# Description
Following the comment from @fdncred:
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/8144#issuecomment-1442514338. I
added some unit tests for HTTP commands. The tests are not exhaustive,
but at least, this is a first good step IMO.
# User-Facing Changes
None.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR adds an alternative alias implementation. Old aliases still work
but you need to use `old-alias` instead of `alias`.
Instead of replacing spans in the original code and re-parsing, which
proved to be extremely error-prone and a constant source of panics, the
new implementation creates a new command that references the old
command. Consider the new alias defined as `alias ll = ls -l`. The
parser creates a new command called `ll` and remembers that it is
actually a `ls` command called with the `-l` flag. Then, when the parser
sees the `ll` command, it will translate it to `ls -l` and passes to it
any parameters that were passed to the call to `ll`. It works quite
similar to how known externals defined with `extern` are implemented.
The new alias implementation should work the same way as the old
aliases, including exporting from modules, referencing both known and
unknown externals. It seems to preserve custom completions and pipeline
metadata. It is quite robust in most cases but there are some rough
edges (see later).
Fixes https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7648,
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8026,
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7512,
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/5780,
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7754
No effect: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8122 (we might
revisit the completions code after this PR)
Should use custom command instead:
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/6048
# User-Facing Changes
Since aliases are now basically commands, it has some new implications:
1. `alias spam = "spam"` (requires command call)
* **workaround**: use `alias spam = echo "spam"`
2. `def foo [] { 'foo' }; alias foo = ls -l` (foo defined more than
once)
* **workaround**: use different name (commands also have this
limitation)
4. `alias ls = (ls | sort-by type name -i)`
* **workaround**: Use custom command. _The common issue with this is
that it is currently not easy to pass flags through custom commands and
command referencing itself will lead to stack overflow. Both of these
issues are meant to be addressed._
5. TODO: Help messages, `which` command, `$nu.scope.aliases`, etc.
* Should we treat the aliases as commands or should they be separated
from regular commands?
6. Needs better error message and syntax highlight for recursed alias
(`alias f = f`)
7. Can't create alias with the same name as existing command (`alias ls
= ls -a`)
* Might be possible to add support for it (not 100% sure)
8. Standalone `alias` doesn't list aliases anymore
9. Can't alias parser keywords (e.g., stuff like `alias ou = overlay
use` won't work)
* TODO: Needs a better error message when attempting to do so
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fixes#8145, by disallowing any rows that are duplicated.
```
❯ ls | select 0 0
Error:
× Select only allows unique rows
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ ls | select 0 0
· ┬
· ╰── duplicated row
╰────
```
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
---------
Co-authored-by: Reilly Wood <reilly.wood@icloud.com>
# Description
`bytes starts-with` converts the input into a `Value` before running
.starts_with to find if the binary matches. This has two side effects:
it makes the code simpler, only dealing in whole values, and simplifying
a lot of input pipeline handling and value transforming it would
otherwise have to do. _Especially_ in the presence of a cell path to
drill into. It also makes buffers the entire input into memory, which
can take up a lot of memory when dealing with large files, especially if
you only want to check the first few bytes (like for a magic number).
This PR adds a special branch on PipelineData::ExternalStream with a
streaming version of starts_with.
# User-Facing Changes
Opening large files and running bytes starts-with on them will not take
a long time.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# Drawbacks
Streaming checking is more complicated, and there may be bugs. I tested
it with multiple chunks with string data and binary data and it seems to
work alright up to 8k and over bytes, though.
The existing `operate` method still exists because the way it handles
cell paths and values is complicated. This causes some "code
duplication", or at least some intent duplication, between the value
code and the streaming code. This might be worthwhile considering the
performance gains (approaching infinity on larger inputs).
Another thing to consider is that my ExternalStream branch considers
string data as valid input. The operate branch only parses Binary
values, so it would fail. `open` is kind of unpredictable on whether it
returns string data or binary data, even when passing `--raw`. I think
this can be a problem but not really one I'm trying to tackle in this
PR, so, it's worth considering.
