I wanted to get the infrastructure in place for starters for our
*nu-cmd-extra* crate...
The plan is to put inside here the following commands...
* bits
* bytes
* math
I thought it would be easier to do one at a time as well as get the
nu-cmd-extra crate out there on crates.io
for this upcoming release...
Once this lands the infrastructure will be in place to move over the
other noted commands for now...
And then add other stuff we do NOT want to be in 1.0.
# Description
Change installation context of the windows terminal profile to
`per-user` from `per-system`.
This change is made because installation validation fails in winget ci
while executing custom action to replace the installation path of
`nu.exe` and `nu.ico` in the windows terminal profile file.
Refer discussions in #5812 and
https://github.com/microsoft/winget-pkgs/pull/106977
- Installation path of the windows terminal profile is changed as below:
- from: `C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows Terminal\Fragments\nu\nu.json`
- to: `C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows
Terminal\Fragments\nu\nu.json`
- Custom action to replace the installation path of `nu.exe` and
`nu.ico` in the json file will be executed without privilege escalation
This change is expected to eliminate the validation failure in winget ci
(need to wait until next release to be sure about it), however, it
creates some inconsistency in installation context.
- The windows terminal profile is installed in `per-user` context, other
files / PATH env variable are installed in `per-system` context.
- Building the installer shows a warning about this: `warning LGHT1076 :
ICE91: The file 'WindowsTerminalProfileFile' will be installed to the
per user directory 'WindowsTerminalProfileAppFolder' that doesn't vary
based on ALLUSERS value. This file won't be copied to each user's
profile even if a per machine installation is desired.`
which means: WT profile will be installed only for the user that
executed the installer and it won't be installed for other users in the
system. However, the installer is configured to use `per-system`
context, therefore, other files (such as nushell binary `nu.exe`) will
be installed for all users.
It might be better if we provide options for installation context
(`per-user` or `per-system`) as requested in #5927 in the future, if
that doesn't cause problems in winget ci.
# User-Facing Changes
- Installation path of windows terminal profile will be changed as
above.
- Windows Terminal profile will be installed only for the user that
installed nushell as stated above. The profile should be manually added
for other users if needed.
# Tests + Formatting
No test is added since this change is related to installation process in
Windows and does not contain source code changes.
Following checks are done manually.
### Environment
- OS: Windows 11 Pro 22H2
- Built the installer by referring `.github/workflows/release-pkg.nu`
script
### Checks
- Install: WT profile should be created in
`C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows
Terminal\Fragments\nu\nu.json` and it should contain correct path for
`nu.exe` and `nu.ico`.
- [x] Install (WT profile feature enabled)
- [x] Install (WT profile enabled) -> Manually remove the WT profile
file -> Re-run the installer and Repair
- Uninstall: WT profile should be removed.
- [x] Install (WT profile enabled) -> Uninstall
- [x] Install (WT profile enabled) -> Re-run the installer and Modify
(WT profile disabled)
# After Submitting
No relevant documentation to update.
Adding more float constants for when
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103883 is accepted and merged.
And fixing a small conflation in the description of the Euler number.
Please take a look and let me know if I've missed or screwed up
anything.
# Description
Improves the output when running `input list` on tabular data by
aligning each column.
# User-Facing Changes
## Before
## After
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Fixes: #9165
It's because `sys` returns a lazy record, and `insert`, `update`,
`upsert` can't operate on lazy record yet.
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Today the only way to extract date parts from a dfr series is the dfr
get-* set of commands. These create a new dataframe with just the
datepart in it, which is almost entirely useless. As far as I can tell
there's no way to append it as a series in the original dataframe. In
discussion with fdncred on Discord we decided the best route was to add
an expression for modifying columns created in dfr with-column. These
are the way you manipulate series within a data frame.
I'd like feedback on this approach - I think it's a fair way to handle
things. An example to test it would be:
```[[ record_time]; [ (date now)]] | dfr into-df | dfr with-column [ ((dfr col record_time) | dfr datepart nanosecond | dfr as "ns" ), (dfr col record_time | dfr datepart second | dfr as "s"), (dfr col record_time | dfr datepart minute | dfr as "m"), (dfr col record_time | dfr datepart hour | dfr as "h") ]```
I'm also proposing we deprecate the dfr get-* commands. I've not been able to figure out any meaningful way they could ever be useful, and this approach makes more sense by attaching the extracted date part to the row in the original dataframe as a new column.
