# Description
This changes the default behaviour of `let` to be able to take a
pipeline as its initial value.
For example:
```
> let x = "hello world" | str length
```
This is a change from the existing behaviour, where the right hand side
is assumed to be an expression. Pipelines are more general, and can be
more powerful.
My google foo is failing me, but this also fixes this issue:
```
let x = foo
```
Currently, this reads `foo` as a bareword that gets converted to a
string rather than running the `foo` command. In practice, this is
really annoying and is a really hard to spot bug in a script.
# User-Facing Changes
BREAKING CHANGE BREAKING CHANGE
`let` gains the power to be assigned via a pipeline. However, this
changes the behaviour of `let x = foo` from assigning the string "foo"
to `$x` to being "run the command `foo` and give the result to `$x`"
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
This splits off `scope` from `$nu`, creating a set of `scope` commands
for the various types of scope you might be interested in.
This also simplifies the `$nu` variable a bit.
# User-Facing Changes
This changes `$nu` to be a bit simpler and introduces a set of `scope`
subcommands.
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-std/tests/run.nu` to run the tests for the
standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
I'm still new to nushell and Rust, so please let me know if there are
any omissions and/or mistakes.
# Description
fixed#8863
`$nu` completion shows wrong completion menus at this time.
This PR fixes the problem to show the correct ones.
# User-Facing Changes
Users can use the correct menus on `$nu` completion like this
[recording](https://asciinema.org/a/KCwfpdAoMFsQODFBnb3NwmufC).
# Tests + Formatting
```
$ use toolkit.nu
$ toolkit check pr
- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`
```
# After Submitting
nothing
# Description
Part solving #8752
Adds an extra variable to the `nu` table `current-exe` which is the path
to the running shell executable.
# User-Facing Changes
Adds a variable to the `nu` table.
# Tests + Formatting
Tests and formatting have been run. No new test added
# After Submitting
I could add documentation for this if wanted
Co-authored-by: Jelle Besseling <jelle@bigbridge.nl>
# Description
This is a pretty heavy refactor of the parser to support multiple parser
errors. It has a few issues we should address before landing:
- [x] In some cases, error quality has gotten worse `1 / "bob"` for
example
- [x] if/else isn't currently parsing correctly
- probably others
# User-Facing Changes
This may have error quality degradation as we adjust to the new error
reporting mechanism.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- crates/nu-utils/standard_library/tests.nu` to run the
tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
in https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8311 and the discord
server, the idea of moving the default banner from the `rust` source to
the `nushell` standar library has emerged 😋
however, in order to do this, one need to have access to all the
variables used in the default banner => all of them are accessible
because known constants, except for the startup time of the shell, which
is not anywhere in the shell...
#### this PR adds exactly this, i.e. the new `startup_time` to the `$nu`
variable, which is computed to have the exact same value as the value
shown in the banner.
## the changes
in order to achieve this, i had to
- add `startup_time` as an `i64` to the `EngineState` => this is, to the
best of my knowledge, the easiest way to pass such an information around
down to where the banner startup time is computed and where the `$nu`
variable is evaluated
- add `startup-time` to the `$nu` variable and use the `EngineState`
getter for `startup_time` to show it as a `Value::Duration`
- pass `engine_state` as a `&mut`able argument from `main.rs` down to
`repl.rs` to allow the setter to change the value of `startup_time` =>
without this, the value would not change and would show `-1ns` as the
default value...
- the value of the startup time is computed in `evaluate_repl` in
`repl.rs`, only once at the beginning, and the same value is used in the
default banner 👌
# User-Facing Changes
one can now access to the same time as shown in the default banner with
```bash
$nu.startup-time
```
# Tests + Formatting
- 🟢 `cargo fmt --all`
- 🟢 `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D
clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect`
- 🟢 `cargo test --workspace`
# After Submitting
```
$nothing
```
Add two rows in `$nu`, `$nu.is-interactive` and `$nu.is-login`, which
are true when nu is run in interactive and login mode respectively.
The `-i` flag now behaves a bit more like that of bash's, where the any
provided command or file is run without REPL but in "interactive mode".
This should entail sourcing interactive-mode config files, but since we
are planning on overhauling the config system soon, I'm holding off on
that. For now, all `-i` does is set `$nu.is-interactive` to be true.
About testing, I can't seem to find where cli-args get tested, so I
haven't written any new tests for this. Also I don't think there are any
docs that need updating. However if I'm wrong please tell me.
# Description
This change sorts completions for files and directories by the ascending
ordering method, related to issue:
[#8023](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/8023)
Currently the Suggestions are being sorted twice, so it's now following
the convention from `completion/base.rs` to match on the
`self.get_sort_by()` result.
# User-Facing Changes
Previously the suggestions were being sorted by the Levenshtein method:
```
/home/rdevenney/projects/open_source/nushell| cd
src/ wix/ docs/ tests/
assets/ crates/ docker/ images/
target/ benches/ pkg_mgrs/ .git/
.cargo/ .github/
```
Now when you tab for autocompletions, they show up in ascending
alphabetical order as shown below (with hidden files/folders at the
end).
