# Description
This now works:
```
try { 'x' | math abs } catch { $in }
```
# User-Facing Changes
See above.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Currently, `filesize_format`/`filesize_metric` conflicts are resolved as
follows: if the `filesize_format` ends in "ib", then that overrides
`filesize_metric`, otherwise, `filesize_metric` overrides
`filesize_format`. This removes this difficult-to-predict asymmetric
behaviour, and makes it so that `filesize_metric` always overrides
`filesize_format`.
This also adds tests for `$env.config.filesize.format` and
`$env.config.filesize.metric` values.
REMINDER: `filesize_metric` means "increments of 1000", and refers to
KB-MB-GB-TB etc.
# User-Facing Changes
See above.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
Fixes#5996
Just found a relative easy way to fix the issue
# User-Facing Changes
```
❯ open $nu.plugin-path | from nuon
Error:
× error when loading nuon text
╭─[entry #36:1:1]
1 │ open $nu.plugin-path | from nuon
· ────┬────
· ╰── could not load nuon text
╰────
Error:
× Error when loading
❯ open $nu.config-path | from nuon
Error:
× error when loading nuon text
╭─[entry #37:1:1]
1 │ open $nu.config-path | from nuon
· ────┬────
· ╰── could not load nuon text
╰────
Error:
× error when loading
```
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
`proptest` caught a failing test condition for `&&` as a literal string. It requires a quotation to be parsed correctly by current `from nuon`
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/actions/runs/3753242377/jobs/6376308675
The change in the parser that now returns an error was introduced by https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7241
This in theory doesn't have to be an error (it is a diagnostic for nushell code) but it is probably better safe than sorry to require quotation here.
- Add a test for `&&` in `to nuon` from proptest fail
- Fix `to nuon` generating invalid `&&` literal
- Add a test for `,` in `to nuon`/`from nuon` cycle
- Bonus: should already be properly quoted
`table` handles slow `ListStream`s in a special way: every 100 items, it
checks whether 1 second has elapsed since the last table page, and if so
it outputs a new page with all the items in its buffer.
**I would like to remove the "every 100 items" condition and always
output whatever we have if a second has elapsed.** I think this will be
a better user experience for very slow streams.
As a motivating example, imagine tailing a log file and doing some
string parsing/projection on each line. The user will be really annoyed
if they have to wait for 100 lines to be written to the log before
seeing new results!
I did some quick performance measurements with Criterion, and the
elapsed-time check takes about 16ns on my machine (Linux, 12900k). I
think the performance impact of checking that for every item will be
negligible.
# Description
_(Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.)_
_(Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.)_
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
ref #7339 - This PR updates explore to take some of the colors from
nushell, namely the line colors and the ls_colors.
note: Not sure why this regression appeared maybe it's a feature or it's
no longer supposed to be supported?
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
> I'm not sure how i feel about that. I mean if there are a lot of
columns, it should probably have a max width so 1 column doesn't take
the entire width of your screen. Ideally it would work closely like
table worked before we migrated to tabled, as far as how column widths
were allocated.
I believe it still not completely matched.
*To be honest I am not against the #7446 approach.
The PR makes a switch between logics on a premise of `termwidth`.
So if `termwidth > 120` we start prioritizing amount of columns we can
show (We try to show as many columns as we can).
Otherwise we do what I've described in #7446 (We show the least columns
but with least truncation involvement).
In case it's OK,
I guess we could make the value configurable.
cc @fdncred
ref #7446
Signed-off-by: Maxim Zhiburt <zhiburt@gmail.com>
A few small tweaks to the new `explore` command:
1. Rewrote the help text a bit.
1. I think it's important to mention `:try` up front.
2. Removed the info about `:help foo` because it's currently supported
by very few subcommands
2. Make `exit_esc` default to true. I want to avoid people getting stuck
in `explore` like they get stuck in Vim
3. ~~Always show the help message ("For help type :help") on startup~~
1. The message is small+unobtrusive and I don't this is worth a
configuration item
4. Exit the information view when Escape is pressed
5. General typo+grammar cleanup
cc: @zhiburt @fdncred
# Description
See title.
