
call the scripts inside `scripts/` => i think this for the greater good,
it was not pretty nor scalable to have a bunch of scripts in the root of
our main `nushell` 😱
*i even think we might want to move these scripts outside the main
`nushell` repo*
maybe to `nu_scripts` or some other tool 👍
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
