# Description
Where appropriate, this PR replaces instances of
`Value::get_data_by_key` and `Value::follow_cell_path` with
`Record::get`. This avoids some unnecessary clones and simplifies the
code in some places.
# Description
Since #10841 the goal is to remove the implementation details of
`Record` outside of core operations.
To this end use Record iterators and map-like accessors in a bunch of
places. In this PR I try to collect the boring cases where I don't
expect any dramatic performance impacts or don't have doubts about the
correctness afterwards
- Use checked record construction in `nu_plugin_example`
- Use `Record::into_iter` in `columns`
- Use `Record` iterators in `headers` cmd
- Use explicit record iterators in `split-by`
- Use `Record::into_iter` in variable completions
- Use `Record::values` iterator in `into sqlite`
- Use `Record::iter_mut` for-loop in `default`
- Change `nu_engine::nonexistent_column` to use iterator
- Use `Record::columns` iter in `nu-cmd-base`
- Use `Record::get_index` in `nu-command/network/http`
- Use `Record.insert()` in `merge`
- Refactor `move` to use encapsulated record API
- Use `Record.insert()` in `explore`
- Use proper `Record` API in `explore`
- Remove defensiveness around record in `explore`
- Use encapsulated record API in more `nu-command`s
# User-Facing Changes
None intentional
# Tests + Formatting
(-)
I haven't tested cause can't reproduce, but the issue very likely was
related to a emojies. (I mean I probably could but ....)
Could you try it @fdncred?
fix#10560
Reverts nushell/nushell#10596
Using the long option in examples is going to be confusing as it makes
the reader think the long option is required. It also isn't idiomatic
Nushell.
The examples should be copy-paste-able as idiomatic Nushell, so as such
we shouldn't expand them to the long flag name.
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Long options are preferable over short ones for documentation.
This PR ports some command examples to exclusively use long options.
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
✅
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
Remove code for 2 no-longer-used configuration options in `explore`:
`explore.config.cursor_color` and `explore.config.border_color`.
Think I made these unnecessary in
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/10533 and
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/10270 but missed this code, my
bad. The `explore` config code is a little hard to follow because it
does so many key lookups in hashmaps.
This PR removes the `line_head_top`, `line_head_bottom`, `line_shift`,
and `line_index` configuration options from `explore`. These were
previously used to control whether the horizontal+vertical lines in this
`ls | explore -i` screenshot would be displayed:
Now, all lines are displayed (same as the previous default config
values) and this is no longer configurable.
## Context
I'm continuing to chip away at `explore` when I have time. I have a
long-term goal to make `explore` simpler for users+developers. For now
I'm mostly making small incremental changes where I find underused
functionality+configuration and remove it; hopefully eventually this
will make it easier to make larger changes.
I found these specific config options a little hard to understand when
reading `explore` code, and when reading `config.nu` as a user their
behaviour+naming is not obvious. I also think that in the long term,
`explore` styling should inherit most styling from `table` instead of
having its own styling system.
The value rendering code in explore is _very_ flexible; values can be
rendered with orientation `Top`, `Left`, `Bottom`, or `Right`. The
default is `Top` for tables (header at the top) and `Left` for records
(header on the left).
This PR removes `Bottom` and `Right`; they are largely untested,
probably used by nobody, and they complicate the rendering code.
## Testing Performed
I've manually confirmed that tables and records still render the same
ass before, and the `t`/transpose command still works.
More incremental `explore` improvements!
This PR removes the `show_cursor` config from the `explore` command, in
favour of always using the background colour to highlight the selected
cell. I believe this is a better default and I'd like to remove the
`show_cursor` functionality entirely as part of the effort to simplify
`explore`.
The style for selected cells is still configurable. I went with light
blue for the default background colour, it looks OK to me.
## Before:
## After:
This PR removes the `explore.try.border_color` config item, and instead
always uses the `separator` colour (the one used for regular table
borders) from the current theme.
The PR also removes some unused `explore.config` bits from the default
config (I missed this in https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/10259).
### Future Work
This PR is intentionally small, I want to confirm that I'm on the right
track before I rip out more colour config from `explore`. If all goes
well, expect more PRs like this soon.
