mirror of
https://github.com/sshuttle/sshuttle.git
synced 2024-11-26 09:53:40 +01:00
259 lines
10 KiB
ReStructuredText
259 lines
10 KiB
ReStructuredText
sshuttle: where transparent proxy meets VPN meets ssh
|
|
=====================================================
|
|
|
|
As far as I know, sshuttle is the only program that solves the following
|
|
common case:
|
|
|
|
- Your client machine (or router) is Linux, FreeBSD, or MacOS.
|
|
|
|
- You have access to a remote network via ssh.
|
|
|
|
- You don't necessarily have admin access on the remote network.
|
|
|
|
- The remote network has no VPN, or only stupid/complex VPN
|
|
protocols (IPsec, PPTP, etc). Or maybe you *are* the
|
|
admin and you just got frustrated with the awful state of
|
|
VPN tools.
|
|
|
|
- You don't want to create an ssh port forward for every
|
|
single host/port on the remote network.
|
|
|
|
- You hate openssh's port forwarding because it's randomly
|
|
slow and/or stupid.
|
|
|
|
- You can't use openssh's PermitTunnel feature because
|
|
it's disabled by default on openssh servers; plus it does
|
|
TCP-over-TCP, which has terrible performance (see below).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client side Requirements
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
- sudo, or logged in as root on your client machine.
|
|
(The server doesn't need admin access.)
|
|
- Python 2.7 or Python 3.5.
|
|
|
|
+-------+--------+------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
|
| OS | Method | Features | Requirements |
|
|
+=======+========+============+===============================================+
|
|
| Linux | NAT | * IPv4 TCP + iptables DNAT, REDIRECT, and ttl modules. |
|
|
+ +--------+------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
|
| | TPROXY | * IPv4 TCP + Linux with TPROXY support. |
|
|
| | | * IPv4 UDP + Python 3.5 preferred (see below). |
|
|
| | | * IPv6 TCP + |
|
|
| | | * IPv6 UDP + |
|
|
+-------+--------+------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
|
| BSD | IPFW | * IPv4 TCP | Your kernel needs to be compiled with |
|
|
| | | | `IPFIREWALL_FORWARD` and you need to have ipfw|
|
|
| | | | available. |
|
|
+-------+--------+------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
|
| MacOS | PF | * IPv4 TCP + You need to have the pfctl command. |
|
|
+-------+--------+------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
The IPFW method is depreciated. It was originally required for MacOS support,
|
|
however is no longer maintained. It is likely to get removed from future
|
|
versions of sshuttle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Server side Requirements
|
|
------------------------
|
|
Python 2.7 or Python 3.5. This should match what is used on the client side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Suggested Software
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
- You may want to use autossh, available in various package management
|
|
systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional information for TPROXY
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
TPROXY is the only method that supports full support of IPv6 and UDP.
|
|
|
|
Full UDP or DNS support with the TPROXY method requires the `recvmsg()`
|
|
syscall. This is not available in Python 2.7, however is in Python 3.5 and
|
|
later.
|
|
|
|
- For Python 2.7, you need PyXAPI, available here:
|
|
http://www.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr/~ylg/PyXAPI/
|
|
|
|
There are some things you need to consider for TPROXY to work:
|
|
|
|
1. The following commands need to be run first as root. This only needs to be
|
|
done once after booting up::
|
|
|
|
ip route add local default dev lo table 100
|
|
ip rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100
|
|
ip -6 route add local default dev lo table 100
|
|
ip -6 rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100
|
|
|
|
2. The client needs to be run as root. e.g.::
|
|
|
|
sudo SSH_AUTH_SOCK="$SSH_AUTH_SOCK" $HOME/tree/sshuttle.tproxy/sshuttle --method=tproxy ...
|
|
|
|
3. You do need the `--method=tproxy` parameter, as above.
|
|
|
|
4. The routes for the outgoing packets must already exist. For example, if your
|
|
connection does not have IPv6 support, no IPv6 routes will exist, IPv6
|
|
packets will not be generated and sshuttle cannot intercept them. Add some
|
|
dummy routes to external interfaces. Make sure they get removed however
|
|
after sshuttle exits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obtaining sshuttle
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
- From PyPI::
|
|
|
|
pip install sshuttle
|
|
|
|
- Clone::
|
|
|
|
git clone https://github.com/sshuttle/sshuttle.git
|
|
./setup.py install
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usage
|
|
-----
|
|
|
|
- Forward all traffic::
|
|
|
|
sshuttle -r username@sshserver 0.0.0.0/0 -vv
|
|
|
|
- By default sshuttle will automatically choose a method to use. Override with
|
|
the `--method=` parameter.
|
|
|
|
- There is a shortcut for 0.0.0.0/0 for those that value
|
|
their wrists::
|
|
|
|
sshuttle -r username@sshserver 0/0 -vv
|
|
|
|
- If you would also like your DNS queries to be proxied
|
|
through the DNS server of the server you are connect to::
|
|
|
|
sshuttle --dns -vvr username@sshserver 0/0
|
|
|
|
The above is probably what you want to use to prevent
|
|
local network attacks such as Firesheep and friends.
