use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
use nu_test_support::fs::file_contents;
|
|
|
|
use nu_test_support::fs::{
|
|
|
|
files_exist_at, AbsoluteFile,
|
|
|
|
Stub::{EmptyFile, FileWithContent, FileWithPermission},
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
use nu_test_support::nu;
|
|
|
|
use nu_test_support::playground::Playground;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use std::path::Path;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(not(target_os = "windows"))]
|
|
|
|
const PATH_SEPARATOR: &str = "/";
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(target_os = "windows")]
|
|
|
|
const PATH_SEPARATOR: &str = "\\";
|
|
|
|
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
fn get_file_hash<T: std::fmt::Display>(file: T) -> String {
|
|
|
|
nu!("open -r {} | to text | hash md5", file).out
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copies_a_file() {
|
|
|
|
copies_a_file_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copies_a_file_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copies_a_file_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_1", |dirs, _| {
|
|
|
|
let test_file = dirs.formats().join("sample.ini");
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
|
|
|
|
let first_hash = get_file_hash(test_file.display());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} `{}` ucp_test_1/sample.ini",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
test_file.display()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(dirs.test().join("sample.ini").exists());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the hash of the copied file content to check against first_hash.
|
|
|
|
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join("sample.ini").display());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(first_hash, after_cp_hash);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copies_the_file_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory() {
|
|
|
|
copies_the_file_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copies_the_file_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copies_the_file_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_2", |dirs, _| {
|
|
|
|
let expected_file = AbsoluteFile::new(dirs.test().join("sample.ini"));
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
|
|
|
|
let first_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.formats().join("../formats/sample.ini").display());
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.formats(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} ../formats/sample.ini {}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
expected_file.dir()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(dirs.test().join("sample.ini").exists());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check the integrity of the file.
|
|
|
|
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(expected_file);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(first_hash, after_cp_hash);
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// error msg changes on coreutils
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn error_if_attempting_to_copy_a_directory_to_another_directory() {
|
|
|
|
error_if_attempting_to_copy_a_directory_to_another_directory_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
error_if_attempting_to_copy_a_directory_to_another_directory_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn error_if_attempting_to_copy_a_directory_to_another_directory_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_3", |dirs, _| {
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.formats(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} ../formats {}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
dirs.test().display()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-06 18:59:46 +02:00
|
|
|
assert!(actual.err.contains("formats"));
|
|
|
|
assert!(actual.err.contains("resolves to a directory (not copied)"));
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copies_the_directory_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_and_with_recursive_flag() {
|
|
|
|
copies_the_directory_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_and_with_recursive_flag_impl(
|
|
|
|
false,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
copies_the_directory_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_and_with_recursive_flag_impl(
|
|
|
|
true,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copies_the_directory_inside_directory_if_path_to_copy_is_directory_and_with_recursive_flag_impl(
|
|
|
|
progress: bool,
|
|
|
|
) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_4", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox
|
|
|
|
.within("originals")
|
|
|
|
.with_files(vec![
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("yehuda.txt"),
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("jttxt"),
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("andres.txt"),
|
|
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
.mkdir("expected");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let expected_dir = dirs.test().join("expected").join("originals");
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.test(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} originals expected -r",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(expected_dir.exists());
|
|
|
|
assert!(files_exist_at(
|
|
|
|
vec![
|
|
|
|
Path::new("yehuda.txt"),
|
|
|
|
Path::new("jttxt"),
|
|
|
|
Path::new("andres.txt")
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
&expected_dir
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn deep_copies_with_recursive_flag() {
|
|
|
|
deep_copies_with_recursive_flag_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
