# Description
See also: #9743
Before:
`http <subcommand> -H` took a list in the form:
```nushell
[my-header-key-A my-header-value-A my-header-key-B my-header-value-B]
```
Now:
In addition to the old format, Records can be passed, For example,
```nushell
> let reqHeaders = {
Cookie: "acc=barfoo",
User-Agent: "Mozilla/7.0 (Windows NT 33.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/1038.90 (KHTML, like Gecko)"
}
> http get -H $reqHeaders https://example.com
```
is now equivalent to
```nushell
http get -H [Cookie "acc=barfoo" User-Agent "Mozilla/7.0 (Windows NT 33.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/1038.90 (KHTML, like Gecko)"] https://example.com
```
# User-Facing Changes
No breaking changes, but Records can now also be passed to `http
<subcommand> -H`.
# Tests + Formatting
# After Submitting
# Description
Hi nushell!
Thanks so much for [adding http headers][headers]! I've been waiting for
this feature for a long time and it's great. However, I found that
`Record` as a return type and using `ureq`'s `response.header` api
results in missing header values when there are multiple with the same
name, as can occur with `set-cookie` and others.
This issue with http has been discussed at length [on
stackoverflow][stackoverflow] and in [`ureq` itself][ureq]. It seems
like concatenating header values with `,` is a common solution, but
tricky especially with `set-cookie` which may contain `,` in the
`Expires` field, as discussed in the former post.
I propose changing the return type to a `List` of `Record` so we can get
all of the header values without relying on ad-hoc mutation. This
solution does not return the headers in the same order as they appear in
the `Response` due to `ureq`'s `Response.all` API, but it's better than
dropping values imo.
This is a **breaking change**. I'm sure `ureq`'s
[`CookieStore`][cookiestore] is a better long-term solution for
returning cookies as a separate record on `http <method>`, but other
headers can be set multiple times as well.
# User-Facing Changes
- Changes the return type of an `http <method>` `header` field from
`Record` to `List` (Table with columns `name` and `value`)
- Returns all values of a header set multiple times instead of just the
first one duplicated
# Implementation
Quick note that running `header_names.dedup()` does not resolve the
necessity to iterate through the previously parsed headers since `dedup`
only removes identical values when they are next to each other in the
`Vec`. You could do a `sort` first, but header ordering can be important
in some cases, so I tried to avoid messing with that more than is
already the case with `Response.all`. Would love to see a better way of
doing this though!
# Tests + Formatting
No tests broke implementing this change. Not sure what endpoint to hit
or mock server to use to verify this in tests. I have some screenshots
to illustrate what I'm talking about.
Before:
> `set-cookie` has the same value for every record field.
> Even if it did not I'm not sure how you would access the different
values since they all have the same key.
After:
> Actual values from the response returned for the same name
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [x] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- [x] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- [x] `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library <-- Note: I did not see a `crates/nu-std/test/run.nu`
file so I ran the snippet below which returned without error
```nushell
for $i in (ls crates/nu-std/tests/*.nu) {
cargo run -- $i.name
}
```
# Code of Conduct
Apologies for not opening an issue first. Just did this fix for myself
because it seemed simple enough before deciding to open this PR.
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
- [ ] update docs
[stackoverflow]:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3241326/set-more-than-one-http-header-with-the-same-name
[headers]: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/8571
[ureq]: https://github.com/algesten/ureq/issues/95
[cookiestore]:
https://docs.rs/cookie_store/latest/cookie_store/struct.CookieStore.html
This PR reverts https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9391
We try not to revert PRs like this, though after discussion with the
Nushell team, we decided to revert this one.
The main reason is that Nushell, as a codebase, isn't ready for these
kinds of optimisations. It's in the part of the development cycle where
our main focus should be on improving the algorithms inside of Nushell
itself. Once we have matured our algorithms, then we can look for
opportunities to switch out technologies we're using for alternate
forms.
Much of Nushell still has lots of opportunities for tuning the codebase,
paying down technical debt, and making the codebase generally cleaner
and more robust. This should be the focus. Performance improvements
should flow out of that work.
Said another, optimisation that isn't part of tuning the codebase is
premature at this stage. We need to focus on doing the hard work of
making the engine, parser, etc better.
# User-Facing Changes
Reverts the HashMap -> ahash change.
cc @FilipAndersson245
Parse the data from string to json if the `--content-type
"application/json"` flag is used for the request.
Fixes: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/9408
In the issue, the actual data is a string `'{ "query": "{ greeting }"
}'` representing json, and it would match the case `Value::String { val,
.. }`
-------------------------
The example in the issue does set the `content-type` to
`application/json` but sends the body as a string note the `'`.
```
(
::: http post
::: -fer
::: # -H [ "Content-Type" "application/json" ]
::: --content-type "application/json"
::: 'http://127.0.0.1:3000/greetings/hello'
::: '{ "query": "{ greeting }" }'
::: )
```
```
╭─────────┬───────────────────────╮
│ headers │ {record 14 fields} │
│ body │ {"content_type":null} │
│ status │ 200 │
╰─────────┴───────────────────────╯
```
If we send the same request but using actual json as the body, the
Header is set correctly.
