Before this rclone ignored the ETag on multipart uploads which missed
an opportunity for a whole file integrity check.
This adds that check which means that we now check even harder that
multipart uploads have arrived properly.
See #5993
Before this change `rclone about swift:container` would show aggregate
info about all the containers, not just the one in use.
This causes a problem if container listing is disabled (for example in
the Blomp service).
This fix makes `rclone about swift:container` show only the info about
the given `container`. If aggregate info about all the containers is
required then use `rclone about swift:`.
See: https://forum.rclone.org/t/rclone-mount-blomp-problem/29151/18
Before this change, rclone supported authorizing for remote systems by
going to a URL and cutting and pasting a token from Google. This is
known as the OAuth out-of-band (oob) flow.
This, while very convenient for users, has been shown to be insecure
and has been deprecated by Google.
https://developers.googleblog.com/2022/02/making-oauth-flows-safer.html#disallowed-oob
> OAuth out-of-band (OOB) is a legacy flow developed to support native
> clients which do not have a redirect URI like web apps to accept the
> credentials after a user approves an OAuth consent request. The OOB
> flow poses a remote phishing risk and clients must migrate to an
> alternative method to protect against this vulnerability. New
> clients will be unable to use this flow starting on Feb 28, 2022.
This change disables that flow, and forces the user to use the
redirect URL flow. (This is the flow used already for local configs.)
In practice this will mean that instead of cutting and pasting a token
for remote config, it will be necessary to run "rclone authorize"
instead. This is how all the other OAuth backends work so it is a well
tested code path.
Fixes#6000
The directory created by `T.TempDir` is automatically removed when the
test and all its subtests complete.
Reference: https://pkg.go.dev/testing#T.TempDir
Signed-off-by: Eng Zer Jun <engzerjun@gmail.com>
Before this change a multipart upload with the --no-head flag returned
the MD5SUM as a base64 string rather than a Hex string as the rest of
rclone was expecting.
Before this change attempting NewObject on a SAS URL's root would
crash the Azure SDK.
This change detects that using the code from this previous fix
f7404f52e7 azureblob: fix crash when listing outside a SAS URL's root - fixes#4851
And returns not object not found instead.
It also prevents things being uploaded to the root of the SAS URL
which also crashes the Azure SDK.
Before this fix if a file was updated, but to the same length and
timestamp then the local backend would return the wrong (cached)
hashes for the object.
This happens regularly on a crypted local disk mount when the VFS
thinks files have been changed but actually their contents are
identical to that written previously. This is because when files are
uploaded their nonce changes so the contents of the file changes but
the timestamp and size remain the same because the file didn't
actually change.
This causes errors like this:
ERROR: file: Failed to copy: corrupted on transfer: md5 crypted
hash differ "X" vs "Y"
This turned out to be because the local backend wasn't clearing its
cache of hashes when the file was updated.
This fix clears the hash cache for Update and Remove.
It also puts a src and destination in the crypt message to make future
debugging easier.
Fixes#4031
Currently the B2 docs don't specify which format the download_url
setting should have, and if you input it wrong, there is nothing
in the verbose logs or anywhere else that can let you know that.
* Wasabi starts to provide AP Northeast 2 (Osaka) endpoint, so add it to the list
* Rename ap-northeast-1 as "AP Northeast 1 (Tokyo)" from "AP Northeast"
Signed-off-by: lindwurm <lindwurm.q@gmail.com>
After speed testing it was discovered that upload speed goes up pretty
much linearly with upload concurrency. This patch changes the default
from 4 to 16 which means that rclone will use 16 * 4M = 64M per
transfer which is OK even for low memory devices.
This adds a note that performance may be increased by increasing
upload concurrency.
See: https://forum.rclone.org/t/performance-of-rclone-vs-azcopy/27437/9