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
add in dfr datepart as an expression
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
Need to add some better assertive tests. I'm also not sure how to properly write the test_dataframe at the bottom, but will revisit as part of this PR. Wanted to get feedback early.
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Robert Waugh <robert@waugh.io>
# Description
This PR restores cursor shape when nushell exists.
Fixes#9243
Related
[nushell/reedline#574](https://github.com/nushell/reedline/pull/574)
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
* windows
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/15247421/ede8d1c0-ecd1-40b0-87b0-6393c1a7160f
* linux
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/15247421/b428f17e-05cb-45ad-aa5f-3a9753fd9176
* macos
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/15247421/5170dabd-8b9f-4bad-a7a2-bdabfca45cca
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
related to the namespace bullet point in
- https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8450
# Description
this was the last module of the standard library with a broken
namespace, this PR takes care of this.
- `run-tests` has been moved to `std/mod.nu`
- `std/testing.nu` has been moved to `std/assert.nu`
- the namespace has been fixed
- `assert` is now called `main` and used in all the other `std assert`
commands
- for `std assert length` and `std assert str contains`, in order not to
shadow the built-in `length` and `str contains` commands, i've used
`alias "core ..." = ...` to (1) define `foo` in `assert.nu` and (2)
still use the builtin `foo` with `core foo` (replace `foo` by `length`
or `str contains`)
- tests have been fixed accordingly
# User-Facing Changes
one can not use
```
use std "assert equal"
```
anymore because `assert ...` is not exported from `std`.
`std assert` is now a *real* module.
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# Notes for reviewers
to test this, i think the easiest is to
- run `toolkit test stdlib` and see all the tests pass
- run `cargo run -- -n` and try `use std assert` => are all the commands
available in scope?
# Description
The old description ("Nushell table printing") is identical to that of
`nu-table`. Per `explore --help` it is probably more accurate to say
"Nushell table pager".
# User-Facing Changes
N/A
# Tests + Formatting
```
❯ cargo metadata --no-deps | from json | get packages | get 14 | get description
warning: please specify `--format-version` flag explicitly to avoid compatibility problems
Nushell table pager
```
# After Submitting
N/A - change will go out when `0.82.0` is released
Signed-off-by: Michel Alexandre Salim <salimma@fedoraproject.org>
# Description
This PR updates most dependencies and tries to get in sync with
reedline.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
in order to write tests for the `std help` commands, as we currently
have in the Rust source base, we need to be able to manipulate the
output of the `std help` commands.
however, until now they've all been directly printing the help pages as
they go...
this PR tries to build the help pages and return them at the end instead
of printing them on the fly 👍
> **Note**
> this is quite a rewrite of the `help.nu` module 🤔
> i think it might be best to either
> - look at the commits in order
> - test the changes by testing the commands in the REPL and comparing
them to their previous `std help` versions
# User-Facing Changes
```
$nothing
```
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# Description
i was installing Nushell and, as we have the `dataframe` feature and
very soon at least the `extra` feature with more and more commands, i
thought it could be cool to have a little `toolkit install` command
😋
# User-Facing Changes
exposes the following command to developers
```
install Nushell and features you want
Usage:
> install ...(features)
Flags:
-h, --help - Display the help message for this command
Parameters:
...features <string>: a space-separated list of feature to install with Nushell
```
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
Add "os record" support.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
This don't change how path add works but just adds support for "os
records" aka records whose key are at least one of:
- linux
- macos
- windows
Check the
[test](a917f1a924/crates/nu-std/tests/test_std.nu (L31-L32))
if that's not clear enough
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: amtoine <stevan.antoine@gmail.com>
I don't want to rm my home again.. sadly..
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
check if there is unique argument
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
user will not easily rm their home
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
I noticed recently these timing discrepancies. I was thinking they would
be nearly identical but they were not.
```
> nu --no-std-lib -n -c "$nu.startup-time"
13ms 686µs 209ns
> nu --no-std-lib -n
> $nu.startup-time
2ms 520µs 416ns
```
My research showed that if `-n` was passed with `-c`, then the `-n` was
essentially being ignored. This PR corrects that.
Also worthy of understanding, if `nu -c "some command"` is passed, the
default env file is always loaded. I believe that's on purpose so that a
NU_LIB_DIRS env is available.
## After this PR (on a different system)
```
> nu --no-std-lib -n -c "$nu.startup-time"
6ms 688µs 600ns
> nu -n --no-std-lib
> $nu.startup-time
6ms 661µs 800ns
```
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Moves us over to dogfooding the git version of reedline ahead of the
next release.