# Description
My terminal emulator happens to be called `st`
(https://st.suckless.org/) which breaks these tests for me
_(Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.)_
_(Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.)_
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fixes#8002, which expands ranges `1..3` to expand to array-like when
saving and converting to json. Now,
```
> 1..3 | save foo.json
# foo.json
[
1,
2,
3
]
> 1..3 | to json
[
1,
2,
3
]
```
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [X] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [X] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- [X] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Fixes#7615
# Description
When calling external commands, we create a table from the pipeline data
to handle external commands expecting paginated input. When a binary
value is made into a table, we convert the vector of bytes representing
the binary bytes into a pretty formatted string. This results in the
pretty formatted string being sent to external commands instead of the
actual binary bytes. By checking whether the stdout of the call is being
redirected, we can decide whether to send the raw binary bytes or the
pretty formatted output when creating a table command.
# User-Facing Changes
When passing binary values to external commands, the external command
will receive the actual bytes instead of the pretty printed string. Use
cases that don't involve piping a binary value into an external command
are unchanged.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
cargo fmt --all -- --check to check standard code formatting (cargo fmt
--all applies these changes)
cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect to check that you're using the standard code
style
cargo test --workspace to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# NOTE
Clean duplicate of #7825
Sorry about all the mess guys... I got confuse with GitHub and and ended
up mankind that mess.
This the same code I just cleaned the commits.
# Description
Progress bar implementation for the `cp` command. Now if the flag `-p`
or `--progress` is set, then the user will be able to see the progress
of the file or files being copy
# User-Facing Changes
A new flag (`--progress` `-p`) was added to the `cp` command
Examples:
```nu
cp -p test_file.txt test_folder_1\
cp -r -p test_folder\* test_folder_1\
cp -r -p -i test_folder\* test_folder_1\
```
## Notes
- The progress bar uses `std::io::{Read, Write}` instead of
`std::fs::copy` to get the progress. that means that when the progress
bar is used the copy process might be a bit slower.
- Progress bar for symbolic links TBD: Since symbolic links are usually
very light I think is not worth it to duplicate the function
`copy_symlink` just to add a progress bar that will be so fast to the
point is not needed, but.. for consistency purposes we might need to
added it, In that case I would have to pass the variable `progress` by
parameter (to not duplicate code unnecessary). If I do that i would have
to pass the `progress` var to every function to respect `copy_impl: impl
Fn(PathBuf, PathBuf, Span)`. Please let me know if this is not clear :p
---------
Co-authored-by: Reilly Wood <reilly.wood@icloud.com>
# Description
Fixes: #8136
# User-Facing Changes
The following command
```
let VAR = ^cat non-existing-file; echo "failed"
```
will no longer output `failed` message
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
---------
Co-authored-by: Reilly Wood <reilly.wood@icloud.com>
# Description
closes#8153
This PR allows different types of lists, like `list<string>` and
`list<any>` to be appended with the `++=` operator.
## Before
```
mut args = [ hello ("hello" | path join world)]
$args ++= [ foo bar ]
Error: nu::parser::type_mismatch (link)
× Type mismatch during operation.
╭─[entry #2:1:1]
1 │ $args ++= [ foo bar ]
· ─────┬─────
· ╰── expected list<any>, found list<string>
╰────
```
## After
```
mut args = [ hello ("hello" | path join world)]
$args ++= [ foo bar ]
$args
╭───┬─────────────╮
│ 0 │ hello │
│ 1 │ hello\world │
│ 2 │ foo │
│ 3 │ bar │
╰───┴─────────────╯
```
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR fixes a bug where a default list in a custom command parameter
wasn't being accepted. The reason was because it was comparing specific
types of list like `list<any>` != `list<string>`. So, this PR attempts
to fix that.
### Before
```
> def f [param: list = [one]] { echo $param }
Error: nu::parser::assignment_mismatch (link)
× Default value wrong type
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ def f [param: list = [one]] { echo $param }
· ──┬──
· ╰── default value not list<any>
╰────
```
### After
```
> def f [param: list = [one]] {echo $param}
> f
╭───┬─────╮
│ 0 │ one │
╰───┴─────╯
```
closes#8092
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Enhancement of new `fill` command (#7846) to handle content including
ANSI escape codes for formatting or multi-code-point Unicode grapheme
clusters.