|
|
|
|
(You may be prompted for one or more passwords; first, the local password to
|
|
become root using sudo, and then the remote ssh password. Or you might have
|
|
sudo and ssh set up to not require passwords, in which case you won't be
|
|
prompted at all.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usage Notes
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
That's it! Now your local machine can access the remote network as if you
|
|
were right there. And if your "client" machine is a router, everyone on
|
|
your local network can make connections to your remote network.
|
|
|
|
You don't need to install sshuttle on the remote server;
|
|
the remote server just needs to have python available.
|
|
sshuttle will automatically upload and run its source code
|
|
to the remote python interpreter.
|
|
|
|
This creates a transparent proxy server on your local machine for all IP
|
|
addresses that match 0.0.0.0/0. (You can use more specific IP addresses if
|
|
you want; use any number of IP addresses or subnets to change which
|
|
addresses get proxied. Using 0.0.0.0/0 proxies *everything*, which is
|
|
interesting if you don't trust the people on your local network.)
|
|
|
|
Any TCP session you initiate to one of the proxied IP addresses will be
|
|
captured by sshuttle and sent over an ssh session to the remote copy of
|
|
sshuttle, which will then regenerate the connection on that end, and funnel
|
|
the data back and forth through ssh.
|
|
|
|
Fun, right? A poor man's instant VPN, and you don't even have to have
|
|
admin access on the server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
Mailing list:
|
|
|
|
* Subscribe by sending a message to <sshuttle+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
|
|
* List archives are at: http://groups.google.com/group/sshuttle
|
|
|
|
Issue tracker and pull requests at github:
|
|
|
|
* https://github.com/sshuttle/sshuttle
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theory of Operation
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
sshuttle is not exactly a VPN, and not exactly port forwarding. It's kind
|
|
of both, and kind of neither.
|
|
|
|
It's like a VPN, since it can forward every port on an entire network, not
|
|
just ports you specify. Conveniently, it lets you use the "real" IP
|
|
addresses of each host rather than faking port numbers on localhost.
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, the way it *works* is more like ssh port forwarding than
|
|
a VPN. Normally, a VPN forwards your data one packet at a time, and
|
|
doesn't care about individual connections; ie. it's "stateless" with respect
|
|
to the traffic. sshuttle is the opposite of stateless; it tracks every
|
|
single connection.
|
|
|
|
You could compare sshuttle to something like the old `Slirp
|
|
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slirp>`_ program, which was a userspace TCP/IP
|
|
implementation that did something similar. But it operated on a
|
|
packet-by-packet basis on the client side, reassembling the packets on the
|
|
server side. That worked okay back in the "real live serial port" days,
|
|
because serial ports had predictable latency and buffering.
|
|
|
|
But you can't safely just forward TCP packets over a TCP session (like ssh),
|
|
because TCP's performance depends fundamentally on packet loss; it
|
|
*must* experience packet loss in order to know when to slow down! At
|
|
the same time, the outer TCP session (ssh, in this case) is a reliable
|
|
transport, which means that what you forward through the tunnel *never*
|
|
experiences packet loss. The ssh session itself experiences packet loss, of
|
|
course, but TCP fixes it up and ssh (and thus you) never know the
|
|
difference. But neither does your inner TCP session, and extremely screwy
|
|
performance ensues.
|
|
|
|
sshuttle assembles the TCP stream locally, multiplexes it statefully over
|
|
an ssh session, and disassembles it back into packets at the other end. So
|
|
it never ends up doing TCP-over-TCP. It's just data-over-TCP, which is
|
|
safe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useless Trivia
|
|
--------------
|
|
This section written by Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>.
|
|
|
|
Back in 1998 (12 years ago! Yikes!), I released the first version of `Tunnel
|
|
Vision <http://alumnit.ca/wiki/?TunnelVisionReadMe>`_, a semi-intelligent VPN
|
|
client for Linux. Unfortunately, I made two big mistakes: I implemented the
|
|
key exchange myself (oops), and I ended up doing TCP-over-TCP (double oops).
|
|
The resulting program worked okay - and people used it for years - but the
|
|
performance was always a bit funny. And nobody ever found any security flaws
|
|
in my key exchange, either, but that doesn't mean anything. :)
|
|
|
|
The same year, dcoombs and I also released Fast Forward, a proxy server
|
|
supporting transparent proxying. Among other things, we used it for
|
|
automatically splitting traffic across more than one Internet connection (a
|
|
tool we called "Double Vision").
|
|
|
|
I was still in university at the time. A couple years after that, one of my
|
|
professors was working with some graduate students on the technology that would
|
|
eventually become `Slipstream Internet Acceleration
|
|
<http://www.slipstream.com/>`_. He asked me to do a contract for him to build
|
|
an initial prototype of a transparent proxy server for mobile networks. The
|
|
idea was similar to sshuttle: if you reassemble and then disassemble the TCP
|
|
packets, you can reduce latency and improve performance vs. just forwarding
|
|
the packets over a plain VPN or mobile network. (It's unlikely that any of my
|
|
code has persisted in the Slipstream product today, but the concept is still
|
|
pretty cool. I'm still horrified that people use plain TCP on complex mobile
|
|
networks with crazily variable latency, for which it was never really
|
|
intended.)
|
|
|
|
That project I did for Slipstream was what first gave me the idea to merge
|
|
the concepts of Fast Forward, Double Vision, and Tunnel Vision into a single
|
|
program that was the best of all worlds. And here we are, at last, 10 years
|
|
later. You're welcome.
|