# User-Facing Changes
See title.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
A follow-up to #7497. That change made it so that `get foo` would
eliminate non-record rows; I think that was an unintentional and
undesirable side-effect.
Before #7497:
```bash
〉[$nothing, { item: "foo" }] | get item
╭───┬─────╮
│ 0 │ │
│ 1 │ foo │
╰───┴─────╯
```
After #7497:
```bash
〉[$nothing, {item: "foo"}] | get item
╭───┬─────╮
│ 0 │ foo │
╰───┴─────╯
```
After this PR:
```bash
〉[$nothing, { item: "foo" }] | get item
╭───┬─────╮
│ 0 │ │
│ 1 │ foo │
╰───┴─────╯
```
cc: @merelymyself
# Description
Follow up to #7141 to map @webbedspace's rgb colors to xterm 256 color
indexes. Also added the xterm 256 named colors to `ansi --list` in the
process.
The few dozen or so names that were duplicate in the xterm 256 names
from [here](https://www.ditig.com/256-colors-cheat-sheet) were renamed
by appending a,b,c,d. So, instead of two blue3's there will be blue3a
and blue3b.
# User-Facing Changes
More colors.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Closes#6909. You can now add closures to your `color_config` themes.
Whenever a value would be printed with `table`, the closure is run with
the value piped-in. The closure must return either a {fg,bg,attr} record
or a color name (`'light_red'` etc.). This returned style is used to
colour the value.
This is entirely backwards-compatible with existing config.nu files.
Example code excerpt:
```
let my_theme = {
header: green_bold
bool: { if $in { 'light_cyan' } else { 'light_red' } }
int: purple_bold
filesize: { |e| if $e == 0b { 'gray' } else if $e < 1mb { 'purple_bold' } else { 'cyan_bold' } }
duration: purple_bold
date: { (date now) - $in | if $in > 1wk { 'cyan_bold' } else if $in > 1day { 'green_bold' } else { 'yellow_bold' } }
range: yellow_bold
string: { if $in =~ '^#\w{6}$' { $in } else { 'white' } }
nothing: white
```
Example output with this in effect:
Slightly important notes:
* Some color_config names, namely "separator", "empty" and "hints", pipe
in `null` instead of a value.
* Currently, doing anything non-trivial inside a closure has an
understandably big perf hit. I currently do not actually recommend
something like `string: { if $in =~ '^#\w{6}$' { $in } else { 'white' }
}` for serious work, mainly because of the abundance of string-type data
in the world. Nevertheless, lesser-used types like "date" and "duration"
work well with this.
* I had to do some reorganisation in order to make it possible to call
`eval_block()` that late in table rendering. I invented a new struct
called "StyleComputer" which holds the engine_state and stack of the
initial `table` command (implicit or explicit).
* StyleComputer has a `compute()` method which takes a color_config name
and a nu value, and always returns the correct Style, so you don't have
to worry about A) the color_config value was set at all, B) whether it
was set to a closure or not, or C) which default style to use in those
cases.
* Currently, errors encountered during execution of the closures are
thrown in the garbage. Any other ideas are welcome. (Nonetheless, errors
result in a huge perf hit when they are encountered. I think what should
be done is to assume something terrible happened to the user's config
and invalidate the StyleComputer for that `table` run, thus causing
subsequent output to just be Style::default().)
* More thorough tests are forthcoming - ran into some difficulty using
`nu!` to take an alternative config, and for some reason `let-env config
=` statements don't seem to work inside `nu!` pipelines(???)
* The default config.nu has not been updated to make use of this yet. Do
tell if you think I should incorporate that into this.