deep_copies_with_recursive_flag_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn deep_copies_with_recursive_flag_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_5", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox
|
|
|
|
.within("originals")
|
|
|
|
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("manifest.txt")])
|
|
|
|
.within("originals/contributors")
|
|
|
|
.with_files(vec![
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("yehuda.txt"),
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("jttxt"),
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("andres.txt"),
|
|
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
.within("originals/contributors/JT")
|
|
|
|
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("errors.txt"), EmptyFile("multishells.txt")])
|
|
|
|
.within("originals/contributors/andres")
|
|
|
|
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("coverage.txt"), EmptyFile("commands.txt")])
|
|
|
|
.within("originals/contributors/yehuda")
|
|
|
|
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("defer-evaluation.txt")])
|
|
|
|
.mkdir("expected");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let expected_dir = dirs.test().join("expected").join("originals");
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let jts_expected_copied_dir = expected_dir.join("contributors").join("JT");
|
|
|
|
let andres_expected_copied_dir = expected_dir.join("contributors").join("andres");
|
|
|
|
let yehudas_expected_copied_dir = expected_dir.join("contributors").join("yehuda");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.test(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} originals expected --recursive",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(expected_dir.exists());
|
|
|
|
assert!(files_exist_at(
|
|
|
|
vec![Path::new("errors.txt"), Path::new("multishells.txt")],
|
|
|
|
jts_expected_copied_dir
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
assert!(files_exist_at(
|
|
|
|
vec![Path::new("coverage.txt"), Path::new("commands.txt")],
|
|
|
|
andres_expected_copied_dir
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
assert!(files_exist_at(
|
|
|
|
vec![Path::new("defer-evaluation.txt")],
|
|
|
|
yehudas_expected_copied_dir
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copies_using_path_with_wildcard() {
|
|
|
|
copies_using_path_with_wildcard_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copies_using_path_with_wildcard_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copies_using_path_with_wildcard_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_6", |dirs, _| {
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
|
|
|
|
let src_hashes = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.formats(),
|
|
|
|
"for file in (ls ../formats/*) { open --raw $file.name | to text | hash md5 }"
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
.out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.formats(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} -r ../formats/* {}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
dirs.test().display()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(files_exist_at(
|
|
|
|
vec![
|
|
|
|
Path::new("caco3_plastics.csv"),
|
|
|
|
Path::new("cargo_sample.toml"),
|
|
|
|
Path::new("jt.xml"),
|
|
|
|
Path::new("sample.ini"),
|
|
|
|
Path::new("sgml_description.json"),
|
|
|
|
Path::new("utf16.ini"),
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
dirs.test()
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check integrity after the copy is done
|
|
|
|
let dst_hashes = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.formats(),
|
|
|
|
"for file in (ls {}) {{ open --raw $file.name | to text | hash md5 }}", dirs.test().display()
|
|
|
|
).out;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(src_hashes, dst_hashes);
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copies_using_a_glob() {
|
|
|
|
copies_using_a_glob_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copies_using_a_glob_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copies_using_a_glob_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_7", |dirs, _| {
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
|
|
|
|
let src_hashes = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.formats(),
|
|
|
|
"for file in (ls *) { open --raw $file.name | to text | hash md5 }"
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
.out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.formats(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} -r * {}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
dirs.test().display()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(files_exist_at(
|
|
|
|
vec![
|
|
|
|
Path::new("caco3_plastics.csv"),
|
|
|
|
Path::new("cargo_sample.toml"),
|
|
|
|
Path::new("jt.xml"),
|
|
|
|
Path::new("sample.ini"),
|
|
|
|
Path::new("sgml_description.json"),
|
|
|
|
Path::new("utf16.ini"),
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
dirs.test()
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check integrity after the copy is done
|
|
|
|
let dst_hashes = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.formats(),
|
|
|
|
"for file in (ls {}) {{ open --raw $file.name | to text | hash md5 }}",
|
|
|
|
dirs.test().display()
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
.out;
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(src_hashes, dst_hashes);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copies_same_file_twice() {
|
|
|
|
copies_same_file_twice_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copies_same_file_twice_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copies_same_file_twice_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_8", |dirs, _| {