# User-Facing Changes
With luck, you should see fewer bugs :D
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Fixes the clippy warnings we're about to get hit with next time we
upgrade Rust.
The big one was shrinking ShellError and related under 128 bytes.
# User-Facing Changes
Shouldn't notice much difference. In theory, we could see a tiny perf
improvement, but I didn't notice one.
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
This removes some unnecessary SyntaxShapes when parsing a
SyntaxShape::Any. Recent updates to the parser look for `{` and then
handle the logic for that separately.
# User-Facing Changes
This may have a slight parser speedup.
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
This PR cleans a couple things up. Nothing major, just a few things that
caught my eye looking for something else.
1. less macros
2. hidden and italic styles weren't fully available
3. lookup_color function didn't lookup all the colors available
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
Fixes https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/9229.
Supersedes #9234
The reported problem was that `shells` list of active shells (a.k.a `std
dirs show` would show an inaccurate active
working directory if user changed it via `cd` command.
The fix here is for the `std dirs` module to let `$env.PWD` mask the
active slot of `$env.DIRS_LIST`. The user is free to invoke CD (or write
to `$env.PWD`) and `std dirs show` will display that as the active
working directory.
When user changes the active slot (via `n`, `p`, `add` or `drop`) `std
dirs` remembers the then current PWD in the about-to-be-vacated active
slot in `$env.DIRS_LIST`, so it is there if you come back to that slot.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
None. It just works™️
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> [x] use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
I was trying `-H [key-A val-A] -H [key-B val-B]` but thanks to @Dorumin
I discovered how it should be used.
This PR just adds an extra example to the help with multiple headers.
Feel free to edit it either to merge both header examples into one or
rename the key value used, but I think it would be nice to have a sample
as the multiple -H variant doesn't error out it wasn't obvious to me.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
One more help example in `help http get`
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Fixes#9254.
# User-Facing Changes
upserting data of a cellpath that doesn't exist into a record now
creates the cellpath.
# Tests + Formatting
```
~/CodingProjects/nushell> mut a = {}
~/CodingProjects/nushell> $a.b.c = 99
~/CodingProjects/nushell> $a
╭───┬────────────╮
│ │ ╭───┬────╮ │
│ b │ │ c │ 99 │ │
│ │ ╰───┴────╯ │
╰───┴────────────╯
```
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Addresses missing features per #9261
# User-Facing Changes
Fixes output of version. Adds wasi feature output
# Tests + Formatting
No tests written
Co-authored-by: Robert Waugh <robert@waugh.io>
appears the `nu-coverage` job of the CI has decided to go wild, marking
a lot of runs with ❌, both in PRs and on the `main` branch 😱
this PR tries to mitigate the damage by disabling the pipeline.
> **Note**
> see [*Using conditions to control job
execution*](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-jobs/using-conditions-to-control-job-execution)
# Description
Closes: #7853
I found that I want this feature too...
So I take over it, sorry for that @VincenzoCarlino
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
related to the changes in
- #9193
# Description
when we change the namespace of a module, the internal calls to the
`export`ed commands needs to be updated as well 👀😆
without this, we have the following pretty error:
```
> std help ansi
Error: × std::help::item_not_found
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ std help ansi
· ──┬─
· ╰── item not found
╰────
```
# Description
Fixes#8896. Also went back and cleaned up the code slightly.
# User-Facing Changes
`view-source` now is more comprehensive when viewing definitions.
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
Fixes#9217 (some cases, still can't accept all default expressions)
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
- Follow-up of #8940, expanding `eval_constant` so that it can also
evaluate values with units.
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
- A unit test was added to verify that defaults like `1sec` are
accepted.
# Description
i've almost always wanted to clean up the root of the repo, so here is
my take at it, with some important advice given by @fdncred 😌
- `README.release.txt` is now gone and directly inline in the
`release-pkg` script used in the `release` *workflow*
- `build.rs` has been moved to `scripts/` and its path has been changed
in
[`Cargo.toml`](https://github.com/amtoine/nushell/blob/refactor/clean-root/Cargo.toml#L3)
according to the [*Build Scripts*
section](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/build-scripts.html#build-scripts)
of *The Cargo Book*
- i've merged `images/` into `assets/` and fix the only mention to the
GIF in the README
- i've moved the `docs/README.md` inside the main `README.md` as a new
[*Configuration*
section](https://github.com/amtoine/nushell/tree/refactor/clean-root#configuration)
- the very deprecated `pkg_mgrs/` has been removed
- all the `.nu`, `.sh`, `.ps1` and `.cmd` scripts have been moved to
`scripts/`
### things i've left as-is
- all the other `.md` documents
- the configuration files
- all the Rust and core stuff
- `docker/`
- `toolkit.nu`
- the `wix/` diretory which appears to be important for `winget`
# User-Facing Changes
scripts that used to rely on the paths to some of the scripts should now
call the scripts inside `scripts/` => i think this for the greater good,
it was not pretty nor scalable to have a bunch of scripts in the root of
our main `nushell` 😱
*i even think we might want to move these scripts outside the main
`nushell` repo*
maybe to `nu_scripts` or some other tool 👍
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- ⚫ `toolkit test`
- ⚫ `toolkit test stdlib`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
# Description
Title; fixes#9208.
