nushell/crates/nu-parser
YizhePKU bdb6daa4b5
Migrate to a new PWD API (#12603)
This is the first PR towards migrating to a new `$env.PWD` API that
returns potentially un-canonicalized paths. Refer to PR #12515 for
motivations.

## New API: `EngineState::cwd()`

The goal of the new API is to cover both parse-time and runtime use
case, and avoid unintentional misuse. It takes an `Option<Stack>` as
argument, which if supplied, will search for `$env.PWD` on the stack in
additional to the engine state. I think with this design, there's less
confusion over parse-time and runtime environments. If you have access
to a stack, just supply it; otherwise supply `None`.

## Deprecation of other PWD-related APIs

Other APIs are re-implemented using `EngineState::cwd()` and properly
documented. They're marked deprecated, but their behavior is unchanged.
Unused APIs are deleted, and code that accesses `$env.PWD` directly
without using an API is rewritten.

Deprecated APIs:

* `EngineState::current_work_dir()`
* `StateWorkingSet::get_cwd()`
* `env::current_dir()`
* `env::current_dir_str()`
* `env::current_dir_const()`
* `env::current_dir_str_const()`

Other changes:

* `EngineState::get_cwd()` (deleted)
* `StateWorkingSet::list_env()` (deleted)
* `repl::do_run_cmd()` (rewritten with `env::current_dir_str()`)

## `cd` and `pwd` now use logical paths by default

This pulls the changes from PR #12515. It's currently somewhat broken
because using non-canonicalized paths exposed a bug in our path
normalization logic (Issue #12602). Once that is fixed, this should
work.

## Future plans

This PR needs some tests. Which test helpers should I use, and where
should I put those tests?

I noticed that unquoted paths are expanded within `eval_filepath()` and
`eval_directory()` before they even reach the `cd` command. This means
every paths is expanded twice. Is this intended?

Once this PR lands, the plan is to review all usages of the deprecated
APIs and migrate them to `EngineState::cwd()`. In the meantime, these
usages are annotated with `#[allow(deprecated)]` to avoid breaking CI.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jakub Žádník <kubouch@gmail.com>
2024-05-03 14:33:09 +03:00
..
fuzz Add 2 fuzzers for nu-path, nu-parser (#10376) 2023-09-16 22:32:53 +02:00
src Migrate to a new PWD API (#12603) 2024-05-03 14:33:09 +03:00
tests Shrink the size of Expr (#12610) 2024-04-24 15:46:35 +00:00
Cargo.toml Bump version to 0.93.1 (#12710) 2024-05-01 17:19:20 -05:00
LICENSE Fix rest of license year ranges (#8727) 2023-04-04 09:03:29 +12:00
README.md Fix typos (#7811) 2023-01-22 15:22:10 +01:00

nu-parser, the Nushell parser

Nushell's parser is a type-directed parser, meaning that the parser will use type information available during parse time to configure the parser. This allows it to handle a broader range of techniques to handle the arguments of a command.

Nushell's base language is whitespace-separated tokens with the command (Nushell's term for a function) name in the head position:

head1 arg1 arg2 | head2

Lexing

The first job of the parser is to a lexical analysis to find where the tokens start and end in the input. This turns the above into:

<item: "head1">, <item: "arg1">, <item: "arg2">, <pipe>, <item: "head2">

At this point, the parser has little to no understanding of the shape of the command or how to parse its arguments.

Lite parsing

As Nushell is a language of pipelines, pipes form a key role in both separating commands from each other as well as denoting the flow of information between commands. The lite parse phase, as the name suggests, helps to group the lexed tokens into units.

The above tokens are converted the following during the lite parse phase:

Pipeline:
  Command #1:
    <item: "head1">, <item: "arg1">, <item: "arg2">
  Command #2:
    <item: "head2">

Parsing

The real magic begins to happen when the parse moves on to the parsing stage. At this point, it traverses the lite parse tree and for each command makes a decision:

  • If the command looks like an internal/external command literal: e.g. foo or /usr/bin/ls, it parses it as an internal or external command
  • Otherwise, it parses the command as part of a mathematical expression

Types/shapes

Each command has a shape assigned to each of the arguments it reads in. These shapes help define how the parser will handle the parse.

For example, if the command is written as:

where $x > 10

When the parsing happens, the parser will look up the where command and find its Signature. The Signature states what flags are allowed and what positional arguments are allowed (both required and optional). Each argument comes with a Shape that defines how to parse values to get that position.

In the above example, if the Signature of where said that it took three String values, the result would be:

CallInfo:
  Name: `where`
  Args:
    Expression($x), a String
    Expression(>), a String
    Expression(10), a String

Or, the Signature could state that it takes in three positional arguments: a Variable, an Operator, and a Number, which would give:

CallInfo:
  Name: `where`
  Args:
    Expression($x), a Variable
    Expression(>), an Operator
    Expression(10), a Number

Note that in this case, each would be checked at compile time to confirm that the expression has the shape requested. For example, "foo" would fail to parse as a Number.

Finally, some Shapes can consume more than one token. In the above, if the where command stated it took in a single required argument, and that the Shape of this argument was a MathExpression, then the parser would treat the remaining tokens as part of the math expression.

CallInfo:
  Name: `where`
  Args:
    MathExpression:
      Op: >
      LHS: Expression($x)
      RHS: Expression(10)

When the command runs, it will now be able to evaluate the whole math expression as a single step rather than doing any additional parsing to understand the relationship between the parameters.

Making space

As some Shapes can consume multiple tokens, it's important that the parser allow for multiple Shapes to coexist as peacefully as possible.

The simplest way it does this is to ensure there is at least one token for each required parameter. If the Signature of the command says that it takes a MathExpression and a Number as two required arguments, then the parser will stop the math parser one token short. This allows the second Shape to consume the final token.

Another way that the parser makes space is to look for Keyword shapes in the Signature. A Keyword is a word that's special to this command. For example in the if command, else is a keyword. When it is found in the arguments, the parser will use it as a signpost for where to make space for each Shape. The tokens leading up to the else will then feed into the parts of the Signature before the else, and the tokens following are consumed by the else and the Shapes that follow.