# User-Facing Changes
See above.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace --features=extra -- -D warnings -D
clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're
using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace --features=extra` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
`echo` tends to confuse new Nu users; they expect it to work like
`print` when it just passes a value to the next stage of the pipeline.
We haven't quite figured out what to do about `echo` in the long run,
but I think a good start is to remove `echo` from command examples where
it would be unnecessary and arguably unidiomatic.
# Description
Fixes#7494.
```
/home/gabriel/CodingProjects/nushell〉[[{foo: bar}]] | get foo 12/16/2022 12:31:17 PM
Error: nu::parser::not_found (link)
× Not found.
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ [[{foo: bar}]] | get foo
· ───────┬──────
· ╰── did not find anything under this name
╰────
```
# User-Facing Changes
cell paths no longer drill into nested tables.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
I've been working on streaming and pipeline interruption lately. It was
bothering me that checking ctrl+c (something we want to do often) always
requires a bunch of boilerplate like:
```rust
use std::sync::atomic::Ordering;
if let Some(ctrlc) = &engine_state.ctrlc {
if ctrlc.load(Ordering::SeqCst) {
...
```
I added a helper method to cut that down to:
```rust
if nu_utils::ctrl_c::was_pressed(&engine_state.ctrlc) {
...
```
# Description
Demonstrates that you can use `do` to execute stored closures and
evaluate their captures properly.
# Tests + Formatting
As an example test increases coverage of the usage to execute first
class closures.
Additional tests using that found in
`tests/shell/pipeline/commands/internal.rs`
A partial fix for #7477. `uniq` can be slow sometimes, so we should
check `ctrl-c` when it's running.
Tested on [this
file](https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/276/yield-curve-rates-1990-2021.csv),
I ran `open yield-curve-rates-1990-2021.csv | uniq` and confirmed that I
can now cancel the operation.
Future work is needed to figure out why `uniq` is so slow.
# Description
Just spot that there are some duplicate code about checking external
runs to failed, is pr is trying to refactor it and reduce lines of code
# User-Facing Changes
NaN
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Fixes#7342. `0..1000 | table` before this change:
`0..1000 | table` after this change:
When piping data to `table`, pages were not getting a newline at the
end[^1]. This problem was uncovered and exacerbated by the new
`display_output` hook which implicitly piped _everything_ to `table`.
## The Fix
`PagingTableCreator` now adds a newline to each page instead of relying
on later code to do it.
## Tests
I spent a while trying to write a regression test for this behaviour but
I couldn't get the test to fail before my fix! I think the test
infrastructure does something special with newlines when it's checking
command output. I eventually ran out of steam trying to investigate
that, sorry.
[^1]: unless the pipe to table was the implicit one that's done when
there is no `display_output` hook set. That situation was still working
OK.
Change in `mkdir` `-s` flag to `-v` to be similar to other commands
# Description
Other commands like `rm`, `mv`, `cp` have a `-v` (`--verbose`) flag.
`mkdir` has a `-s` (`--show-created-paths`), but should be consistent
with other commands.
# User-Facing Changes
- flag `-s` replaced by `-v` in `mkdir` command.
# Tests + Formatting
```
> mkdir -v new_dir
╭───┬───────────────────────────────────╮
│ 0 │ C:\Users\ricardo.monteiro\new_dir │
╰───┴───────────────────────────────────╯
```
# Description
Fixes#6773.
```
/home/gabriel/CodingProjects/nushell〉ls -r 12/12/2022 02:57:35 PM
Error: nu::parser::unknown_flag (link)
× The `ls` command doesn't have flag `-r`.
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ ls -r
· ┬
· ╰── unknown flag
╰────
help: Available flags: --help(-h), --all(-a), --long(-l), --short-names(-s), --full-paths(-f), --du(-d), --directory(-D). Use `--help` for more information.