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} `{}` ucp_test_8/sample.ini",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
dirs.formats().join("sample.ini").display()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} `{}` ucp_test_8/sample.ini",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
dirs.formats().join("sample.ini").display()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(dirs.test().join("sample.ini").exists());
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
#[ignore = "Behavior not supported by uutils cp"]
|
|
|
|
fn copy_files_using_glob_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots() {
|
|
|
|
copy_files_using_glob_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_imp(false);
|
|
|
|
copy_files_using_glob_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_imp(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copy_files_using_glob_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_imp(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_9", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox.within("foo").within("bar").with_files(vec![
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("jtjson"),
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("andres.xml"),
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("yehuda.yaml"),
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("kevin.txt"),
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("many_more.ppl"),
|
|
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.test().join("foo/bar"),
|
|
|
|
" cp {} * ...",
|
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(files_exist_at(
|
|
|
|
vec![
|
|
|
|
"yehuda.yaml",
|
|
|
|
"jtjson",
|
|
|
|
"andres.xml",
|
|
|
|
"kevin.txt",
|
|
|
|
"many_more.ppl",
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
dirs.test()
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copy_file_and_dir_from_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_to_current_dir_recursive() {
|
|
|
|
copy_file_and_dir_from_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_to_current_dir_recursive_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copy_file_and_dir_from_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_to_current_dir_recursive_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copy_file_and_dir_from_two_parents_up_using_multiple_dots_to_current_dir_recursive_impl(
|
|
|
|
progress: bool,
|
|
|
|
) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_10", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("hello_there")]);
|
|
|
|
sandbox.mkdir("hello_again");
|
|
|
|
sandbox.within("foo").mkdir("bar");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.test().join("foo/bar"),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} -r .../hello* .",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let expected = dirs.test().join("foo/bar");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(files_exist_at(vec!["hello_there", "hello_again"], expected));
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// error msg changes on coreutils
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copy_to_non_existing_dir() {
|
|
|
|
copy_to_non_existing_dir_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copy_to_non_existing_dir_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copy_to_non_existing_dir_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_11", |_dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("empty_file")]);
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} empty_file ~/not_a_dir{}",
|
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
PATH_SEPARATOR,
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert!(actual.err.contains("is not a directory"));
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copy_dir_contains_symlink_ignored() {
|
|
|
|
copy_dir_contains_symlink_ignored_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copy_dir_contains_symlink_ignored_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copy_dir_contains_symlink_ignored_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_12", |_dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox
|
|
|
|
.within("tmp_dir")
|
|
|
|
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("hello_there"), EmptyFile("good_bye")])
|
|
|
|
.within("tmp_dir")
|
|
|
|
.symlink("good_bye", "dangle_symlink");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// make symbolic link and copy.
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
|
|
|
|
"rm {} tmp_dir/good_bye; cp -r tmp_dir tmp_dir_2",
|
|
|
|
progress_flag
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// check hello_there exists inside `tmp_dir_2`, and `dangle_symlink` don't exists inside `tmp_dir_2`.
|
|
|
|
let expected = sandbox.cwd().join("tmp_dir_2");
|
|
|
|
assert!(files_exist_at(vec!["hello_there"], expected));
|
|
|
|
// GNU cp will copy the broken symlink, so following their behavior
|
|
|
|
// thus commenting out below
|
|
|
|
// let path = expected.join("dangle_symlink");
|
|
|
|
// assert!(!path.exists() && !path.is_symlink());
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copy_dir_contains_symlink() {
|
|
|
|
copy_dir_contains_symlink_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copy_dir_contains_symlink_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copy_dir_contains_symlink_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_13", |_dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox
|
|
|
|
.within("tmp_dir")
|
|
|
|
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("hello_there"), EmptyFile("good_bye")])
|
|
|
|
.within("tmp_dir")
|
|
|
|
.symlink("good_bye", "dangle_symlink");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// make symbolic link and copy.
