~~I happened to be reviewing our uses of `thread::spawn()` and came to
the conclusion that we're spawning a thread unnecessarily for plugin
calls. We were basically doing this:~~
~~1. Spawn a background thread to send data to the plugin over stdin~~
~~2. Immediately do a blocking wait for the plugin's response~~
~~As far as I can tell, there's no point in spawning a thread for 1 (and
it may harm error handling) given that we're blocking right away for the
response.~~
**Update:** the logic is correct, as confirmed by @WindSoilder
[here](https://discord.com/channels/601130461678272522/855947301380947968/1072743414795350037).
I've added a comment explaining the thread usage.
Hi there,
The case which was presented must be addressed.
But I did not test it properly...
I'd encourage you to do so.
Take care.
---------
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
# Description
I factorized the HTTP client from HTTP Post and HTTP Get into a common
file, in order to reduce the code duplication. This PR has to be looked
commit by commit.
# User-Facing Changes
A new option has been to HTTP Get: `--insecure`. This option was already
available for HTTP Post command.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
This PR is an incremental improvement to `ls` when it encounters
'illegal' file paths on Windows. Related:
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7869
## Context
We have trouble with filenames that Windows doesn't like, for example
[files with a `.` at the end of their
name](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/naming-a-file#naming-conventions).
To make a long story short, the Rust stdlib and several Win32 APIs will
choke if asked to do something with an illegal filepath. This is a
problem because files with illegal names can be created via other means
(like `touch foo.` in MINGW bash).
Previously `ls` would fail completely in a directory with a bad file,
which isn't great. After this PR, bad files get included in `ls` results
but without any metadata columns. This is not quite where we want to be
— eventually we want to be able to display file metadata for _all_ files
(even naughty ones) — but it's an improvement on the status quo.
### Before
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26268125/217340906-26afd6d3-0ec3-454f-bed4-2bfcc9cf3a2f.png)
### After
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26268125/217344373-6b81cc39-50b8-4390-8061-3e570502a784.png)
## Future work
Try the workarounds @ChrisDenton suggested:
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7869#issuecomment-1405977221
Some info on verbatim paths:
https://users.rust-lang.org/t/understanding-windows-paths/58583
## Testing
I tried to write a test for this, but it looks like our testing sandbox
can't create files with illegal filenames.😔 Here's the code in case it
proves useful someday:
```rust
/// Windows doesn't like certain file names, like file names ending with a period:
/// https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/naming-a-file#naming-conventions
/// However, those files can still be created with tools like MINGW bash.
/// We may not be able to get full metadata for those files, but we should test that we can at least include them in ls results
#[test]
#[cfg(windows)]
fn can_list_illegal_files() {
Playground::setup("ls_test_all_columns", |dirs, sandbox| {
sandbox.with_files(vec![
EmptyFile("foo"),
EmptyFile("bar."),
EmptyFile("baz"),
]);
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
"ls | length"
);
assert_eq!(actual.out, "3");
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
"ls"
);
assert_eq!(actual.out, "1");
let actual = nu!(
cwd: dirs.test(),
"ls | where {|f| $f.name | str ends-with 'bar.'} | length"
);
assert_eq!(actual.out, "1");
})
}
```
I noticed that `$nu.loginshell-path` was using backward *and* forward
slashes on Windows.
#### Before
`C:\Users\reill\AppData\Roaming\nushell/login.nu`
#### After
`C:\Users\reill\AppData\Roaming\nushell\login.nu`
Fixed up 2 other similar issues while I was at it.
# Description
Fix#7953
Fix flags on `du` which should be positive and added some tests.
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR will help report a bad date that can't be converted where the
error message says `* Unable to parse datetime`. This is helpful when
you're converting a big table and it fails somewhere that you really
can't see. I put it in `[]` so that when it's null, you can see that
there should be something there.
Before:
```
> 'Tue 1 0' | into datetime
Error: nu:🐚:datetime_parse_error (link)
× Unable to parse datetime
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ 'Tue 1 0' | into datetime
· ────┬────
· ╰── datetime parsing failed
╰────
help: Examples of supported inputs:
* "5 pm"
* "2020/12/4"
* "2020.12.04 22:10 +2"
* "2020-04-12 22:10:57 +02:00"
* "2020-04-12T22:10:57.213231+02:00"
* "Tue, 1 Jul 2003 10:52:37 +0200"
```
After:
```
> 'Tue 1 0' | into datetime
Error: nu:🐚:datetime_parse_error (link)
× Unable to parse datetime: [Tue 1 0].
╭─[entry #4:1:1]
1 │ 'Tue 1 0' | into datetime
· ────┬────
· ╰── datetime parsing failed
╰────
help: Examples of supported inputs:
* "5 pm"
* "2020/12/4"
* "2020.12.04 22:10 +2"
* "2020-04-12 22:10:57 +02:00"
* "2020-04-12T22:10:57.213231+02:00"
* "Tue, 1 Jul 2003 10:52:37 +0200"
```
# User-Facing Changes
New format for the error message.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Added fix for #7970 - Upgraded toml crate version from version from
0.5.8 to 0.7.1 for package nu-command
# Tests + Formatting
Added two tests to support the toml upgrade.
- `cargo test --package nu-command --lib -- formats::from::toml::tests
--nocapture`
Executed all tests.