# User-Facing Changes
`input` now can specify a certain number of characters to read.
# Tests + Formatting
No CI tests; can't find a way to implement.
```
~/CodingProjects/nushell> let user_input = (input --numchar 2)
~/CodingProjects/nushell> echo $user_input
te
```
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
All of the dataframe commands ported over with no issues...
### 11 tests are commented out (for now)
So 100 of the original 111 tests are passing with only 11 tests being
ignored for now..
As per our conversation in the core team meeting on Wednesday
I took @jntrnr suggestion and just commented out the tests dealing
with
[IntoDatetime](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/blob/main/crates/nu-command/src/conversions/into/mod.rs)
Later on we can move this functionality out of nu-command if we decide
it makes sense...
### The following tests were ignored...
```rust
modified: crates/nu-cmd-dataframe/src/dataframe/series/date/get_day.rs
modified: crates/nu-cmd-dataframe/src/dataframe/series/date/get_hour.rs
modified: crates/nu-cmd-dataframe/src/dataframe/series/date/get_minute.rs
modified: crates/nu-cmd-dataframe/src/dataframe/series/date/get_month.rs
modified: crates/nu-cmd-dataframe/src/dataframe/series/date/get_nanosecond.rs
modified: crates/nu-cmd-dataframe/src/dataframe/series/date/get_ordinal.rs
modified: crates/nu-cmd-dataframe/src/dataframe/series/date/get_second.rs
modified: crates/nu-cmd-dataframe/src/dataframe/series/date/get_week.rs
modified: crates/nu-cmd-dataframe/src/dataframe/series/date/get_weekday.rs
modified: crates/nu-cmd-dataframe/src/dataframe/series/date/get_year.rs
modified: crates/nu-cmd-dataframe/src/dataframe/series/string/strftime.rs
```
# Description
A new command to simplify assertions for `false`.
The name is just a draft, though I could not come up with a better name.
I have rejected `assert false`, because I would have to rename `assert`
to `assert true` which would break the compatibility and worsen the
shell experience of the good old `assert`.
Another idea I have rejected was something like `assert_false` to keep
it consistent with the naming convention of our stdlib.
I am open to suggestions :)
# User-Facing Changes
Just a new command
# Tests + Formatting
- [x] Done
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
This is a test PR to see if we can remove dependencies. The crates to
remove was generated from cargo machete. If ci works, I'll update the PR
to remove deps instead of comment them out.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
`ansi strip` (used in the clip command by default) removes tab symbols,
which is sometimes not useful (for example, when using the `[[a b]; [1
2]] | to tsv | clip` command). Therefore, I added a flag to prevent
using `ansi strip` in the clip command.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
PATH and Path are different (in nushell at least) based on the OS
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
None the command now works as expected
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
Cleans up various tests that unnecessarily use the `cwd` argument of
`nu!`, and the `pipeline` function for single line commands. Also
replaces some unnecessary raw strings with normal strings. Part of
#8670.
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
None
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
All checks pass
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
closes#9111
# Description
this pr improves parsing of values with units (`filesizes`, `durations`
and any other **future values**) by:
1. allowing underscores in the value part
```nu
> 42kb # okay
> 42_sec # okay
> 1_000_000mib # okay
> 69k_b # not okay, underscores not allowed in the unit
```
2. improving error messages involving these values
```nu
> sleep 40-sec
# before
Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch
× Parse mismatch during operation.
╭─[entry #42:1:1]
1 │ sleep 40-sec
· ──┬──
· ╰── expected duration with valid units
╰────
# now
Error:
× duration value must be a number
╭─[entry #41:1:1]
1 │ sleep 40-sec
· ─┬─
· ╰── not a number
╰────
```
3. unifying parsing of these values. now all of these use one function
# User-Facing Changes
filesizes and durations can now have underscores for readability
# Description
Despite the innocent-looking title, this PR involves quite a few backend
changes as the existing LazyRecord trait was not at all friendly towards
the idea of these values being generated on the fly from Nu code.