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
|
|
|
|
"rm tmp_dir/good_bye; cp {} -r -n tmp_dir tmp_dir_2",
|
|
|
|
progress_flag
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// check hello_there exists inside `tmp_dir_2`, and `dangle_symlink` also exists inside `tmp_dir_2`.
|
|
|
|
let expected = sandbox.cwd().join("tmp_dir_2");
|
|
|
|
assert!(files_exist_at(vec!["hello_there"], expected.clone()));
|
|
|
|
let path = expected.join("dangle_symlink");
|
|
|
|
assert!(path.is_symlink());
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copy_dir_symlink_file_body_not_changed() {
|
|
|
|
copy_dir_symlink_file_body_not_changed_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copy_dir_symlink_file_body_not_changed_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copy_dir_symlink_file_body_not_changed_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_14", |_dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox
|
|
|
|
.within("tmp_dir")
|
|
|
|
.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("hello_there"), EmptyFile("good_bye")])
|
|
|
|
.within("tmp_dir")
|
|
|
|
.symlink("good_bye", "dangle_symlink");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// make symbolic link and copy.
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
|
|
|
|
"rm tmp_dir/good_bye; cp {} -r -n tmp_dir tmp_dir_2; rm -r tmp_dir; cp {} -r -n tmp_dir_2 tmp_dir; echo hello_data | save tmp_dir/good_bye",
|
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// check dangle_symlink in tmp_dir is no longer dangling.
|
|
|
|
let expected_file = sandbox.cwd().join("tmp_dir").join("dangle_symlink");
|
|
|
|
let actual = file_contents(expected_file);
|
|
|
|
assert!(actual.contains("hello_data"));
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// error msg changes on coreutils
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copy_identical_file() {
|
|
|
|
copy_identical_file_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copy_identical_file_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copy_identical_file_impl(progress: bool) {
|
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_15", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("same.txt")]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.test(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} same.txt same.txt",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// assert!(actual.err.contains("Copy aborted"));
|
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
|
|
|
let msg = format!(
|
|
|
|
"'{}' and '{}' are the same file",
|
|
|
|
dirs.test().join("same.txt").display(),
|
|
|
|
dirs.test().join("same.txt").display(),
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// debug messages in CI
|
|
|
|
if !actual.err.contains(&msg) {
|
|
|
|
panic!("stderr was: {}", actual.err);
|
|
|
|
}
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
#[ignore = "File name in progress bar not on uutils impl"]
|
|
|
|
fn copy_ignores_ansi() {
|
|
|
|
copy_ignores_ansi_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copy_ignores_ansi_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copy_ignores_ansi_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_16", |_dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("test.txt")]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
|
|
|
|
"ls | find test | get name | cp {} $in.0 success.txt; ls | find success | get name | ansi strip | get 0",
|
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(actual.out, "success.txt");
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//apparently on windows error msg is different, but linux(where i test) is fine.
