- I've attached a patch that adds xz support to the default MODULE_SUFFIX.
- I'm wondering it wouldn't be better to not have MODULE_SUFFX=ko in various
sample configs so that the default value is used instead:
./Shorewall/configfiles/shorewall.conf:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
./Shorewall/Samples/Universal/shorewall.conf:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
./Shorewall/Samples/three-interfaces/shorewall.conf:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
./Shorewall/Samples/two-interfaces/shorewall.conf:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
./Shorewall/Samples/one-interface/shorewall.conf:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
./docs/MultiISP.xml:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
./docs/MyNetwork.xml:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
./Shorewall6/configfiles/shorewall6.conf:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
./Shorewall6/Samples6/Universal/shorewall6.conf:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
./Shorewall6/Samples6/three-interfaces/shorewall6.conf:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
./Shorewall6/Samples6/two-interfaces/shorewall6.conf:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
./Shorewall6/Samples6/one-interface/shorewall6.conf:MODULE_SUFFIX=ko
- Is:
MODULE_SUFFIX=
sufficient to use the default value or does it need to be commented out?
Thanks,
Orion
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com
>From f13edf8fc07c7b62825408b8665b10d6014d368d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:48:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Support xz compressed modules
Signed-off-by: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net>
Hi,
here is the patch set for the shorewall6-lite man page.
-Thomas
>From d3fc3bd79f6313e8c940f6df49ae6ea3e05fa590 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas D <whissi@whissi.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 01:23:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Fixes for the "commands" section.
Signed-off-by: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net>
add conflicts to obviously conflicting services
remove old version number from init files
remove legacy syslog.target which is not needed on modern systems
fix formatting of email address onold Copyright text
Signed-off-by: Tuomo Soini <tis@foobar.fi>
On 09/24/2012 10:19 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 09/24/2012 02:31 AM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> Such a change is something I've been meaning to submit a (trivial) patch
>> for - from a fedora perspective this would be a welcome change.
>
> Okay -- if one of you would send me a patch, I'll apply it. 4.5.8 is
> about to be released, so I would like the patch ASAP if you want it
> included in 4.5.8.
Hope not late and it works, see attached
Togan
>From 3ec45217b6ac93437d002315c56a1b3354160ff2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Togan Muftuoglu <toganm@opensuse.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:26:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix sbin
The service files need to be executed from /usr/sbin not from /sbin
Signed-off-by: Togan Muftuoglu <toganm@opensuse.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net>
Hi Tom,
I have been patching shorewall packages for the opensuse releases, but I
guess it is better to send them to you . the upstream so it gets
incorporated into shorewall itself and I do not have to patch it ;)
I believe I have incorparted most of my patches in to this one. If you
can review them and if appropriate apply them that would be great
Thanks
Togan
>From 6072c08de753e7d1cc31bb758295dee198197e41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Togan Muftuoglu <toganm@opensuse.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:17:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] suse-specific
Signed-off-by: Togan Muftuoglu <toganm@opensuse.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net>
