2005-02-22 00:18:35 +01:00
|
|
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
|
|
|
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN"
|
|
|
|
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd">
|
|
|
|
<article>
|
|
|
|
<!--$Id$-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<articleinfo>
|
|
|
|
<title>Shorewall and Routing</title>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<authorgroup>
|
|
|
|
<author>
|
|
|
|
<firstname>Tom</firstname>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<surname>Eastep</surname>
|
|
|
|
</author>
|
|
|
|
</authorgroup>
|
|
|
|
|
2005-03-04 01:16:13 +01:00
|
|
|
<pubdate>2005-03-03</pubdate>
|
2005-02-22 00:18:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<copyright>
|
|
|
|
<year>2005</year>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<holder>Thomas M. Eastep</holder>
|
|
|
|
</copyright>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<legalnotice>
|
|
|
|
<para>Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
|
|
|
|
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version
|
|
|
|
1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with
|
|
|
|
no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover, and with no Back-Cover
|
|
|
|
Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
|
|
|
|
<quote><ulink url="GnuCopyright.htm">GNU Free Documentation
|
|
|
|
License</ulink></quote>.</para>
|
|
|
|
</legalnotice>
|
|
|
|
</articleinfo>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section>
|
|
|
|
<title>Routing vs. Firewalling.</title>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>One of the most misunderstood aspects of Shorewall is its
|
|
|
|
releationship with routing. This article attempts to clear some of the fog
|
|
|
|
that surrounds this issue.</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>As a general principle:</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<orderedlist>
|
|
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
|
|
<para>Routing determines where packets are to be sent.</para>
|
|
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
|
|
<para>Once routing determines where the packet is to go, the firewall
|
|
|
|
(Shorewall) determines if the packet is allowed to go there.</para>
|
|
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
</orderedlist>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>There are ways that Shorewall can affect routing which are described
|
|
|
|
in the following sections.</para>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section>
|
|
|
|
<title>Routing and Netfilter</title>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The following diagram shows the relationship between routing
|
|
|
|
decisions and Netfilter.</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<graphic fileref="images/Netfilter.png" />
|
|
|
|
|
2005-03-04 01:16:13 +01:00
|
|
|
<para>The light blue boxes indicate where routing decisions are made. Upon
|
|
|
|
exit from one of these boxes, if the packet is being sent to another
|
|
|
|
system then the interface and the next hop have been uniquely
|
|
|
|
determined.</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The green boxes show where Netfilter processing takes place (as
|
|
|
|
directed by Shorewall). You will notice that there are two different paths
|
|
|
|
through this maze, depending on where the packet originates. We will look
|
|
|
|
at each of these separately.</para>
|
2005-02-22 00:18:35 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section>
|
|
|
|
<title>Packets Entering the Firewall from Outside</title>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>When a packet arrives from outside, it first undergoes Netfilter
|
|
|
|
PREROUTING processing. In Shorewall terms:</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<orderedlist>
|
|
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
|
|
<para>Packets may be marked using entries in the <ulink
|
|
|
|
url="???">/etc/shorewall/tcrules</ulink> file. Entries in that file
|
|
|
|
containing ":P" in the mark column are applied here as are rules
|
|
|
|
that default to the MARK_IN_FORWARD_CHAIN=No setting in
|
|
|
|
<filename>/etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf</filename>. These marks may
|
|
|
|
be used to specify that the packet should be routed using an
|
|
|
|
<firstterm>alternate routing table</firstterm>; see the <ulink
|
|
|
|
url="Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html">Shorewall Squid
|
|
|
|
documentation</ulink> for examples.</para>
|
2005-03-04 01:16:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<caution>
|
|
|
|
<para>Marking packets then using the <emphasis>fwmark</emphasis>
|
|
|
|
selector in your "<emphasis role="bold">ip rule add</emphasis>"
|
|
|
|
commands should NOT be your first choice. In most cases, you can
|
|
|
|
use the <emphasis>from</emphasis> or <emphasis>dev</emphasis>
|
|
|
|
selector instead.</para>
|
|
|
|
</caution>
|
2005-02-22 00:18:35 +01:00
|
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
|
|
<para>The destination IP address may be rewritten as a consequence
|
|
|
|
of:</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
|
|
<para>DNAT[-] rules.</para>
|
|
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
|
|
<para>REDIRECT[-] rules.</para>
|
|
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
|
|
<para>Entries in <filename>/etc/shorewall/nat</filename>.</para>
|
|
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
</orderedlist>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>So the only influence that Shorewall has over where these packets
|
|
|
|
go is via NAT or by marking them so that they may be routed using an
|
|
|
|
alternate routing table.</para>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section>
|
|
|
|
<title>Packets Originating on the Firewall</title>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>Processing of packets that originate on the firewall itself are
|
|
|
|
initially routed using the default routing table then passed through the
|
|
|
|
OUTPUT chains. Shorewall can influence what happens here:</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<orderedlist>
|
|
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
|
|
<para>Packets may be marked using entries in the <ulink
|
|
|
|
url="???">/etc/shorewall/tcrules</ulink> file (rules with "$FW" in
|
|
|
|
the SOURCE column). These marks may be used to specify that the
|
|
|
|
packet should be re-routed using an alternate routing table.</para>
|
|
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
|
|
<para>The destination IP address may be rewritten as a consequence
|
|
|
|
of:</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
|
|
<para>DNAT[-] rules that specify $FW as the SOURCE.</para>
|
|
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<listitem>
|
|
|
|
<para>Entries in <filename>/etc/shorewall/nat</filename> that
|
|
|
|
have "Yes" in LOCAL column.</para>
|
|
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
</orderedlist>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>So again in this case, the only influence that Shorewall has over
|
|
|
|
the packet destination is NAT or marking.</para>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<section>
|
|
|
|
<title>Alternate Routing Table Configuration</title>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>The <ulink url="Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html">Shorewall Squid
|
|
|
|
documentation</ulink> shows how alternate routing tables can be created
|
|
|
|
and used. That documentation shows how you can use logic in
|
|
|
|
<filename>/etc/shorewall/init</filename> to create and populate an
|
|
|
|
alternate table and to add a routing rule for its use. It is fine to use
|
|
|
|
that technique so long as you understand that you are basically just using
|
|
|
|
the Shorewall init script (<filename>/etc/init.d/shorewall</filename>) to
|
|
|
|
configure your alternate routing table at boot time and that <emphasis
|
|
|
|
role="bold">other than as described in the previous section, there is no
|
2005-03-04 01:16:13 +01:00
|
|
|
connection between Shorewall and routing</emphasis>.</para>
|
2005-02-22 00:18:35 +01:00
|
|
|
</section>
|
|
|
|
</article>
|