### Testing
I confirmed that this works by changing my `separator` colour in
`config.nu`, and also confirmed that nothing breaks if a user still has
`explore.try.border_color` in their config.
Currently, `ctrl+z` is the command to exit `explore` no matter where you
are in the UI. IMO this is a bit unintuitive since that's usually used
to suspend a process.
After this change, `ctrl+c`, `ctrl+d`, and `ctrl+q` all work to exit
`explore`.
I think these are all shortcuts that users might try when attempting to
exit `explore`, and I think we might as well handle them all.
More trimming of underused `explore` functionality.
The `explore` command has subcommands that can be run like `:config` or
`:try` or whatnot. This PR removes the `:config`, `:show-config`, and
`:tweak` commands which are all for viewing+modifying config.
These are interesting commands and they were cool experiments, but
ultimately I don't think they fit with our plans for a simplified
`explore`. They'd need a lot more polish if we want to keep them and I
don't think we do. Happy to discuss if I've missed a good reason to keep
these.
cc @fdncred
Removing 2 underused config options from `explore`.
`show_banner` controls whether `For help type :help"` is shown in the
message area when `explore is first launched. I don't think there's any
good reason not to show it, it's not a modal dialog or anything.
`exit_esc` controls whether to exit `explore` when `esc` is pressed and
we can't "go up" any further (or at least that's what it's supposed to
do, looking at the code I'm not so sure). IMO we don't need to make this
kind of basic interaction configurable unless there's a really good
reason.
## Context
`explore` is complicated and we want to overhaul its design. It will be
easier to make meaningful changes if `explore` is a little slimmer
first, so I'm trying to pare back unused/underused code and config as a
starting point.
I'm gonna be making more PRs like this, I'll try to keep them
small+self-contained.
# Description
This updates most crates to 0.27 `crossterm`.
To do so we need the most recent `ratatui`
`reedline` can now update as well.
See https://github.com/nushell/reedline/pull/625
Sadly this introduces some crate duplication again as there are some
other dependency updates.
Furthermore we have another crate depending on 0.26.1 crossterm
(`comfy-table` that some how gets pulled in by polars)
# User-Facing Changes
2 additional mouse events detected by `input listen`
# Tests + Formatting
None
# Description
As part of the refactor to split spans off of Value, this moves to using
helper functions to create values, and using `.span()` instead of
matching span out of Value directly.
Hoping to get a few more helping hands to finish this, as there are a
lot of commands to update :)
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: WindSoilder <windsoilder@outlook.com>
related to
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7819
# Description
this PR does not quite address
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7819 because it does not
implement configurable keybindings for `explore` but rather only adds
support for Vim-like motions *out of the box*.
# User-Facing Changes
in *view* and *cursor* modes,
- `h`, `j`, `k` and `l` give standard Qwerty-based Vim motions
- `g` and `G` go to the top and the end respectively
- `u` and `d` scroll up and down
> **Note**
> the bindings do not support the use of modifiers for now, so it's not
`c-u` and `c-d` which scroll pages but rather `u` and `d`
# Tests + Formatting
# After Submitting
# Description
This doesn't really do much that the user could see, but it helps get us
ready to do the steps of the refactor to split the span off of Value, so
that values can be spanless. This allows us to have top-level values
that can hold both a Value and a Span, without requiring that all values
have them.
We expect to see significant memory reduction by removing so many
unnecessary spans from values. For example, a table of 100,000 rows and
5 columns would have a savings of ~8megs in just spans that are almost
always duplicated.
# User-Facing Changes
Nothing yet
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
This PR creates a new `Record` type to reduce duplicate code and
possibly bugs as well. (This is an edited version of #9648.)
- `Record` implements `FromIterator` and `IntoIterator` and so can be
iterated over or collected into. For example, this helps with
conversions to and from (hash)maps. (Also, no more
`cols.iter().zip(vals)`!)
- `Record` has a `push(col, val)` function to help insure that the
number of columns is equal to the number of values. I caught a few
potential bugs thanks to this (e.g. in the `ls` command).