In both of these cases, the content is (many) bytes longer than its
visible length, and `fill` was counting the extra bytes so not adding
enough fill characters.
# Description
This script:
```rust
# the teacher emoji `\u{1F9D1}\u{200D}\u{1F3EB}` is 3 code points, but only 1 print position wide.
echo "This output should be 3 print positions wide, with leading and trailing `+`"
$"\u{1F9D1}\u{200D}\u{1F3EB}" | fill -c "+" -w 3 -a "c"
echo "This output should be 3 print positions wide, with leading and trailing `+`"
$"(ansi green)a(ansi reset)" | fill -c "+" -w 3 -a c
echo ""
```
Was producing this output:
```rust
This output should be 3 print positions wide, with leading and trailing `+`
🧑🏫
This output should be 3 print positions wide, with leading and trailing `+`
a
```
After this PR, it produces this output:
```rust
This output should be 3 print positions wide, with leading and trailing `+`
+🧑🏫+
This output should be 3 print positions wide, with leading and trailing `+`
+a+
```
# User-Facing Changes
Users may have to undo fixes they may have introduced to work around the
former behavior. I have one such in my prompt string that I can now
revert.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
-- Done
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [x] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- [x] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
`fill` command not documented in the book, and it still talks about `str
lpad/rpad`. I'll fix.
Note added dependency on a new library `print-positions`, which is an
iterator that yields a complete print position (cluster + Ansi sequence)
per call. Should this be vendored?
close#8033
So as I said they suppose to be there;
I've basically added a change of style if --collapse is used.
PS: I guess it's worth to add tests so hold on if you'll plan to merge
it.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
# Description
This does two fixes for bare words:
* It changes completions for paths to wrap a path with backticks if it
starts with a number. This helps bare words that start with numbers be
separate from unit values
* It allows bare words wrapped with backticks to be the name of a
command. Backtick values in command positions are no longer treated as
strings
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR fixes a bug that occurs if you pass `rename --column` and empty
list like `ls | rename -c []`.
## Before
```
> ls | rename -c []
thread 'main' panicked at 'index out of bounds: the len is 0 but the index is 0', crates\nu-command\src\filters\rename.rs:110:15
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
```
## After
```
> ls | rename -c []
Error: nu:🐚:type_mismatch (link)
× Type mismatch.
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ ls | rename -c []
· ─┬
· ╰── The list cannot be empty and must contain only two values: the column's name and its replacement value
╰────
```
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
As title, I found this feature is useful to me too :)
Closes: #8039
# User-Facing Changes
```
❯ 3 * "ab"
ababab
❯ 3 * [1 2 3]
╭───┬───╮
│ 0 │ 1 │
│ 1 │ 2 │
│ 2 │ 3 │
│ 3 │ 1 │
│ 4 │ 2 │
│ 5 │ 3 │
│ 6 │ 1 │
│ 7 │ 2 │
│ 8 │ 3 │
╰───┴───╯
```
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
From nushell 0.8 philosophy:
https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io/blob/main/contributor-book/philosophy_0_80.md#core-categories
> The following categories should be moved to plugins:
Uncommon format support
So this pr is trying to move following commands to plugin:
- [X] from eml
- [x] from ics
- [x] from ini
- [x] from vcf
And we can have a new plugin handles for these formatting, currently
it's implemented here:
https://github.com/WindSoilder/nu_plugin_format
The command usage should be the same to original command.
If it's ok, the plugin can support more formats like
[parquet](https://github.com/fdncred/nu_plugin_from_parquet), or [EDN
format](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/6415), or something
else.
Just create a draft pr to show what's the blueprint looks like, and is
it a good direction to move forward?
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Improve error when `str replace <pattern>` detects a problem with
<pattern>.
