Tom Eastep 2003-11-21 2003 Thomas M. Eastep Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover, and with no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.

While most configurations can be handled with each of the firewall's network interfaces assigned to a single zone, there are cases where you will want to divide the hosts accessed through an interface between two or more zones. The interface has multiple addresses on multiple subnetworks. This case is covered in the Aliased Interface documentation. You are using some form of NAT and want to access a server by its external IP address from the same LAN segment. This is covered in FAQs 2 and 2a. There are routers accessible through the interface and you want to treat the networks accessed through that router as a separate zone. Some of the hosts accessed through an interface have significantly different firewalling requirements from the others so you want to assign them to a different zone. The key points to keep in mind when setting up multiple zones per interface are: Shorewall generates rules for zones in the order that the zone declarations appear in /etc/shorewall/zones. The order of entries in /etc/shorewall/hosts is immaterial as far as the generated ruleset is concerned. These examples use the local zone but the same technique works for any zone. Remember that Shorewall doesn't have any conceptual knowledge of Internet, Local, or DMZ so all zones except the firewall itself ($FW) are the same as far as Shorewall is concerned. Also, the examples use private (RFC 1918) addresses but public IP addresses can be used in exactly the same way.

Here is an example of a router in the local zone. the box called Router could be a VPN server or other such device; from the point of view of this discussion, it makes no difference.

In many cases, the standard two-interface Shorewall setup will work fine in this configuration. It will work if: The firewall requirements to/from the internet are the same for 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24. The hosts in 192.168.1.0/24 know that the route to 192.168.2.0/24 is through the router. All you have to do on the firewall is add a route to 192.168.2.0/24 through the router and restart Shorewall.

If the firewalling requirements for the two local networks is the same but the hosts in 192.168.1.0/24 don't know how to route to 192.168.2.0/24 then you need to configure the firewall slightly differently. This type of configuration is rather stupid from an IP networking point of view but it is sometimes necessary because you simply don't want to have to reconfigure all of the hosts in 192.168.1.0/24 to add a persistent route to 192.168.2.0/24. On the firewall: Add a route to 192.168.2.0/24 through the Router. Set the routeback and newnotsyn options for eth1 (the local firewall interface) in /etc/shorewall/interfaces. Restart Shorewall.

If you need to make 192.168.2.0/24 into it's own zone, you can do it one of two ways; Nested Zones or Parallel Zones.

You can define one zone (called it loc) as being all hosts connectied to eth1 and a second zone loc1 (192.168.2.0/24) as a sub-zone. The advantage of this approach is that the zone loc1 can use CONTINUE policies such that if a connection request doesn't match a loc1 rule, it will be matched against the loc rules. For example, if your loc1->net policy is CONTINUE then if a connection request from loc1 to the internet doesn't match any rules for loc1->net then it will be checked against the loc->net rules. ZONE DISPLAY COMMENTS loc1 Local2 Hosts access through internal router loc Local All hosts accessed via eth1 the sub-zone (loc1) is defined first! ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS loc eth1 192.168.1.255 ... ZONE HOSTS OPTIONS loc1 eth1:192.168.2.0/24 If you don't need Shorewall to set up infrastructure to route traffic between loc and loc1, add these two policies: SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL RATE:BURST loc loc1 NONE loc1 loc NONE

You define both zones in the /etc/shorewall/hosts file to create two disjoint zones. ZONE DISPLAY COMMENTS loc1 Local1 Hosts accessed Directly from Firewall loc2 Local2 Hosts accessed via internal Router Here it doesn't matter which zone is defined first. ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS - eth1 192.168.1.255 ... ZONE HOSTS OPTIONS loc1 eth1:192.168.1.0/24 loc2 eth1:192.168.2.0/24 If you don't need Shorewall to set up infrastructure to route traffic between loc and loc1, add these two policies: SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL RATE:BURST loc loc1 NONE loc1 loc NONE

There are cases where a subset of the addresses associated with an interface need special handling. Here's an example. In this example, addresses 192.168.1.8 - 192.168.1.15 (192.168.1.8/29) are to be treated as their own zone (loc1). ZONE DISPLAY COMMENTS loc1 Local2 192.168.1.8 - 192.168.1.15 loc Local All hosts accessed via eth1 the sub-zone (loc1) is defined first! ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS loc eth1 192.168.1.255 ... ZONE HOSTS OPTIONS loc1 eth1:192.168.2.0/24 You probably don't want Shorewall to set up infrastructure to route traffic between loc and loc1 so you should add these two policies: SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL RATE:BURST loc loc1 NONE loc1 loc NONE