- Finally, this PR also adds a `record!` macro that helps simplify
record creation. It is used like so:
```rust
record! {
"key1" => some_value,
"key2" => Value::string("text", span),
"key3" => Value::int(optional_int.unwrap_or(0), span),
"key4" => Value::bool(config.setting, span),
}
```
Since macros hinder formatting, etc., the right hand side values should
be relatively short and sweet like the examples above.
Where possible, prefer `record!` or `.collect()` on an iterator instead
of multiple `Record::push`s, since the first two automatically set the
record capacity and do less work overall.
# User-Facing Changes
Besides the changes in `nu-protocol` the only other breaking changes are
to `nu-table::{ExpandedTable::build_map, JustTable::kv_table}`.
# Description
This PR bumps nushell from release version 0.84.0 to dev version 0.84.1.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
This PR fixes the semver issues with `strip-ansi-escapes` and updates it
to 0.2.0 as well as updating to the latest reedline which just landed an
identical patch.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
This PR updates `strip-ansi-escapes` to support their new API. This also
updates nushell to the latest reedline after the same fix
https://github.com/nushell/reedline/pull/617closes#9957
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
fix#9796
Sorry that you've had the issues.
I've actually encountered them yesterday too (seems like they have
appeared after some refactoring in the middle) but was not able to fix
that rapid.
Created a bunch of tests.
cc: @fdncred
Note:
This option will be certainly slower then a default ones. (could be
fixed but ... maybe later).
Maybe it shall be cited somewhere.
PS: Haven't tested on a wrapped/expanded tables.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
Reverts nushell/nushell#9796
This is just draft since we're seeing some issues with the latest fixes
to table drawing that just landed with #9796. We're hoping to get these
fixed, but if we're not able to fix them before the next release, we'll
need to revert (hence this PR, just in case we need it).
A patch to play with.
Need to make a few tests after all.
The question is what shall be done with `table.mode = none`, as it has
no borders.
```nu
$env.config.table.move_header = true
```
cc: @fdncred
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
# Description
This bumps nushell to the dev version of 0.83.1 and updates the default
config files with the proper version.
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
# After Submitting
# Description
Bump 0.83
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
This PR ensures functions exist to extract and create each and every
`Value` case. It also renames `Value::boolean` to `Value::bool` to match
`Value::test_bool`, `Value::as_bool`, and `Value::Bool`. Similarly,
`Value::as_integer` was renamed to `Value::as_int` to be consistent with
`Value::int`, `Value::test_int`, and `Value::Int`. These two renames can
be undone if necessary.
# User-Facing Changes
No user facing changes, but two public functions were renamed which may
affect downstream dependents.
close#9665
It could be good to run it though and see if it does what indented.
(I did but cause there's no test coverage for it it's better to recheck)
PS: Surely... this cursor logic much more complex then it shall be ...
the method names ....
cc: @fdncred
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
# Description
`tabled`/`papergrid` already use `ansi-str 0.8` while `nu-explore`
itself was still depending on `0.7`. Single fix necessary to adapt to
the new API.
cc @zhiburt
# User-Facing Changes
None
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
Fixes: #8479
Co-authored-by: Jan9103 <55753387+Jan9103@users.noreply.github.com>
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Jan9103 <55753387+Jan9103@users.noreply.github.com>
# Checklist
- `nu-ansi-term` remains the same
- [x] `reedline` is released and updated
- [x] release scripts are updated for `nu-cmd-base`
- [x] info blog post is online
- [ ] release notes are ready
This PR reverts https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9391
We try not to revert PRs like this, though after discussion with the
Nushell team, we decided to revert this one.
The main reason is that Nushell, as a codebase, isn't ready for these
kinds of optimisations. It's in the part of the development cycle where
our main focus should be on improving the algorithms inside of Nushell
itself. Once we have matured our algorithms, then we can look for
opportunities to switch out technologies we're using for alternate
forms.
Much of Nushell still has lots of opportunities for tuning the codebase,
paying down technical debt, and making the codebase generally cleaner
and more robust. This should be the focus. Performance improvements
should flow out of that work.
Said another, optimisation that isn't part of tuning the codebase is
premature at this stage. We need to focus on doing the hard work of
making the engine, parser, etc better.
# User-Facing Changes
Reverts the HashMap -> ahash change.
cc @FilipAndersson245
