Config:
```
- type: push
...
conflict_resolution:
initial_replication: most_recent | all | fali
```
The ``initial_replication`` option determines which snapshots zrepl
replicates if the filesystem has not been replicated before.
If ``most_recent`` (the default), the initial replication will only
transfer the most recent snapshot, while ignoring previous snapshots.
If all snapshots should be replicated, specify ``all``.
Use ``fail`` to make replication of the filesystem fail in case
there is no corresponding fileystem on the receiver.
Code-Level Changes, apart from the obvious:
- Rework IncrementalPath()'s return signature.
Now returns an error for initial replications as well.
- Rename & rework it's consumer, resolveConflict().
Co-authored-by: Graham Christensen <graham@grahamc.com>
Fixes https://github.com/zrepl/zrepl/issues/550
Fixes https://github.com/zrepl/zrepl/issues/187
Closes https://github.com/zrepl/zrepl/pull/592
fixes https://github.com/zrepl/zrepl/issues/504
Problem:
plain send + recv with root_fs encrypted + placeholders causes plain recvs
whereas user would expect encrypt-on-recv
Reason:
We create placeholder filesytems with -o encryption=off.
Thus, children received below those placeholders won't inherit
encryption of root_fs.
Fix:
We'll have three values for `recv.placeholders.encryption: unspecified (default) | off | inherit`.
When we create a placeholder, we will fail the operation if `recv.placeholders.encryption = unspecified`.
The exception is if the placeholder filesystem is to encode the client identity ($root_fs/$client_identity) in a pull job.
Those are created in `inherit` mode if the config field is `unspecified` so that users who don't need
placeholders are not bothered by these details.
Future Work:
Automatically warn existing users of encrypt-on-recv about the problem
if they are affected.
The problem that I hit during implementation of this is that the
`encryption` prop's `source` doesn't quite behave like other props:
`source` is `default` for `encryption=off` and `-` when `encryption=on`.
Hence, we can't use `source` to distinguish the following 2x2 cases:
(1) placeholder created with explicit -o encryption=off
(2) placeholder created without specifying -o encryption
with
(A) an encrypted parent at creation time
(B) an unencrypted parent at creation time
From:
github.com/golang/protobuf v1.3.2
google.golang.org/grpc v1.17.0
To:
github.com/golang/protobuf v1.4.3
google.golang.org/grpc v1.35.0
google.golang.org/protobuf v1.25.0
About the two protobuf packages:
https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/go/faq
> Version v1.4.0 and higher of github.com/golang/protobuf wrap the new
implementation and permit programs to adopt the new API incrementally. For
example, the well-known types defined in github.com/golang/protobuf/ptypes are
simply aliases of those defined in the newer module. Thus,
google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/emptypb and
github.com/golang/protobuf/ptypes/empty may be used interchangeably.
Notable Code Changes in zrepl:
- generate protobufs now contain a mutex so we can't copy them by value
anymore
- grpc.WithDialer is deprecated => use grpc.WithContextDialer instead
Go1.12 is now actually required by some of the dependencies.
This commit
- adds a configuration in which no step holds, replication cursors, etc. are created
- removes the send.step_holds.disable_incremental setting
- creates a new config option `replication` for active-side jobs
- adds the replication.protection.{initial,incremental} settings, each
of which can have values
- `guarantee_resumability`
- `guarantee_incremental`
- `guarantee_nothing`
(refer to docs/configuration/replication.rst for semantics)
The `replication` config from an active side is sent to both endpoint.Sender and endpoint.Receiver
for each replication step. Sender and Receiver then act accordingly.
For `guarantee_incremental`, we add the new `tentative-replication-cursor` abstraction.
The necessity for that abstraction is outlined in https://github.com/zrepl/zrepl/issues/340.
fixes https://github.com/zrepl/zrepl/issues/340
This is a stop-gap solution until we re-write the pruner to support
rules for removing step holds.
Note that disabling step holds for incremental sends does not affect
zrepl's guarantee that incremental replication is always possible:
Suppose you yank the external drive during an incremental @from -> @to step:
* restarting that step or future incrementals @from -> @to_later` will be possible
because the replication cursor bookmark points to @from until the step is complete
* resuming @from -> @to will work as long as the pruner on your internal pool doesn't come around to destroy @to.
* in that case, the replication algorithm should determine that the resumable state
on the receiving side isuseless because @to no longer exists on the sending side,
and consequently clear it, and restart an incremental step @from -> @to_later
refs #288
