mirror of
https://github.com/zrepl/zrepl.git
synced 2024-11-28 03:14:57 +01:00
docs: prune: improve grid
example
This commit is contained in:
parent
bcfcd7a134
commit
009bd410af
@ -124,43 +124,51 @@ The syntax to describe the bucket list is as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
This grid spec produces the following list of adjacent buckets. For the sake of simplicity,
|
||||
we subject all snapshots to the grid pruning policy by settings `regex: .*`.
|
||||
Assume the following grid spec:
|
||||
|
||||
`
|
||||
grid: 1x1h(keep=all) | 2x2h | 1x3h
|
||||
regex: .*
|
||||
`
|
||||
grid: 1x1h(keep=all) | 2x2h | 1x3h
|
||||
|
||||
0h 1h 2h 3h 4h 5h 6h 7h 8h 9h
|
||||
| | | | | | | | | |
|
||||
|-Bucket1-|-----Bucket 2------|------Bucket 3-----|-----------Bucket 4----------|
|
||||
| keep=all| keep=1 | keep=1 | keep=1 |
|
||||
This grid spec produces the following constellation of buckets:
|
||||
|
||||
0h 1h 2h 3h 4h 5h 6h 7h 8h 9h
|
||||
| | | | | | | | | |
|
||||
|-Bucket1-|-----Bucket2-------|------Bucket3------|-----------Bucket4-----------|
|
||||
| keep=all| keep=1 | keep=1 | keep=1 |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Let us consider the following set of snapshots @a-zA-C:
|
||||
Now assume that we have a set of snapshots @a, @b, ..., @D.
|
||||
Snapshot @a is the most recent snapshot.
|
||||
Snapshot @D is the oldest snapshot, it is almost 9 hours older than snapshot @a.
|
||||
We place the snapshots on the same timeline as the buckets:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z A B C D |
|
||||
0h 1h 2h 3h 4h 5h 6h 7h 8h 9h
|
||||
| | | | | | | | | |
|
||||
|-Bucket1-|-----Bucket2-------|------Bucket3------|-----------Bucket4-----------|
|
||||
| keep=all| keep=1 | keep=1 | keep=1 |
|
||||
| | | | |
|
||||
| a b c| d e f g h i j k l m n o p |q r s t u v w x y z |A B C D
|
||||
|
||||
The `grid` algorithm maps them to their respective buckets:
|
||||
The result is the following mapping of snapshots to buckets:
|
||||
|
||||
Bucket 1: a, b, c
|
||||
Bucket 2: d,e,f,g,h,i,j
|
||||
Bucket 3: k,l,m,n,o,p
|
||||
Bucket 4: q,r, q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z
|
||||
None: A,B,C,D
|
||||
Bucket1: a, b, c
|
||||
Bucket2: d,e,f,g,h,i,j
|
||||
Bucket3: k,l,m,n,o,p
|
||||
Bucket4: q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z
|
||||
No bucket: A,B,C,D
|
||||
|
||||
It then applies the per-bucket pruning logic described above which resulting in the
|
||||
following list of remaining snapshots.
|
||||
For each bucket, we now prune snapshots until it only contains `keep` snapshots.
|
||||
Newer snapshots are destroyed first.
|
||||
Snapshots that do not fall into a bucket are always destroyed.
|
||||
|
||||
| a b c j p z |
|
||||
|
||||
Note that it only makes sense to grow (not shorten) the interval duration for buckets
|
||||
further in the past since each bucket acts like a low-pass filter for incoming snapshots
|
||||
and adding a less-low-pass-filter after a low-pass one has no effect.
|
||||
Result after pruning:
|
||||
|
||||
0h 1h 2h 3h 4h 5h 6h 7h 8h 9h
|
||||
| | | | | | | | | |
|
||||
|-Bucket1-|-----Bucket2-------|------Bucket3------|-----------Bucket4-----------|
|
||||
| | | | |
|
||||
| a b c| j p | z |
|
||||
|
||||
.. _prune-keep-last-n:
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user