Recommend holding until after #13125 is fully digested and *possibly*
until 0.96.
# Description
Fixes one of the issues described in #13125
The `do` signature included a `SyntaxShape:Any` as one of the possible
first-positional types. This is incorrect. `do` only takes a closure as
a positional. This had the result of:
1. Moving what should have been a parser error to evaluation-time
## Before
```nu
> do 1
Error: nu:🐚:cant_convert
× Can't convert to Closure.
╭─[entry #26:1:4]
1 │ do 1
· ┬
· ╰── can't convert int to Closure
╰────
```
## After
```nu
> do 1
Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch
× Parse mismatch during operation.
╭─[entry #5:1:4]
1 │ do 1
· ┬
· ╰── expected block, closure or record
╰────
```
2. Masking a bad test in `std assert`
This is a bit convoluted, but `std assert` tests included testing
`assert error` to make sure it:
* Asserts on bad code
* Doesn't assert on good code
The good-code test was broken, and was essentially bad-code (really
bad-code) that wasn't getting caught due to the bad signature.
Fixing this resulted in *parse time* failures on every call to
`test_asserts` (not something that particular test was designed to
handle.
This PR also fixes the test case to properly evaluate `std assert error`
against a good code path.
# User-Facing Changes
* Error-type returned (possible breaking change?)
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
N/A
# Description
We keep "into decimal" for a release and warn through a message that it
will be removed in 0.86.
All tests are updated to use `into float`
# User-Facing Changes
`into decimal` raises a deprecation warning, will be removed soon.
Use `into float` as the new functionally identical command instead.
```
~/nushell> 2 | into decimal
Error: × Deprecated command
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ 2 | into decimal
· ──────┬─────
· ╰── `into decimal` is deprecated and will be removed in 0.86.
╰────
help: Use `into float` instead
2
```
# Tests + Formatting
Updated
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Test runner now uses annotations instead of magic function names to pick
up code to run. Additionally skipping tests is now done on annotation
level so skipping and unskipping a test no longer requires changes to
the test code
In order for a function to be picked up by the test runner it needs to
meet following criteria:
* Needs to be private (all exported functions are ignored)
* Needs to contain one of valid annotations (and only the annotation)
directly above the definition, all other comments are ignored
Following are considered valid annotations:
* \# test
* \# test-skip
* \# before-all
* \# before-each
* \# after-each
* \# after-all
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Test runner now performs following actions in order to run tests:
* Module file is opened
* Public function with random name is added to the source code, this
function calls user-specified private function
* Modified module file is saved under random name in $nu.temp-path
* Modified module file is imported in subprocess, injected function is
called by the test runner
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
* Test functions no longer need to be exported
* test functions no longer need to reside in separate test_ files
* setup and teardown renamed to before-each and after-each respectively
* before-all and after-all functions added that run before all tests in
given module. This matches the behavior of test runners used by other
languages such as JUnit/TestNG or Mocha
# Tests + Formatting
# After Submitting
---------
Co-authored-by: Kamil <skelly37@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: amtoine <stevan.antoine@gmail.com>
# Description
A new command to simplify assertions for `false`.
The name is just a draft, though I could not come up with a better name.
I have rejected `assert false`, because I would have to rename `assert`
to `assert true` which would break the compatibility and worsen the
shell experience of the good old `assert`.
Another idea I have rejected was something like `assert_false` to keep
it consistent with the naming convention of our stdlib.
I am open to suggestions :)
# User-Facing Changes
Just a new command
# Tests + Formatting
- [x] Done
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
