- fixes#16011
# Description
`Display` implementation for `f64` omits the decimal part for round
numbers, and by using it we did the same.
This affected:
- conversions to delimited formats: `csv`, `tsv`
- textual formats: `html`, `md`, `text`
- pretty printed `json` (`--raw` was unaffected)
- how single float values are displayed in the REPL
> [!TIP]
> This PR fixes our existing json pretty printing implementation.
> We can likely switch to using serde_json's impl using its
PrettyFormatter which allows arbitrary indent strings.
# User-Facing Changes
- Round trips through `csv`, `tsv`, and `json` preserve the type of
round floats.
- It's always clear whether a number is an integer or a float in the
REPL
```nushell
4 / 2
# => 2 # before: is this an int or a float?
4 / 2
# => 2.0 # after: clearly a float
```
# Tests + Formatting
Adjusted tests for the new behavior.
- 🟢 toolkit fmt
- 🟢 toolkit clippy
- 🟢 toolkit test
- 🟢 toolkit test stdlib
# After Submitting
N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Bahex <17417311+Bahex@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
This PR adds a `--params` param to `query db`. This closes#11643.
You can't combine both named and positional parameters, I think this
might be a limitation with rusqlite itself. I tried using named
parameters with indices like `{ ':named': 123, '1': "positional" }` but
that always failed with a rusqlite error. On the flip side, the other
way around works: for something like `VALUES (:named, ?)`, you can treat
both as positional: `-p [hello 123]`.
This PR introduces some very gnarly code repetition in
`prepared_statement_to_nu_list`. I tried, I swear; the compiler wasn't
having any of it, it kept telling me to box my closures and then it said
that the reference lifetimes were incompatible in the match arms. I gave
up and put the mapping code in the match itself, but I'm still not
happy.
Another thing I'm unhappy about: I don't like how you have to put the
`:colon` in named parameters. I think nushell should insert it if it's
[missing](https://www.sqlite.org/lang_expr.html#parameters). But this is
the way [rusqlite
works](https://docs.rs/rusqlite/latest/rusqlite/trait.Params.html#example-named),
so for now, I'll let it be consistent. Just know that it's not really a
blocker, and it isn't a compatibility change to later make `{ colon: 123
}` work, without the quotes and `:`. This would require allocating and
turning our pretty little `&str` into a `String`, though
# User-Facing Changes
Less incentive to leave yourself open to SQL injection with statements
like `query db $"INSERT INTO x VALUES \($unsafe_user_input)"`.
Additionally, the `$""` syntax being annoying with parentheses plays in
our favor, making users even more likely to use ? with `--params`.
# Tests + Formatting
Hehe
