Remove "Progress" section from README (#9471)

I would personally propose to remove the progress board table from our
README.

At the stage where we are at right now with most items in a pre-stable
stage I don't think it is a good use of README real estate anymore. It
hasn't been updated in over 7 months for a single item and older than a
year for most boxes.

For upcoming users the list doesn't present detailed enough explanations
of potential pitfalls and may be more confusing by mentioning features
that are not really present (e.g. paging). Generally I have the
impression that the community generally helps raise awareness about the
limitations of the pre-1.0 state together with our release notes that
try to highlight the pace of breaking or evolving changes.

Potential users are probably best served by additional links to learn
more about our features and generally improved documentation and
community tutorials

For contributors that want to look for areas to help out, this view is
both not granular enough for real guidance and is maybe even actively
harmful in highlighting areas we don't prioritize for 1.0 stability
(e.g. notebook integration)

Contributors are probably better served by our planned write-ups around
the 1.0 roadmap and updating GitHub Kanban/project boards.
This commit is contained in:
Stefan Holderbach 2023-06-19 08:50:40 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent 63e30899f7
commit 5754f307eb
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ A new type of shell.
- [Opening files](#opening-files) - [Opening files](#opening-files)
- [Plugins](#plugins) - [Plugins](#plugins)
- [Goals](#goals) - [Goals](#goals)
- [Progress](#progress)
- [Officially Supported By](#officially-supported-by) - [Officially Supported By](#officially-supported-by)
- [Contributing](#contributing) - [Contributing](#contributing)
- [License](#license) - [License](#license)
@ -210,27 +209,6 @@ Nu adheres closely to a set of goals that make up its design philosophy. As feat
- Finally, Nu views data functionally. Rather than using mutation, pipelines act as a means to load, change, and save data without mutable state. - Finally, Nu views data functionally. Rather than using mutation, pipelines act as a means to load, change, and save data without mutable state.
## Progress
Nu is under heavy development and will naturally change as it matures. The chart below isn't meant to be exhaustive, but it helps give an idea for some of the areas of development and their relative maturity:
| Features | Not started | Prototype | MVP | Preview | Mature | Notes |
| ------------- | :---------: | :-------: | :-: | :-----: | :----: | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Aliases | | | | X | | Aliases allow for shortening large commands, while passing flags |
| Notebook | | X | | | | Initial jupyter support, but it loses state and lacks features |
| File ops | | | | X | | cp, mv, rm, mkdir have some support, but lacking others |
| Environment | | | | X | | Temporary environment and scoped environment variables |
| Shells | | | | X | | Basic value and file shells, but no opt-in/opt-out for commands |
| Protocol | | | | X | | Streaming protocol is serviceable |
| Plugins | | | X | | | Plugins work on one row at a time, lack batching and expression eval |
| Errors | | | | X | | Error reporting works, but could use usability polish |
| Documentation | | | X | | | Book updated to latest release, including usage examples |
| Paging | | | | X | | Textview has paging, but we'd like paging for tables |
| Functions | | | | X | | Functions and aliases are supported |
| Variables | | | | X | | Nu supports variables and environment variables |
| Completions | | | | X | | Completions for filepaths |
| Type-checking | | | | x | | Commands check basic types, and input/output types |
## Officially Supported By ## Officially Supported By
Please submit an issue or PR to be added to this list. Please submit an issue or PR to be added to this list.