# Description
This PR changes some commands that previously accepted row conditions
(like `$it > 5`) as parameter to accept closures instead. The reasons
are:
a) The commands would need to move into parser keywords in the future
while they feel more like commands to be implemented in Nushell code as
a part of standard library.
b) In scripts, it is useful to store the predicate condition in a
variable which you can't do with row conditions.
c) These commands are not used that often to benefit enough from the
shorter row condition syntax
# User-Facing Changes
The following commands now accept **closure** instead of a **row
condition**:
- `take until`
- `take while`
- `skip until`
- `skip while`
- `any`
- `all`
This is a part of an effort to move away from shape-directed parsing.
Related PR: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7365
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Alters `all`, `any`, `each while`, `each`, `insert`, `par-each`, `reduce`, `update`, `upsert` and `where`,
so that their blocks take an optional parameter containing the index.
Rename `all?`, `any?` and `empty?` to `all`, `any` and `is-empty` for sake of simplicity and consistency.
- More understandable for newcomers, that these commands are no special to others.
- `?` syntax did not really aprove readability. For me it made it worse.
- We can reserve `?` syntax for any other nushell feature.
* commands: any? all?
We can check if `any` (or `all`) rows of tables match predicates.
Small `all?` example: Given the following table with `services` running:
```
> echo [[status]; [UP] [UP]]
───┬────────
# │ status
───┼────────
0 │ UP
1 │ UP
───┴────────
```
We can ask if all services are UP, like so:
```
> echo [[status]; [UP] [UP]] | all? status == UP
true
```
* Fix any? signature.
