Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jack Wright
0dd35cddcd
Bumping version to 0.95.1 (#13231)
Marks development for hotfix
2024-06-25 18:26:07 -07:00
Jakub Žádník
f93c6680bd
Bump to 0.95.0 (#13221)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx

you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->

# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.

Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->

# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->

# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the
tests for the standard library

> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->

# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
2024-06-25 21:29:47 +03:00
Wind
ad5a6cdc00
bump version to 0.94.3 (#13055) 2024-06-05 06:52:40 +08:00
Devyn Cairns
6635b74d9d
Bump version to 0.94.2 (#13014)
Version bump after 0.94.1 patch release.
2024-06-03 10:28:35 +03:00
Devyn Cairns
f3991f2080
Bump version to 0.94.1 (#12988)
Merge this PR before merging any other PRs.
2024-05-28 22:41:23 +00:00
Jakub Žádník
61182deb96
Bump version to 0.94.0 (#12987) 2024-05-28 12:04:09 -07:00
Devyn Cairns
21ebdfe8d7
Bump version to 0.93.1 (#12710)
# Description

Next patch/dev release, `0.93.1`
2024-05-01 17:19:20 -05:00
Devyn Cairns
3b220e07e3
Bump version to 0.93.0 (#12709)
# Description

Bump version to `0.93.0`
2024-04-30 15:51:13 -07:00
Antoine Stevan
55edef5dda
create nuon crate from from nuon and to nuon (#12553)
# Description
playing with the NUON format in Rust code in some plugins, we agreed
with the team it was a great time to create a standalone NUON format to
allow Rust devs to use this Nushell file format.

> **Note**
> this PR almost copy-pastes the code from
`nu_commands/src/formats/from/nuon.rs` and
`nu_commands/src/formats/to/nuon.rs` to `nuon/src/from.rs` and
`nuon/src/to.rs`, with minor tweaks to make then standalone functions,
e.g. remove the rest of the command implementations

### TODO
- [x] add tests
- [x] add documentation

# User-Facing Changes
devs will have access to a new crate, `nuon`, and two functions,
`from_nuon` and `to_nuon`
```rust
from_nuon(
    input: &str,
    span: Option<Span>,
) -> Result<Value, ShellError>
```
```rust
to_nuon(
    input: &Value,
    raw: bool,
    tabs: Option<usize>,
    indent: Option<usize>,
    span: Option<Span>,
) -> Result<String, ShellError>
```

# Tests + Formatting
i've basically taken all the tests from
`crates/nu-command/tests/format_conversions/nuon.rs` and converted them
to use `from_nuon` and `to_nuon` instead of Nushell commands
- i've created a `nuon_end_to_end` to run both conversions with an
optional middle value to check that all is fine

> **Note** 
> the `nuon::tests::read_code_should_fail_rather_than_panic` test does
give different results locally and in the CI...
> i've left it ignored with comments to help future us :)

# After Submitting
mention that in the release notes for sure!!
2024-04-19 13:54:16 +02:00