- `cargo test --workspace`
---------
Co-authored-by: Nitin Londhe <nitin.londhe@genmills.com>
# Description
I just updated a few examples linked to math commands.
I used the character of pi where possible, and I updated one example
since the example was misleading IMO (for the tau command).
# User-Facing Changes
Only examples have been updated, there is no real user changes.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Functionality added by @nabacg in #7961 already
h/t @YuriGeinishO for the example in #7933Closes#7933
# User-Facing Changes
None
# Tests + Formatting
+1 end to end example
# Description
`help <keyword>` will now search for `<keyword>` in aliases first, then
commands. This matches the way the parser resolves aliases before
commands.
# User-Facing Changes
Not significant
As usual, Rust optimizes a bit less if more function boundaries are
introduced.
However, in my opinion, being able to comprehend the decision tree beats
a couple of string allocations.
# Description
_(Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.)_
I opened this PR to unify the run command method. It's mainly to improve
consistency across the tree.
# User-Facing Changes
None.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fix for #7933. I've read through code and found the obvious difference
between them, where `each` command calls eval_with_early_return
e89e734ca2/crates/nu-command/src/filters/each.rs (L158),
while `reduce` command uses eval_block
e89e734ca2/crates/nu-command/src/filters/reduce.rs (L143)
That simple change seems to resolve the problem.
# User-Facing Changes
Allows the use of `return` in reduce closures, as per example in #7933
description. Arguably it's restoring consistency, than changing user
interface.
```
[1, 2] | reduce --fold null { |it, state|
::: if $it == 1 {
::: return 10
::: }
::: return ($it * $state)
::: }
20
```
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- [x] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(cargo fmt --all applies these changes)
- [x] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- [x] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Closes#6768.
BEFORE:
```
〉{ foo: [{a:1, b:2},2,3,4,5] }
╭─────┬────────────────╮
│ foo │ [table 5 rows] │
╰─────┴────────────────╯
```
AFTER:
```
〉{ foo: [{a:1, b:2},2,3,4,5] }
╭─────┬────────────────╮
│ foo │ [list 5 items] │
╰─────┴────────────────╯
```
# User-Facing Changes
See above.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Remove `--numbered` from ~~`for`~~, `each`, `par-each`, `reduce` and
`each while`. These all provide indexes (numbering) via the optional
second param to their closures.
EDIT: Closes#6986.
# User-Facing Changes
Every command that had `--numbered` listed as "deprecated" in their help
docs is affected.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Broken after #7415
We currently don't try to build the benchmarks in the CI thus this
slipped through the cracks.
# User-Facing Changes
None
# Tests + Formatting
Compile check is currently missing, but working towards that
# Description
This cleans up the `registry query` output so that it's more usable.
Before:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/343840/216129871-7cadcb68-a289-4e29-8857-6fc20b6a57f7.png)
After:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/343840/216129814-70021706-f58a-4647-b5f1-a0e30f5fae16.png)
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fixes: #7874
It's because `do -i` doesn't handles `Pipeline::ListStream`
data(especially there is Value::Error inside the stream)
To fix it, we need to iterate through `ListStream`, check if there is
`Value::Error`. If so, just returns `Pipeline::empty()`
# User-Facing Changes
```
help commands | find arg | get search_terms | do -i { ansi strip }
```
No longer raises error.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Use the `use_ansi_coloring` configuration point to decide whether the
output will have colors, where possible.
Related: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7676
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/749306/215435128-cbf5f4b8-aafa-4718-bf23-3f0fd19b63ba.png)
- [x] `grid -c`
- [x] `perf()`
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fixes#7301.
# User-Facing Changes
`return` can now be used in scripts without explicit `def main`.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. (I'm not sure how to
test this.)
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Fixes#7693
On `cp` commands there were two error which pass error message with
invalid detail about source and destination files . there error were for
Not exist file and Permission denied .
Examples:
Before :
Copy `source_file_valid` to `destination_invalid_dir` throw this error ;
`copy file "/source_file_valid" failed: No such file or directory (os
error 2) `
After this PR it will throw this if destination will be invalid :
`copying to destination "/destination_invalid_dir" failed: No such file
or directory (os error 2) `
it was for Permission denied too .
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Holderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Use newer reedline that fixes the code completion crash in
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7885 by subtracting from the
insertion point if the suggestion is shorter than the editor span.
Closes https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7885
Depends on https://github.com/nushell/reedline/pull/534
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
Tested in reedline.
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
---------
Co-authored-by: sholderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Fixes: #7828
We delegate to `save` command to finish redirection, then if it runs to
success, the relative exit code is set to 0. To fix it, in redirection
context, we take exit_code stream before sending it to `save` command,
than manually returns `PipelineData::ExternalStream` to make nushell set
relative code properly.
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Avoids duplication of `windows` crate and friends as it updates to the
most recent `windows 0.44` version.
# User-Facing Changes
None intended
# Description
Lint: `clippy::uninlined_format_args`
More readable in most situations.
(May be slightly confusing for modifier format strings
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/index.html#formatting-parameters)
Alternative to #7865
# User-Facing Changes
None intended
# Tests + Formatting
(Ran `cargo +stable clippy --fix --workspace -- -A clippy::all -D
clippy::uninlined_format_args` to achieve this. Depends on Rust `1.67`)
# Description
Just a couple clippy-recommended simplifications.
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Let's check before shipping `reedline 0.15`
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.