In particular, here are a few changes involved:
- The LazyRecord trait now involves a lifetime `'a`, and this lifetime
is used in the return value of `get_column_names`. This means it no
longer returns `'static str`s (but implementations still can return
these). This is more stringent on the consumption side.
- The LazyRecord trait now must be able to clone itself via a new
`clone_value` method (as requiring `Clone` is not object safe). This
pattern is borrowed from `Value::CustomValue`.
- LazyRecord no longer requires being serde serializable and
deserializable.
These, in hand, allow for the following:
- LazyRecord can now clone itself, which means that they don't have to
be collected into a Record when being cloned.
- This is especially useful in Stack, which is cloned on each repl line
and in a few other cases. This would mean that _every_ LazyRecord
instance stored in a variable would be collected in its entirety and
cloned, which can be catastrophic for performance. See: `let nulol =
$nu`.
- LazyRecord's columns don't have to be static, they can have the same
lifetime of the struct itself, so different instances of the same
LazyRecord type can have different columns and values (like the new
`NuLazyRecord`)
- Serialization and deserialization are no longer meaningless, they are
simply less.
I would consider this PR very "drafty", but everything works. It
probably requires some cleanup and testing, though, but I'd like some
eyes and pointers first.
# User-Facing Changes
New command. New restrictions are largely internal. Maybe there are some
plugins affected?
Example of new command's usage:
```
lazy make --columns [a b c] --get-value { |name| print $"getting ($name)"; $name | str upcase }
```
You can also trivially implement something like `lazy make record` to
take a record of closures and turn it into a getter-like lazy struct:
```
def "lazy make record" [
record: record
] {
let columns = ($record | columns)
lazy make --columns $columns --get-value { |col| do ($record | get $col) }
}
```
Open to bikeshedding. `lazy make` is similar to `error make` which is
also in the core commands. I didn't like `make lazy` since it sounded
like some transformation was going on.
# Tour for reviewers
Take a look at LazyMake's examples. They have `None` as the results, as
such they aren't _really_ correct and aren't being tested at all. I
didn't do this because creating the Value::LazyRecord is a little tricky
and didn't want to risk messing it up, especially as the necessary
variables aren't available when creating the examples (like stack and
engine state).
Also take a look at NuLazyRecord's get_value implementation, or in
general. It uses an Arc<Mutex<_>> for the stack, which must be accessed
mutably for eval_block but get_value only provides us with a `&self`.
This is a sad state of affairs, but I don't know if there's a better
way.
On the same code path, we also have pipeline handling, and any pipeline
that isn't a Pipeline::Value will return Value::nothing. I believe
returning a Value::Error is probably better, or maybe some other
handling. Couldn't decide on which ShellError to settle with for that
branch.
The "unfortunate casualty" in the columns.rs file. I'm not sure just how
bad that is, though, I simply had to fight a little with the borrow
checker.
A few leftover comments like derives, comments about the now
non-existing serde requirements, and impls. I'll definitely get around
to those eventually but they're in atm
Should NuLazyRecord implement caching? I'm leaning heavily towards
**yes**, this was one of the main reasons not to use a record of
closures (besides convenience), but maybe it could be opt-out. I'd
wonder about its implementation too, but a simple way would be to move a
HashMap into the mutex state and keep cached values there.
Closes#9003.
This PR changes `group-by` so that its optional argument is interpreted
as a cell path. In turn, this lets users use `?` to ignore rows that are
missing the column they wish to group on. For example:
```
> [{foo: 123}, {foo: 234}, {bar: 345}] | group-by foo
Error: nu:🐚:column_not_found
× Cannot find column
╭─[entry #3:1:1]
1 │ [{foo: 123}, {foo: 234}, {bar: 345}] | group-by foo
· ─────┬──── ─┬─
· │ ╰── cannot find column 'foo'
· ╰── value originates here
╰────
> [{foo: 123}, {foo: 234}, {bar: 345}] | group-by foo?
╭─────┬───────────────╮
│ 123 │ [table 1 row] │
│ 234 │ [table 1 row] │
╰─────┴───────────────╯
```
~~This removes the ability to pass `group-by` a closure or block (I
wasn't able to figure out how to make the 2 features coexist), and so it
is a breaking change. I think this is OK; I didn't even know `group-by`
could accept a closure or block because there was no example for that
functionality.~~