# User-Facing Changes
New "Incorrect value" error:
```
〉 'C:\Users\kubouch' | str replace 'C:\Users' 'foo'
Error: nu:🐚:incorrect_value (link)
× Incorrect value.
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ 'C:\Users\kubouch' | str replace 'C:\Users' 'foo'
· ─────┬────
· ╰── Regex error: Parsing error at position 4: Invalid hex escape
╰────
```
We could fruitfully replace some of the current uses of
`ShellError::UnsupportedInput` with this error. 'Incorrect value' is
different from 'wrong type'
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
* none added / changed.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- [x] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- [x] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
This PR makes `++` (the append operator) work with strings and binary
values. Can now do things like:
```bash
〉"a" ++ "b"
ab
〉0x[01 02] ++ 0x[03]
Length: 3 (0x3) bytes | printable whitespace ascii_other non_ascii
00000000: 01 02 03 •••
```
Closes#8015.
# Description
Fixes#7864. Haven't removed redundant code yet; and there's also a
weird visual bug, but I'm not sure if that's the fault of this PR or
just a quirk of how tabling works:
```
/home/gabriel/CodingProjects/nushell〉ping 1.1.1.1 | parse -r '(?P<num>\d+) ttl' 01/27/2023 11:28:31 AM
╭───┬─────╮
│ # │ num │
├───┼─────┤
│ 0 │ 1 │
│ 1 │ 2 │
╰───┴─────╯
╭───┬─────╮
│ # │ num │
├───┼─────┤
│ 2 │ 3 │
╰───┴─────╯
╭───┬─────╮
│ # │ num │
├───┼─────┤
│ 3 │ 4 │
│ 4 │ 5 │
╰───┴─────╯
╭───┬─────╮
│ # │ num │
├───┼─────┤
│ 5 │ 6 │
│ 6 │ 7 │
╰───┴─────╯
^C
/home/gabriel/CodingProjects/nushell〉 01/27/2023 11:28:59 AM
```
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR tries to resolve the overloading issue by going back to our
original naming convention for dataframes. So, this PR renames all
dataframe commands with a prefix of `dfr`. Some commands like `open-df`
were renamed to `dfr open` and things like `into df` were renamed `dfr
into-df`. I'm sure we can optimize naming a bit, but it seems to compile
now.
# User-Facing Changes
All dataframe commands are prefixed with dfr.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Hi there,
The case which was presented must be addressed.
But I did not test it properly...
I'd encourage you to do so.
Take care.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
# Description
Fix#7953
Fix flags on `du` which should be positive and added some tests.
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Functionality added by @nabacg in #7961 already
h/t @YuriGeinishO for the example in #7933Closes#7933
# User-Facing Changes
None
# Tests + Formatting
+1 end to end example
# Description
`help <keyword>` will now search for `<keyword>` in aliases first, then
commands. This matches the way the parser resolves aliases before
commands.
# User-Facing Changes
Not significant
# Description
_(Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.)_
I opened this PR to unify the run command method. It's mainly to improve
consistency across the tree.
# User-Facing Changes
None.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Remove `--numbered` from ~~`for`~~, `each`, `par-each`, `reduce` and
`each while`. These all provide indexes (numbering) via the optional
second param to their closures.
EDIT: Closes#6986.
# User-Facing Changes
Every command that had `--numbered` listed as "deprecated" in their help
docs is affected.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Fixes: #7874
It's because `do -i` doesn't handles `Pipeline::ListStream`
data(especially there is Value::Error inside the stream)
To fix it, we need to iterate through `ListStream`, check if there is
`Value::Error`. If so, just returns `Pipeline::empty()`
# User-Facing Changes
```
help commands | find arg | get search_terms | do -i { ansi strip }
```
No longer raises error.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fixes#7301.
# User-Facing Changes
`return` can now be used in scripts without explicit `def main`.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. (I'm not sure how to
test this.)
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Fixes#7693
On `cp` commands there were two error which pass error message with
invalid detail about source and destination files . there error were for
Not exist file and Permission denied .
