Reverts nushell/nushell#7448
Some surprising behavior in how we do this. For example:
```
〉if (true || false) { print "yes!" } else { print "no!" }
no!
〉if (true or false) { print "yes!" } else { print "no!" }
yes!
```
This means for folks who are using the old `||`, they possibly get the
wrong answer once they upgrade. I don't think we can ship with that as
it will catch too many people by surprise and just make it easier to
write buggy code.
# Description
We got some feedback from folks used to other shells that `try/catch`
isn't quite as convenient as things like `||`. This PR adds `&&` as a
synonym for `;` and `||` as equivalent to what `try/catch` would do.
# User-Facing Changes
Adds `&&` and `||` pipeline operators.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Adds improved errors for when a user uses a bashism that nu doesn't
support.
fixes#7237
Examples:
```
Error: nu::parser::shell_andand (link)
× The '&&' operator is not supported in Nushell
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ ls && ls
· ─┬
· ╰── instead of '&&', use ';' or 'and'
╰────
help: use ';' instead of the shell '&&', or 'and' instead of the boolean '&&'
```
```
Error: nu::parser::shell_oror (link)
× The '||' operator is not supported in Nushell
╭─[entry #8:1:1]
1 │ ls || ls
· ─┬
· ╰── instead of '||', use 'try' or 'or'
╰────
help: use 'try' instead of the shell '||', or 'or' instead of the boolean '||'
```
```
Error: nu::parser::shell_err (link)
× The '2>' shell operation is 'err>' in Nushell.
╭─[entry #9:1:1]
1 │ foo 2> bar.txt
· ─┬
· ╰── use 'err>' instead of '2>' in Nushell
╰────
```
```
Error: nu::parser::shell_outerr (link)
× The '2>&1' shell operation is 'out+err>' in Nushell.
╭─[entry #10:1:1]
1 │ foo 2>&1 bar.txt
· ──┬─
· ╰── use 'out+err>' instead of '2>&1' in Nushell
╰────
help: Nushell redirection will write all of stdout before stderr.
```
# User-Facing Changes
**BREAKING CHANGES**
This removes the `&&` and `||` operators. We previously supported by
`&&`/`and` and `||`/`or`. With this change, only `and` and `or` are
valid boolean operators.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Also enforce this by #[non_exhaustive] span such that going forward we
cannot, in debug builds (1), construct invalid spans.
The motivation for this stems from #6431 where I've seen crashes due to
invalid slice indexing.
My hope is this will mitigate such senarios
1. https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/6431#issuecomment-1278147241
# Description
(description of your pull request here)
# Tests
Make sure you've done the following:
- [ ] Add tests that cover your changes, either in the command examples,
the crate/tests folder, or in the /tests folder.
- [ ] Try to think about corner cases and various ways how your changes
could break. Cover them with tests.
- [ ] If adding tests is not possible, please document in the PR body a
minimal example with steps on how to reproduce so one can verify your
change works.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [ ] `cargo clippy --workspace --features=extra -- -D warnings -D
clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're
using the standard code style
- [ ] `cargo test --workspace --features=extra` to check that all the
tests pass
# Documentation
- [ ] If your PR touches a user-facing nushell feature then make sure
that there is an entry in the documentation
(https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) for the feature, and
update it if necessary.
This adds new pipeline connectors called out> and err> which redirect either stdout or stderr to a file. You can also use out+err> (or err+out>) to redirect both streams into a file.