```
/home/rdevenney/projects/open_source/nushell| cd
assets/ benches/ crates/ docker/
docs/ images/ pkg_mgrs/ src/
target/ tests/ wix/ .cargo/
.git/ .github/
```
And when you've already typed a bit of the path:
```
/home/rdevenney/projects/open_source/nushell| cd crates/nu
crates/nu-cli/ crates/nu-color-config/ crates/nu-command/
crates/nu-engine/ crates/nu-explore/ crates/nu-glob/
crates/nu-json/ crates/nu-parser/ crates/nu-path/
crates/nu-plugin/ crates/nu-pretty-hex/ crates/nu-protocol/
crates/nu-system/ crates/nu-table/ crates/nu-term-grid/
crates/nu-test-support/ crates/nu-utils/ crates/nu_plugin_custom_values/
crates/nu_plugin_example/ crates/nu_plugin_formats/ crates/nu_plugin_gstat/
crates/nu_plugin_inc/ crates/nu_plugin_python/ crates/nu_plugin_query/
```
And another for when there are files and directories present:
```
/home/rdevenney/projects/open_source/nushell/crates/nu-cli/src| nvim 02/16/2023 08:22:16 AM
commands.rs completions/ config_files.rs eval_file.rs
lib.rs menus/ nu_highlight.rs print.rs
prompt.rs prompt_update.rs reedline_config.rs repl.rs
syntax_highlight.rs util.rs validation.rs
```
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
[*] `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting
(`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes)
[*] `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
[*] `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Reverts the PR #7779 which breaks subcommand completions. The issues
#7648 and #7754 thus still need fixing.
This reverts commit 8acced5.
# User-Facing Changes
Enables subcommand completions.
Unfortunately, also brings back the completion panic if alias is shorter
than the command name.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR attempts to fix the completions issue where, on Windows,
completions wouldn't get generated from items in your path environment
variable. This seemed to be down to `PATH` vs `Path`. So, I tried to add
a new function that we can use anywhere to avoid this problem.
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Lint: `clippy::uninlined_format_args`
More readable in most situations.
(May be slightly confusing for modifier format strings
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/index.html#formatting-parameters)
Alternative to #7865
# User-Facing Changes
None intended
# Tests + Formatting
(Ran `cargo +stable clippy --fix --workspace -- -A clippy::all -D
clippy::uninlined_format_args` to achieve this. Depends on Rust `1.67`)
# Description
This adds a `number` command that will enumerate the input, and add an
`index` and `item` record for each item. The `index` is the number of
the item in the input stream, and `item` is the original value of the
item.
```
> ls | number | get 14
╭───────┬────────────────────────────╮
│ index │ 14 │
│ │ ╭──────────┬─────────────╮ │
│ item │ │ name │ crates │ │
│ │ │ type │ dir │ │
│ │ │ size │ 832 B │ │
│ │ │ modified │ 2 weeks ago │ │
│ │ ╰──────────┴─────────────╯ │
╰───────┴────────────────────────────╯
```
# User-Facing Changes
This adds a `number` command.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fixes: #7706
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Holderbach <sholderbach@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
This PR adds the `mime-type` to the `type` column if you add the
`--mime-type(-m)` flag to `ls`.
<img width="853" alt="Screenshot 2022-12-27 at 11 43 20 AM"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/343840/209705499-27fe40fe-0356-4d9d-97f2-4b2dc52e0963.png">
<img width="781" alt="Screenshot 2022-12-27 at 11 45 53 AM"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/343840/209705509-4d677389-fd68-401e-a7af-3fc6052743b6.png">
# User-Facing Changes
If you specify the `-m` flag, you get the "guessed at" mime type. The
guess is based on the file name and uses this crate
https://docs.rs/mime_guess/latest/mime_guess/ for the guessing.
Part of issue #7612 and and #7524
There's some debate on if the `mime-type` should be added to the `type`
column or if there should be a separate `mime` column. I tend to lean on
the side of `type` since it's technically a type and it's only in that
column if you ask it to be there. Also, I'd prefer to reuse a column
rather than having a list of sprawling columns. Also, as @KodiCraft
suggested, there is precedence as with `ls -d` where the summed size is
in the size column.
I could go either way and if someone wants to create a `mime` column,
we'd probably accept it.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
* start working on source-env
* WIP
* Get most tests working, still one to go
* Fix file-relative paths; Report parser error
* Fix merge conflicts; Restore source as deprecated
* Tests: Use source-env; Remove redundant tests
* Fmt
* Respect hidden env vars
* Fix file-relative eval for source-env
* Add file-relative eval to "overlay use"
* Use FILE_PWD only in source-env and "overlay use"
* Ignore new tests for now
This will be another issue
* Throw an error if setting FILE_PWD manually
* Fix source-related test failures
* Fix nu-check to respect FILE_PWD
* Fix corrupted spans in source-env shell errors
* Fix up some references to old source
* Remove deprecation message
* Re-introduce deleted tests
Co-authored-by: kubouch <kubouch@gmail.com>
This PR merges all the completions tests into one file.
The reason for them to be separated was organization, so we wouldn't need to scroll a huge file.
But that came with another issue, because rust generates a new binary for each completion test file and each completion test depends on Nu looks like all the dataframes were coming into each test file as well (as pointed by @rgwood