```
(
::: http post
::: -fer
::: # -H [ "Content-Type" "application/json" ]
::: --content-type "application/json"
::: 'http://127.0.0.1:3000/greetings/hello'
::: { "query": "{ greeting }" }
::: )
```
```
╭─────────┬─────────────────────────────────────╮
│ headers │ {record 14 fields} │
│ body │ {"content_type":"application/json"} │
│ status │ 200 │
╰─────────┴─────────────────────────────────────╯
```
# Description
see https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/9390
using `ahash` instead of the default hasher. this will not affect
compile time as we where already building `ahash`.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Fixes the clippy warnings we're about to get hit with next time we
upgrade Rust.
The big one was shrinking ShellError and related under 128 bytes.
# User-Facing Changes
Shouldn't notice much difference. In theory, we could see a tiny perf
improvement, but I didn't notice one.
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
This PR fixes a bug introduced in
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/8571.
We were accidentally converting a `Result<Value, ShellError>` to JSON
instead of converting a `Value`. The upshot was that we were sending
JSON like `{"Ok":{"foo":"bar"}}` instead of `{"foo":"bar"}`.
This was an easy bug to miss, because `ureq::send_json()` accepts any
`impl serde::Serialize`. I've added a test to prevent regression.
Continuation of #8229 and #8326
# Description
The `ShellError` enum at the moment is kind of messy.
Many variants are basic tuple structs where you always have to reference
the implementation with its macro invocation to know which field serves
which purpose.
Furthermore we have both variants that are kind of redundant or either
overly broad to be useful for the user to match on or overly specific
with few uses.
So I set out to start fixing the lacking documentation and naming to
make it feasible to critically review the individual usages and fix
those.
Furthermore we can decide to join or split up variants that don't seem
to be fit for purpose.
# Call to action
**Everyone:** Feel free to add review comments if you spot inconsistent
use of `ShellError` variants.
# User-Facing Changes
(None now, end goal more explicit and consistent error messages)
# Tests + Formatting
(No additional tests needed so far)
# Commits (so far)
- Remove `ShellError::FeatureNotEnabled`
- Name fields on `SE::ExternalNotSupported`
- Name field on `SE::InvalidProbability`
- Name fields on `SE::NushellFailed` variants
- Remove unused `SE::NushellFailedSpannedHelp`
- Name field on `SE::VariableNotFoundAtRuntime`
- Name fields on `SE::EnvVarNotFoundAtRuntime`
- Name fields on `SE::ModuleNotFoundAtRuntime`
- Remove usused `ModuleOrOverlayNotFoundAtRuntime`
- Name fields on `SE::OverlayNotFoundAtRuntime`
- Name field on `SE::NotFound`
Continuation of #8229
# Description
The `ShellError` enum at the moment is kind of messy.
Many variants are basic tuple structs where you always have to reference
the implementation with its macro invocation to know which field serves
which purpose.
Furthermore we have both variants that are kind of redundant or either
overly broad to be useful for the user to match on or overly specific
with few uses.
So I set out to start fixing the lacking documentation and naming to
make it feasible to critically review the individual usages and fix
those.
Furthermore we can decide to join or split up variants that don't seem
to be fit for purpose.
**Everyone:** Feel free to add review comments if you spot inconsistent
use of `ShellError` variants.
- Name fields of `SE::IncorrectValue`
- Merge and name fields on `SE::TypeMismatch`
- Name fields on `SE::UnsupportedOperator`
- Name fields on `AssignmentRequires*` and fix doc
- Name fields on `SE::UnknownOperator`
- Name fields on `SE::MissingParameter`
- Name fields on `SE::DelimiterError`
- Name fields on `SE::IncompatibleParametersSingle`
# User-Facing Changes
(None now, end goal more explicit and consistent error messages)
# Tests + Formatting
(No additional tests needed so far)
# Description
_(Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.)_
This pull request removes `Reqwest` and replaces it with `Ureq` to
remove some of our dependencies, giving us faster compile times as well
as smaller binaries. `Ureq` does not have an async runtime included so
we do not need build heavy dependencies such as `Tokio`. From older
tests I had the number of build units be reduced from `430 -> 392`.
The default of `Ureq` uses `Rustls` but it has been configured to
instead use `native_tls` which should work exactly the same as the `tls`
works now.
I removed `content-length` from the http commands as after refactoring i
did not see a reason to have it available, correct me if this is
something we should preserve.
In the medium, to long term, we should maybe consider changing to
`rustls` to have the same `tls` on all platforms.
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Based on https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/8135.
Add the remaining HTTP commands:
- Head
- Patch
- Put
- Delete
It should finally resolve the issue
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/2741
# User-Facing Changes
New sub HTTP commands.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Final rework for https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/2741, after
this one, we'll add for free HTTP PUT, PATCH, DELETE and HEAD.
# User-Facing Changes
We can now post data using HTTP GET. I add some examples in the output
of `http get --help` to demonstrate this new behavior.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
In order to work on https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/2741, I'm
preparing the code.
# User-Facing Changes
Both commands do support the timeout option.
**But the timeout argument `-t, --timeout` has been migrated to `-m,
--max-time`**. I had to make a choice since there is another option
using the short command `t` which is "content-type".
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
I factorized the HTTP client from HTTP Post and HTTP Get into a common
file, in order to reduce the code duplication. This PR has to be looked
commit by commit.
# User-Facing Changes
A new option has been to HTTP Get: `--insecure`. This option was already
available for HTTP Post command.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