|
2023-09-10 02:41:53 +02:00
|
|
|
//fix later FIXME
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(unix)]
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn copy_file_not_exists_dst() {
|
|
|
|
copy_file_not_exists_dst_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copy_file_not_exists_dst_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-10 02:41:53 +02:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(unix)]
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
fn copy_file_not_exists_dst_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_17", |_dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("valid.txt")]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} valid.txt ~/invalid_dir/invalid_dir1",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert!(
|
|
|
|
actual.err.contains("invalid_dir1") && actual.err.contains("No such file or directory")
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//again slightly different error message on windows on tests
|
|
|
|
// compared to linux
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
#[ignore] //FIXME: This test needs to be re-enabled once uu_cp has fixed the bug
|
|
|
|
fn copy_file_with_read_permission() {
|
|
|
|
copy_file_with_read_permission_impl(false);
|
|
|
|
copy_file_with_read_permission_impl(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn copy_file_with_read_permission_impl(progress: bool) {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_18", |_dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox.with_files(vec![
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("valid.txt"),
|
|
|
|
FileWithPermission("invalid_prem.txt", false),
|
|
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let progress_flag = if progress { "-p" } else { "" };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: sandbox.cwd(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} valid.txt invalid_prem.txt",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
progress_flag,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert!(actual.err.contains("invalid_prem.txt") && actual.err.contains("denied"));
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// uutils/coreutils copy tests
|
|
|
|
static TEST_EXISTING_FILE: &str = "existing_file.txt";
|
|
|
|
static TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE: &str = "hello_world.txt";
|
|
|
|
static TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST: &str = "copy_of_hello_world.txt";
|
|
|
|
static TEST_HOW_ARE_YOU_SOURCE: &str = "how_are_you.txt";
|
|
|
|
static TEST_HOW_ARE_YOU_DEST: &str = "hello_dir/how_are_you.txt";
|
|
|
|
static TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER: &str = "hello_dir/";
|
|
|
|
static TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_FILE: &str = "hello_dir/hello_world.txt";
|
|
|
|
static TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER: &str = "hello_dir_with_file/";
|
|
|
|
static TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER_FILE: &str = "hello_dir_with_file/hello_world.txt";
|
2023-09-10 02:41:53 +02:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(not(target_os = "macos"))]
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
static TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_NEW: &str = "hello_dir_new";
|
2023-09-10 02:41:53 +02:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(not(target_os = "macos"))]
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
static TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_NEW_FILE: &str = "hello_dir_new/hello_world.txt";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_cp() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_19", |dirs, _| {
|
|
|
|
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
|
|
|
|
let src_hash = get_file_hash(src.display());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} ucp_test_19/{}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
src.display(),
|
|
|
|
TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(dirs.test().join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST).exists());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the hash of the copied file content to check against first_hash.
|
|
|
|
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST).display());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(src_hash, after_cp_hash);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_existing_target() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_20", |dirs, _| {
|
|
|
|
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
|
|
|
|
let existing = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_EXISTING_FILE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
|
|
|
|
let src_hash = get_file_hash(src.display());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Copy existing file to destination, so that it exists for the test
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} ucp_test_20/{}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
existing.display(),
|
|
|
|
TEST_EXISTING_FILE
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// At this point the src and existing files should be different
|
|
|
|
assert!(dirs.test().join(TEST_EXISTING_FILE).exists());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now for the test
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} ucp_test_20/{}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
src.display(),
|
|
|
|
TEST_EXISTING_FILE
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(dirs.test().join(TEST_EXISTING_FILE).exists());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the hash of the copied file content to check against first_hash.
|
|
|
|
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_EXISTING_FILE).display());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(src_hash, after_cp_hash);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_multiple_files() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_21", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
let src1 = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
|
|
|
|
let src2 = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HOW_ARE_YOU_SOURCE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the hash of the file content to check integrity after copy.
|
|
|
|
let src1_hash = get_file_hash(src1.display());
|
|
|
|
let src2_hash = get_file_hash(src2.display());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//Create target directory
|
|
|
|
sandbox.mkdir(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Start test
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} {} ucp_test_21/{}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
src1.display(),
|
|
|
|
src2.display(),
|
|
|
|
TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert!(dirs.test().join(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER).exists());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the hash of the copied file content to check against first_hash.