Examples:
Before :
Copy `source_file_valid` to `destination_invalid_dir` throw this error ;
`copy file "/source_file_valid" failed: No such file or directory (os
error 2) `
After this PR it will throw this if destination will be invalid :
`copying to destination "/destination_invalid_dir" failed: No such file
or directory (os error 2) `
it was for Permission denied too .
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Holderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Fixes: #7828
We delegate to `save` command to finish redirection, then if it runs to
success, the relative exit code is set to 0. To fix it, in redirection
context, we take exit_code stream before sending it to `save` command,
than manually returns `PipelineData::ExternalStream` to make nushell set
relative code properly.
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Lint: `clippy::uninlined_format_args`
More readable in most situations.
(May be slightly confusing for modifier format strings
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/index.html#formatting-parameters)
Alternative to #7865
# User-Facing Changes
None intended
# Tests + Formatting
(Ran `cargo +stable clippy --fix --workspace -- -A clippy::all -D
clippy::uninlined_format_args` to achieve this. Depends on Rust `1.67`)
# Description
Fixes#7886.
```
/home/gabriel/CodingProjects/nushell〉'A|B|C' | parse -r '(\w)\|(\w)\|(\w)' 01/29/2023 01:08:29 PM
╭───┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────╮
│ # │ capture0 │ capture1 │ capture2 │
├───┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┤
│ 0 │ A │ B │ C │
╰───┴──────────┴──────────┴──────────╯
```
# User-Facing Changes
Columns automatically named by `parse -r` are now 0-indexec and
uncapitalised.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
I tackled some of the disabled `FIXME`/`#[ignore]` tests. Most were
straightforward to re-enable, and a few of them did not deserve to be
re-enabled.
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Add flags for filtering the output of `glob` by file type. I find myself
occasionally wanting to do this, and getting a file's
[file_type](https://docs.rs/wax/latest/wax/struct.WalkEntry.html#method.file_type)
is presumably fast to do as it doesn't have to go through the fallible
metadata method.
The design of the signature does concern me; it's not as readable as a
filter or "include" type list would be. They have to be filtered one by
one, which can be annoying if you only want files `-D -S`, or only want
folders `-F -S`, or only want symlinks `--butwhy?`. I considered
SyntaxShape::Keyword for this but I'll just defer to comments on this PR
if they pop up.
I'd also like to bring up performance since including these flags
technically incurs a `.filter` penalty on all glob calls, which could be
optimized out if we added a branch for the no-filters case. But in
reality I'd expect the file system to be the bottleneck and the flags to
be pretty branch predictor friendly, so eh
# User-Facing Changes
Three new flags when using `glob` and a slightly more cluttered help
page. No breaking changes, I hope.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
fix#7858
Once again we here 😞
~~I am thinking is there some files with not flat structure we could use
to test table -e?
I mean it is clear it was a while ago were we had to create at least
some tests.
Do you have anything in mind (or maybe commands which is consistent
across systems)?~~
Take care
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
Currently, if you run `do -i { sudo apt upgrade }`, stdin gets swallowed
and doesn't let you respond yes/no to the upgrade question. This PR
fixes that, but runs into https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7205
so the tests fail.
Signed-off-by: Alex Saveau <saveau.alexandre@gmail.com>
# Description
Fixes#7774. The functionality should be the same as feeding all
`PipelineDate::Value(Value::String(_,_),_)` into `lines` before putting
it into `find`.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Nothing changed, just fix some typos
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Holderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Closes: #7590
# User-Facing Changes
So the following command
```
1..100 | each { |i| sleep 400ms; $i} | save --raw -f output.txt
```
Will stream data to `output.txt`
But I'm note sure how to make a proper test for it, so I leave with no
new test cases..
Also rename from `string_binary_list_value_to_bytes ` to
`value_to_bytes` to accepts more Value type.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
I have changed `assert!(a == b)` calls to `assert_eq!(a, b)`, which give
better error messages. Similarly for `assert!(a != b)` and
`assert_ne!(a, b)`. Basically all instances were comparing primitives
(string slices or integers), so there is no loss of generality from
special-case macros,
I have also fixed a number of typos in comments, variable names, and a
few user-facing messages.
