Douglas b8efd2a347 ansi name for clear-scrollback code (#14184) ... Related to #14181 # Description Our understanding of `ESC[3J` has apparently been wrong. And I say "our" because I posted a [Super User answer](https://superuser.com/a/1738611/1210833) a couple of years ago with the same misconception (now fixed). In addition, the [crossterm crate doc](https://docs.rs/crossterm/latest/crossterm/terminal/enum.ClearType.html) is wrong on the topic. `ESC[3J` doesn't clear the screen plus the scrollback; it *only* clears the scrollback. Reference the official [Xterm Control Sequences doc](https://www.xfree86.org/4.8.0/ctlseqs.html). > CSI P s J > > Erase in Display (ED) > > P s = 0 → Erase Below (default) > P s = 1 → Erase Above > P s = 2 → Erase All > P s = 3 → Erase Saved Lines (xterm) This also means that: ```nu $"(ansi clear_entire_screen_plus_buffer)" ``` ... doesn't. This PR updates it to `ansi clear_scrollback_buffer` (short-code remains the same). # User-Facing Changes Breaking-change: `ansi clear_entire_screen_plus_buffer` is renamed `ansi clear_scrollback_buffer` # Tests + Formatting - 🟢 `toolkit fmt` - 🟢 `toolkit clippy` - 🟢 `toolkit test` - 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib` # After Submitting Self-documenting command via `ansi -l`		2024-10-29 07:01:32 -05:00
..
ansi_.rs	ansi name for clear-scrollback code (#14184)	2024-10-29 07:01:32 -05:00
char_.rs	update format signature to allow record to be passed in (#9898)	2023-08-02 10:57:58 -05:00
kill.rs	Use variable names directly in the format strings (#7906)	2023-01-29 19:37:54 -06:00
mod.rs	refactor: move du from platform to filesystem (#11852)	2024-02-15 06:55:21 +08:00