|
|
|
|
let after_cp_1_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_FILE).display());
|
|
|
|
let after_cp_2_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_HOW_ARE_YOU_DEST).display());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(src1_hash, after_cp_1_hash);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(src2_hash, after_cp_2_hash);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(not(target_os = "macos"))]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_recurse() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_22", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
// Create the relevant target directories
|
|
|
|
sandbox.mkdir(TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER);
|
|
|
|
sandbox.mkdir(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_NEW);
|
|
|
|
let src = dirs
|
|
|
|
.fixtures
|
|
|
|
.join("cp")
|
|
|
|
.join(TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER)
|
|
|
|
.join(TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER_FILE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let src_hash = get_file_hash(src.display());
|
|
|
|
// Start test
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp -r {} ucp_test_22/{}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER,
|
|
|
|
TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_NEW,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_NEW_FILE).display());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(src_hash, after_cp_hash);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_with_dirs() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_23", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
|
|
|
|
let src_hash = get_file_hash(src.display());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//Create target directory
|
|
|
|
sandbox.mkdir(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER);
|
|
|
|
// Start test
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} ucp_test_23/{}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
src.display(),
|
|
|
|
TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_COPY_TO_FOLDER_FILE).display());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(src_hash, after_cp_hash);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Other way around
|
|
|
|
sandbox.mkdir(TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER);
|
|
|
|
let src2 = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_COPY_FROM_FOLDER_FILE);
|
|
|
|
let src2_hash = get_file_hash(src2.display());
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} ucp_test_23/{}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
src2.display(),
|
|
|
|
TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let after_cp_2_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST).display());
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(src2_hash, after_cp_2_hash);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(not(windows))]
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_arg_force() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_24", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
|
|
|
|
let src_hash = get_file_hash(src.display());
|
|
|
|
sandbox.with_files(vec![FileWithPermission("invalid_prem.txt", false)]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} --force ucp_test_24/{}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
src.display(),
|
|
|
|
"invalid_prem.txt"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(dirs.test().join("invalid_prem.txt").display());
|
|
|
|
// Check content was copied by the use of --force
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(src_hash, after_cp_hash);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_directory_to_itself_disallowed() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_25", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox.mkdir("d");
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp -r ucp_test_25/{} ucp_test_25/{}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
"d",
|
|
|
|
"d"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
actual
|
|
|
|
.err
|
|
|
|
.contains("cannot copy a directory, 'd', into itself, 'd/d'");
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_nested_directory_to_itself_disallowed() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_26", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox.mkdir("a");
|
|
|
|
sandbox.mkdir("a/b");
|
|
|
|
sandbox.mkdir("a/b/c");
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.test(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp -r {} {}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
"a/b",
|
|
|
|
"a/b/c"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
actual
|
|
|
|
.err
|
|
|
|
.contains("cannot copy a directory, 'a/b', into itself, 'a/b/c/b'");
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(not(windows))]
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_same_file_force() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_27", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("f")]);
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.test(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp --force {} {}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
"f",
|
|
|
|
"f"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
actual.err.contains("cp: 'f' and 'f' are the same file");
|
|
|
|
assert!(!dirs.test().join("f~").exists());
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_arg_no_clobber() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_28", |dirs, _| {
|
|
|
|
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
|
|
|
|
let target = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HOW_ARE_YOU_SOURCE);
|
|
|
|
let target_hash = get_file_hash(target.display());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {} {} --no-clobber",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
src.display(),
|
|
|
|
target.display()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let after_cp_hash = get_file_hash(target.display());
|
|
|
|
assert!(actual.err.contains("not replacing"));
|
|
|
|
// Check content was not clobbered
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(after_cp_hash, target_hash);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_arg_no_clobber_twice() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_29", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox.with_files(vec![