```
# User-Facing Changes
Different error for unknown flag.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
add input_output_types() to benchmark, cd and config reset commands
It's an update to https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/7320
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
Reverts nushell/nushell#7448
Some surprising behavior in how we do this. For example:
```
〉if (true || false) { print "yes!" } else { print "no!" }
no!
〉if (true or false) { print "yes!" } else { print "no!" }
yes!
```
This means for folks who are using the old `||`, they possibly get the
wrong answer once they upgrade. I don't think we can ship with that as
it will catch too many people by surprise and just make it easier to
write buggy code.
# Description
_(Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.)_
_(Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.)_
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
We got some feedback from folks used to other shells that `try/catch`
isn't quite as convenient as things like `||`. This PR adds `&&` as a
synonym for `;` and `||` as equivalent to what `try/catch` would do.
# User-Facing Changes
Adds `&&` and `||` pipeline operators.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fixes: #7216
Adds `interact-once` switch which numbers out the number of files to
delete and asks the user for confirmation.
```
/home/gabriel/test〉ls 12/11/2022 11:25:42 AM
╭───┬───────┬──────┬──────┬──────────╮
│ # │ name │ type │ size │ modified │
├───┼───────┼──────┼──────┼──────────┤
│ 0 │ a.txt │ file │ 0 B │ now │
│ 1 │ b.txt │ file │ 0 B │ now │
│ 2 │ c.txt │ file │ 0 B │ now │
╰───┴───────┴──────┴──────┴──────────╯
/home/gabriel/test〉rm *.txt -I 12/11/2022 11:25:42 AM
rm: remove 3 files? : y
/home/gabriel/test〉ls 12/11/2022 11:25:51 AM
/home/gabriel/test〉 12/11/2022 11:25:54 AM
```
# User-Facing Changes
_(List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps
us keep track of breaking changes.)_
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Fixes: #7404Fixes: #7402
## About change
In `eval_block`, all pipelines(or called statements?) result will be
printed except the last one, the last one is returned by `eval_block`
function.
So if we want to print the last statement in eval block, we just need to
print that value.
# User-Facing Changes
### for
```
❯ for _ in 1..2 { echo "a" }
a
a
```
### while
```
❯ mut x = 1; while $x < 3 { $x = $x + 1; echo bb; }
bb
bb
```
### loop
```
❯ mut total = 0; loop {
∙ if $total > 1 {
∙ break
∙ } else {
∙ $total += 1
∙ }
∙ echo 3
∙ }
3
3
```
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
The message arrow is altered to show the external command name in case
it wasn't obvious. (See example for an occasion where it is
non-obvious).
BEFORE:
```
〉else if (2mb) > 4mb
Error: nu:🐚:external_command (link)
× External command failed
╭─[entry #35:1:1]
1 │ else if (2mb) > 4mb
· ─┬
· ╰── Cannot convert filesize to a string
╰────
help: All arguments to an external command need to be string-compatible
```
AFTER:
```
〉else if (2mb) > 4mb
Error: nu:🐚:external_command (link)
× External command failed
╭─[entry #3:1:1]
1 │ else if (2mb) > 4mb
· ─┬
· ╰── Cannot convert filesize to a string argument for 'else'
╰────
help: All arguments to an external command need to be string-compatible
```
# User-Facing Changes
See above.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
This PR changes some commands that previously accepted row conditions
(like `$it > 5`) as parameter to accept closures instead. The reasons
are:
a) The commands would need to move into parser keywords in the future
while they feel more like commands to be implemented in Nushell code as
a part of standard library.
b) In scripts, it is useful to store the predicate condition in a
variable which you can't do with row conditions.
c) These commands are not used that often to benefit enough from the
shorter row condition syntax
# User-Facing Changes
The following commands now accept **closure** instead of a **row
condition**:
- `take until`
- `take while`
- `skip until`
- `skip while`
- `any`
- `all`
This is a part of an effort to move away from shape-directed parsing.
Related PR: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/7365
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
