0c4d5330ee
# Description This breaks `nu-plugin` up into four crates: - `nu-plugin-protocol`: just the type definitions for the protocol, no I/O. If someone wanted to wire up something more bare metal, maybe for async I/O, they could use this. - `nu-plugin-core`: the shared stuff between engine/plugin. Less stable interface. - `nu-plugin-engine`: everything required for the engine to talk to plugins. Less stable interface. - `nu-plugin`: everything required for the plugin to talk to the engine, what plugin developers use. Should be the most stable interface. No changes are made to the interface exposed by `nu-plugin` - it should all still be there. Re-exports from `nu-plugin-protocol` or `nu-plugin-core` are used as required. Plugins shouldn't ever have to use those crates directly. This should be somewhat faster to compile as `nu-plugin-engine` and `nu-plugin` can compile in parallel, and the engine doesn't need `nu-plugin` and plugins don't need `nu-plugin-engine` (except for test support), so that should reduce what needs to be compiled too. The only significant change here other than splitting stuff up was to break the `source` out of `PluginCustomValue` and create a new `PluginCustomValueWithSource` type that contains that instead. One bonus of that is we get rid of the option and it's now more type-safe, but it also means that the logic for that stuff (actually running the plugin for custom value ops) can live entirely within the `nu-plugin-engine` crate. # User-Facing Changes - New crates. - Added `local-socket` feature for `nu` to try to make it possible to compile without that support if needed. # Tests + Formatting - 🟢 `toolkit fmt` - 🟢 `toolkit clippy` - 🟢 `toolkit test` - 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib` |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
fuzz | ||
src | ||
tests | ||
Cargo.toml | ||
LICENSE | ||
README.md |
nu-parser, the Nushell parser
Nushell's parser is a type-directed parser, meaning that the parser will use type information available during parse time to configure the parser. This allows it to handle a broader range of techniques to handle the arguments of a command.
Nushell's base language is whitespace-separated tokens with the command (Nushell's term for a function) name in the head position:
head1 arg1 arg2 | head2
Lexing
The first job of the parser is to a lexical analysis to find where the tokens start and end in the input. This turns the above into:
<item: "head1">, <item: "arg1">, <item: "arg2">, <pipe>, <item: "head2">
At this point, the parser has little to no understanding of the shape of the command or how to parse its arguments.
Lite parsing
As Nushell is a language of pipelines, pipes form a key role in both separating commands from each other as well as denoting the flow of information between commands. The lite parse phase, as the name suggests, helps to group the lexed tokens into units.
The above tokens are converted the following during the lite parse phase:
Pipeline:
Command #1:
<item: "head1">, <item: "arg1">, <item: "arg2">
Command #2:
<item: "head2">
Parsing
The real magic begins to happen when the parse moves on to the parsing stage. At this point, it traverses the lite parse tree and for each command makes a decision:
- If the command looks like an internal/external command literal: e.g.
foo
or/usr/bin/ls
, it parses it as an internal or external command - Otherwise, it parses the command as part of a mathematical expression
Types/shapes
Each command has a shape assigned to each of the arguments it reads in. These shapes help define how the parser will handle the parse.
For example, if the command is written as:
where $x > 10
When the parsing happens, the parser will look up the where
command and find its Signature. The Signature states what flags are allowed and what positional arguments are allowed (both required and optional). Each argument comes with a Shape that defines how to parse values to get that position.
In the above example, if the Signature of where
said that it took three String values, the result would be:
CallInfo:
Name: `where`
Args:
Expression($x), a String
Expression(>), a String
Expression(10), a String
Or, the Signature could state that it takes in three positional arguments: a Variable, an Operator, and a Number, which would give:
CallInfo:
Name: `where`
Args:
Expression($x), a Variable
Expression(>), an Operator
Expression(10), a Number
Note that in this case, each would be checked at compile time to confirm that the expression has the shape requested. For example, "foo"
would fail to parse as a Number.
Finally, some Shapes can consume more than one token. In the above, if the where
command stated it took in a single required argument, and that the Shape of this argument was a MathExpression, then the parser would treat the remaining tokens as part of the math expression.
CallInfo:
Name: `where`
Args:
MathExpression:
Op: >
LHS: Expression($x)
RHS: Expression(10)
When the command runs, it will now be able to evaluate the whole math expression as a single step rather than doing any additional parsing to understand the relationship between the parameters.
Making space
As some Shapes can consume multiple tokens, it's important that the parser allow for multiple Shapes to coexist as peacefully as possible.
The simplest way it does this is to ensure there is at least one token for each required parameter. If the Signature of the command says that it takes a MathExpression and a Number as two required arguments, then the parser will stop the math parser one token short. This allows the second Shape to consume the final token.
Another way that the parser makes space is to look for Keyword shapes in the Signature. A Keyword is a word that's special to this command. For example in the if
command, else
is a keyword. When it is found in the arguments, the parser will use it as a signpost for where to make space for each Shape. The tokens leading up to the else
will then feed into the parts of the Signature before the else
, and the tokens following are consumed by the else
and the Shapes that follow.