|
|
|
|
EmptyFile("source.txt"),
|
|
|
|
FileWithContent("source_with_body.txt", "some-body"),
|
|
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp --no-clobber ucp_test_29/{} ucp_test_29/{}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
"source.txt",
|
|
|
|
"dest.txt"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert!(dirs.test().join("dest.txt").exists());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp --no-clobber ucp_test_29/{} ucp_test_29/{}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
"source_with_body.txt",
|
|
|
|
"dest.txt"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Should have same contents of original empty file as --no-clobber should not overwrite dest.txt
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(file_contents(dirs.test().join("dest.txt")), "fake data");
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_debug_default() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_30", |dirs, _| {
|
|
|
|
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp --debug {} ucp_test_30/{}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
src.display(),
|
|
|
|
TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(target_os = "macos")]
|
|
|
|
if !actual
|
|
|
|
.out
|
|
|
|
.contains("copy offload: unknown, reflink: unsupported, sparse detection: unsupported")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
panic!("{}", format!("Failure: stdout was \n{}", actual.out));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(target_os = "linux")]
|
|
|
|
if !actual
|
|
|
|
.out
|
|
|
|
.contains("copy offload: unknown, reflink: unsupported, sparse detection: no")
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
panic!("{}", format!("Failure: stdout was \n{}", actual.out));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cfg(windows)]
|
|
|
|
if !actual.out.contains(
|
|
|
|
"copy offload: unsupported, reflink: unsupported, sparse detection: unsupported",
|
|
|
|
) {
|
|
|
|
panic!("{}", format!("Failure: stdout was \n{}", actual.out));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_verbose_default() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_31", |dirs, _| {
|
|
|
|
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp --verbose {} {}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
src.display(),
|
|
|
|
TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert!(actual.out.contains(
|
|
|
|
format!(
|
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
|
|
|
"'{}' -> '{}'",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
src.display(),
|
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
|
|
|
dirs.root().join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_DEST).display()
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
.as_str(),
|
|
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_only_source_no_dest() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_32", |dirs, _| {
|
|
|
|
let src = dirs.fixtures.join("cp").join(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE);
|
|
|
|
let actual = nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.root(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"cp {}",
|
use uutils/coreutils cp command in place of nushell's cp command (#10097)
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Hi. Basically, this is a continuation of the work that @fdncred started.
Given some nice discussions on #9463 , and [merged uutils
PR](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/5152) from @tertsdiepraam
we have decided to give the `cp` command the `crawl` stage as it was
named.
> [!NOTE]
Given that the `uutils` crate has not made the release for the merged
PR, just make sure you checkout latest and put it in the required place
to make this PR work.
The aim of this PR is for is to see how to move forward using `uutils`
crate. In order to getting this started, I have made the current
`nushell cp tests` pass along with some extra ones I copied over from
the `uutils` repo.
With all of that being said, things that would be nice to decide, and
keep working on:
Crawl:
- Handling of certain `named` flags, with their long and short
forms(e.g. --update, --reflink, --preserve, etc), and using default
values. Maybe `-u` can already have a `default_missing_value`.
- Should we maybe just support one single option `switch` flags (see
`--backup` in code) as a contrast to the other named args.
- Complete test coverage from `uutils`. They had > 100 tests, and I
could only port like 12 as they are a bit time consuming given they
cannot be straight up copy pasted. Maybe we do not need all >100, but
maybe the more relevant to what we want.
- Refactor this code
Walk:
- Non fatal errors on `copy` from `utils`. Currently it just sends it to
stdout but errors have no span
- Better integration
An added possibility is the addition of `SyntaxShape::OneOf()` for
`Named` arguments which was briefly mentioned in the discord server, but
that is still to be decided. This could greatly improve some of the
integration. This would enable something like `cp --preserve [all
timestamp]` or `cp --preserve all` to both work.
I did not want to keep holding on this, and wait till I was happy with
the code because I think its nice if everyone can start up and suggest
refactors, but the main important part now was getting it out the door,
as if I take my sweet time this will take way longer :stuck_out_tongue:
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- [X] cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [X] cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-08 20:57:38 +02:00
|
|
|
src.display(),
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert!(actual
|
|
|
|
.err
|
|
|
|
.contains("Missing destination path operand after"));
|
|
|
|
assert!(actual.err.contains(TEST_HELLO_WORLD_SOURCE));
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_cp_with_vars() {
|
|
|
|
Playground::setup("ucp_test_33", |dirs, sandbox| {
|
|
|
|
sandbox.with_files(vec![EmptyFile("input")]);
|
|
|
|
nu!(
|
|
|
|
cwd: dirs.test(),
|
2023-10-11 01:13:28 +02:00
|
|
|
"let src = 'input'; let dst = 'target'; cp $src $dst",
|
2023-09-11 00:54:33 +02:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert!(dirs.test().join("target").exists());
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|