Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Christian Schwarz
0c189265e8 platformtests: fix skipping encryption-only tests on systems that don't support encryption
(Or split the test into two tests  of which one is skipped depending on encryption support)
2020-09-05 16:04:34 +02:00
Christian Schwarz
02db5994fe [#345] fix broken identification of parent-fs for initial replication ordering
fixup of 02807279

fixes #345
2020-07-26 20:32:35 +02:00
Christian Schwarz
a0e3dc7040 [#348] replication: add platformtest to check behavior on recv fail while still sending
Regression test for #348
2020-07-26 20:32:35 +02:00
Christian Schwarz
30cdc1430e replication + endpoint: replication guarantees: guarantee_{resumability,incremental,nothing}
This commit

- adds a configuration in which no step holds, replication cursors, etc. are created
- removes the send.step_holds.disable_incremental setting
- creates a new config option `replication` for active-side jobs
- adds the replication.protection.{initial,incremental} settings, each
  of which can have values
    - `guarantee_resumability`
    - `guarantee_incremental`
    - `guarantee_nothing`
  (refer to docs/configuration/replication.rst for semantics)

The `replication` config from an active side is sent to both endpoint.Sender and endpoint.Receiver
for each replication step. Sender and Receiver then act accordingly.

For `guarantee_incremental`, we add the new `tentative-replication-cursor` abstraction.
The necessity for that abstraction is outlined in https://github.com/zrepl/zrepl/issues/340.

fixes https://github.com/zrepl/zrepl/issues/340
2020-07-26 20:32:35 +02:00
Christian Schwarz
1c270b7e39 add option to disable step holds for incremental sends
This is a stop-gap solution until we re-write the pruner to support
rules for removing step holds.

Note that disabling step holds for incremental sends does not affect
zrepl's guarantee that incremental replication is always possible:

Suppose you yank the external drive during an incremental @from -> @to step:

* restarting that step or future incrementals @from -> @to_later` will be possible
  because the replication cursor bookmark points to @from until the step is complete
* resuming @from -> @to will work as long as the pruner on your internal pool doesn't come around to destroy @to.
    * in that case, the replication algorithm should determine that the resumable state
      on the receiving side isuseless because @to no longer exists on the sending side,
      and consequently clear it, and restart an incremental step @from -> @to_later

refs #288
2020-06-14 15:26:05 +02:00
Christian Schwarz
94a0fbf953 [#321] platformtest: add test for zfs.ZFSHolds 2020-06-14 15:21:36 +02:00
Christian Schwarz
b056e7b2b9 [#321] endpoint: ListAbstractions: acutally emit one Abstraction per matching hold 2020-06-14 15:21:36 +02:00
Christian Schwarz
6e927f20f9 [#321] platformtest: minimal integration tests for package replication
# Conflicts:
#	platformtest/tests/generated_cases.go
2020-06-14 15:21:36 +02:00
Christian Schwarz
301f163a44 [#321] platformtest: generate test case list + coverage tooling 2020-06-14 15:21:36 +02:00